Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Singlet-doublet dark matter revisited

Prudhvi N. Bhattiprolu1,2,*, Evan Petrosky2,†, and Aaron Pierce2,‡

  • *Contact author: prudhvi.bhattiprolu@fi.infn.it
  • †Contact author: epetros@umich.edu
  • ‡Contact author: atpierce@umich.edu

Phys. Rev. D 112, 035017 – Published 13 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pw56-v9z5

Abstract

The singlet-doublet model is an economical model of weakly interacting dark matter. We revisit it in light of improved dark matter direct detection limits. We characterize the now well-defined regions of remaining parameter space with suppressed direct detection cross sections and discuss features of the spectrum accessible at the Large Hadron Collider. We discuss when and how parameters in these special regions might be realized as the result of renormalization group evolution when starting with generic ultraviolet initial conditions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (69)

  1. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  2. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and S. Kachru, arXiv:hep-th/0501082.
  3. J. Kearney, N. Orlofsky, and A. Pierce, Phys. Rev. D 95, 035020 (2017).
  4. T. Cohen, J. Kearney, A. Pierce, and D. Tucker-Smith, Phys. Rev. D 85, 075003 (2012).
  5. C. Cheung and D. Sanford, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2014) 011.
  6. F. D’Eramo, Phys. Rev. D 76, 083522 (2007).
  7. R. Mahbubani and L. Senatore, Phys. Rev. D 73, 043510 (2006).
  8. R. Enberg, P. J. Fox, L. J. Hall, A. Y. Papaioannou, and M. Papucci, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2007) 014.
  9. T. Abe, R. Kitano, and R. Sato, Phys. Rev. D 91, 095004 (2015); 96, 019902(E) (2017).
  10. L. Calibbi, A. Mariotti, and P. Tziveloglou, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2015) 116.
  11. A. Freitas, S. Westhoff, and J. Zupan, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 015.
  12. S. Banerjee, S. Matsumoto, K. Mukaida, and Y.-L. S. Tsai, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2016) 070.
  13. D. Egana-Ugrinovic, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2017) 064.
  14. L. Lopez Honorez, M. H. G. Tytgat, P. Tziveloglou, and B. Zaldivar, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 011.
  15. S. Esch, M. Klasen, and C. E. Yaguna, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2018) 055.
  16. G. Arcadi, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 864 (2018).
  17. G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, J. P. Neto, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 152 (2025).
  18. G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi, and M. Raidal, Phys. Rep. 842, 1 (2020).
  19. G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 203 (2018).
  20. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, arXiv:2406.01705.
  21. P. K. Paul, S. K. Sahoo, and N. Sahu, arXiv:2412.02607.
  22. N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2005) 073.
  23. G. F. Giudice and A. Romanino, Nucl. Phys. B699, 65 (2004); B706, 487(E) (2005).
  24. A. Pierce, Phys. Rev. D 70, 075006 (2004).
  25. C. Cheung, L. J. Hall, D. Pinner, and J. T. Ruderman, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2013) 100.
  26. M. Ibe, Y. Nakayama, and S. Shirai, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 012.
  27. N. Nagata and S. Shirai, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2015) 029.
  28. S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 109, 095045 (2024).
  29. S. P. Martin, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075004 (2025).
  30. K. Griest and D. Seckel, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3191 (1991).
  31. T. Abe and R. Sato, Phys. Rev. D 99, 035012 (2019).
  32. M. Badziak, M. Olechowski, and P. Szczerbiak, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 179.
  33. M. Badziak, M. Olechowski, and P. Szczerbiak, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 050.
  34. T. Han, H. Liu, S. Mukhopadhyay, and X. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 080.
  35. C.-Y. Chen, R. J. Hill, M. P. Solon, and A. M. Wijangco, Phys. Lett. B 781, 473 (2018).
  36. Q. Chen and R. J. Hill, Phys. Lett. B 804, 135364 (2020).
  37. F. Staub, arXiv:0806.0538.
  38. F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1773 (2014).
  39. F. Staub, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 840780 (2015).
  40. A. Vicente, arXiv:1507.06349.
  41. W. Porod and F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2458 (2012).
  42. W. Porod, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153, 275 (2003).
  43. G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov, Comput. Phys. Commun. 299, 109133 (2024).
  44. P. N. Bhattiprolu, E. Petrosky, and A. Pierce, Dataset for singlet-doublet dark matter revisited, 10.7302/27j9-nw17.
  45. L. Calibbi, L. Lopez-Honorez, S. Lowette, and A. Mariotti, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2018) 037.
  46. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  47. C. A. J. O’Hare, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 251802 (2021).
  48. D. S. Akerib et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 101, 052002 (2020).
  49. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  50. D. Tucker-Smith and N. Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 64, 043502 (2001).
  51. P. W. Graham, H. Ramani, and S. S. Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. D 111, 055030 (2025).
  52. S. D. Thomas and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 34 (1998).
  53. T. Nihei, L. Roszkowski, and R. Ruiz de Austri, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2002) 031.
  54. G. Alguero, G. Belanger, S. Kraml, and A. Pukhov, SciPost Phys. 13, 124 (2022).
  55. E. Arganda, M. Carena, M. de los Rios, A. D. Perez, D. Rocha, R. M. Sandá Seoane, and C. E. M. Wagner, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 014.
  56. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rep. 1116, 261 (2025).
  57. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 109, 112001 (2024).
  58. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 031802 (2024).
  59. P. Achard et al. (L3 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 517, 75 (2001).
  60. A. Djouadi, Y. Mambrini, and M. Muhlleitner, Eur. Phys. J. C 20, 563 (2001).
  61. H. E. Haber and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B323, 267 (1989).
  62. S. Baum, M. Carena, T. Ou, D. Rocha, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 037.
  63. J. Kearney and A. Pierce, Phys. Rev. D 88, 095009 (2013); 88, 119902(E) (2013).
  64. D. Binosi and L. Theußl, Comput. Phys. Commun. 161, 76 (2004).
  65. C. R. Harris et al., Nature (London) 585, 357 (2020).
  66. P. Virtanen et al., Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
  67. J. D. Hunter, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90 (2007).
  68. H. K. Dreiner, H. E. Haber, and S. P. Martin, From Spinors to Supersymmetry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2023).
  69. H. K. Dreiner, H. E. Haber, and S. P. Martin, Phys. Rep. 494, 1 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation