Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Deep neural network extraction of unpolarized transverse momentum distributions

I. P. Fernando* and D. Keller†

  • *Contact author: ishara@virginia.edu
  • †Contact author: dustin@virginia.edu

Phys. Rev. D 113, 096017 – Published 22 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p3sg-k524

Abstract

Building on the first-ever application of neural networks in transverse momentum distribution (TMD) phenomenology—“Extraction of the Sivers function with deep neural networks”—we now present a momentum-space, physics-informed deep-learning framework for the direct extraction of unpolarized transverse-momentum-dependent parton distribution functions (TMDs) from fixed-target Drell-Yan data (E288, E605). Rather than transforming to impact-parameter space, we remain in k⊥ and embed a normalized integrand s(x,k⊥;Q) whose autoconvolution produces the observed qT spectra. We introduce two phenomenological objects in this data-driven approach: the transverse structure kernel S(qT,x1,x2;Q) and the intrinsic-transverse-momentum profile s(x,k⊥;Q). The extraction proceeds in two steps. Stage I learns the structure kernel S(qT,x1,x2;QM) by regressing the cross section with known kinematic prefactors and charge-weighted parton distribution function (PDF) combinations factored out; experimental and PDF uncertainties are propagated with Monte Carlo replicas. Stage II reconstructs s(x,k⊥;Q) with an end-to-end differentiable k⊥ quadrature layer. Applied to Fermilab cross-section data from experiments E288 and E605, the method reproduces the measured qT spectra across the QM bins and yields x- and Q-dependent TMDs that broaden with Q, with uncertainty bands that consistently propagate experimental, PDF, algorithmic, and methodological components. The approach is minimally biased (no factorized Ansätze and no bT transform) and provides a transferable template for polarized TMDs and related quantum chromodynamics inverse problems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (80)

  1. X. Ji, Gauge-invariant decomposition of nucleon spin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 610 (1997).
  2. X. Ji, J.-P. Ma, and F. Yuan, Transverse-momentum-dependent gluon distributions and semi-inclusive processes at hadron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2005) 020.
  3. R. Boussarie et al., TMD handbook, arXiv:2304.03302.
  4. X. Ji, J.-P. Ma, and F. Yuan, QCD factorization for spin-dependent cross sections in DIS and Drell–Yan processes at low transverse momentum, Phys. Lett. B 597, 299 (2004).
  5. X. Ji, J.-P. Ma, and F. Yuan, QCD factorization for semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at low transverse momentum, Phys. Rev. D 71, 034005 (2005).
  6. A. Vladimirov, V. Moos, and I. Scimemi, Transverse momentum dependent operator expansion at next-to-leading power, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2022) 110.
  7. J.-Y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill, and I. Z. Rothstein, A formalism for the systematic treatment of rapidity logarithms in quantum field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2012) 084.
  8. M. G. Echevarría, A. Idilbi, and I. Scimemi, Factorization theorem for Drell-Yan at low qT and transverse-momentum distributions on-the-light-cone, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 002.
  9. T. Becher and M. Neubert, Drell–Yan production at small qt, transverse parton distributions and the collinear anomaly, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1665 (2011).
  10. J. C. Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011).
  11. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. Sterman, Factorization of hard processes in QCD, in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics, edited by A. H. Mueller (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), pp. 1–91.
  12. J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Back-to-back jets: Fourier transform from b to kt, Nucl. Phys. B197, 446 (1982).
  13. J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Back-to-back jets in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B193, 381 (1981).
  14. J. C. Collins and D. E. Soper, Erratum: Back-to-back jets in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B213, 545 (1983).
  15. M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, J. O. Gonzalez Hernandez, S. Melis, and A. Prokudin, Unpolarized transverse momentum dependent distribution and fragmentation functions from SIDIS multiplicities, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 005.
  16. A. Bacchetta, F. Delcarro, C. Pisano, M. Radici, and A. Signori, Extraction of partonic transverse momentum distributions from semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering, Drell–Yan and Z-boson production, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 081.
  17. V. Bertone, I. Scimemi, and A. Vladimirov, Extraction of unpolarized quark transverse-momentum-dependent parton distributions from Drell–Yan/Z-boson production, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 028.
  18. I. Scimemi and A. Vladimirov, Nonperturbative structure of semi-inclusive deep-inelastic and Drell–Yan scattering at small transverse momentum, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 137.
  19. A. Vladimirov, Pion-induced Drell–Yan processes within TMD factorization, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 090.
  20. M. Bury, F. Hautmann, S. Leal-Gomez, I. Scimemi, A. Vladimirov, and P. Zurita, PDF bias and flavor dependence in TMD distributions, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 118.
  21. V. Moos, I. Scimemi, A. Vladimirov, and P. Zurita, Extraction of unpolarized transverse-momentum distributions from the fit of Drell–Yan data at N4LL, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 036.
  22. A. Bacchetta, V. Bertone, C. Bissolotti, G. Bozzi, F. Delcarro, F. Piacenza, M. Radici, and A. Signori (MAP Collaboration), Unpolarized transverse-momentum distributions from a global fit of Drell–Yan and semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering data, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 127.
  23. M. Boglione, J. O. Gonzalez-Hernandez, and A. Simonelli, Transverse-momentum-dependent fragmentation functions from recent BELLE data, Phys. Rev. D 106, 074024 (2022).
  24. P. C. Barry, L. Gamberg, W. Melnitchouk, E. Moffat, D. Pitonyak, A. Prokudin, and N. Sato, Tomography of pions and protons via transverse-momentum-dependent distributions, Phys. Rev. D 108, L091504 (2023).
  25. M. Boglione and A. Simonelli, Full treatment of the thrust distribution in single inclusive e+e−→hX processes, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2023) 006.
  26. A. Bacchetta, V. Bertone, C. Bissolotti, G. Bozzi, M. Cerutti, F. Delcarro, M. Radici, L. Rossi, and A. Signori (MAP Collaboration), Flavor dependence of unpolarized quark transverse-momentum distributions from a global fit, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2024) 232.
  27. F. Aslan, M. Boglione, J. O. Gonzalez-Hernandez, T. Rainaldi, T. C. Rogers, and A. Simonelli, Phenomenology of TMD parton distributions in Drell–Yan and Z0 boson production in a hadron-structure–oriented approach, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074016 (2024).
  28. A. Bacchetta, V. Bertone, C. Bissolotti, M. Cerutti, M. Radici, S. Rodini, and L. Rossi, Neural-network extraction of unpolarized transverse-momentum-dependent distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 021904 (2025).
  29. V. Moos, I. Scimemi, A. Vladimirov, and P. Zurita, Determination of unpolarized TMD distributions from the fit of Drell–Yan and SIDIS data at N4LL, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 134.
  30. P. C. Barry, A. Prokudin, T. Anderson, C. Cocuzza, L. Gamberg, W. Melnitchouk, E. Moffat, D. Pitonyak, J. W. Qiu, N. Sato, A. Vladimirov, and R. M. Whitehill, First simultaneous analysis of transverse-momentum-dependent and collinear parton distributions in the proton, arXiv:2510.13771.
  31. M. Cerutti, L. Rossi, S. Venturini, A. Bacchetta, V. Bertone, C. Bissolotti, and M. Radici (MAP Collaboration), Extraction of pion transverse momentum distributions from Drell-Yan data, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014014 (2023).
  32. L. Rossi et al., New insights from the flavor dependence of quark transverse momentum distributions in the pion, arXiv:2509.25098.
  33. M. Bury, A. Prokudin, and A. Vladimirov, Extraction of the Sivers function from SIDIS, Drell–Yan, and W±/Z-boson production data with TMD evolution, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2021) 151.
  34. M. Bury, A. Prokudin, and A. Vladimirov, Extraction of the Sivers function from SIDIS, Drell–Yan, and W±/Z data at next-to-next-to-next-to leading order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 112002 (2021).
  35. M. Horstmann, A. Schäfer, and A. Vladimirov, Study of the worm-gear-t function g1T with semi-inclusive DIS data, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034016 (2023).
  36. K. Yang, T. Liu, P. Sun, Y. Zhao, and B.-Q. Ma, First extraction of transverse-momentum dependent helicity distributions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 121902 (2025).
  37. J.-C. He, M.-H. Chu, J. Hua, X. Ji, A. Schäfer, Y. Su, W. Wang, Y.-B. Yang, J.-H. Zhang, and Q.-A. Zhang (Lattice Parton Collaboration (LPC), Unpolarized transverse momentum dependent parton distributions of the nucleon from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114513 (2024).
  38. D. Boer et al., Gluons and the quark sea at high energies: Distributions, polarization, tomography, https://arxiv.org/abs/1108.1713.
  39. A. Accardi et al., Electron-ion collider: The next QCD frontier, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 268 (2016).
  40. R. Abdul Khalek et al., Science requirements and detector concepts for the electron-ion collider, Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022).
  41. J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. Sterman, Transverse momentum distribution in Drell–Yan pair and W and Z boson production, Nucl. Phys. B 250, 199 (1985).
  42. I. Scimemi and A. Vladimirov, Analysis of vector boson production within TMD factorization, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 89 (2018).
  43. A. Bacchetta, A. Bongallino, M. Cerutti, M. Radici, and L. Rossi, Exploring the three-dimensional momentum distribution of longitudinally polarized quarks in the proton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 121901 (2025).
  44. M. G. Echevarría, Z.-B. Kang, A. Prokudin, and I. Vitev, QCD evolution of the Sivers asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 89, 074013 (2014).
  45. A. Bacchetta, F. Delcarro, C. Pisano, and M. Radici, The three-dimensional distribution of quarks in momentum space, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136961 (2022).
  46. Z.-B. Kang, A. Prokudin, P. Sun, and F. Yuan, Extraction of quark Sivers functions from SIDIS data with QCD evolution, Phys. Rev. D 93, 014009 (2016).
  47. M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin, and C. Turk, Transversity and Collins functions from SIDIS and e+e− data, Phys. Rev. D 75, 054032 (2007).
  48. M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, S. Melis, F. Murgia, and A. Prokudin, Simultaneous extraction of transversity and collins functions from SIDIS and e+e− data, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094019 (2013).
  49. Z.-B. Kang, A. Prokudin, P. Sun, and F. Yuan, Nucleon tensor charge from Collins azimuthal asymmetry measurements, Phys. Rev. D 91, 071501 (2015).
  50. W. Vogelsang and F. Yuan, Single-transverse-spin asymmetries: From deep inelastic scattering to hadronic collisions, Phys. Rev. D 72, 054028 (2005).
  51. P. Schweitzer, T. Teckentrup, and A. Metz, Intrinsic transverse parton momenta in deeply inelastic reactions, Phys. Rev. D 81, 094019 (2010).
  52. M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia, and A. Prokudin, Extracting the Sivers function from polarized SIDIS data and making predictions, Phys. Rev. D 72, 094007 (2005).
  53. M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, S. Melis, and A. Prokudin, Simultaneous extraction of transversity and Collins functions from new semi-inclusive deep inelastic scattering and e+e− data, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094019 (2013).
  54. A. Signori, A. Bacchetta, M. Radici, and G. Schnell, Investigations into the flavor dependence of partonic transverse momentum, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 194.
  55. M. Aghasyan et al. (COMPASS Collaboration), Transverse-momentum-dependent multiplicities of charged hadrons in muon–deuteron deep inelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D 97, 032006 (2018).
  56. A. S. Ito, R. J. Fisk, H. Jöstlein, D. M. Kaplan, S. W. Herb, D. C. Hom, L. M. Lederman, H. D. Snyder, J. K. Yoh, B. C. Brown, C. N. Brown, W. R. Innes, R. D. Kephart, K. Ueno, and T. Yamanouchi, Measurement of the continuum of dimuons produced in high-energy proton–nucleus collisions, Phys. Rev. D 23, 604 (1981).
  57. G. Moreno, C. N. Brown, W. E. Cooper, D. M. Kaplan, T. J. Nash, M. H. Schub, W. J. Spalding, T. A. Trippe, Y. C. Wang, H. J. Frisch et al., Dimuon production in proton–copper collisions at s=38.8  GeV, Phys. Rev. D 43, 2815 (1991). fermilab E605.
  58. A. Bacchetta, V. Bertone, C. Bissolotti, G. Bozzi, F. Delcarro, F. Piacenza, and M. Radici, Transverse-momentum-dependent parton distributions up to N3LL from Drell–Yan data, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2020) 117.
  59. I. P. Fernando and D. Keller, Extraction of the Sivers function with deep neural networks, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054007 (2023).
  60. R. N. Bracewell, The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, 3rd ed. (McGraw–Hill, New York, 1999).
  61. P. Shanahan, M. Wagman, and Y. Zhao, Collins–Soper kernel for TMD evolution from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 102, 014511 (2020).
  62. A. G. Baydin, B. A. Pearlmutter, A. A. Radul, and J. Siskind, Automatic differentiation in machine learning: A survey, J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18, 1 (2018), https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10066574.
  63. F. Landry, R. Brock, P. M. Nadolsky, and C. P. Yuan, Tevatron run-1Z-boson data and Collins–Soper–Sterman resummation formalism, Phys. Rev. D 67, 073016 (2003).
  64. A. V. Konychev and P. M. Nadolsky, Universality of the Collins–Soper–Sterman nonperturbative function in gauge boson production, Phys. Lett. B 633, 710 (2006).
  65. R. D. Ball et al., The path to proton structure at 1% accuracy, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 428 (2022).
  66. A. Buckley, J. Ferrando, S. Lloyd, K. Nordström, B. Page, M. Rüfenacht, M. Schönherr, and G. Watt, LHAPDF6: Parton density access in the LHC precision era, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 132 (2015).
  67. S. Arridge, P. Maass, O. Öktem, and C.-B. Schönlieb, Solving inverse problems using data-driven models, Acta Numer. 28, 1 (2019).
  68. J. Adler and O. Öktem, Learned primal–dual reconstruction, arXiv:1707.06474.
  69. A. Bacchetta, D. Boer, M. Diehl, and P. J. Mulders, Matches and mismatches in the descriptions of semi-inclusive processes at low and high transverse momentum, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2008) 023.
  70. M. Zaheer, S. Kottur et al., Deep sets, arXiv:1703.06114.
  71. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, Deep residual learning for image recognition, arXiv:1512.03385.
  72. R. T. Q. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, and D. Duvenaud, Neural ordinary differential equations, arXiv:1806.07366.
  73. B. Mildenhall et al., NeRF: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis, arXiv:2003.08934.
  74. B. Amos, L. Xu, and J. Z. Kolter, Input convex neural networks, arXiv:1609.07152.
  75. S. You et al., Deep lattice networks and partial monotonic functions, arXiv:1709.06680.
  76. C. Durkan, A. Bekasov, I. Murray, and G. Papamakarios, Neural spline flows, arXiv:1906.04032.
  77. E. Perez, F. Strub, H. de Vries, V. Dumoulin, and A. Courville, Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer, arXiv:1709.07871.
  78. V. Dumoulin et al., A learned representation for artistic style, arXiv:1610.07629.
  79. D. Keller, Experimental uncertainty propagation in neural network extraction in hadronic physics, arXiv:2509.11456.
  80. https://rc.virginia.edu.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation