Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Neutrino mass and secluded dark matter puzzles solved together

Mattia Di Mauro*

  • *Contact author: dimauro.mattia@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 113, 095035 – Published 26 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/np7k-2fck

Abstract

We present a secluded dark-matter (DM) framework based on an extra U(1)X gauge symmetry. The model contains a Dirac DM particle χ, three heavy neutrinos NI with masses MN,I, and a singlet scalar R that mixes with the Standard Model Higgs doublet Φ by an angle α. A symmetry forbids the Φ−R portal at tree level; the leading portal then arises at one loop from the same Yukawa structures that generate active neutrino masses mν,I, implying tan(2α)∝∑Imν,IMN,I2/(vhmH2), where vh and mH are the Standard Model Higgs vacuum-expectation-value and mass. For heavy-neutrino masses in the multi-TeV range, this yields a naturally tiny mixing, tan(2α)∼5×10−11(MN/10  TeV)2, which strongly suppresses DM signals in direct, indirect, and collider searches. For PeV-scale heavy neutrinos the loop-induced portal is enhanced and the DM-nucleon cross section can instead enter the reach of direct-detection experiments. The visible and dark sectors thermalize at temperatures of order a few times the mass of the lightest heavy neutrino, then subsequently decouple, and typically evolve with a slightly hotter dark bath. In the secluded regime, with tan(2α)≪1 and mχ>mHp, the relic density is set by p-wave annihilation χχ¯→HpHp (with Hp the Higgs-like particle of the dark sector), and the dark-sector Yukawa couplings required to reproduce the observed abundance are O(0.1−1), as in the standard WIMP case. For heavy-neutrino masses ≳10  TeV, the mediator decays before nucleosynthesis without spoiling big bang nucleosynthesis observables, while the tiny portal suppresses present-day signals below current and near-future sensitivities. This links two long-standing puzzles—the absence of DM signals and the smallness of neutrino masses—within a predictive thermal framework.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (63)

  1. J. Silk et al., Particle Dark Matter: Observations, Models and Searches, edited by G. Bertone (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
  2. G. Bertone and D. Hooper, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045002 (2018).
  3. M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, arXiv:2406.01705.
  4. G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Phys. Rep. 405, 279 (2005).
  5. B. W. Lee and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 165 (1977).
  6. J. E. Gunn, B. W. Lee, I. Lerche, D. N. Schramm, and G. Steigman, Astrophys. J. 223, 1015 (1978).
  7. J. Wess and B. Zumino, Nucl. Phys. B70, 39 (1974).
  8. H. Goldberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1419 (1983).
  9. J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Nucl. Phys. B238, 453 (1984).
  10. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), arXiv:1807.06209.
  11. G. Steigman and M. S. Turner, Nucl. Phys. B253, 375 (1985).
  12. M. Schumann, J. Phys. G 46, 103003 (2019).
  13. A. Boveia and C. Doglioni, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 429 (2018).
  14. J. M. Gaskins, Contemp. Phys. 57, 496 (2016).
  15. J. Aalbers et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  16. E. Aprile et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
  17. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  18. G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 203 (2018).
  19. G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi, and M. Raidal, Phys. Rep. 842, 1 (2020).
  20. M. Di Mauro, C. Arina, N. Fornengo, J. Heisig, and D. Massaro, Phys. Rev. D 108, 095008 (2023).
  21. G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, J. P. Neto, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 152 (2025).
  22. M. Di Mauro and B. Xie, Phys. Rev. D 113, 015034 (2026).
  23. C. Kong and M. Di Mauro, Phys. Rev. D 113, 043031 (2026).
  24. M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, and M. B. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. B 662, 53 (2008).
  25. M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Phys. Lett. B 671, 391 (2009).
  26. M. Di Mauro and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 113, 075003 (2026).
  27. J. Aalbers et al. (DARWIN Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2016) 017.
  28. N. Aghanim et al., Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020).
  29. A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2025) 021.
  30. I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2024) 216.
  31. M. Aker et al. (KATRIN Collaboration), Science 388, adq9592 (2025).
  32. P. Minkowski, Phys. Lett. 67B, 421 (1977).
  33. T. Yanagida, in Proceedings of the Workshop on the Unified Theory and the Baryon Number in the Universe (1979), https://inspirehep.net/literature/19833.
  34. M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, Conf. Proc. C 790927, 315 (1979), https://inspirehep.net/literature/9686.
  35. R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 912 (1980).
  36. D. Wyler and L. Wolfenstein, Nucl. Phys. B218, 205 (1983).
  37. R. N. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1642 (1986).
  38. S. Baek, P. Ko, and W.-I. Park, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2011) 047.
  39. S. Baek, P. Ko, and W.-I. Park, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 013.
  40. B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. 166B, 196 (1986).
  41. R. Essig et al., arXiv:1311.0029.
  42. H. Ruegg and M. Ruiz-Altaba, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19, 3265 (2004).
  43. B. Kors and P. Nath, Phys. Lett. B 586, 366 (2004).
  44. J. A. Casas and A. Ibarra, Nucl. Phys. B618, 171 (2001).
  45. K. R. Dienes, C. F. Kolda, and J. March-Russell, Nucl. Phys. B492, 104 (1997).
  46. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, and G. R. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B 429, 263 (1998).
  47. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370 (1999).
  48. M. A. Luty and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. D 67, 045007 (2003).
  49. M. Dine, P. J. Fox, E. Gorbatov, Y. Shadmi, Y. Shirman, and S. D. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 70, 045023 (2004).
  50. H. Murayama, Y. Nomura, and D. Poland, Phys. Rev. D 77, 015005 (2008).
  51. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Nucl. Phys. B557, 79 (1999).
  52. T. Gherghetta, J. Kersten, K. Olive, and M. Pospelov, Phys. Rev. D 100, 095001 (2019).
  53. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 107, 095014 (2023).
  54. T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075037 (2024).
  55. D. Feldman, B. Kors, and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 251802 (2007).
  56. T. Bringmann, P. F. Depta, M. Hufnagel, and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, Phys. Lett. B 817, 136341 (2021).
  57. M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 174, 45 (1986).
  58. W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari, and M. Plumacher, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 315, 305 (2005).
  59. S. Davidson, E. Nardi, and Y. Nir, Phys. Rep. 466, 105 (2008).
  60. G. F. Giudice, A. Notari, M. Raidal, A. Riotto, and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B685, 89 (2004).
  61. C. S. Fong, E. Nardi, and A. Riotto, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2012, 158303 (2012).
  62. F. Hahn-Woernle, M. Plumacher, and Y. Y. Y. Wong, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2009) 010.
  63. E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Nucl. Phys. B339, 310 (1990).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation