Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Fermion-portal dark matter at a high-energy muon collider

Pouya Asadi1,*, Samuel Homiller2,†, Aria Radick1,‡, and Tien-Tien Yu1,§

  • 1Institute for Fundamental Science and Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA
  • 2Laboratory for Elementary Particle Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

  • *Contact author: pasadi@uoregon.edu
  • †Contact author: shomiller@cornell.edu
  • ‡Contact author: aradick@uoregon.edu
  • §Contact author: tientien@uoregon.edu

Phys. Rev. D 112, 055038 – Published 26 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p7p8-wqqb

Abstract

In this work, we provide a comprehensive study of fermion-portal dark matter models in the freeze-in regime at a future muon collider. For different possible nonsinglet fermion portals, we calculate the upper bound on the mediator’s mass arising from the relic abundance calculation and discuss the reach of a future muon collider in probing their viable parameter space in prompt and long-lived particle search strategies. In particular, we develop rudimentary search strategies in the prompt region and show that cuts on the invariant dilepton or dijet masses, the missing transverse mass MT2, pseudorapidity and energy of leptons or jets, and the opening angle between the lepton or the jet pair can be employed to subtract the Standard Model background. In the long-lived particle regime, we discuss the signals of each model and calculate their event counts. In this region, the lepton-(quark-)portal model signal consists of charged tracks (R-hadrons) that either decay in the detector to give rise to a displaced lepton (jet) signature, or are detector stable and give rise to heavy stable charged track signals. As a byproduct, a pipeline is developed for including the nontrivial parton distribution function of a muon component inside a muon beam; it is shown that this leads to nontrivial effects on the kinematic distributions and attainable significances. We also highlight phenomenological features of all models unique to a muon collider and hope our results, for this motivated and broad class of dark matter models, inform the design of a future muon collider detector. We also speculate on suggestions for improving the sensitivity of a muon collider detector to long-lived particle signals in fermion-portal models.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (115)

  1. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, Dark matter, arXiv:2406.01705.
  2. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Secluded WIMP dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008).
  3. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Fermion portal dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 171.
  4. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Lepton portal dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2014) 153.
  5. P. Agrawal, S. Blanchet, Z. Chacko, and C. Kilic, Flavored dark matter, and its implications for direct detection and colliders, Phys. Rev. D 86, 055002 (2012).
  6. B. Batell, T. Lin, and L.-T. Wang, Flavored dark matter and R-parity violation, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2014) 075.
  7. P. Agrawal, B. Batell, D. Hooper, and T. Lin, Flavored dark matter and the galactic center gamma-ray excess, Phys. Rev. D 90, 063512 (2014).
  8. P. Agrawal, M. Blanke, and K. Gemmler, Flavored dark matter beyond minimal flavor violation, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 072.
  9. P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko, C. Kilic, and C. B. Verhaaren, A couplet from flavored dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2015) 072.
  10. P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko, E. C. F. S. Fortes, and C. Kilic, Skew-flavored dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 93, 103510 (2016).
  11. P. Agrawal, C. Kilic, S. Swaminathan, and C. Trendafilova, Secretly asymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 95, 015031 (2017).
  12. N. Desai, C. Kilic, Y.-P. Yang, and T. Youn, Suppressed flavor violation in lepton flavored dark matter from an extra dimension, Phys. Rev. D 101, 075043 (2020).
  13. H. Acaroğlu, P. Agrawal, and M. Blanke, Lepton-flavoured scalar dark matter in dark minimal flavour violation, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 106.
  14. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson, and M. Luty, Effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D 89, 015011 (2014).
  15. S. Chang, R. Edezhath, J. Hutchinson, and M. Luty, Leptophilic effective WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D 90, 015011 (2014).
  16. A. DiFranzo, K. I. Nagao, A. Rajaraman, and T. M. P. Tait, Simplified models for dark matter interacting with quarks, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 014.
  17. M. Garny, A. Ibarra, S. Rydbeck, and S. Vogl, Majorana dark matter with a coloured Mediator: Collider vs direct and indirect searches, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 169.
  18. J. A. Evans and J. Shelton, Long-lived staus and displaced leptons at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 056.
  19. M. Garny and J. Heisig, Interplay of super-WIMP and freeze-in production of dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 98, 095031 (2018).
  20. L. Calibbi, F. D’Eramo, S. Junius, L. Lopez-Honorez, and A. Mariotti, Displaced new physics at colliders and the early universe before its first second, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 234.
  21. G. D’Ambrosio, S. Chatterjee, R. Laha, and S. K. Vempati, Freezing in with lepton flavored fermions, SciPost Phys. 11, 006 (2021).
  22. A. Hamze, C. Kilic, J. Koeller, C. Trendafilova, and J.-H. Yu, Lepton-flavored asymmetric dark matter and interference in direct detection, Phys. Rev. D 91, 035009 (2015).
  23. C. Dessert, C. Kilic, C. Trendafilova, and Y. Tsai, Addressing astrophysical and cosmological problems with secretly asymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 100, 015029 (2019).
  24. C. M. Ankenbrandt et al., Status of muon collider research and development and future plans, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 2, 081001 (1999).
  25. M.-H. Wang, Y. Nosochkov, Y. Cai, and M. Palmer, Design of a 6 TeV muon collider, J. Instrum. 11, P09003 (2016).
  26. M. Boscolo, J.-P. Delahaye, and M. Palmer, The future prospects of muon colliders and neutrino factories, Rev. Accel. Sci. Techol. 10, 189 (2019).
  27. D. Neuffer and V. Shiltsev, On the feasibility of a pulsed 14 TeV c.m.e. muon collider in the LHC tunnel, J. Instrum. 13, T10003 (2018).
  28. J. P. Delahaye, M. Diemoz, K. Long, B. Mansoulié, N. Pastrone, L. Rivkin, D. Schulte, A. Skrinsky, and A. Wulzer, Muon colliders, arXiv:1901.06150.
  29. V. Shiltsev and F. Zimmermann, Modern and future colliders, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015006 (2021).
  30. J. de Blas et al. (Muon Collider Collaboration), The physics case of a 3 TeV Muon Collider stage, arXiv:2203.07261.
  31. S. Jindariani et al. (Muon Collider Collaboration), Promising technologies and R&D directions for the future Muon Collider detectors, arXiv:2203.07224.
  32. D. Stratakis et al. (Muon Collider Collaboration), A Muon Collider facility for physics discovery, arXiv:2203.08033.
  33. N. Bartosik et al. (Muon Collider Collaboration), Simulated detector performance at the Muon Collider, arXiv:2203.07964.
  34. K. M. Black et al., Muon Collider forum report, J. Instrum. 19, T02015 (2024).
  35. C. Accettura et al., Towards a muon Collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 864 (2023).
  36. C. Accettura et al.(International Muon Collider Collaboration), Interim report for the International Muon Collider Collaboration (IMCC), CERN Yellow Rep. Monogr. 2/2024, 1 (2024).
  37. Y. Hamada, R. Kitano, R. Matsudo, H. Takaura, and M. Yoshida, μTRISTAN, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 053B02 (2022).
  38. C. Accettura et al. (MuCoL Collaboration), MuCol milestone report No. 5: Preliminary parameters, arXiv:2411.02966.
  39. P. Asadi, A. Radick, and T.-T. Yu, Interplay of freeze-in and freeze-out: Lepton-flavored dark matter and muon colliders, Phys. Rev. D 110, 035022 (2024).
  40. L. Covi, J. E. Kim, and L. Roszkowski, Axinos as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4180 (1999).
  41. J. L. Feng, A. Rajaraman, and F. Takayama, Superweakly interacting massive particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 011302 (2003).
  42. J. L. Feng, A. Rajaraman, and F. Takayama, SuperWIMP dark matter signals from the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 68, 063504 (2003).
  43. J. McDonald, Gauge singlet scalars as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3637 (1994).
  44. L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell, and S. M. West, Freeze-in production of FIMP dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 080.
  45. T. Han, Y. Ma, and K. Xie, High energy leptonic collisions and electroweak parton distribution functions, Phys. Rev. D 103, L031301 (2021).
  46. T. Han, Y. Ma, and K. Xie, Quark and gluon contents of a lepton at high energies, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 154.
  47. H. Al Ali et al., The muon Smasher’s guide, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 084201 (2022).
  48. F. Garosi, D. Marzocca, and S. Trifinopoulos, LePDF: Standard model PDFs for high-energy lepton colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 107.
  49. S. Frixione and G. Stagnitto, The muon parton distribution functions, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 170.
  50. D. Marzocca and A. Stanzione, On the impact of the mixed Z/γ PDF at muon colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 171.
  51. R. Ruiz, A. Costantini, F. Maltoni, and O. Mattelaer, The effective vector boson approximation in high-energy muon collisions, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 114.
  52. J. Kile and A. Soni, Flavored dark matter in direct detection experiments and at LHC, Phys. Rev. D 84, 035016 (2011).
  53. H. An, L.-T. Wang, and H. Zhang, Dark matter with t-channel mediator: A simple step beyond contact interaction, Phys. Rev. D 89, 115014 (2014).
  54. A. Ibarra, T. Toma, M. Totzauer, and S. Wild, Sharp gamma-ray spectral features from scalar dark matter annihilations, Phys. Rev. D 90, 043526 (2014).
  55. C. Kilic, M. D. Klimek, and J.-H. Yu, Signatures of top flavored dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054036 (2015).
  56. F. Bishara, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik, E. Stamou, and J. Zupan, Dark matter and gauged flavor symmetries, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 130.
  57. M. Blanke, S. Das, and S. Kast, Flavoured dark matter moving left, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2018) 105.
  58. W. Chao, H.-K. Guo, H.-L. Li, and J. Shu, Electron flavored dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 782, 517 (2018).
  59. L. Darmé, S. A. R. Ellis, and T. You, Light dark sectors through the fermion portal, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 053.
  60. T. N. Maity, A. K. Saha, S. Mondal, and R. Laha, Neutrinos from the Sun can discover dark matter-electron scattering, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023025 (2025).
  61. A. Das, T. Herbermann, M. Sen, and V. Takhistov, Energy-dependent boosted dark matter from diffuse supernova neutrino background, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 045.
  62. B. Batell, J. Pradler, and M. Spannowsky, Dark matter from minimal flavor violation, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2011) 038.
  63. M.-C. Chen, J. Huang, and V. Takhistov, Beyond minimal lepton flavored dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2016) 060.
  64. J. Kile, A. Kobach, and A. Soni, Lepton-flavored dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 744, 330 (2015).
  65. J. Kawamura, S. Okawa, and Y. Omura, Current status and muon g−2 explanation of lepton portal dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 042.
  66. Y. Bai and J. Berger, Muon g−2 in lepton portal dark matter, arXiv:2104.03301.
  67. J. Kawamura, S. Okawa, and Y. Omura, W boson mass and muon g-2 in a lepton portal dark matter model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 015005 (2022).
  68. H. Acaroğlu, M. Blanke, and M. Tabet, Opening the Higgs portal to lepton-flavoured dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 079.
  69. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  70. F. D’Eramo and A. Lenoci, Lower mass bounds on FIMP dark matter produced via freeze-in, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2021) 045.
  71. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for long-lived, massive particles in events with displaced vertices and missing transverse momentum in s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 97, 052012 (2018).
  72. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in s=13  TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 123 (2020).
  73. CMS Collaboration et al., Search for supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 244.
  74. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Searches for physics beyond the standard model with the MT2 variable in hadronic final states with and without disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 3 (2020).
  75. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 139  fb−1 of s=13  TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2021) 143.
  76. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for supersymmetry in final states with two oppositely charged same-flavor leptons and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2021) 123.
  77. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for displaced leptons in s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 051802 (2021).
  78. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for heavy, long-lived, charged particles with large ionisation energy loss in pp collisions at s=13  TeV using the ATLAS experiment and the full Run 2 dataset, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 158.
  79. ATLAS Collaboration, Search for heavy, long lived charged particles with large specific ionisation, low-β in 140  fb−1 of p p collisions at s=13  TeV using the ATLAS experiment.
  80. CMS Collaboration, Search for heavy long-lived charged particles with large ionization energy loss in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, tech. rep., CERN Report No. CMS-PAS-EXO-18-002, Geneva, 2024. https://cds.cern.ch/record/2893595.
  81. M. Cirelli, N. Fornengo, and A. Strumia, Minimal dark matter, Nucl. Phys. B753, 178 (2006).
  82. ATLAS Collaboration, SUSY July 2024 summary plot update, tech. rep., CERN Report No. ATL-PHYS-PUB-2024-014, Geneva, 2024. http://cds.cern.ch/record/2904978. All figures including auxiliary figures are available at https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PUBNOTES/ATL-PHYS-PUB-2024-014.
  83. G. R. Farrar and P. Fayet, Phenomenology of the production, decay, and detection of new hadronic states associated with aupersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 76, 575 (1978).
  84. S. Dimopoulos, M. Dine, S. Raby, and S. D. Thomas, Experimental signatures of low-energy gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3494 (1996).
  85. K. R. Dienes, D. Kim, T. T. Leininger, and B. Thomas, Sequential displaced vertices: Novel collider signature for long-lived particles, Phys. Rev. D 106, 095012 (2022).
  86. J. Chen, T. Han, and B. Tweedie, Electroweak splitting functions and high energy showering, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 093.
  87. C. W. Bauer and B. R. Webber, Polarization effects in standard model parton distributions at very high energies, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 013.
  88. A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordström, B. Page, M. Rüfenacht, M. Schönherr, and G. Watt, lhapdf6: Parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 132 (2015).
  89. M. Ciafaloni, P. Ciafaloni, and D. Comelli, Electroweak double logarithms in inclusive observables for a generic initial state, Phys. Lett. B 501, 216 (2001).
  90. P. Ciafaloni and D. Comelli, Electroweak evolution equations, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2005) 022.
  91. D. Buarque Franzosi, O. Mattelaer, R. Ruiz, and S. Shil, Automated predictions from polarized matrix elements, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2020) 082.
  92. S. Frixione, Initial conditions for electron and photon structure and fragmentation functions, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 158.
  93. V. Bertone, M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, and G. Stagnitto, The partonic structure of the electron at the next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy in QED, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 135.
  94. S. Frixione, On factorisation schemes for the electron parton distribution functions in QED, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 180.
  95. V. Bertone, M. Cacciari, S. Frixione, G. Stagnitto, M. Zaro, and X. Zhao, Improving methods and predictions at high-energy e+e− colliders within collinear factorisation, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 089.
  96. C. G. Lester and D. J. Summers, Measuring masses of semiinvisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B 463, 99 (1999).
  97. N. Alipour Tehrani et al. (CLICdp Collaboration), CLICdet: The post-CDR CLIC detector model.
  98. G. Aarons et al. (ILC Collaboration), ILC reference design report Volume 4—Detectors, arXiv:0712.2356.
  99. N. Arkani-Hamed and S. Dimopoulos, Supersymmetric unification without low energy supersymmetry and signatures for fine-tuning at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2005) 073.
  100. R. Capdevilla, F. Meloni, and J. Zurita, Discovering electroweak interacting dark matter at Muon Colliders using soft tracks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 181802 (2025).
  101. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 103, 112006 (2021).
  102. CMS Collaboration, Search for new particles in events with energetic jets and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV.
  103. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Constraints on dark matter models involving an s-channel mediator with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at s=13  TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1102 (2024).
  104. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment, Phys. Rep. 1115, 448 (2025).
  105. T. Han, Z. Liu, L.-T. Wang, and X. Wang, WIMPs at high energy Muon Colliders, Phys. Rev. D 103, 075004 (2021).
  106. M. Ruhdorfer, E. Salvioni, and A. Wulzer, Why detect forward muons at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 111, 053010 (2025).
  107. R. Capdevilla, F. Meloni, R. Simoniello, and J. Zurita, Hunting wino and higgsino dark matter at the muon collider with disappearing tracks, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 133.
  108. ATLAS Collaboration, Generation and simulation of R-hadrons in the ATLAS experiment.
  109. A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, A. Pierce, S. Rajendran, and J. G. Wacker, Stopping gluinos, Phys. Rev. D 76, 055007 (2007).
  110. Y. Gershtein and S. Knapen, Trigger strategy for displaced muon pairs following the CMS phase II upgrades, Phys. Rev. D 101, 032003 (2020).
  111. Y. Gershtein, S. Knapen, and D. Redigolo, Probing naturally light singlets with a displaced vertex trigger, Phys. Lett. B 823, 136758 (2021).
  112. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), The phase-2 upgrade of the CMS tracker.
  113. A. Zabi, J. W. Berryhill, E. Perez, and A. D. Tapper (CMS Collaboration), The phase-2 upgrade of the CMS level-1 trigger.
  114. C. Aimè, S. Calzaferri, M. Casarsa, D. Fiorina, C. Riccardi, P. Salvini, N. Valle, I. Vai, and P. Vitulo (Muon Collider Physics and Detector Working Group Collaboration), Muon detector for a Muon Collider, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1046, 167800 (2023).
  115. https://github.com/ariaradick/fermportal_DM

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation