Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Running of the spectral index: Reconciling the CMB with the Lyman-α forest

Malcolm Fairbairn*, Lucien Heurtier†, and María Olalla Olea-Romacho‡

  • *Contact author: malcolm.fairbairn@kcl.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: lucien.heurtier@kcl.ac.uk
  • ‡Contact author: maria_olalla.olea_romacho@kcl.ac.uk

Phys. Rev. D 114, 043507 – Published 6 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pwfl-mt4g

Abstract

We investigate the scale dependence of the primordial power spectrum by combining Planck, ACT DR6, SPT-3G, and eBOSS Lyman-α forest data, extending sensitivity to smaller comoving scales than those probed by the cosmic microwave background (CMB) alone. Within a parametrization based on a Taylor expansion around the pivot scale, we constrain the running of the spectral index αs and its running βs. By using eBOSS likelihoods exhibiting a suppression of small-scale power either in amplitude or spectral index, we show that the latter can be accommodated by correlated variations of (αs,βs), leading to a preference for nonzero running. We show that inflationary potentials with localized features—such as Gaussian dips, bumps, or axion-monodromy modulations—can reproduce the inferred scale dependence while remaining compatible with current CMB constraints. We release the public pipe code to enable systematic tests of inflationary potentials against current CMB datasets.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. A. R. Liddle and D. H. Lyth, Phys. Rep. 231, 1 (1993).
  2. D. Baumann, Cosmology (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2022).
  3. A. A. Starobinsky, JETP Lett. 30, 682 (1979).
  4. A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981).
  5. E. Komatsu et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 192, 18 (2011).
  6. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  7. S. Chabanier et al. (eBOSS Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2019) 017.
  8. J. Chaves-Montero et al. (2026), 10.5281/zenodo.16943722.
  9. T. Louis et al. (ACT Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 062.
  10. E. Calabrese et al. (ACT Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 063.
  11. K. K. Rogers and V. Poulin, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012018 (2025).
  12. M. A. Fernandez, S. Bird, and M.-F. Ho, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 029.
  13. M. Walther et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2025) 099.
  14. S. Hannestad, S. H. Hansen, F. L. Villante, and A. J. S. Hamilton, Astropart. Phys. 17, 375 (2002).
  15. E. Camphuis et al. (SPT-3G Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 113, 083504 (2026).
  16. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A5 (2020).
  17. L. Pagano, J. M. Delouis, S. Mottet, J. L. Puget, and L. Vibert, Astron. Astrophys. 635, A99 (2020).
  18. S. Goldstein, J. C. Hill, V. Iršič, and B. D. Sherwin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 201001 (2023).
  19. H. A. R. El-Ella, A. Huck, and U. L. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 100, 214407 (2019).
  20. J. Torrado and A. Lewis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2021) 057.
  21. A. Lewis, A. Challinor, and A. Lasenby, Astrophys. J. 538, 473 (2000).
  22. M. Raveri and C. Doux, Phys. Rev. D 104, 043504 (2021).
  23. R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 198.
  24. R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2014) 052.
  25. R. Kallosh and A. Linde, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 033.
  26. A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. 91B, 99 (1980).
  27. F. L. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Lett. B 659, 703 (2008).
  28. E. G. M. Ferreira, E. McDonough, L. Balkenhol, R. Kallosh, L. Knox, and A. Linde, Phys. Rev. D 113, 043524 (2026).
  29. M. Drees and Y. Xu, Phys. Lett. B 867, 139612 (2025).
  30. M. R. Haque, S. Pal, and D. Paul, Phys. Lett. B 869, 139852 (2025).
  31. D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023544 (2025).
  32. Y.-Y. Ye and B.-M. Gu, Phys. Lett. B 873, 140204 (2026).
  33. N. Barnaby and Z. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 80, 126018 (2009).
  34. N. Barnaby, Phys. Rev. D 82, 106009 (2010).
  35. D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, A. Riotto, and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043508 (2000).
  36. J. Fumagalli, S. Renaux-Petel, and L. T. Witkowski, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2021) 030.
  37. S. S. Mishra and V. Sahni, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2020) 007.
  38. R. Flauger, L. McAllister, E. Pajer, A. Westphal, and G. Xu, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2010) 009.
  39. R. Flauger, L. McAllister, E. Silverstein, and A. Westphal, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2017) 055.
  40. P. Auclair and C. Ringeval, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063512 (2022).
  41. A. Lewis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 025.
  42. M. Tristram et al., Phys. Rev. D 105, 083524 (2022).
  43. T. Biekötter, SciPost Phys. Codebases 64, 1 (2026).
  44. https://gitlab.com/cosmoPipe/pipe-inflation
  45. S. Chabanier, M. Millea, and N. Palanque-Delabrouille, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 489, 2247 (2019).
  46. A. H. Wright et al., Astron. Astrophys. 703, A158 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation