Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Λc(2910) and Λc(2940) productions in π−p scattering process

Quan-Yun Guo1 and Dian-Yong Chen1,2,*

  • *Corresponding author: chendy@seu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 111, 114011 – Published 16 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pplc-7r3c

Abstract

In the present work, we propose to investigate the productions of Λc(2910) and Λc(2940) in the π−p→D−D0p processes by utilizing an effective Lagrangian approach, where Λc(2910) and Λc(2940) are considered as D*N molecular states with JP quantum numbers to be 1/2− and 3/2−, respectively. With the cutoff parameter determined by the upper limit of the cross sections for π−p→D*−Λc(2286), the ratios of the cross sections for π−p→D*−Λc(2286), π−p→D−Λc(2286), π−p→D−Λc(2910), and π−p→D−Λc(2940) are estimated to be 1:4.8:1.42:0.26 at pπ=30  GeV. Considering that the Λc(2910) and Λc(2940) state can further decay into D0p, we estimate the cross sections for π−p→D−D0p process and the differential cross sections depending on the D0p invariant mass spectrum. Our estimations indicate that the total cross sections are (0.49−0.38+1.56)  nb when pπ=15  GeV, where the uncertainties result from the variation of the Λr. By comparing the contributions of the s, u, and t-channels, we conclude that the t-channel plays the predominant role. Moreover, the present estimations suggest that the structure around 2.9 GeV in the D0p invariant mass spectrum of the π−p→D−D0p process should correspond to Λc(2910) rather than Λc(2940), which can be tested by further experimental measurements at J-PARC in the future.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (75)

  1. S. K. Choi et al., Observation of a narrow charmonium-like state in exclusive B±→K±π+π−J/ψ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
  2. S. K. Choi et al., Observation of a resonance-like structure in the π±ψ′ mass distribution in exclusive B→Kπ±ψ′ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 142001 (2008).
  3. S. Uehara et al., Observation of a charmonium-like enhancement in the γγ→ωJ/ψ process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 092001 (2010).
  4. M. Ablikim et al., Observation of a charged charmoniumlike structure in e+e−→π+π−J/ψ at s=4.26  GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001 (2013).
  5. Z. Q. Liu et al., Study of e+e−→π+π−J/ψ and observation of a charged charmoniumlike state at Belle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252002 (2013); 111, 019901(E) (2013).
  6. Roel Aaij et al., Observation of J/ψp resonances consistent with pentaquark states in Λb0→J/ψK−p decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
  7. Roel Aaij et al., Observation of J/ψϕ structures consistent with exotic states from amplitude analysis of B+→J/ψϕK+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 022003 (2017).
  8. Medina Ablikim et al., Precise measurement of the e+e−→π+π−J/ψ cross section at center-of-mass energies from 3.77 to 4.60 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 092001 (2017).
  9. Roel Aaij et al., First observation of excited Ωb− states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 082002 (2020).
  10. Roel Aaij et al., Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark, Nat. Phys. 18, 751 (2022).
  11. Roel Aaij et al., Model-independent evidence for J/ψp contributions to Λb0→J/ψpK− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 082002 (2016).
  12. Roel Aaij et al., Evidence for exotic hadron contributions to Λb0→J/ψpπ− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 082003 (2016); 117, 109902(A) (2016); 118, 119901(A) (2017).
  13. Roel Aaij et al., Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019).
  14. Roel Aaij et al., Evidence of a J/ψΛ structure and observation of excited Ξ− states in the Ξb−→J/ψΛK− decay, Sci. Bull. 66, 1278 (2021).
  15. R. Aaij et al., Observation of a J/ψΛ resonance consistent with a strange pentaquark candidate in B−→J/ψΛp¯ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 031901 (2023).
  16. Hua-Xing Chen, Wei Chen, and Shi-Lin Zhu, Possible interpretations of the Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457), Phys. Rev. D 100, 051501 (2019).
  17. Rui Chen, Zhi-Feng Sun, Xiang Liu, and Shi-Lin Zhu, Strong LHCb evidence supporting the existence of the hidden-charm molecular pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 100, 011502 (2019).
  18. Feng-Kun Guo, Hao-Jie Jing, Ulf-G Meißner, and Shuntaro Sakai, Isospin breaking decays as a diagnosis of the hadronic molecular structure of the Pc(4457), Phys. Rev. D 99, 091501 (2019).
  19. Ming-Zhu Liu, Ya-Wen Pan, Fang-Zheng Peng, Mario Sánchez Sánchez, Li-Sheng Geng, Atsushi Hosaka, and Manuel Pavon Valderrama, Emergence of a complete heavy-quark spin symmetry multiplet: Seven molecular pentaquarks in light of the latest LHCb analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 242001 (2019).
  20. Cheng-Jian Xiao, Yin Huang, Yu-Bing Dong, Li-Sheng Geng, and Dian-Yong Chen, Exploring the molecular scenario of Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457), Phys. Rev. D 100, 014022 (2019).
  21. C. W. Xiao, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Heavy quark spin symmetric molecular states from D¯(*)Σc(*) and other coupled channels in the light of the recent LHCb pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014021 (2019).
  22. Jian-Rong Zhang, Exploring a ΣcD¯ state: With focus on Pc(4312)+, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 1001 (2019).
  23. Zhi-Gang Wang and Xu Wang, Analysis of the strong decays of the Pc(4312) as a pentaquark molecular state with QCD sum rules, Chin. Phys. C 44, 103102 (2020).
  24. Yong-Jiang Xu, Chun-Yu Cui, Yong-Lu Liu, and Ming-Qiu Huang, Partial decay widths of Pc(4312) as a D¯Σc molecular state, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034028 (2020).
  25. T. J. Burns and E. S. Swanson, Molecular interpretation of the Pc(4440) and Pc(4457) states, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114033 (2019).
  26. Yong-Hui Lin and Bing-Song Zou, Strong decays of the latest LHCb pentaquark candidates in hadronic molecule pictures, Phys. Rev. D 100, 056005 (2019).
  27. Jun He and Dian-Yong Chen, Molecular states from Σc(*)D¯(*)−ΛcD¯(*) interaction, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 887 (2019).
  28. Meng-Lin Du, Vadim Baru, Feng-Kun Guo, Christoph Hanhart, Ulf-G Meißner, José A. Oller, and Qian Wang, Interpretation of the LHCb Pc states as hadronic molecules and hints of a narrow Pc(4380), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 072001 (2020).
  29. Guang-Juan Wang, Li-Ye Xiao, Rui Chen, Xiao-Hai Liu, Xiang Liu, and Shi-Lin Zhu, Probing hidden-charm decay properties of Pc states in a molecular scenario, Phys. Rev. D 102, 036012 (2020).
  30. Hao Xu, Qiang Li, Chao-Hsi Chang, and Guo-Li Wang, Recently observed Pc as molecular states and possible mixture of Pc(4457), Phys. Rev. D 101, 054037 (2020).
  31. Yong-Jiang Xu, Yong-Lu Liu, and Ming-Qiu Huang, The magnetic moment of Pc(4312) as a D¯Σc molecular state, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 421 (2021).
  32. Xi-Zhe Ling, Jun-Xu Lu, Ming-Zhu Liu, and Li-Sheng Geng, Pc(4457)→Pc(4312) π/γ in the molecular picture, Phys. Rev. D 104, 074022 (2021).
  33. Kan Chen, Rui Chen, Lu Meng, Bo Wang, and Shi-Lin Zhu, Systematics of the heavy flavor hadronic molecules, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 581 (2022).
  34. Meng-Lin Du, Zhi-Hui Guo, and J. A. Oller, Insights into the nature of the Pcs(4459), Phys. Rev. D 104, 114034 (2021).
  35. Rui Chen and Xiang Liu, Mass behavior of hidden-charm open-strange pentaquarks inspired by the established Pc molecular states, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014029 (2022).
  36. Hong-Wei Ke, Fang Lu, Hai Pang, Xiao-Hai Liu, and Xue-Qian Li, Study on the possible molecular states composed of ΛcD¯*, ΣcD¯*, ΞcD¯* and Ξc′D¯* in the Bethe–Salpeter frame based on the pentaquark states Pc(4440), Pc(4457) and Pcs(4459), Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1074 (2023).
  37. Kai Xu, Kanokphon Phumphan, Wiriya Ruangyoo, Chia-Chu Chen, Ayut Limphirat, and Yupeng Yan, Pc states in the mixture of molecular and pentaquark pictures, Phys. Rev. D 109, 036019 (2024).
  38. Rui Chen, Can the newly reported Pcs(4459) be a strange hidden-charm ΞcD¯* molecular pentaquark?, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054007 (2021).
  39. Rui Chen, Strong decays of the newly Pcs(4459) as a strange hidden-charm ΞcD¯* molecule, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 122 (2021).
  40. Jun-Tao Zhu, Lin-Qing Song, and Jun He, Pcs(4459) and other possible molecular states from Ξc(*)D¯(*) and Ξc′D¯(*) interactions, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074007 (2021).
  41. C. W. Xiao, J. J. Wu, and B. S. Zou, Molecular nature of Pcs(4459) and its heavy quark spin partners, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054016 (2021).
  42. Jun-Xu Lu, Ming-Zhu Liu, Rui-Xiang Shi, and Li-Sheng Geng, Understanding Pcs(4459) as a hadronic molecule in the Ξb−→J/ψΛK− decay, Phys. Rev. D 104, 034022 (2021).
  43. Xiu-Wu Wang and Zhi-Gang Wang, Analysis of Pcs(4338) and related pentaquark molecular states via QCD sum rules, Chin. Phys. C 47, 013109 (2023).
  44. Albert Feijoo, Wen-Fei Wang, Chu-Wen Xiao, Jia-Jun Wu, Eulogio Oset, Juan Nieves, and Bing-Song Zou, A new look at the Pcs states from a molecular perspective, Phys. Lett. B 839, 137760 (2023).
  45. Qi Wu and Dian-Yong Chen, Production of PψsΛ(4338) from Ξb decay, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094003 (2024).
  46. Qi Wu and Dian-Yong Chen, Production of Pc states from Λb decay, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114002 (2019).
  47. Qi Wu, Dian-Yong Chen, and Ran Ji, Production of Pcs(4459) from Ξb decay, Chin. Phys. Lett. 38, 071301 (2021).
  48. Bernard Aubert et al., Observation of a charmed baryon decaying to D0p at a mass near 2.94−GeV/c2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 012001 (2007).
  49. Kazuo Abe et al., Experimental constraints on the possible JP quantum numbers of the Λc(2880)+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 262001 (2007).
  50. Y. B. Li et al., Evidence of a new excited charmed baryon decaying to Σc(2455)0,++π±, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 031901 (2023).
  51. S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  52. Xiao-Gang He, Xue-Qian Li, Xiang Liu, and Xiao-Qiang Zeng, Λc+(2940): A possible molecular state?, Eur. Phys. J. C 51, 883 (2007).
  53. Yubing Dong, Amand Faessler, Thomas Gutsche, and Valery E. Lyubovitskij, Strong two-body decays of the Λc(2940)+ in a hadronic molecule picture, Phys. Rev. D 81, 014006 (2010).
  54. Yubing Dong, Amand Faessler, Thomas Gutsche, S. Kumano, and Valery E. Lyubovitskij, Strong three-body decays of Λc(2940)+, Phys. Rev. D 83, 094005 (2011).
  55. Jun He, Yuan-Tao Ye, Zhi-Feng Sun, and Xiang Liu, The observed charmed hadron Λc(2940)+ and the D*N interaction, Phys. Rev. D 82, 114029 (2010).
  56. Jian-Rong Zhang, S-wave D(*)N molecular states: Σc(2800) and Λc(2940)+?, Phys. Rev. D 89, 096006 (2014).
  57. Zi-Li Yue, Quan-Yun Guo, and Dian-Yong Chen, Strong decays of the Λc(2910) and Λc(2940) in the ND* molecular frame, Phys. Rev. D 109, 094049 (2024).
  58. Bo Wang, Lu Meng, and Shi-Lin Zhu, D(*)N interaction and the structure of Σc(2800) and Λc(2940) in chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094035 (2020).
  59. Qi Xin, Xiao-Song Yang, and Zhi-Gang Wang, The singly charmed pentaquark molecular states via the QCD sum rules, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 38, 2350123 (2023).
  60. Ye Yan, Xiaohuang Hu, Yuheng Wu, Hongxia Huang, Jialun Ping, and Youchang Yang, Pentaquark interpretation of Λc states in the quark model, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 524 (2023).
  61. Jun He, Zhen Ouyang, Xiang Liu, and Xue-Qian Li, Production of charmed baryon Λc(2940)+ at PANDA, Phys. Rev. D 84, 114010 (2011).
  62. Yubing Dong, Amand Faessler, Thomas Gutsche, and Valery E. Lyubovitskij, Role of the hadron molecule Λc(2940) in the pp¯ßD0Λ¯c(2286) annihilation reaction, Phys. Rev. D 90, 094001 (2014).
  63. Xiao-Yun Wang, Alexey Guskov, and Xu-Rong Chen, Λc*(2940)+ photoproduction off the neutron, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094032 (2015).
  64. Kazuya Aoki et al., Extension of the J-PARC hadron experimental facility: Third white paper, arXiv:2110.04462.
  65. Ju-Jun Xie, Yu-Bing Dong, and Xu Cao, Role of the Λc+(2940) in the π−p→D−D0p reaction close to threshold, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034029 (2015).
  66. J. H. Christenson, E. Hummel, G. A. Kreiter, J. Sculli, and P. Yamin, Limits on charm production in hadronic interactions near threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 154 (1985).
  67. Yubing Dong, Amand Faessler, Thomas Gutsche, S. Kumano, and Valery E. Lyubovitskij, Radiative decay of Λc(2940)+ in a hadronic molecule picture, Phys. Rev. D 82, 034035 (2010).
  68. Sang-Ho Kim, Atsushi Hosaka, Hyun-Chul Kim, and Hiroyuki Noumi, Production of strange and charmed baryons in pion induced reactions, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094021 (2015).
  69. Dian-Yong Chen and Xiang Liu, Predicted charged charmonium-like structures in the hidden-charm dipion decay of higher charmonia, Phys. Rev. D 84, 034032 (2011).
  70. W. Liu, C. M. Ko, and Z. W. Lin, Cross-section for charmonium absorption by nucleons, Phys. Rev. C 65, 015203 (2002).
  71. S. Okubo, SU(4), SU(8) mass formulas and weak interactions, Phys. Rev. D 11, 3261 (1975).
  72. Benjamin C. Jackson, Yongseok Oh, H. Haberzettl, and K. Nakayama, K¯+N→K+Ξ reaction and S=−1 hyperon resonances, Phys. Rev. C 91, 065208 (2015).
  73. Yong-seok Oh, Taesoo Song, and Su Houng Lee, J/ψ absorption by π and ρ mesons in meson exchange model with anomalous parity interactions, Phys. Rev. C 63, 034901 (2001).
  74. Steven Weinberg, Evidence that the deuteron is not an elementary particle, Phys. Rev. 137, B672 (1965).
  75. V. Baru, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, Yu. Kalashnikova, and Alexander Evgenyevich Kudryavtsev, Evidence that the a0(980) and f0(980) are not elementary particles, Phys. Lett. B 586, 53 (2004).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation