Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Running couplings in high-temperature effective field theory

Mikael Chala1,*, Andrii Dashko1,†, and Guilherme Guedes2,‡

  • 1Departamento de Física Teórica y del Cosmos, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain
  • 2CERN, Theoretical Physics Department, Esplanade des Particules 1, Geneva 1211, Switzerland

  • *Contact author: mikael.chala@ugr.es
  • †Contact author: andrii.dashko@ugr.es
  • ‡Contact author: guilherme.guedes@cern.ch

Phys. Rev. D 113, 055026 – Published 16 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ptqg-5g38

Abstract

In this work, we study the renormalization-group evolution of parameters in the three-dimensional effective field theory (3D EFT) that describes the thermally driven electroweak phase transition of the Higgs field. We consider tree-level and radiatively generated barriers induced by beyond the Standard Model physics, enabling a first-order phase transition at and below the soft scale, respectively. For each case, we compute the two-loop running of the 3D EFT couplings, including the effects of the leading nonrenormalizable terms. We then analyze how the new contributions to the beta functions compare with those in the super-renormalizable case, highlighting their impact on perturbative computations of the scalar potential, which describes the vacuum structure of the theory. By incorporating higher-order corrections in the mass parameter evolution, as well as the running of other effective operators, we set the stage for testing their impact on phase transition dynamics in lattice simulations.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (61)

  1. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2887 (1996).
  2. Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, Nature (London) 443, 675 (2006).
  3. C. Caprini et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2020) 024.
  4. C. Caprini, R. Jinno, M. Lewicki, E. Madge, M. Merchand, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Roper Pol, and V. Vaskonen (LISA Cosmology Working Group), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2024) 020.
  5. O. Gould, J. Kozaczuk, L. Niemi, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and D. J. Weir, Phys. Rev. D 100, 115024 (2019).
  6. J. Hirvonen, J. Löfgren, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 135.
  7. J. Löfgren, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 251801 (2023).
  8. A. Ekstedt, O. Gould, and J. Löfgren, Phys. Rev. D 106, 036012 (2022); 110, 019901(E) (2024).
  9. P. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and G. White, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 047.
  10. B. Laurent and J. M. Cline, Phys. Rev. D 106, 023501 (2022).
  11. O. Gould and T. V. I. Tenkanen, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 048.
  12. A. Ekstedt, O. Gould, and J. Hirvonen, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 056.
  13. P. Athron, C. Balázs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris, and L. Wu, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135, 104094 (2024).
  14. A. Dashko and A. Ekstedt, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 024.
  15. A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Phys. Rev. D 110, 096006 (2024).
  16. A. Ekstedt, O. Gould, J. Hirvonen, B. Laurent, L. Niemi, P. Schicho, and J. van de Vis, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 101.
  17. C. Tian, X. Wang, and C. Balázs, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1091 (2025).
  18. L. Niemi and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075034 (2025).
  19. M. Chala, J. C. Criado, L. Gil, and J. L. Miras, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 025.
  20. C. Branchina, A. Conaci, S. De Curtis, and L. Delle Rose, Phys. Rev. D 113, 035024 (2026).
  21. W.-Y. Ai, M. Carosi, B. Garbrecht, C. Tamarit, and M. Vanvlasselaer, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 077.
  22. H. Chen and Y. Jiang, arXiv:2503.00421.
  23. C. Branchina, A. Conaci, S. De Curtis, and L. Delle Rose, Phys. Rev. D 112, 095008 (2025).
  24. F. Bernardo, P. Klose, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 109.
  25. M. Carena, A. Ireland, T. Ou, and I. R. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 175.
  26. M. Chala and G. Guedes, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 085.
  27. M. Chala, L. Gil, and Z. Ren, Chin. Phys. 49, 123105 (2025).
  28. P. Navarrete, R. Paatelainen, K. Seppänen, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2026) 113.
  29. D. Croon, O. Gould, P. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and G. White, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 055.
  30. O. Gould and T. V. I. Tenkanen, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 069.
  31. M. Kierkla, P. Schicho, B. Swiezewska, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and J. van de Vis, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 153.
  32. X.-X. Li, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, T. V. I. Tenkanen, and Y. Wu, arXiv:2506.01585.
  33. P. H. Ginsparg, Nucl. Phys. B170, 388 (1980).
  34. K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Nucl. Phys. B425, 67 (1994).
  35. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Nucl. Phys. B458, 90 (1996).
  36. A. Ekstedt, P. Schicho, and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Comput. Phys. Commun. 288, 108725 (2023).
  37. K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Nucl. Phys. B466, 189 (1996).
  38. T. Biekötter, A. Dashko, M. Löschner, and G. Weiglein, arXiv:2511.14831.
  39. P. Bittar, S. Roy, and C. E. M. Wagner, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 021.
  40. J. O’Dwyer and H. Osborn, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 323, 1859 (2008).
  41. S. Kapoor and S. Prakash, Phys. Rev. D 108, 026002 (2023).
  42. J. Henriksson, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 031.
  43. C. Grojean, G. Servant, and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 71, 036001 (2005).
  44. S. W. Ham and S. K. Oh, Phys. Rev. D 70, 093007 (2004).
  45. P. B. Arnold and O. Espinosa, Phys. Rev. D 47, 3546 (1993); 50, 6662(E) (1994).
  46. E. Camargo-Molina, R. Enberg, and J. Löfgren, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 113.
  47. W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986).
  48. G. Isidori, F. Wilsch, and D. Wyler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 015006 (2024).
  49. M. B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Nucl. Phys. B876, 556 (2013).
  50. A. I. Davydychev and J. B. Tausk, Nucl. Phys. B397, 123 (1993).
  51. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  52. L. F. Abbott, Acta Phys. Pol. B 13, 33 (1982).
  53. T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001).
  54. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 306, 109357 (2025).
  55. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/ptqg-5g38 for the calculated couterterms and beta functions.
  56. M. Laine, Nucl. Phys. B451, 484 (1995).
  57. R. M. Fonseca, P. Olgoso, and J. Santiago, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 135.
  58. H. H. Patel and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2011) 029.
  59. V. Guada, M. Nemevšek, and M. Pintar, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256, 107480 (2020).
  60. K. Farakos, K. Kajantie, K. Rummukainen, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Nucl. Phys. B442, 317 (1995).
  61. G. Guedes and J. Roosmale Nepveu, arXiv:2512.08827.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation