Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Menagerie of Euclidean constructions for 3D holographic cosmologies

Mark Van Raamsdonk* and Alejandro Vilar López†

  • *Contact author: mav@phas.ubc.ca
  • †Contact author: alejandro.vilarlopez@ubc.ca

Phys. Rev. D 113, 106010 – Published 12 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qlnl-rpm2

Abstract

We construct a large number of exact solutions of three-dimensional gravity with heavy matter particles that generalize the construction of Antonini, Sasieta, and Swingle, argued to define CFT states dual to a spacetime with a closed baby-universe cosmology. Our construction starts with an arbitrary heavy-particle closed universe cosmology of the type constructed in Maloney, Meruliya, and Van Raamsdonk [arXiv:2503.12227] and via a gluing procedure adds an arbitrary number of AdS tubes connecting the past and future conformal boundaries of the associated Euclidean wormhole solution. With our construction, it is straightforward to produce examples where the cosmology is approximately homogeneous and isotropic. We describe a necessary condition for the cosmological wormhole saddle to dominate the Euclidean path integral with the specified boundary conditions. We argue that the original Antonini-Sasieta-Swingle construction usually does not meet this condition and describe alternative saddles that are likely to dominate. We discuss various possibilities for how the cosmological saddle might be made to dominate in our generalized construction.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. J. M. Maldacena and L. Maoz, Wormholes in AdS, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2004) 053.
  2. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao, The page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 149.
  3. J. McNamara and C. Vafa, Baby universes, holography, and the Swampland, arXiv:2004.06738.
  4. G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 205.
  5. D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, Transcending the ensemble: Baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 044.
  6. M. Usatyuk, Z.-Y. Wang, and Y. Zhao, Closed universes in two dimensional gravity, SciPost Phys. 17, 051 (2024).
  7. M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao, Closed universes, factorization, and ensemble averaging, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 052.
  8. A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu, and A. Levine, The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 059.
  9. D. Harlow, M. Usatyuk, and Y. Zhao, Quantum mechanics and observers for gravity in a closed universe, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 108.
  10. C. Akers, G. Bueller, O. DeWolfe, K. Higginbotham, J. Reinking, and R. Rodriguez, On observers in holographic maps, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 201.
  11. H. Z. Chen, Observers seeing gravitational Hilbert spaces: Abstract sources for an abstract path integral, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 139.
  12. A. Maloney, V. Meruliya, and M. Van Raamsdonk, Ordinary wormholes, arXiv:2503.12227.
  13. B. McInnes, Answering a basic objection to bang/crunch holography, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2004) 018.
  14. S. Banerjee, U. Danielsson, G. Dibitetto, S. Giri, and M. Schillo, Emergent de Sitter cosmology from decaying anti–de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 261301 (2018).
  15. S. Antonini and B. Swingle, Cosmology at the end of the world, Nat. Phys. 16, 881 (2020).
  16. M. Van Raamsdonk, Cosmology from confinement?, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 039.
  17. A. Sahu and M. Van Raamsdonk, Holographic black hole cosmologies, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 233.
  18. M. Van Raamsdonk, Comments on wormholes, ensembles, and cosmology, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 156.
  19. S. Antonini, M. Sasieta, and B. Swingle, Cosmology from random entanglement, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 188.
  20. S. Antonini and P. Rath, Do holographic CFT states have unique semiclassical bulk duals?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 34, 2544025 (2025).
  21. N. Engelhardt and E. Gesteau, Further evidence against a semiclassical baby Universe in AdS/CFT, arXiv:2504.14586.
  22. E. Gesteau, A no-go theorem for large N closed universes, arXiv:2509.14338.
  23. S. Antonini, P. Rath, M. Sasieta, B. Swingle, and A. Vilar López, The baby universe is fine and the CFT knows it: On holography for closed universes, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 159.
  24. J. Kudler-Flam and E. Witten, Emergent mixed states for baby universes and black holes, arXiv:2510.06376.
  25. M. Sasieta, B. Swingle, and A. Vilar López, Baby universes from thermal pure states in SYK, arXiv:2512.00149.
  26. H. Liu, Towards a holographic description of closed universes, arXiv:2509.14327.
  27. H. Liu, “Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean wormholes, closed universes, and black hole interiors, arXiv:2512.13807.
  28. A. Belin and J. de Boer, Baby universes in AdS3, arXiv:2512.02098.
  29. A. Belin, Euclidean wormholes and gravitational states, arXiv:2508.14165.
  30. P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115.
  31. A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, and A. Tajdini, Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 013.
  32. A. Belin and J. de Boer, Random statistics of OPE coefficients and Euclidean wormholes, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 164001 (2021).
  33. A. Maloney and E. Witten, Averaging over Narain moduli space, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 187.
  34. J. Chandra, S. Collier, T. Hartman, and A. Maloney, Semiclassical 3d gravity as an average of large-c CFTs, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 069.
  35. Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko, and J. Maldacena, Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 009.
  36. D. Marolf and J. E. Santos, AdS Euclidean wormholes, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 224002 (2021).
  37. P. Saad, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford, and S. Yao, Wormholes without averaging, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 133.
  38. J. Cotler and K. Jensen, AdS3 gravity and random CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 033.
  39. J. Cotler and K. Jensen, Wormholes and black hole microstates in AdS/CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2021) 001.
  40. V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J. M. Magan, and M. Sasieta, Microscopic origin of the entropy of black holes in general relativity, Phys. Rev. X 14, 011024 (2024).
  41. J. Pollack, M. Rozali, J. Sully, and D. Wakeham, Eigenstate thermalization and disorder averaging in gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 021601 (2020).
  42. T. Anous, T. Hartman, A. Rovai, and J. Sonner, Black hole collapse in the 1/c expansion, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 123.
  43. D. Harlow and H. Ooguri, Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 383, 1669 (2021).
  44. A. Goel, H. T. Lam, G. J. Turiaci, and H. Verlinde, Expanding the black hole interior: Partially entangled thermal states in SYK, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 156.
  45. V. Balasubramanian, A. Lawrence, J. M. Magan, and M. Sasieta, Microscopic origin of the entropy of astrophysical black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 141501 (2024).
  46. A. Climent, R. Emparan, J. M. Magan, M. Sasieta, and A. Vilar López, Universal construction of black hole microstates, Phys. Rev. D 109, 086024 (2024).
  47. V. Balasubramanian, B. Craps, J. Hernandez, M. Khramtsov, and M. Knysh, Counting microstates of out-of-equilibrium black hole fluctuations, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 083.
  48. J. M. Magan, M. Sasieta, and B. Swingle, Random circuits in the black hole interior, SciPost Phys. 19, 007 (2025).
  49. V. Balasubramanian and T. Yildirim, How to count states in gravity, arXiv:2506.15767.
  50. Z. Wang, Microscopic origin of the entropy of de Sitter spacetime, arXiv:2506.03058.
  51. R. Espíndola and S. Miyashita, Flow-geometry microstates, arXiv:2510.18901.
  52. J. de Boer, D. Liska, and K. Salehi Vaziri, Microstate counting from defects in de Sitter, arXiv:2511.09624.
  53. E. Bavaro, J. M. Magan, and L. Martinek, Quantum microstate counting from Brownian motion: From many-body systems to black holes, arXiv:2512.15854.
  54. V. Keranen, H. Nishimura, S. Stricker, O. Taanila, and A. Vuorinen, Gravitational collapse of thin shells: Time evolution of the holographic entanglement entropy, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 126.
  55. J. Chandra and T. Hartman, Coarse graining pure states in AdS/CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 030.
  56. M. Sasieta, Wormholes from heavy operator statistics in AdS/CFT, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 158.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation