- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Using tunable coherence for reaching micrometer coherence lengths and suppressing stray light in a power-recycled Michelson interferometer

Daniel Voigt* and Oliver Gerberding†

  • *Contact author: daniel.voigt@uni-hamburg.de
  • †Contact author: oliver.gerberding@uni-hamburg.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 112, 122006 – Published 15 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nw44-3bhp

Abstract

By reentering into laser interferometers, scattered or stray light introduces nonlinear noise. This is a major limitation of precision interferometers as preventing such parasitic light is nearly impossible. Thus, substantial effort is put into mitigating the reentering of these fields in various ways. Ground-based laser interferometric gravitational wave detectors employ such mitigation techniques to reduce otherwise restrictive stray light noise. However, they are now reaching sensitivities where conventional mitigation techniques reach limitations. Further improvements planed for future observatories are placing even more demanding constraints on tolerable stray light power. We previously presented tunable coherence as a possible technique to ease these constraints and suppress unwanted coherent interference. For these promising demonstrations, the remaining coherence length and achievable suppression in length-constrained layouts was limited, among other things, by the used pseudo-random-noise phase modulation frequency. In this work, we demonstrate stray light suppression and cavity performance at modulation frequencies up to 10 GHz. This reduces the remaining coherence to a few centimeter in an interferometer, and even to the scale of the laser wavelength in a cavity. We further present a first demonstration of tunable coherence in a power-recycled Michelson interferometer, successfully suppressing stray light in a more complex topology.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. R. Schilling, L. Schnupp, W. Winkler, H. Billing, K. Maischberger, and A. Rudiger, J. Phys. E 14, 65 (1981).
  2. L. Schnupp, W. Winkler, K. Maischberger, A. Rudiger, and R. Schilling, J. Phys. E 18, 482 (1985).
  3. T. Accadia, F. Acernese, F. Antonucci, P. Astone, G. Ballardin, F. Barone et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194011 (2010).
  4. W. Z. Korth, A. Heptonstall, E. D. Hall, K. Arai, E. K. Gustafson, and R. X. Adhikari, Classical Quantum Gravity 33, 035004 (2015).
  5. D. V. Martynov, E. D. Hall, B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. D 93, 112004 (2016).
  6. A. Buikema, C. Cahillane, G. L. Mansell et al., Phys. Rev. D 102, 062003 (2020).
  7. E. Capote, W. Jia, N. Aritomi, M. Nakano, V. Xu, R. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. D 111, 062002 (2025).
  8. H. Igel, K. U. Schreiber, A. Gebauer, F. Bernauer, S. Egdorf, A. Simonelli, C.-J. Lin, J. Wassermann, S. Donner, C. Hadziioannou et al., Geophys. J. Int. 225, 684 (2021).
  9. K. U. Schreiber, J. Kodet, U. Hugentobler, T. Klügel, and J.-P. R. Wells, Nat. Photonics 17, 1054 (2023).
  10. J.-Y. Vinet, V. Brisson, and S. Braccini, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1276 (1996).
  11. B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott et al. (KAGRA Collaboration, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, and Virgo Collaboration), Living Rev. Relativity 21, 3 (2018).
  12. J. Aasi, B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. R. Abernathy, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  13. F. Acernese et al. (VIRGO Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 024001 (2015).
  14. T. Akutsu, M. Ando, K. Arai, Y. Arai, S. Araki, A. Araya, N. Aritomi, Y. Aso, S. Bae, Y. Bae et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A101 (2020).
  15. H. Lück, C. Affeldt, J. Degallaix, A. Freise, H. Grote, M. Hewitson, S. Hild, J. Leong, M. Prijatelj, K. A. Strain et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 228, 012012 (2010).
  16. M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. Andersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Barsuglia, M. Beker et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010).
  17. A. Abac, R. Abramo, S. Albanesi, A. Albertini, A. Agapito, M. Agathos et al., arXiv:2503.12263.
  18. D. Reitze, R. X. Adhikari, S. Ballmer, B. Barish, L. Barsotti, G. Billingsley, D. A. Brown, Y. Chen, D. Coyne, R. Eisenstein et al., Bull. AAS 51 (2019), https://baas.aas.org/pub/2020n7i035/release/1.
  19. E. D. Hall, K. Kuns, J. R. Smith, Y. Bai, C. Wipf, S. Biscans, R. X. Adhikari, K. Arai, S. Ballmer, L. Barsotti et al., Phys. Rev. D 103, 122004 (2021).
  20. J.-Y. Vinet, V. Brisson, S. Braccini, I. Ferrante, L. Pinard, F. Bondu, and E. Tournié, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6085 (1997).
  21. D. J. Ottaway, P. Fritschel, and S. J. Waldman, Opt. Express 20, 8329 (2012).
  22. S. S. Y. Chua, S. Dwyer, L. Barsotti et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 035017 (2014).
  23. S. Soni, C. Austin, A. Effler et al. (The LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 025016 (2021).
  24. P. Nguyen, R. M. S. Schofield, A. Effler et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 145001 (2021).
  25. S. Soni, J. Glanzer, A. Effler, V. Frolov, G. González, A. Pele, and R. Schofield, Classical Quantum Gravity 41, 135015 (2024).
  26. O. Ballester, O. Blanch, L. Cardiel, M. Cavalli-Sforza, A. Chiummo, C. García, J. M. Illa, C. Karathanasis, M. Kolstein, M. Martínez, A. Menéndez-Vázquez, L. M. Mir, J. Mundet, A. Romero-Rodríguez, D. Serrano, and H. Yamamoto, Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 115011 (2022).
  27. M. Andrés-Carcasona, M. Martínez, L. M. Mir, J. Mundet, and H. Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D 111, 042001 (2025).
  28. H. Lück, J. Degallaix, H. Grote, M. Hewitson, S. Hild, B. Willke, and K. Danzmann, J. Opt. A 10, 085004 (2008).
  29. M. Ast, S. Steinlechner, and R. Schnabel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 180801 (2016).
  30. M. Wąs, R. Gouaty, and R. Bonnand, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 075020 (2021).
  31. F. Acernese, M. Agathos, A. Ain, S. Albanesi, A. Allocca, A. Amato, T. Andrade, N. Andres, T. Andrić, S. Ansoldi et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 39, 045006 (2022).
  32. D. Voigt, A. Lohde, and O. Gerberding, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 021106 (2023).
  33. D. Voigt, L. Eggers, K.-S. Isleif, S. M. Koehlenbeck, M. Ast, and O. Gerberding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 213802 (2025).
  34. L. Eggers, D. Voigt, and O. Gerberding, Phys. Rev. D 112, 022001 (2025).
  35. D. Dewey, A search for astronomical gravitational radiation with an interferometric broad band antenna, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986, https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/123081.
  36. D. A. Shaddock, Opt. Lett. 32, 3355 (2007).
  37. K.-S. Isleif, O. Gerberding, S. Köhlenbeck, A. Sutton, B. Sheard, S. Gossler, D. Shaddock, G. Heinzel, and K. Danzmann, Opt. Express 22, 24689 (2014).
  38. P. Alfke, Efficient shift registers, LFSR counters, and long pseudo- random sequence generators (1996), https://docs.amd.com/v/u/en-US/xapp052.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 112, 122006– Published 15 December, 2025
  • Received 5 August 2025
  • Accepted 13 November 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation