Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

How common are grand unified theories?

Johannes Herms*

Maximilian Ruhdorfer†

  • Laboratory for Elementary Particle Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

  • *Contact author: johannes.herms@tum.de
  • †Contact author: m.ruhdorfer@cornell.edu

Phys. Rev. D 112, 115041 – Published 29 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/q4nj-8gbd

Abstract

The individual fermion generations of the standard model fit neatly into a representation of a simple grand unified theory gauge algebra. If grand unification is not realized in nature, this would appear to be a coincidence. We attempt to quantify how frequently this coincidence occurs among theories with group structure and fermion content similar to the standard model. While many of the completely chiral, anomaly-free fermion representations of the standard model gauge algebra that are no larger than the single-generation standard model are unifiable, we find that unifiability quickly becomes rare when the analysis is extended to include other gauge algebras or larger representations. This purely group-theoretical analysis may be taken as a bottom-up indication for grand unification, conceptually similar to a naturalness argument.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (13)

  1. S. L. Glashow, Partial symmetries of weak interactions, Nucl. Phys. 22, 579 (1961).
  2. S. Weinberg, A model of leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967).
  3. A. Salam, Weak and electromagnetic interactions, Conf. Proc. C 680519, 367 (1968).
  4. J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Lepton number as the fourth color, Phys. Rev. D 10, 275 (1974); 11, 703(E) (1975).
  5. H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Unity of all elementary particle forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).
  6. R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, Left-right gauge symmetry and an isoconjugate model of CP violation, Phys. Rev. D 11, 566 (1975).
  7. H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Unified interactions of leptons and hadrons, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 93, 193 (1975).
  8. H. Georgi, The state of the art—gauge theories, AIP Conf. Proc. 23, 575 (1975).
  9. A. Gomes, M. Ruhdorfer, and J. Tooby-Smith, Semisimple unifications of any gauge theory, Phys. Rev. D 108, 075001 (2023).
  10. R. M. Fonseca, GroupMath: A Mathematica package for group theory calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 267, 108085 (2021).
  11. E. Witten, An SU(2) anomaly, Phys. Lett. 117B, 324 (1982).
  12. P. Batra, B. A. Dobrescu, and D. Spivak, Anomaly-free sets of fermions, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 47, 082301 (2006).
  13. D. B. Costa, B. A. Dobrescu, and P. J. Fox, General solution to the U(1) anomaly equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 151601 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation