Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Precise prediction of the decay rate for ηb→γγ from lattice QCD

Brian Colquhoun1,*, Christine T. H. Davies1,†, and G. Peter Lepage2 (HPQCD Collaboration‡)

Phys. Rev. D 112, 114513 – Published 24 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nn49-wn7h

Abstract

We calculate the decay rate for ηb→γγ in lattice QCD for the first time, providing a precise prediction for the Belle II experiment. Our calculation includes u, d, s, and c quarks in the sea, using gluon field configurations generated by the MILC collaboration, at three values of the lattice spacing from 0.06 to 0.03 fm. All quarks are treated in the highly improved staggered quark formalism, which enables us to reach the b quark mass for our valence quarks on these fine lattices. We calculate quark-line connected correlation functions only. By working at additional heavy quark masses between those of c and b we map out the behavior of the ratio fηh/(Mηh2Fηh(0,0)), where f is the decay constant, M, the mass and F(0,0), the form factor for decay to two on-shell photons for the pseudoscalar heavyonium meson, ηh. This ratio takes the approximate value 0.5 in leading-order nonrelativistic QCD (NRQCD) but we are able to give a much more accurate analysis than this. Focusing on the b quark mass, we find a ratio of 0.467(11), giving Γ(ηb→γγ)=0.559(32)fit(1)syst  keV. Combined with a value for the branching fraction from NRQCD, our result can be used to determine the total width of the ηb with a 6% uncertainty.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (37)

  1. B. Colquhoun, L. J. Cooper, C. T. H. Davies, and G. P. Lepage (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 108, 014513 (2023).
  2. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  3. A. Heister et al. (ALEPH Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 530, 56 (2002).
  4. J. S. Lange and E. Prencipe, Hadron spectroscopy: The next big steps, workshop at Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics (2022).
  5. E. Follana, Q. Mason, C. Davies, K. Hornbostel, G. Lepage, J. Shigemitsu, H. Trottier, and K. Wong (HPQCD Collaboration and UKQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 75, 054502 (2007).
  6. C. Monahan, J. Shigemitsu, and R. Horgan, Phys. Rev. D 87, 034017 (2013).
  7. B. Colquhoun, C. T. H. Davies, D. Hatton, and G. P. Lepage, arXiv:2508.02862.
  8. D. Hatton, C. T. H. Davies, J. Koponen, G. P. Lepage, and A. T. Lytle (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 103, 054512 (2021).
  9. A. Bazavov et al. (MILC Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 82, 074501 (2010).
  10. A. Bazavov et al. (MILC Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 87, 054505 (2013).
  11. S. Borsányi et al., J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 010.
  12. R. Dowdall, C. Davies, G. Lepage, and C. McNeile (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 074504 (2013).
  13. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice Collaboration and MILC Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 074512 (2018).
  14. C. Sachrajda and G. Villadoro, Phys. Lett. B 609, 73 (2005).
  15. D. Guadagnoli, F. Mescia, and S. Simula, Phys. Rev. D 73, 114504 (2006).
  16. X. Ji and C. Jung, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 208 (2001).
  17. X. Ji and C. Jung, Phys. Rev. D 64, 034506 (2001).
  18. J. J. Dudek, R. G. Edwards, and D. G. Richards, Phys. Rev. D 73, 074507 (2006).
  19. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/nn49-wn7h for tabulated data and further details of the fits and analysis.
  20. G. P. Lepage, B. Clark, C. T. H. Davies, K. Hornbostel, P. B. Mackenzie, C. Morningstar, and H. Trottier (HPQCD Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 106, 12 (2002).
  21. D. Hatton, C. T. H. Davies, G. P. Lepage, and A. T. Lytle (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 100, 114513 (2019).
  22. D. Hatton, C. Davies, B. Galloway, J. Koponen, G. Lepage, and A. Lytle (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 054511 (2020).
  23. B. Chakraborty, C. T. H. Davies, B. Galloway, P. Knecht, J. Koponen, G. C. Donald, R. J. Dowdall, G. P. Lepage, and C. McNeile (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 91, 054508 (2015).
  24. E. McLean, C. T. H. Davies, A. T. Lytle, and J. Koponen (HPQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 99, 114512 (2019).
  25. A. Bazavov et al. (Fermilab Lattice Collaboration, MILC Collaboration, and TUMQCD Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 98, 054517 (2018).
  26. A. A. Pivovarov, Phys. At. Nucl. 65, 1319 (2002).
  27. S. J. Brodsky, G. P. Lepage, and P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D 28, 228 (1983).
  28. C. T. H. Davies, C. McNeile, E. Follana, G. P. Lepage, H. Na, and J. Shigemitsu, Phys. Rev. D 82, 114504 (2010).
  29. C. Bernard and D. Toussaint (MILC Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 97, 074502 (2018).
  30. D. Besson et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 052002 (2007).
  31. A. Czarnecki and K. Melnikov, Phys. Lett. B 519, 212 (2001).
  32. Y. Kiyo, A. Pineda, and A. Signer, Nucl. Phys. B841, 231 (2010).
  33. R. Barbieri, E. d’Emilio, G. Curci, and E. Remiddi, Nucl. Phys. B 154, 535 (1979).
  34. E. Braaten and S. Fleming, Phys. Rev. D 52, 181 (1995).
  35. N. Brambilla, H. S. Chung, and J. Komijani, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114020 (2018).
  36. H. S. Chung, Phys. Rev. D 109, 054001 (2024).
  37. MILC Code Repository, https://github.com/milc-qcd.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation