- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quarkonium spectra with magnetically induced anisotropic confinement

Ahmad Jafar Arifi1,2,* and Kei Suzuki1,†

  • *Contact author: aj.arifi01@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: k.suzuki.2010@th.phys.titech.ac.jp
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 114, 014067 – Published 31 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pzm6-jgnt

Abstract

Strong magnetic fields modify the force that confines quarks inside hadrons and make it direction-dependent. Using quark-antiquark potentials obtained from lattice simulations as inputs to a quark potential model, we investigate how the anisotropic confinement affects the mass spectrum of quarkonium. In the strong-field regime, we find downward mass shifts induced by a softening of the confining potential along the field direction. In particular, the mass shifts of radially excited states are more significant than that of the ground state. For the longitudinal spin eigenstates, the excited-state spectrum strongly depends on the magnetic-field strength, in contrast to the spectrum with conventional isotropic confinement, which is insensitive to the field strength. This provides a clean probe of magnetically induced confinement anisotropy that can be confirmed in future lattice simulations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (94)

  1. K. Hattori and X.-G. Huang, Novel quantum phenomena induced by strong magnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 26 (2017).
  2. J. Zhao, K. Zhou, S. Chen, and P. Zhuang, Heavy flavors under extreme conditions in high energy nuclear collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 114, 103801 (2020).
  3. S. Iwasaki, M. Oka, and K. Suzuki, A review of quarkonia under strong magnetic fields, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 222 (2021).
  4. C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, and F. Sanfilippo, Anisotropy of the quark-antiquark potential in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 89, 114502 (2014).
  5. C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, M. Mariti, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, A. Rucci, and F. Sanfilippo, Magnetic field effects on the static quark potential at zero and finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 94, 094007 (2016).
  6. M. D’Elia, L. Maio, F. Sanfilippo, and A. Stanzione, Confining and chiral properties of QCD in extremely strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114512 (2021).
  7. G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrődi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schafer, and K. K. Szabo, The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2012) 044.
  8. E. V. Luschevskaya and O. V. Larina, The ρ and A mesons in a strong abelian magnetic field in SU(2) lattice gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B884, 1 (2014).
  9. Y. Hidaka and A. Yamamoto, Charged vector mesons in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094502 (2013).
  10. E. V. Luschevskaya, O. E. Solovjeva, O. A. Kochetkov, and O. V. Teryaev, Magnetic polarizabilities of light mesons in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B898, 627 (2015).
  11. E. V. Luschevskaya, O. E. Solovjeva, and O. V. Teryaev, Magnetic polarizability of pion, Phys. Lett. B 761, 393 (2016).
  12. G. S. Bali, B. B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, and B. Gläßle, Meson masses in electromagnetic fields with Wilson fermions, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034505 (2018).
  13. G. S. Bali, B. B. Brandt, G. Endrődi, and B. Gläßle, Weak decay of magnetized pions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 072001 (2018).
  14. E. V. Luschevskaya, O. V. Teryaev, D. Y. Golubkov, O. V. Solovjeva, and R. A. Ishkuvatov, Tensor polarizability of the vector mesons from SU(3) lattice gauge theory, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 186.
  15. K. Hattori and A. Yamamoto, Meson deformation by magnetic fields in lattice QCD, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 043B04 (2019).
  16. R. Bignell, W. Kamleh, and D. Leinweber, Pion in a uniform background magnetic field with clover fermions, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114518 (2019).
  17. R. Bignell, W. Kamleh, and D. Leinweber, Pion magnetic polarisability using the background field method, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135853 (2020).
  18. H.-T. Ding, S.-T. Li, A. Tomiya, X.-D. Wang, and Y. Zhang, Chiral properties of (2+1)-flavor QCD in strong magnetic fields at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. D 104, 014505 (2021).
  19. H.-T. Ding, S.-T. Li, J.-H. Liu, and X.-D. Wang, Chiral condensates and screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons in thermomagnetic QCD medium, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034514 (2022).
  20. G. Endrődi, QCD with background electromagnetic fields on the lattice: A review, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 141, 104153 (2025).
  21. H.-T. Ding, J.-B. Gu, S.-T. Li, and R. Thakkar, Chiral condensates and screening masses of neutral pseudoscalar mesons from lattice QCD at physical quark masses, Phys. Rev. D 111, 074513 (2025).
  22. H.-T. Ding and D. Zhang, Chiral properties of (2+1)-flavor QCD in magnetic fields at zero temperature, Phys. Rev. D 113, 094503 (2026).
  23. D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, The effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: “Event by event P and CP violation”, Nucl. Phys. A803, 227 (2008).
  24. V. Skokov, A. Y. Illarionov, and V. Toneev, Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 24, 5925 (2009).
  25. V. Voronyuk, V. D. Toneev, W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, V. P. Konchakovski, and S. A. Voloshin, Electromagnetic field evolution in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 83, 054911 (2011).
  26. W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 85, 044907 (2012).
  27. E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K. D. Lane, and T. M. Yan, Charmonium: Comparison with experiment, Phys. Rev. D 21, 203 (1980).
  28. W. Buchmüller and S.-H. H. Tye, Quarkonia and quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 24, 132 (1981).
  29. S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a relativized quark model with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).
  30. K. Marasinghe and K. Tuchin, Quarkonium dissociation in quark-gluon plasma via ionization in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. C 84, 044908 (2011).
  31. K. Tuchin, J/ψ dissociation in parity-odd bubbles, Phys. Lett. B 705, 482 (2011).
  32. D.-L. Yang and B. Müller, J/ψ production by magnetic excitation of ηc, J. Phys. G 39, 015007 (2012).
  33. K. Tuchin, Particle production in strong electromagnetic fields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013, 490495 (2013).
  34. C. S. Machado, F. S. Navarra, E. G. de Oliveira, J. Noronha, and M. Strickland, Heavy quarkonium production in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 88, 034009 (2013).
  35. J. Alford and M. Strickland, Charmonia and bottomonia in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 88, 105017 (2013).
  36. S. Cho, K. Hattori, S. H. Lee, K. Morita, and S. Ozaki, QCD sum rules for magnetically induced mixing between ηc and J/ψ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 172301 (2014).
  37. D. Dudal and T. G. Mertens, Melting of charmonium in a magnetic field from an effective AdS/QCD model, Phys. Rev. D 91, 086002 (2015).
  38. S. Cho, K. Hattori, S. H. Lee, K. Morita, and S. Ozaki, Charmonium spectroscopy in strong magnetic fields by QCD sum rules: S-wave ground states, Phys. Rev. D 91, 045025 (2015).
  39. C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, and A. Rucci, Heavy quarkonia in strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054014 (2015).
  40. A. V. Sadofyev and Y. Yin, The charmonium dissociation in an “anomalous wind”, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2016) 052.
  41. K. Suzuki and T. Yoshida, Cigar-shaped quarkonia under strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 93, 051502(R) (2016).
  42. T. Yoshida and K. Suzuki, Heavy meson spectroscopy under strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 94, 074043 (2016).
  43. M. Hasan, B. Chatterjee, and B. K. Patra, Heavy quark potential in a static and strong homogeneous magnetic field, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 767 (2017).
  44. B. Singh, L. Thakur, and H. Mishra, Heavy quark complex potential in a strongly magnetized hot QGP medium, Phys. Rev. D 97, 096011 (2018).
  45. N. R. F. Braga and L. F. Ferreira, Heavy meson dissociation in a plasma with magnetic fields, Phys. Lett. B 783, 186 (2018).
  46. S. Iwasaki, M. Oka, K. Suzuki, and T. Yoshida, Hadronic Paschen-Back effect, Phys. Lett. B 790, 71 (2019).
  47. A. Jahan C. S., N. Dhale, S. Reddy P., S. Kesarwani, and A. Mishra, Charmonium states in strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. C 98, 065202 (2018).
  48. S. Iwasaki and K. Suzuki, Quarkonium radiative decays from the hadronic Paschen-Back effect, Phys. Rev. D 98, 054017 (2018).
  49. M. Hasan, B. K. Patra, B. Chatterjee, and P. Bagchi, Landau damping in a strong magnetic field: Dissociation of quarkonia, Nucl. Phys. A995, 121688 (2020).
  50. N. R. F. Braga and L. F. Ferreira, Quasinormal modes for quarkonium in a plasma with magnetic fields, Phys. Lett. B 795, 462 (2019).
  51. M. Hasan and B. K. Patra, Dissociation of heavy quarkonia in a weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 102, 036020 (2020).
  52. J. Zhou, X. Chen, Y.-Q. Zhao, and J. Ping, Thermodynamics of heavy quarkonium in a magnetic field background, Phys. Rev. D 102, 086020 (2020).
  53. N. R. F. Braga and R. da Mata, Configuration entropy description of charmonium dissociation under the influence of magnetic fields, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135918 (2020).
  54. Nelson R. F. Braga, Y. F. Ferreira, and L. F. Ferreira, Configuration entropy and stability of bottomonium radial excitations in a plasma with magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 105, 114044 (2022).
  55. S. S. Jena, B. Shukla, D. Dudal, and S. Mahapatra, Entropic force and real-time dynamics of holographic quarkonium in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 105, 086011 (2022).
  56. J. Hu, S. Shi, Z. Xu, J. Zhao, and P. Zhuang, Magnetic field induced hair structure in the charmonium gluon dissociation, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094013 (2022).
  57. R. Ghosh, A. Bandyopadhyay, I. Nilima, and S. Ghosh, Anisotropic tomography of heavy quark dissociation by using the general propagator structure in a finite magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 106, 054010 (2022).
  58. P. Parui, S. De, A. Kumar, and A. Mishra, QCD sum rule analysis of heavy quarkonium states in magnetized matter: Effects of magnetic and inverse magnetic catalysis, Phys. Rev. D 106, 114033 (2022).
  59. J. Sebastian, L. Thakur, H. Mishra, and N. Haque, Heavy quarkonia in QGP medium in an arbitrary magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 108, 094001 (2023).
  60. I. Nilima, M. Hasan, B. K. Singh, and M. Y. Jamal, Quarkonia dissociation at finite magnetic field in the presence of momentum anisotropy, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 160 (2024).
  61. S. S. Jena, J. Barman, B. Toniato, D. Dudal, and S. Mahapatra, A dynamical Einstein-Born-Infeld-dilaton model and holographic quarkonium melting in a magnetic field, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 096.
  62. B. Shukla, J. Nongmaithem, D. Dudal, and S. Mahapatra, Interplay of magnetic field and chemical potential induced anisotropy and frame dependent chaos of a QQ¯ pair in holographic QCD, Phys. Rev. D 111, 106002 (2025).
  63. L. Wen, M. Li, Y. Zhou, Y. Li, and J. P. Vary, Relativistic dynamics of charmonia in strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014019 (2025).
  64. S. S. Jena, A. Bhattacharjee, D. Dudal, and S. Mahapatra, Probing quarkonium diffusion in a magnetized quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D 112, 086010 (2025).
  65. A. J. Arifi and K. Suzuki, Structure of heavy quarkonia in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D 112, 094013 (2025).
  66. C. A. Dominguez, M. Koning, and L. A. Hernández, Magnetic catalysis of charmonium in the vector channel, Phys. Rev. D 112, 094049 (2025).
  67. X. Guo, S. Shi, N. Xu, Z. Xu, and P. Zhuang, Magnetic field effect on charmonium formation in high energy nuclear collisions, Phys. Lett. B 751, 215 (2015).
  68. K. Suzuki and S. H. Lee, Delayed versus accelerated quarkonium formation in a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. C 96, 035203 (2017).
  69. N. Dutta and S. Mazumder, Majorana flipping of quarkonium spin states in transient magnetic field, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 525 (2018).
  70. J. Hoelck and G. Wolschin, Electromagnetic field effects on ϒ-meson dissociation in PbPb collisions at LHC energies, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 241 (2017).
  71. P. Bagchi, N. Dutta, B. Chatterjee, and S. P. Adhya, Dissociation of heavy quarkonium states in a rapidly varying strong magnetic field, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 38, 2350035 (2023).
  72. S. Iwasaki, D. Jido, M. Oka, and K. Suzuki, Survival probabilities of charmonia as a clue to measure transient magnetic fields, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136498 (2021).
  73. A. J. Arifi and K. Suzuki, Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana dynamics of magnetized quarkonia, Phys. Rev. D 113, 054047 (2026).
  74. V. A. Miransky and I. A. Shovkovy, Magnetic catalysis and anisotropic confinement in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 66, 045006 (2002).
  75. M. N. Chernodub, QCD string breaking in strong magnetic field, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29, 1450162 (2014).
  76. M. A. Andreichikov, V. D. Orlovsky, and Yu. A. Simonov, Asymptotic freedom in strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 162002 (2013).
  77. Y. A. Simonov and M. A. Trusov, Confinement and αs in a strong magnetic field, Phys. Lett. B 747, 48 (2015).
  78. H. Bohra, D. Dudal, A. Hajilou, and S. Mahapatra, Anisotropic string tensions and inversely magnetic catalyzed deconfinement from a dynamical AdS/QCD model, Phys. Lett. B 801, 135184 (2020).
  79. U. Gürsoy, M. Järvinen, G. Nijs, and J. F. Pedraza, On the interplay between magnetic field and anisotropy in holographic QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2021) 180.
  80. I. Y. Aref’eva, K. Rannu, and P. Slepov, Energy loss in holographic anisotropic model for heavy quarks in external magnetic field, arXiv:2012.05758.
  81. I. Y. Aref’eva, A. Hajilou, K. Rannu, and P. Slepov, Spatial Wilson loops and energy loss for heavy quarks in a magnetized holographic QCD model, Phys. Rev. D 113, 106004 (2026).
  82. T. Barnes, S. Godfrey, and E. S. Swanson, Higher charmonia, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054026 (2005).
  83. T. Kawanai and S. Sasaki, Potential description of charmonium and charmed-strange mesons from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094503 (2015).
  84. T. Kawanai and S. Sasaki, Charmonium potential from full lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 85, 091503(R) (2012).
  85. M. H. Johnson and B. A. Lippmann, Motion in a constant magnetic field, Phys. Rev. 76, 828 (1949).
  86. M. A. Andreichikov, B. O. Kerbikov, V. D. Orlovsky, and Y. A. Simonov, Meson spectrum in strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094029 (2013).
  87. M. Kamimura, Nonadiabatic coupled-rearrangement-channel approach to muonic molecules, Phys. Rev. A 38, 621 (1988).
  88. E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Gaussian expansion method for few-body systems, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 223 (2003).

  89. We note that the transverse-sector parameters exhibit strong correlations, particularly between aT and κT, since the asymptotic region is less constrained, whereas the longitudinal-sector parameters are only weakly correlated because we impose aL=0.

  90. V. D. Orlovsky and Y. A. Simonov, Nambu-Goldstone mesons in strong magnetic field, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 136.
  91. H. Taya, Hadron masses in strong magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. D 92, 014038 (2015).
  92. M. A. Andreichikov, B. O. Kerbikov, E. V. Luschevskaya, Yu. A. Simonov, and O. E. Solovjeva, The evolution of meson masses in a strong magnetic field, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 007.
  93. T. Kojo, Neutral and charged mesons in magnetic fields: A resonance gas in a non-relativistic quark model, Eur. Phys. J. A 57, 317 (2021).
  94. I. I. Rabi, Das freie Elektron im homogenen Magnetfeld nach der Diracschen Theorie, Z. Phys. 49, 507 (1928).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 114, 014067– Published 31 July, 2026
  • Received 30 March 2026
  • Accepted 1 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation