- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Deconstructing resonant Higgs boson pair production at the LHC: Effects of colored and neutral scalars in the NMSSM test case

Stefano Moretti1,2,*, Luca Panizzi3,†, Jörgen Sjölin4,‡, and Harri Waltari2,§

  • *Contact author: s.moretti@soton.ac.uk, stefano.moretti@physics.uu.se
  • †Contact author: luca.panizzi@unical.it
  • ‡Contact author: sjolin@fysik.su.se
  • §Contact author: harri.waltari@physics.uu.se
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 055005 – Published 3 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p2p4-67g9

Abstract

We study resonant production of pairs of Standard Model (SM-)like Higgs bosons, in the presence of new neutral Higgs states together with new colored scalars (stops or sbottoms) in loops within the Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model. This is used as a test case to prove that the Large Hadron Collider has sensitivity to a variety of effects stemming from interferences between resonant (heavy) Higgs diagrams and/or among these and nonresonant topologies involving loops of both tops and stops. These effects can alter significantly the naive description of individual s-channel Breit-Wigner resonances, leading to distortions of the latter, which, on the one hand, may mask their presence but, on the other hand, could enable one to extract features of the underlying new physics scenario. This last aspect is made possible through a decomposition of the gg→hh signal process into all its amplitude components, each of which has a well-defined coupling structure. Ultimately, such effects can be traced back to the relevant Feynman diagrams and can enable a detailed interpretation of this process. To illustrate this, we introduce various benchmark points that exhibit potentially observable features during the current and/or upcoming runs of the LHC in one or more of the three customary di-Higgs decay channels: bb¯bb¯, bb¯τ+τ−, and bb¯γγ.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (69)

  1. E. W. N. Glover and J. J. van der Bij, Higgs boson pair production via gluon fusion, Nucl. Phys. B309, 282 (1988).
  2. D. A. Dicus, C. Kao, and S. S. D. Willenbrock, Higgs boson pair production from gluon fusion, Phys. Lett. B 203, 457 (1988).
  3. S. Kanemura, S. Kiyoura, Y. Okada, E. Senaha, and C. P. Yuan, New physics effect on the Higgs selfcoupling, Phys. Lett. B 558, 157 (2003).
  4. A. Noble and M. Perelstein, Higgs self-coupling as a probe of electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D 78, 063518 (2008).
  5. W. Rodejohann and H. Zhang, Impact of massive neutrinos on the Higgs self-coupling and electroweak vacuum stability, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2012) 022.
  6. L. Wu, J. M. Yang, C.-P. Yuan, and M. Zhang, Higgs self-coupling in the MSSM and NMSSM after the LHC Run 1, Phys. Lett. B 747, 378 (2015).
  7. L. Di Luzio, R. Gröber, and M. Spannowsky, Maxi-sizing the trilinear Higgs self-coupling: How large could it be?, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 788 (2017).
  8. H. Bahl, J. Braathen, and G. Weiglein, New constraints on extended higgs sectors from the trilinear Higgs coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 231802 (2022).
  9. B. Batell, M. McCullough, D. Stolarski, and C. B. Verhaaren, Putting a stop to di-Higgs modifications, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2015) 216.
  10. P. Huang, A. Joglekar, M. Li, and C. E. M. Wagner, Corrections to di-Higgs boson production with light stops and modified Higgs couplings, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075001 (2018).
  11. S. Moretti, L. Panizzi, J. Sjölin, and H. Waltari, Deconstructing squark contributions to di-Higgs production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 107, 115010 (2023).
  12. S. De Curtis, L. Delle Rose, F. Egle, S. Moretti, M. Mühlleitner, and K. Sakurai, Composite 2-Higgs doublet model: Strong effects on Higgs pair production, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 063.
  13. T. Plehn, M. Spira, and P. M. Zerwas, Pair production of neutral Higgs particles in gluon-gluon collisions, Nucl. Phys. B479, 46 (1996); B531, 655(E) (1998).
  14. M. J. Dolan, C. Englert, and M. Spannowsky, New physics in LHC Higgs boson pair production, Phys. Rev. D 87, 055002 (2013).
  15. J. M. No and M. Ramsey-Musolf, Probing the Higgs portal at the LHC through resonant di-Higgs production, Phys. Rev. D 89, 095031 (2014).
  16. S. Dawson and I. M. Lewis, NLO corrections to double Higgs boson production in the Higgs singlet model, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094023 (2015).
  17. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Measurements of tt¯H production and the CP structure of the Yukawa interaction between the Higgs boson and top quark in the diphoton decay channel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 061801 (2020).
  18. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), CP properties of Higgs boson interactions with top quarks in the tt¯H and tH processes using H→γγ with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 061802 (2020).
  19. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurement of the associated production of a top-antitop-quark pair and a Higgs boson decaying into a bb¯ pair in pp collisions at s=13  TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 210 (2025).
  20. S. Dawson and I. M. Lewis, Singlet model interference effects with high scale UV physics, Phys. Rev. D 95, 015004 (2017).
  21. M. Carena, Z. Liu, and M. Riembau, Probing the electroweak phase transition via enhanced di-Higgs boson production, Phys. Rev. D 97, 095032 (2018).
  22. F. Feuerstake, E. Fuchs, T. Robens, and D. Winterbottom, Interference effects in resonant di-Higgs production at the LHC in the Higgs singlet extension, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 094.
  23. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, and A. M. Teixeira, The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rep. 496, 1 (2010).
  24. S. Moretti and S. Khalil, Supersymmetry Beyond Minimality: From Theory to Experiment (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2019).
  25. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 051801 (2020).
  26. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Searches for additional Higgs bosons and for vector leptoquarks in ττ final states in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 073.
  27. M. Drees, Supersymmetric models with extended Higgs sector, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 04, 3635 (1989).
  28. U. Ellwanger, Higgs pair production in the NMSSM at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2013) 077.
  29. Z. Heng, X. Gong, and H. Zhou, Pair production of Higgs boson in NMSSM at the LHC with the next-to-lightest CP-even Higgs boson being SM-like, Chin. Phys. C 42, 073103 (2018).
  30. J. Cao, Z. Heng, L. Shang, P. Wan, and J. M. Yang, Pair production of a 125 GeV Higgs boson in MSSM and NMSSM at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 134.
  31. Z. Heng, L. Shang, and P. Wan, Pair production of a 125 GeV Higgs boson in MSSM and NMSSM at the ILC, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 047.
  32. J. Cao, D. Li, L. Shang, P. Wu, and Y. Zhang, Exploring the Higgs sector of a most natural NMSSM and its prediction on Higgs pair production at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2014) 026.
  33. P. Huang and Y. H. Ng, Di-Higgs production in SUSY models at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 660 (2020).
  34. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, and T. Reiter, UFO—The universal FeynRules output, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1201 (2012).
  35. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  36. R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H. S. Shao, and M. Zaro, The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2018) 185; 11 (2021) 85.
  37. R. D. Ball et al. (NNPDF Collaboration), Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2015) 040.
  38. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to pythia 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  39. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2008) 063.
  40. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, fastjet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  41. E. Conte, B. Fuks, and G. Serret, madanalysis 5, a user-friendly framework for collider phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 222 (2013).
  42. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature (London) 607, 60 (2022); 623, E4 (2023).
  43. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Interpretations of the ATLAS measurements of Higgs boson production and decay rates and differential cross-sections in pp collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 097.
  44. M. Carena, H. E. Haber, I. Low, N. R. Shah, and C. E. M. Wagner, Alignment limit of the NMSSM Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. D 93, 035013 (2016).
  45. W. Porod, spheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+e− colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153, 275 (2003).
  46. W. Porod and F. Staub, spheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2458 (2012).
  47. F. Staub, sarah 4: A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1773 (2014).
  48. R. Barate et al. (LEP Working Group for Higgs boson searches, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, and OPAL Collaborations), Search for the standard model Higgs boson at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 565, 61 (2003).
  49. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for diphoton resonances in the 66 to 110 GeV mass range using pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2025) 053.
  50. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for a standard model-like Higgs boson in the mass range between 70 and 110 GeV in the diphoton final state in proton-proton collisions at s=8 and 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 793, 320 (2019).
  51. T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, and G. Weiglein, Mounting evidence for a 95 GeV Higgs boson, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2022) 201.
  52. D. Azevedo, T. Biekötter, and P. M. Ferreira, 2HDM interpretations of the CMS diphoton excess at 95 GeV, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2023) 017.
  53. A. Belyaev, R. Benbrik, M. Boukidi, M. Chakraborti, S. Moretti, and S. Semlali, Explanation of the hints for a 95 GeV Higgs boson within a 2-Higgs Doublet Model, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 209.
  54. U. Ellwanger and C. Hugonie, Additional Higgs bosons near 95 and 650 GeV in the NMSSM, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1138 (2023).
  55. J. Cao, X. Jia, J. Lian, and L. Meng, 95 GeV diphoton and bb− excesses in the general next-to-minimal supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075001 (2024).
  56. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie, S. F. King, and S. Moretti, NMSSM explanation for excesses in the search for neutralinos and charginos and a 95 GeV Higgs boson, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 788 (2024).
  57. M. Reichert, A. Eichhorn, H. Gies, J. M. Pawlowski, T. Plehn, and M. M. Scherer, Probing baryogenesis through the Higgs boson self-coupling, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075008 (2018).
  58. P. Basler, M. Mühlleitner, and J. Müller, Electroweak phase transition in non-minimal Higgs sectors, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2020) 016.
  59. T. Biekötter, S. Heinemeyer, J. M. No, M. O. Olea-Romacho, and G. Weiglein, The trap in the early Universe: Impact on the interplay between gravitational waves and LHC physics in the 2HDM, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2023) 031.
  60. S. Dawson, S. Dittmaier, and M. Spira, Neutral Higgs boson pair production at hadron colliders: QCD corrections, Phys. Rev. D 58, 115012 (1998).
  61. D. de Florian and J. Mazzitelli, Two-loop virtual corrections to Higgs pair production, Phys. Lett. B 724, 306 (2013).
  62. R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, P. Torrielli, E. Vryonidou, and M. Zaro, Higgs pair production at the LHC with NLO and parton-shower effects, Phys. Lett. B 732, 142 (2014).
  63. S. Borowka, N. Greiner, G. Heinrich, S. P. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk, U. Schubert, and T. Zirke, Higgs boson pair production in gluon fusion at next-to-leading order with full top-quark mass dependence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 012001 (2016); 117, 079901(E) (2016).
  64. J. Baglio, F. Campanario, S. Glaus, M. Mühlleitner, M. Spira, and J. Streicher, Gluon fusion into Higgs pairs at NLO QCD and the top mass scheme, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 459 (2019).
  65. J. Baglio, F. Campanario, S. Glaus, M. Mühlleitner, J. Ronca, and M. Spira, gg→HH: Combined uncertainties, Phys. Rev. D 103, 056002 (2021).
  66. A. Agostini, G. Degrassi, R. Gröber, and P. Slavich, NLO-QCD corrections to Higgs pair production in the MSSM, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2016) 106.
  67. S. Dawson, A. Djouadi, and M. Spira, QCD corrections to SUSY Higgs production: The role of squark loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 16 (1996).
  68. R. Harlander and M. Steinhauser, Effects of SUSY QCD in hadronic Higgs production at next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. D 68, 111701 (2003).
  69. L. Panizzi, UFO model for BSM Di-Higgs studies, (2025), https://github.com/FeynRules/Models/tree/main/DiHiggs-BSM-Simplified.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 055005– Published 3 September, 2025
  • Received 27 June 2025
  • Accepted 1 August 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation