Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Lattice Monte Carlo meets the lattice functional renormalization group: A quantitative comparison

Niklas Zorbach1,*, Jan Philipp Klinger2,†, Owe Philipsen2,‡, and Jens Braun1,3,4,§

  • *Contact author: niklas.zorbach@tu-darmstadt.de
  • †Contact author: klinger@itp.uni-frankfurt.de
  • ‡Contact author: philipsen@itp.uni-frankfurt.de
  • §Contact author: jens.braun@tu-darmstadt.de

Phys. Rev. D 112, 076036 – Published 31 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nsd5-nxdp

Abstract

Lattice Monte Carlo simulations and the functional renormalization group (RG) are powerful approaches that allow for quantitative studies of nonperturbative phenomena such as bound-state formation, spontaneous symmetry breaking, and phase transitions. While results from both methods have recently shown remarkable agreement for many observables, e.g., in quantum chromodynamics, an analysis of deviations in certain quantities turns out to be challenging. This is because calculations with the two methods are based on different approximations, regularizations, and scale fixing procedures. In the present work, we present a framework for a more direct comparison by formulating the functional RG approach on a finite spacetime lattice. This removes all ambiguities of regularization, finite-size, and scale fixing procedures in concrete studies. By investigating the emergence of spontaneous symmetry breaking and phase transitions in a Z(2) scalar theory in d=1, 2, and 3 spacetime dimensions, we demonstrate at the example of the local potential approximation how this framework can be used to evaluate and compare the systematic errors of both approaches.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (70)

  1. A. Bazavov et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys. Lett. B 795, 15 (2019).
  2. C. Bonati, M. D’Elia, F. Negro, F. Sanfilippo, and K. Zambello, Curvature of the pseudocritical line in QCD: Taylor expansion matches analytic continuation, Phys. Rev. D 98, 054510 (2018).
  3. H. T. Ding et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Chiral phase transition temperature in (2+1)-flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 062002 (2019).
  4. C. Bonati, E. Calore, M. D’Elia, M. Mesiti, F. Negro, F. Sanfilippo, S. F. Schifano, G. Silvi, and R. Tripiccione, Roberge-Weiss endpoint and chiral symmetry restoration in Nf=2+1 QCD, Phys. Rev. D 99, 014502 (2019).
  5. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, QCD crossover at finite chemical potential from lattice simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 052001 (2020).
  6. Y. Kuramashi, Y. Nakamura, H. Ohno, and S. Takeda, Nature of the phase transition for finite temperature Nf=3 QCD with nonperturbatively O(a) improved wilson fermions at Nt=12, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054509 (2020).
  7. A. Y. Kotov, M. P. Lombardo, and A. Trunin, QCD transition at the physical point, and its scaling window from twisted mass Wilson fermions, Phys. Lett. B 823, 136749 (2021).
  8. A. Y. Kotov, M. P. Lombardo, and A. Trunin, Gliding down the QCD transition line, from Nf=2 till the onset of conformality, Symmetry 13, 1833 (2021).
  9. F. Cuteri, O. Philipsen, and A. Sciarra, On the order of the QCD chiral phase transition for different numbers of quark flavours, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2021) 141.
  10. L. Dini, P. Hegde, F. Karsch, A. Lahiri, C. Schmidt, and S. Sharma, Chiral phase transition in three-flavor QCD from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034510 (2022).
  11. F. Cuteri, J. Goswami, F. Karsch, A. Lahiri, M. Neumann, O. Philipsen, C. Schmidt, and A. Sciarra, Toward the chiral phase transition in the Roberge-Weiss plane, Phys. Rev. D 106, 014510 (2022).
  12. A. D’Ambrosio, O. Philipsen, and R. Kaiser, The chiral phase transition at non-zero imaginary baryon chemical potential for different numbers of quark flavours, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2022 (2023) 172 [arXiv:2212.03655].
  13. H.-T. Ding, W.-P. Huang, S. Mukherjee, and P. Petreczky, Microscopic encoding of macroscopic universality: Scaling properties of Dirac eigenspectra near QCD chiral phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161903 (2023).
  14. H. T. Ding, O. Kaczmarek, F. Karsch, P. Petreczky, M. Sarkar, C. Schmidt, and S. Sharma, Curvature of the chiral phase transition line from the magnetic equation of state of (2+1)-flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114516 (2024).
  15. J. P. Klinger, R. Kaiser, and O. Philipsen, The order of the chiral phase transition in massless many-flavour lattice QCD, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2024 (2025) 172 [arXiv:2501.19251]
  16. Y. Zhang, Y. Aoki, S. Hashimoto, I. Kanamori, T. Kaneko, and Y. Nakamura, Three flavor QCD phase transition with Möbius domain wall fermions, Proc. Sci., LATTICE2024 (2025) 193 [arXiv:2501.15494].
  17. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, V. Vovchenko, and C. H. Wong, Lattice QCD constraints on the critical point from an improved precision equation of state, arXiv:2502.10267.
  18. W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, and F. Rennecke, QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D 101, 054032 (2020).
  19. J. Braun, W.-j. Fu, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, D. Rosenblüh, and S. Yin, Chiral susceptibility in (2+1)-flavor QCD, Phys. Rev. D 102, 056010 (2020).
  20. F. Gao and J. M. Pawlowski, Chiral phase structure and critical end point in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 820, 136584 (2021).
  21. F. Gao and J. M. Pawlowski, Phase structure of (2+1)-flavor QCD and the magnetic equation of state, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094020 (2022).
  22. P. J. Gunkel and C. S. Fischer, Locating the critical endpoint of QCD: Mesonic backcoupling effects, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054022 (2021).
  23. J. Braun et al., Soft modes in hot QCD matter, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094010 (2025).
  24. W.-j. Fu, X. Luo, J. M. Pawlowski, F. Rennecke, and S. Yin, Ripples of the QCD critical point, Phys. Rev. D 111, L031502 (2025).
  25. J. Bernhardt and C. S. Fischer, QCD phase transitions in the light quark chiral limit, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114018 (2023).
  26. C. S. Fischer, QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential from Dyson–Schwinger equations, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 105, 1 (2019).
  27. N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, The nonperturbative functional renormalization group and its applications, Phys. Rep. 910, 1 (2021).
  28. O. Philipsen, Lattice constraints on the QCD chiral phase transition at finite temperature and baryon density, Symmetry 13, 2079 (2021).
  29. G. Aarts et al., Phase transitions in particle physics: Results and perspectives from lattice quantum chromo-dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 133, 104070 (2023).
  30. J. Braun, B. Klein, and H. J. Pirner, Volume dependence of the pion mass in the quark-meson-model, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014032 (2005).
  31. J. Braun, B. Klein, and H. J. Pirner, Influence of quark boundary conditions on the pion mass in finite volume, Phys. Rev. D 72, 034017 (2005).
  32. J. Braun and B. Klein, Finite-size scaling behavior in the O(4)-model, Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 443 (2009).
  33. L. Fister and J. M. Pawlowski, Functional renormalization group in a finite volume, Phys. Rev. D 92, 076009 (2015).
  34. L. Batini, E. Grossi, and N. Wink, Dissipation dynamics of a scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 108, 125021 (2023).
  35. N. Dupuis and K. Sengupta, Non-perturbative renormalization-group approach to lattice models, Eur. Phys. J. B 66, 271 (2008).
  36. T. Machado and N. Dupuis, From local to critical fluctuations in lattice models: A non-perturbative renormalization-group approach, Phys. Rev. E 82, 041128 (2010).
  37. A. Rancon and N. Dupuis, Nonperturbative renormalization-group approach to strongly-correlated lattice bosons, Phys. Rev. B 84, 174513 (2011).
  38. J. Krieg and P. Kopietz, Dual lattice functional renormalization group for the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition: irrelevance of amplitude and out-of-plane fluctuations, Phys. Rev. E 96, 042107 (2017).
  39. J. M. Pawlowski, I.-O. Stamatescu, and F. P. G. Ziegler, Cooling stochastic quantization with colored noise, Phys. Rev. D 96, 114505 (2017).
  40. S. Duane, A. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Hybrid Monte Carlo, Phys. Lett. B 195, 216 (1987).
  41. J. Braun, B. Klein, and P. Piasecki, On the scaling behavior of the chiral phase transition in QCD in finite and infinite volume, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1576 (2011).
  42. J. Braun, B. Klein, and B.-J. Schaefer, On the phase structure of QCD in a finite volume, Phys. Lett. B 713, 216 (2012).
  43. R.-A. Tripolt, J. Braun, B. Klein, and B.-J. Schaefer, Effect of fluctuations on the QCD critical point in a finite volume, Phys. Rev. D 90, 054012 (2014).
  44. B. Klein, Modeling finite-volume effects and chiral symmetry breaking in two-flavor QCD thermodynamics, Phys. Rep. 707–708, 1 (2017).
  45. C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys. Lett. B 301, 90 (1993).
  46. J. M. Pawlowski, Aspects of the functional renormalisation group, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 322, 2831 (2007).
  47. J. Berges, N. Tetradis, and C. Wetterich, Nonperturbative renormalization flow in quantum field theory and statistical physics, Phys. Rep. 363, 223 (2002).
  48. H. Gies, Introduction to the functional RG and applications to gauge theories, Lect. Notes Phys. 852, 287 (2012).
  49. B. Delamotte, An Introduction to the nonperturbative renormalization group, Lect. Notes Phys. 852, 49 (2012).
  50. P. Kopietz, L. Bartosch, and F. Schütz, Introduction to the functional renormalization group, Lect. Notes Phys. 798, 1 (2010).
  51. J. Braun, Fermion interactions and universal behavior in strongly interacting theories, J. Phys. G 39, 033001 (2012).
  52. J. Braun, M. Leonhardt, and J. M. Pawlowski, Renormalization group consistency and low-energy effective theories, SciPost Phys. 6, 056 (2019).
  53. D. F. Litim, Optimized renormalization group flows, Phys. Rev. D 64, 105007 (2001).
  54. D. F. Litim, Mind the gap, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 2081 (2001).
  55. J. Keitel and L. Bartosch, The zero-dimensional O(N) vector model as a benchmark for perturbation theory, the large-N expansion and the functional renormalization group, J. Phys. A 45, 105401 (2012).
  56. A. Koenigstein, M. J. Steil, N. Wink, E. Grossi, J. Braun, M. Buballa, and D. H. Rischke, Numerical fluid dynamics for FRG flow equations: Zero-dimensional QFTs as numerical test cases. I. The O(N) model, Phys. Rev. D 106, 065012 (2022).
  57. A. Koenigstein, M. J. Steil, N. Wink, E. Grossi, and J. Braun, Numerical fluid dynamics for FRG flow equations: Zero-dimensional QFTs as numerical test cases. II. Entropy production and irreversibility of RG flows, Phys. Rev. D 106, 065013 (2022).
  58. M. J. Steil and A. Koenigstein, Numerical fluid dynamics for FRG flow equations: Zero-dimensional QFTs as numerical test cases. III. Shock and rarefaction waves in RG flows reveal limitations of the N→∞ limit in O(N)-type models, Phys. Rev. D 106, 065014 (2022).
  59. N. Zorbach, A. Koenigstein, and J. Braun, Functional renormalization group meets computational fluid dynamics: RG flows in a multi-dimensional field space, arXiv:2412.16053.
  60. N. Zorbach, J. Stoll, and J. Braun, Optimization and stabilization of functional renormalization group flows, Phys. Rev. D 111, 096022 (2025).
  61. A. Pelissetto and E. Vicari, Critical phenomena and renormalization group theory, Phys. Rep. 368, 549 (2002).
  62. D. F. Litim and D. Zappala, Ising exponents from the functional renormalisation group, Phys. Rev. D 83, 085009 (2011).
  63. D. F. Litim, Critical exponents from optimized renormalization group flows, Nucl. Phys. B631, 128 (2002).
  64. F. Benitez, J. P. Blaizot, H. Chate, B. Delamotte, R. Mendez-Galain, and N. Wschebor, Solutions of renormalization group flow equations with full momentum dependence, Phys. Rev. E 80, 030103 (2009).
  65. F. Benitez, J. P. Blaizot, H. Chate, B. Delamotte, R. Mendez-Galain, and N. Wschebor, Non-perturbative renormalization group preserving full-momentum dependence: Implementation and quantitative evaluation, Phys. Rev. E 85, 026707 (2012).
  66. F. Murgana, A. Koenigstein, and D. H. Rischke, Reanalysis of critical exponents for the O(N) model via a hydrodynamic approach to the functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. D 108, 116016 (2023).
  67. A. S. Kapoyannis and N. Tetradis, Quantum mechanical tunneling and the renormalization group, Phys. Lett. A 276, 225 (2000).
  68. N. Zorbach, J.-P. Klinger, Owe Philipsen, and J. Braun, Lattice Monte Carlo meets lattice functional Renormalization group: A quantitative comparison, arXiv:2503.14149.
  69. E. Grossi and N. Wink, Resolving phase transitions with Discontinuous Galerkin methods, SciPost Phys. Core 6, 071 (2023).
  70. A. Kurganov and E. Tadmor, New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection–diffusion equations, J. Comput. Phys. 160, 241 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation