Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

CP violation in hadronic weak decays of charmed baryons in the topological diagrammatic approach

Hai-Yang Cheng

Fanrong Xu* and Huiling Zhong

  • Department of Physics, College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, People’s Republic of China

  • *Contact author: fanrongxu@jnu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 054022 – Published 12 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n8fk-v7r8

Abstract

CP violation in the charmed baryon sector is generally expected to be very small, of order 10−4 or even smaller. Nevertheless, large long-distance penguin topologies can be induced through final-state rescattering. At the hadron level, they are manifested as the triangle and bubble diagrams. However, these diagrams consist of not only the penguin but also other tree topologies. Therefore, we focus on the flavor structure of the these diagrams and project out their contributions to penguin and tree topologies. The analysis is performed within the framework of the topological diagram approach and the irreducible SU(3) approach in which the SU(3) flavor symmetry of QCD is realized to describe the nonleptonic decays of charmed baryons. CP violation at the per mille level is found in the following decay modes: Λc+→pπ0,Λc+→pη′,Ξc0→Σ0η, and Ξc+→Σ+η. CP asymmetries in the last three modes receive sizable contributions from the SU(3)-flavor-singlet hairpin diagram.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (56)

  1. H. Y. Cheng, Charmed baryon physics circa 2021, Chin. J. Phys. (Taipei) 78, 324 (2022).
  2. C. Q. Geng, C. W. Liu, and T. H. Tsai, Asymmetries of anti-triplet charmed baryon decays, Phys. Lett. B 794, 19 (2019).
  3. H. Zhong, F. Xu, Q. Wen, and Y. Gu, Weak decays of antitriplet charmed baryons from the perspective of flavor symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 235.
  4. Z. P. Xing, X. G. He, F. Huang, and C. Yang, Global analysis of measured and unmeasured hadronic two-body weak decays of antitriplet charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 108, 053004 (2023).
  5. C. Q. Geng, C. W. Liu, T. H. Tsai, and Y. Yu, Charmed baryon weak decays with decuplet baryon and SU(3) flavor symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 99, 114022 (2019).
  6. C. Q. Geng, C. W. Liu, and T. H. Tsai, Charmed baryon weak decays with vector mesons, Phys. Rev. D 101, 053002 (2020).
  7. F. Huang, Z. P. Xing, and X. G. He, A global analysis of charmless two body hadronic decays for anti-triplet charmed baryons, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 143; 09 (2022) 87.
  8. Y. Kohara, Quark diagram analysis of charmed baryon decays, Phys. Rev. D 44, 2799 (1991).
  9. L. L. Chau, H. Y. Cheng, and B. Tseng, Analysis of two-body decays of charmed baryons using the quark diagram scheme, Phys. Rev. D 54, 2132 (1996).
  10. Y. K. Hsiao, Y. L. Wang, and H. J. Zhao, Equivalent SU(3)f approaches for two-body anti-triplet charmed baryon decays, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2022) 035.
  11. H. J. Zhao, Y. L. Wang, Y. K. Hsiao, and Y. Yu, A diagrammatic analysis of two-body charmed baryon decays with flavor symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2020) 165.
  12. Y. K. Hsiao, Q. Yi, S. T. Cai, and H. J. Zhao, Two-body charmed baryon decays involving decuplet baryon in the quark-diagram scheme, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1067 (2020).
  13. X. G. He, Y. J. Shi, and W. Wang, Unification of flavor SU(3) analyses of heavy hadron weak decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 359 (2020).
  14. D. Wang and J. F. Luo, Topological amplitudes of charmed baryon decays in the SU(3)F limit, Phys. Rev. D 110, 093001 (2024).
  15. Z. P. Xing, Y. J. Shi, J. Sun, and Y. Xing, SU(3) symmetry analysis in charmed baryon two body decays with penguin diagram contribution, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1014 (2024).
  16. J. Sun, Z. P. Xing, and R. Zhu, Analysis of charmed baryon decays with strong phases under SU(3) symmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 262 (2025).
  17. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Two-body hadronic charmed meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 81, 074021 (2010).
  18. H. Y. Cheng, C. W. Chiang, and A. L. Kuo, Global analysis of two-body D→VP decays within the framework of flavor symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 93, 114010 (2016).
  19. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Updated analysis of D→PP,VP and VV decays: Implications for KS0−KL0 asymmetries and D0−D¯0 mixing, Phys. Rev. D 109, 073008 (2024).
  20. H. Zhong, F. Xu, and H. Y. Cheng, Analysis of hadronic weak decays of charmed baryons in the topological diagrammatic approach, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114027 (2024).
  21. H. Zhong, F. Xu, and H. Y. Cheng, Topological diagrams and hadronic weak decays of charmed baryons, arXiv:2401.15926.
  22. H. Y. Cheng, F. Xu, and H. Zhong, Hadronic weak decays of charmed baryons in the topological diagrammatic approach: An update, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034011 (2025).
  23. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of Λb0, Λc+ and Λ decay parameters using Λb0→Λc+h− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 261804 (2024).
  24. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II and Belle Collaborations), Measurements of the branching fractions of Ξc+→Σ+KS0, Ξc+→Ξ0π+, and Ξc+→Ξ0K+ at Belle and Belle II, arXiv:2503.17643.
  25. I. Adachi et al. (Belle and Belle-II Collaborations), Observations of the singly Cabibbo-suppressed decays Ξc+→pKS0, Ξc+→Λπ+, and Ξc+→Σ0π+ at Belle and Belle II, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2025) 061.
  26. C. Yang, X. G. He, and C. W. Liu, Charmed baryon decays: SU(3)F breaking and CP violation, arXiv:2506.19005.
  27. J. G. Körner, Octet behavior of single-particle matrix elements ⟨B′|HW|B⟩ and ⟨M′|HW|M⟩ using a weak current current quark Hamiltonian, Nucl. Phys. B25, 282 (1971); J. C. Pati and C. H. Woo, ΔI=1/2 rule with fermion quarks, Phys. Rev. D 3, 2920 (1971).
  28. C. Q. Geng, X. G. He, X. N. Jin, C. W. Liu, and C. Yang, Complete determination of SU(3)F amplitudes and strong phase in Λc+→Ξ0K+, Phys. Rev. D 109, L071302 (2024).
  29. Y. Grossman and D. J. Robinson, SU(3) sum rules for charm decay, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2013) 067.
  30. X. G. He and C. W. Liu, Large CP violation in charmed baryon decays, Sci. Bull. 70, 2598 (2025).
  31. C. Q. Geng, C. W. Liu, and T. H. Tsai, Singly Cabibbo suppressed decays of Λc+ with SU(3) flavor symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 790, 225 (2019).
  32. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Evidence for CP violation in time-integrated D0→h+h− decay rates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 111602 (2012).
  33. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for direct CP violation in D0→h+h− modes using semileptonic B decays, Phys. Lett. B 723, 33 (2013).
  34. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of CP violation in charm decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 211803 (2019).
  35. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Direct CP violation in two-body hadronic charmed meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 85, 034036 (2012).
  36. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, SU(3) symmetry breaking and CP violation in D→PP decays, Phys. Rev. D 86, 014014 (2012).
  37. H. n. Li, C. D. Lu, and F. S. Yu, Branching ratios and direct CP asymmetries in D→PP decays, Phys. Rev. D 86, 036012 (2012).
  38. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, Revisiting CP violation in D→PP and VP decays, Phys. Rev. D 100, 093002 (2019).
  39. H. Y. Cheng and C. W. Chiang, CP violation in quasi-two-body D→VP decays and three-body D decays mediated by vector resonances, Phys. Rev. D 104, 073003 (2021).
  40. D. Wang, From topological amplitude to rescattering dynamics, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2022) 155.
  41. A. Pich, E. Solomonidi, and L. Vale Silva, Final-state interactions in the CP asymmetries of charm-meson two-body decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 036026 (2023).
  42. I. Bediaga, T. Frederico, and P. C. Magalhães, Enhanced charm CP asymmetries from final state interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 051802 (2023).
  43. A. Lenz, M. L. Piscopo, and A. V. Rusov, Two body non-leptonic D0 decays from LCSR and implications for ΔaCPdir, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 151.
  44. H. Y. Cheng and R. Shrock, Some results on vector and tensor meson mixing in a generalized QCD-like theory, Phys. Rev. D 84, 094008 (2011).
  45. T. M. Aliev, A. Ozpineci, M. Savci, and V. S. Zamiralov, Vector meson-baryon strong coupling constants in light cone QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 80, 016010 (2009).
  46. C. P. Jia, H. Y. Jiang, J. P. Wang, and F. S. Yu, Final-state rescattering mechanism of charmed baryon decays, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2024) 072.
  47. Cai-Ping Jia (private communication).
  48. C. W. Liu, Nonleptonic two-body weak decays of charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 109, 033004 (2024).
  49. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), First measurement of the decay asymmetry in the pure W-boson-exchange decay Λc+→Ξ0K+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 031801 (2024).
  50. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II and Belle Collaborations), Measurements of the branching fractions of Ξc0→Ξ0π0, Ξc0→Ξ0η, and Ξc0→Ξ0η′ and asymmetry parameter of Ξc0→Ξ0π0, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 045.
  51. D. Wang, Sum rules for CP asymmetries of charmed baryon decays in the SU(3)F limit, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 429 (2019).
  52. H. Y. Cheng, C. K. Chua, and A. Soni, Final state interactions in hadronic B decays, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014030 (2005).
  53. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), First measurement of the decay asymmetry of pure W-exchange decay Λc+→Ξ0K+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 031801 (2024).
  54. P. Carruthers, Introduction to Unitary Symmetry (Interscience Publishers, New York, 1966).
  55. M. P. Khanna and R. C. Verma, Sum rules for the pseudoscalar BBP couplings, Z. Phys. C 47, 275 (1990).
  56. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation