Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Cosmic birefringence from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 6

Patricia Diego-Palazuelos1,* and Eiichiro Komatsu1,2,3

  • *Contact author: diegop@MPA-Garching.MPG.DE

Phys. Rev. D 113, L101302 – Published 8 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/pbc3-t52s

Abstract

The polarized light of the cosmic microwave background is sensitive to new physics that violates parity symmetry. For example, the interaction of photons with the fields of elusive dark matter and dark energy could cause a uniform rotation of the plane of linear polarization across the sky, an effect known as cosmic birefringence. We extract the cosmological rotation angle, β, using Bayesian analysis of parity-violating correlations, EB and TB, of polarization data from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) Data Release 6. We use prior probabilities for instrumental miscalibration angles derived from the optics model for the ACT telescope and instruments, and marginalize over a residual intensity-to-polarization leakage. We measure β=0.215°±0.074° (68% confidence level), which excludes β=0 with a statistical significance of 2.9σ. Although there remain systematics in the ACT data that are not understood and do not allow us to draw strong cosmological conclusions, this result is consistent with previous independent results from the WMAP and Planck missions. It is suggestive that independent data sets and analyses using different methodologies have yielded the same sign and comparable magnitudes for β.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (43)

  1. S. Weinberg, Cosmology (Oxford University Press, New York, 2008).
  2. E. Komatsu, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 452 (2022).
  3. T. Lee and C.-N. Yang, Phys. Rev. 104, 254 (1956).
  4. C. S. Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes, and R. P. Hudson, Phys. Rev. 105, 1413 (1957).
  5. S. M. Carroll, G. B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990).
  6. S. M. Carroll and G. B. Field, Phys. Rev. D 43, 3789 (1991).
  7. D. Harari and P. Sikivie, Phys. Lett. B 289, 67 (1992).
  8. A. Lue, L.-M. Wang, and M. Kamionkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1506 (1999).
  9. M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky, and A. Stebbins, Phys. Rev. D 55, 7368 (1997).
  10. M. Zaldarriaga and U. Seljak, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1830 (1997).
  11. B. Feng, H. Li, M. Li, and X. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 620, 27 (2005).
  12. E. Y. S. Wu et al. (QUaD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 161302 (2009).
  13. N. J. Miller, M. Shimon, and B. G. Keating, Phys. Rev. D 79, 103002 (2009).
  14. Y. Minami, H. Ochi, K. Ichiki, N. Katayama, E. Komatsu, and T. Matsumura, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 083E02 (2019).
  15. Y. Minami, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 063E01 (2020).
  16. Y. Minami and E. Komatsu, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 103E02 (2020).
  17. Y. Minami and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 221301 (2020).
  18. P. Diego-Palazuelos et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 091302 (2022).
  19. J. R. Eskilt, Astron. Astrophys. 662, A10 (2022).
  20. J. R. Eskilt and E. Komatsu, Phys. Rev. D 106, 063503 (2022).
  21. P. Diego-Palazuelos et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2023) 044.
  22. J. R. Eskilt et al. (Cosmoglobe Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 679, A144 (2023).
  23. S. E. Clark, C.-G. Kim, J. C. Hill, and B. S. Hensley, Astrophys. J. 919, 53 (2021).
  24. C. Hervías-Caimapo, A. J. Cukierman, P. Diego-Palazuelos, K. M. Huffenberger, and S. E. Clark, Phys. Rev. D 111, 083532 (2025).
  25. T. Louis et al. (ACT Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 062.
  26. C. C. Murphy et al., Appl. Opt. 63, 5079 (2024).
  27. S. Naess et al. (ACT Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 061.
  28. Z. Atkins et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2025) 015.
  29. A. Duivenvoorden et al. (to be published).
  30. E. Komatsu et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 192, 18 (2011).
  31. B. Keating, M. Shimon, and A. Yadav, Astrophys. J. 762, L23 (2012).
  32. K. M. Huffenberger, A. Rotti, and D. C. Collins, Astrophys. J. 899, 31 (2020).
  33. E. de la Hoz, P. Diego-Palazuelos, E. Martínez-González, P. Vielva, R. B. Barreiro, and J. D. Bilbao-Ahedo, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2022) 032.
  34. Planck Collaboration Int. XLIX, Astron. Astrophys. 596, A110 (2016).
  35. R. M. Sullivan, A. Abghari, P. Diego-Palazuelos, L. T. Hergt, and D. Scott, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 06 (2025) 025.
  36. G. Hinshaw et al. (WMAP Collaboration), Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 208, 19 (2013).
  37. Planck Collaboration Int. LVII, Astron. Astrophys. 643, A42 (2020).
  38. P. A. R. Ade et al. (BICEP/Keck Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 111, 063505 (2025).
  39. G. Coppi et al., Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 279, 30 (2025).
  40. M. Murata et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 94, 124502 (2023).
  41. C. R. Harris et al., Nature (London) 585, 357 (2020).
  42. J. D. Hunter, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90 (2007).
  43. A. Lewis, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2025) 025.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation