Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Framework for the quantum mechanical sum of possibilities and meaning for field theory and gravity

Artem Averin*

  • *Contact author: artem.averin@campus.lmu.de

Phys. Rev. D 111, 125012 – Published 17 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qbzf-vdq2

Abstract

In quantum mechanics, the measurable quantities of a given theory are predicted by performing a weighted sum over possibilities. We show how to arrange the possibilities into bundles such that the associated subsums can be viewed as well-defined theories on their own right. These bundles are submanifolds of possibilities which we call possifolds. We collect and prove some basic facts about possifolds. Especially, we show that possifolds are ensembles of what in a certain broadly defined sense that we explain can be regarded as soliton excitations (soliton-possifold correspondence). We provide an outlook on some applications. Among other things, we illustrate the use of the developed framework for the example of the Lieb-Liniger model. It describes nonrelativistic bosons with an attractive interaction. We derive a dual theory describing the lowest-lying energy excitation modes. While the standard Bogoliubov-approximation breaks down at the critical point, our derived summation prescription stays regular. In the Bogoliubov-limit we observe the summation to possess an enhanced symmetry at this point while the summation cannot be ignored there. We finally provide a glimpse on the restrictions black hole physics implies in this context for the gravitational path integral.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (10)

  1. A. Averin, Schwarzschild/CFT from soft black hole hair?, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 092.
  2. A. Averin, Entropy counting from a Schwarzschild/CFT correspondence and soft hair, Phys. Rev. D 101, 046024 (2020).
  3. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995).
  4. A. Seraj, Conserved charges, surface degrees of freedom, and black hole entropy, arXiv:1603.02442.
  5. Sometimes, the operator insertion times are taken to infinity. This is, for instance, the case in the derivation of the LSZ-formula. This is not problematic, however, as the limits are taken after the limit T→∞ in (4).

  6. The discussion of this section justifies the approach of [1] in the analysis of black holes. [2] reads as a proposal to explain the universality of black hole entropy as a consequence of the possifold flow. We, however, do not go further into this topic here.

  7. A. Averin, Formulation and proof of the gravitational entropy bound, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2025) 193.
  8. Rina Kanamoto, Hiroki Saito, and Masahito Ueda, Quantum phase transition in one-dimensional Bose-Einstein condensates with attractive interactions, Phys. Rev. A 67, 013608 (2003).
  9. F. Dalfovo, S. Giorgini, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 463 (1999).
  10. E. Palti, The swampland: Introduction and review, Fortschr. Phys. 67, 1900037 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation