Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Transport coefficients and quasinormal modes in Einstein-dilaton holographic QCD

Nairy A. Villarreal1,2,*, Luis A. H. Mamani3,2,†, Alfonso Ballon-Bayona4,‡, Alex S. Miranda2,§, and Vilson T. Zanchin1,∥

  • *Contact author: n.villarreal@ufabc.edu.br
  • †Contact author: luis.mamani@ufrb.edu.br
  • ‡Contact author: aballonb@if.ufrj.br
  • §Contact author: asmiranda@uesc.br
  • ∥Contact author: zanchin@ufabc.edu.br

Phys. Rev. D 112, 066017 – Published 25 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p2zw-5xm7

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the transport coefficients of a strongly coupled plasma in the context of holographic QCD models based on Einstein-dilaton gravity that are compatible with linear confinement at zero temperature. At finite temperature, the holographic model is characterized by an asymptotically anti–de Sitter black hole coupled to a scalar field, the dilaton, which is quadratic in the radial direction. The inclusion of the scalar field results in an explicit breaking of the conformal symmetry in the dual field theory. In such systems, the Hawking temperature of the black hole corresponds to the plasma temperature in the dual field theory. We confirm the existence of a minimum temperature Tmin, above which two distinct classes of black hole solutions emerge: one corresponding to large black holes and the other to small black holes. We calculate some thermodynamic quantities—such as entropy, specific heat, and speed of sound—and find results that are consistent with similar holographic models. We calculate the quasinormal modes of the tensor and vector sectors using the pseudospectral method. In the hydrodynamic regime, we derive the dispersion relation for the vector sector, from which we extract the shear viscosity and the ratio η/s=1/4π. The bulk viscosity is calculated using the Kubo formula in the scalar sector. Finally, our results for the speed of sound are compared with the lattice QCD predictions, and our results for the bulk viscosity are compared with those reported by the JETSCAPE collaboration.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (53)

  1. K. Adcox et al., Nucl. Phys. 757, 184 (2005).
  2. B. B. Back et al. (PHOBOS Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. 757, 28 (2005).
  3. I. Arsene et al. (BRAHMS Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A757, 1 (2005).
  4. J. Adams, M. Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, J. Amonett, B. Anderson, D. Arkhipkin, G. Averichev, S. Badyal, Y. Bai, J. Balewski et al., Nucl. Phys. 757, 102 (2005).
  5. M. Natsuume, AdS/CFT Duality User Guide (Springer, New York, 2015), Vol. 903.
  6. J. M. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  7. D. T. Son and A. O. Starinets, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2002) 042.
  8. P. K. Kovtun and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. D 72, 086009 (2005).
  9. C. P. Herzog and D. T. Son, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2003) 046.
  10. G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 081601 (2001).
  11. G. Policastro, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2002) 054.
  12. P. Kovtun, D. T. Son, and A. O. Starinets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 111601 (2005).
  13. S. S. Gubser and A. Nellore, Phys. Rev. D 78, 086007 (2008).
  14. S. S. Gubser, A. Nellore, S. S. Pufu, and F. D. Rocha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 131601 (2008).
  15. A. Ballon-Bayona, L. A. H. Mamani, A. S. Miranda, and V. T. Zanchin, Phys. Rev. D 104, 046013 (2021).
  16. U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, G. Michalogiorgakis, and F. Nitti, Lect. Notes Phys. 828, 79 (2011).
  17. U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 032.
  18. U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, and F. Nitti, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2008) 019.
  19. U. Gürsoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, and F. Nitti, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2009) 033.
  20. J. Noronha-Hostler, in Proceedings of the 12th Conference on the Intersections of Particle and Nuclear Physics (2015), arXiv:1512.06315.
  21. Z. Yang and L.-W. Chen, Phys. Rev. C 107, 064910 (2023).
  22. A. Ballon-Bayona, H. Boschi-Filho, L. A. H. Mamani, A. S. Miranda, and V. T. Zanchin, Phys. Rev. D 97, 046001 (2018).
  23. A. Saha and S. Gangopadhyay, arXiv:2506.09431.
  24. S. S. Gubser, S. S. Pufu, and F. D. Rocha, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2008) 085.
  25. O. DeWolfe, S. S. Gubser, and C. Rosen, Phys. Rev. D 84, 126014 (2011).
  26. R. Rougemont, A. Ficnar, S. Finazzo, and J. Noronha, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 102.
  27. J. Grefa, M. Hippert, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti, and R. Rougemont, Phys. Rev. D 106, 034024 (2022).
  28. U. Gürsoy, E. Kiritsis, G. Michalogiorgakis, and F. Nitti, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2009) 056.
  29. C. Eling and Y. Oz, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 007.
  30. A. Buchel, U. Gursoy, and E. Kiritsis, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2011) 095.
  31. A. Buchel, Phys. Lett. B 663, 286 (2008).
  32. A. Buchel, Phys. Rev. D 85, 066004 (2012).
  33. A. Karch, E. Katz, D. T. Son, and M. A. Stephanov, Phys. Rev. D 74, 015005 (2006).
  34. D. Li, S. He, and M. Huang, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 046.
  35. S. He, S.-Y. Wu, Y. Yang, and P.-H. Yuan, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 093.
  36. L. A. H. Mamani, C. V. Flores, and V. T. Zanchin, Phys. Rev. D 102, 066006 (2020).
  37. A. S. Miranda, C. A. Ballon Bayona, H. Boschi-Filho, and N. R. F. Braga, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2009) 119.
  38. A. Ballon-Bayona, H. Boschi-Filho, E. F. Capossoli, and D. M. Rodrigues, Phys. Rev. D 102, 126003 (2020).
  39. O. Andreev and V. I. Zakharov, Phys. Rev. D 76, 047705 (2007).
  40. D. Li and M. Huang, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2013) 088.
  41. J. Mas and J. Tarrio, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2007) 036.
  42. T. Springer, Phys. Rev. D 79, 046003 (2009).
  43. D. Everett et al. (JETSCAPE Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 242301 (2021).
  44. A. Jansen, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 546 (2017).
  45. L. A. H. Mamani, D. Hou, and N. R. F. Braga, Phys. Rev. D 105, 126020 (2022).
  46. D. Li, J. Liao, and M. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 89, 126006 (2014).
  47. I. Y. Aref’eva, K. Rannu, and P. Slepov, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2021) 161.
  48. N. Abbasi and S. Tahery, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2020) 076.
  49. L. A. H. Mamani, A. D. D. Masa, L. T. Sanches, and V. T. Zanchin, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 897 (2022).
  50. A. Buchel, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 065.
  51. S. Borsanyi, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2012) 053.
  52. https://github.com/naivi/QMN_EinsteinDilaton_HQCD_data.
  53. A. Jansen, A. Rostworowski, and M. Rutkowski, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2019) 036.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation