Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Theoretical framework for lattice QCD computations of B→Kℓ+ℓ− and B¯s→ℓ+ℓ−γ decays rates, including contributions from charming penguin diagrams

Roberto Frezzotti and Nazario Tantalo

Giuseppe Gagliardi and Vittorio Lubicz

Guido Martinelli

Chris T. Sachrajda

Francesco Sanfilippo and Silvano Simula

Luca Silvestrini

Phys. Rev. D 113, 034509 – Published 24 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qk4f-1dv5

Abstract

We develop a strategy for computing the B→Kℓ+ℓ− and B¯s→γℓ+ℓ− decay amplitudes using lattice QCD (where ℓ± are charged leptons). We focus on those terms which contain complex contributions to the amplitude, due to on-shell intermediate states propagating between the weak operator and electromagnetic current(s). Such terms, which are generally estimated using model calculations and represent significant uncertainties in the phenomenological predictions for these decays, cannot be computed using standard lattice QCD techniques. It has recently been shown that such contributions can be computed using spectral density methods and our proposed strategy, which we discuss in detail, is built on this approach. The complex contributions include the “charming penguins” [matrix elements of the current-current operators O1(c) and O2(c) defined in Eq. (6) below], in which the charm-quark loop can propagate long distances, particularly close to the region of charmonium resonances. They also include the contributions from the chromomagnetic operator [O8 in standard notation, defined in Eq. (8) below]. We discuss the renormalization of the ultraviolet divergences, and in particular those which arise due to “contact” terms, and explain how those which appear as inverse powers of the lattice spacing can be subtracted nonperturbatively. We apply the spectral density methods in an instructive exploratory computation of the charming penguin diagram in B→Kℓ+ℓ− decays in which the virtual photon is emitted from the charm-quark loop [the diagram in Fig. 1(a) below] and discuss the prospects and strategies for the reliable determination of the amplitudes in future dedicated computations; computations which are, however, beyond the scope of the present paper.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (93)

  1. R. Ammar et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Evidence for penguins: First observation of B→K*(892)γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 674 (1993).
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions BR(B0→K⋆0γ)/BR(Bs0→ϕγ) and the direct CP asymmetry in B0→K⋆0γ, Nucl. Phys. B867, 1 (2013).
  3. D. Dutta et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for Bs0→γγ and a measurement of the branching fraction for Bs0→ϕγ, Phys. Rev. D 91, 011101 (2015).
  4. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of photon polarization in the b→sγ transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 161801 (2014).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), First experimental study of photon polarization in radiative Bs0 decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 021801 (2017); 118, 109901(E) (2017).
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of CP-violating and mixing-induced observables in Bs0→ϕγ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 081802 (2019).
  7. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Measurements of the angular distributions in the decays B→K(*)μ+μ− at CDF, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 081807 (2012).
  8. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Angular distributions in the decays B→K*ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. D 79, 031102 (2009).
  9. J. T. Wei et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the differential branching fraction and forward-backward asymmetry for B→K(*)ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 171801 (2009).
  10. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Differential branching fraction and angular analysis of the decay B0→K*0μ+μ−, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 131.
  11. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of form-factor-independent observables in the decay B0→K*0μ+μ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 191801 (2013).
  12. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Angular analysis and branching fraction measurement of the decay B0→K*0μ+μ−, Phys. Lett. B 727, 77 (2013).
  13. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Angular analysis of the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay using 3  fb−1 of integrated luminosity, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 104.
  14. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Angular analysis of the decay B0→K*0μ+μ− from pp collisions at s=8  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 753, 424 (2016).
  15. S. Wehle et al. (Belle Collaboration), Lepton-flavor-dependent angular analysis of B→K*ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 111801 (2017).
  16. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurement of angular parameters from the decay B0→K*0μ+μ− in proton-proton collisions at s=8  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 781, 517 (2018).
  17. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Angular analysis of Bd0→K*μ+μ− decays in pp collisions at s=8  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 047.
  18. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of CP-averaged observables in the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 011802 (2020).
  19. A. Hayrapetyan et al. , Angular analysis of the B0→K*0(892)μ+μ− decay at s=13  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 864, 139406 (2025).
  20. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Search for the decays B0→e+e−γ and B0→μ+μ−γ, Phys. Rev. D 77, 011104 (2008).
  21. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the Bs0→μ+μ− decay properties and search for the B0→μ+μ− and Bs0→μ+μ−γ decays, Phys. Rev. D 105, 012010 (2022).
  22. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for the Bs0→μ+μ−γ decay, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 101.
  23. M. Hansen, A. Lupo, and N. Tantalo, Extraction of spectral densities from lattice correlators, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094508 (2019).
  24. R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, and V. Lubicz, Spectral-function determination of complex electroweak amplitudes with lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074510 (2023).
  25. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Amplitude analysis of the B0→K*0μ+μ− decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 131801 (2024).
  26. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Determination of short- and long-distance contributions in B0→K*0μ+μ− decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 052009 (2024).
  27. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Comprehensive analysis of local and nonlocal amplitudes in the in B0→K*0μ+μ− decay, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2024) 026.
  28. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality using B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151601 (2014).
  29. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality with B0→K*0ℓ+ℓ− decays, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2017) 055.
  30. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for lepton-universality violation in B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 191801 (2019).
  31. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, Nat. Phys. 18, 277 (2022); 19, 1517(E) (2023).
  32. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Tests of lepton universality using B0→KS0ℓ+ℓ− and B+→K*+ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 191802 (2022).
  33. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051803 (2023).
  34. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of lepton universality parameters in B+→K+ℓ+ℓ− and B0→K*0ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032002 (2023).
  35. M. Algueró, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, P. Masjuan, and J. Matias, Are we overlooking lepton flavor universal new physics in b→sℓℓ ?, Phys. Rev. D 99, 075017 (2019).
  36. T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, and S. Neshatpour, Model independent analysis of the angular observables in B0→K*0μ+μ− and B+→K*+μ+μ−, Phys. Rev. D 103, 095020 (2021).
  37. W. Altmannshofer and P. Stangl, New physics in rare B decays after Moriond 2021, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 952 (2021).
  38. N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. van Dyk, and J. Virto, Improved theory predictions and global analysis of exclusive b→sμ+μ− processes, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 133.
  39. M. Algueró, A. Biswas, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, and M. Novoa-Brunet, To (b)e or not to (b)e: No electrons at LHCb, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 648 (2023).
  40. Q. Wen and F. Xu, Global fits of new physics in b→s after the RK(*) 2022 release, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095038 (2023).
  41. M. Bordone, G. isidori, S. Mächler, and A. Tinari, Short- vs long-distance physics in B→K(*)ℓ+ℓ−: A data-driven analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 547 (2024).
  42. D. Guadagnoli, C. Normand, S. Simula, and L. Vittorio, Insights on the current semi-leptonic B-decay discrepancies—and how Bs→μ+μ−γ can help, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 102.
  43. M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, S. Mishima, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, B→K*ℓ+ℓ− decays at large recoil in the standard model: A theoretical reappraisal, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 116.
  44. M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Lessons from the B0,+→K*0,+μ+μ− angular analyses, Phys. Rev. D 103, 015030 (2021).
  45. M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Charming penguins and lepton universality violation in b→sℓ+ℓ− decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 64 (2023).
  46. M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, and M. Valli, Constraints on lepton universality violation from rare B decays, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055036 (2023).
  47. R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, and C. T. Sachrajda, Bs→μ+μ−γ decay rate at large q2 from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114506 (2024).
  48. Y. Aoki et al. (Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG), FLAG review 2024, arXiv:2411.04268.
  49. J. C. A. Barata and K. Fredenhagen, Particle scattering in Euclidean lattice field theories, Commun. Math. Phys. 138, 507 (1991).
  50. S. Hashimoto, Inclusive semi-leptonic B meson decay structure functions from lattice QCD, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2017, 053B03 (2017).
  51. P. Gambino and S. Hashimoto, Inclusive semileptonic decays from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 032001 (2020).
  52. M. T. Hansen, H. B. Meyer, and D. Robaina, From deep inelastic scattering to heavy-flavor semileptonic decays: Total rates into multihadron final states from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 96, 094513 (2017).
  53. J. Bulava and M. T. Hansen, Scattering amplitudes from finite-volume spectral functions, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034521 (2019).
  54. M. Bruno and M. T. Hansen, Variations on the Maiani-Testa approach and the inverse problem, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 043.
  55. A. Patella and N. Tantalo, Scattering amplitudes from Euclidean correlators: Haag-Ruelle theory and approximation formulae, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 091.
  56. T. Bergamaschi, W. I. Jay, and P. R. Oare, Hadronic structure, conformal maps, and analytic continuation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074516 (2023).
  57. J. Bulava, M. T. Hansen, M. W. Hansen, A. Patella, and N. Tantalo, Inclusive rates from smeared spectral densities in the two-dimensional O(3) nonlinear σ-model, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 034.
  58. C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration (ETMC), Probing the energy-smeared R ratio using lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 241901 (2023).
  59. G. Bailas, S. Hashimoto, and T. Ishikawa, Reconstruction of smeared spectral function from Euclidean correlation functions, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 043B07 (2020).
  60. P. Gambino, S. Hashimoto, S. Mächler, M. Panero, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, A. Smecca, and N. Tantalo, Lattice QCD study of inclusive semileptonic decays of heavy mesons, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 083.
  61. A. Barone, S. Hashimoto, A. Jüttner, T. Kaneko, and R. Kellermann, Approaches to inclusive semileptonic B(s)-meson decays from Lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 145.
  62. R. Kellermann, Z. Hu, A. Barone, A. Elgaziari, S. Hashimoto, T. Kaneko, and A. Jüttner, Inclusive semileptonic decays from lattice QCD: Analysis of systematic effects, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014501 (2025).
  63. A. Evangelista, R. Frezzotti, N. Tantalo, G. Gagliardi, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, and V. Lubicz (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration), Inclusive hadronic decay rate of the τ lepton from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074513 (2023).
  64. C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration), Inclusive hadronic decay rate of the τ lepton from lattice QCD: The u−s flavor channel and the Cabibbo angle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 261901 (2024).
  65. E. Bennett et al., Meson spectroscopy from spectral densities in lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074509 (2024).
  66. A. De Santis et al., Inclusive semileptonic decays of the Ds meson: A first-principles lattice QCD calculation, Phys. Rev. D 112, 054503 (2025).
  67. A. De Santis et al., Inclusive semileptonic decays of the Ds meson: Lattice QCD confronts experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 121901 (2025).
  68. C. Bonanno, F. D’Angelo, M. D’Elia, L. Maio, and M. Naviglio, Sphaleron rate from a modified Backus-Gilbert inversion method, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074515 (2023).
  69. M. Panero, A. Smecca, N. Tantalo, and D. Vadacchino, The quenched glueball spectrum from smeared spectral densities, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2023 (2024) 050 [arXiv:2311.14806].
  70. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, QCD factorization for B→ππ decays: Strong phases and CP violation in the heavy quark limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1914 (1999).
  71. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, QCD factorization for exclusive, nonleptonic B meson decays: General arguments and the case of heavy light final states, Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000).
  72. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, QCD factorization in B→πK,ππ decays and extraction of Wolfenstein parameters, Nucl. Phys. B606, 245 (2001).
  73. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, and L. Silvestrini, Charming penguins in B decays, Nucl. Phys. B501, 271 (1997).
  74. M. Ciuchini, R. Contino, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, and L. Silvestrini, Charming penguin enhanced B decays, Nucl. Phys. B512, 3 (1998); B531, 656(E) (1998).
  75. M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, G. Martinelli, M. Pierini, and L. Silvestrini, Charming penguins strike back, Phys. Lett. B 515, 33 (2001).
  76. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A. Pivovarov, and Y.-M. Wang, Charm-loop effect in B→K(*)ℓ+ℓ− and B→K*γ, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2010) 089.
  77. A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, and Y. M. Wang, B→Kℓ+ℓ− decay at large hadronic recoil, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2013) 010.
  78. G. Isidori, Z. Polonsky, and A. Tinari, Explicit estimate of charm rescattering in B0→K0ℓ¯ℓ, Phys. Rev. D 111, 093007 (2025).
  79. G. Martinelli, C. Pittori, C. T. Sachrajda, M. Testa, and A. Vladikas, A general method for nonperturbative renormalization of lattice operators, Nucl. Phys. B445, 81 (1995).
  80. C. Sturm, Y. Aoki, N. H. Christ, T. Izubuchi, C. T. C. Sachrajda, and A. Soni, Renormalization of quark bilinear operators in a momentum-subtraction scheme with a nonexceptional subtraction point, Phys. Rev. D 80, 014501 (2009).
  81. R. Frezzotti, P. A. Grassi, S. Sint, and P. Weisz (Alpha Collaboration), Lattice QCD with a chirally twisted mass term, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2001) 058.
  82. M. Bochicchio, L. Maiani, G. Martinelli, G. C. Rossi, and M. Testa, Chiral symmetry on the lattice with Wilson fermions, Nucl. Phys. B262, 331 (1985).
  83. G. Martinelli, S. Petrarca, C. T. Sachrajda, and A. Vladikas, Nonperturbative renormalization of two quark operators with an improved lattice fermion action, Phys. Lett. B 311, 241 (1993); 317, 660(E) (1993).
  84. K. Jansen, C. Liu, M. Luscher, H. Simma, S. Sint, R. Sommer, P. Weisz, and U. Wolff, Nonperturbative renormalization of lattice QCD at all scales, Phys. Lett. B 372, 275 (1996).
  85. L. Maiani, G. Martinelli, and C. T. Sachrajda, Nonperturbative subtractions in the heavy quark effective field theory, Nucl. Phys. B368, 281 (1992).
  86. R. Frezzotti and G. C. Rossi, Chirally improving Wilson fermions. II. Four-quark operators, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2004) 070.
  87. C. Dawson, G. Martinelli, G. C. Rossi, C. T. Sachrajda, S. R. Sharpe, M. Talevi, and M. Testa, New lattice approaches to the ΔI=1/2 rule, Nucl. Phys. B514, 313 (1998).
  88. M. Constantinou, M. Costa, R. Frezzotti, V. Lubicz, G. Martinelli, D. Meloni, H. Panagopoulos, and S. Simula, Renormalization of the chromomagnetic operator on the lattice, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034505 (2015).
  89. C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration), Strange and charm quark contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment in lattice QCD with twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 111, 054502 (2025).
  90. A. Desiderio et al., First lattice calculation of radiative leptonic decay rates of pseudoscalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D 103, 014502 (2021).
  91. S. Borsanyi et al., Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Nature (London) 593, 51 (2021).
  92. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  93. N. H. Christ, X. Feng, A. Portelli, and C. T. Sachrajda (RBC and UKQCD Collaborations), Prospects for a lattice computation of rare kaon decay amplitudes II K→πνν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114517 (2016).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation