- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Description of the baryon mass spectrum by open strings and diquarks

Yuki Fujimoto*

  • *Contact author: fujimotophy@gmail.com
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 054044 – Published 25 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n6b5-f2t3

Abstract

We analyze the mass spectra of hadrons and demonstrate that the physical spectra of mesons and baryons are well described by the exponential spectrum of open strings. The open-string spectrum, derived from string theory, is characterized by a unique Hagedorn temperature TH and free from any other parameters. Notably, our fitting to the physical spectra yields consistent values for both mesons and baryons, TH≃0.34  GeV, which contrasts with previous phenomenological analyses that suggested different values. This obtained value aligns well with typical string tension derived from lattice-QCD calculations and the Regge slope. In the baryonic sector, our results indicate that diquarks play a crucial role in describing the mass spectrum, implying that baryons can be understood as a quark-diquark system, as anticipated by Regge phenomenology. These findings have significant implications for our understanding of quark deconfinement, especially in the possibly existing regime at high temperature and small baryon chemical potential within the QCD phase diagram.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (57)

  1. Y. Aoki, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and K. K. Szabo, The order of the quantum chromodynamics transition predicted by the standard model of particle physics, Nature (London) 443, 675 (2006).
  2. A. Bazavov et al. (HotQCD Collaboration), Chiral crossover in QCD at zero and non-zero chemical potentials, Phys. Lett. B 795, 15 (2019).
  3. S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. N. Guenther, R. Kara, S. D. Katz, P. Parotto, A. Pasztor, C. Ratti, and K. K. Szabo, QCD crossover at finite chemical potential from lattice simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 052001 (2020).
  4. K. Fukushima and V. Skokov, Polyakov loop modeling for hot QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 96, 154 (2017).
  5. A. Rothkopf, Heavy quarkonium in extreme conditions, Phys. Rep. 858, 1 (2020).
  6. P. Petreczky, S. Sharma, and J. H. Weber, Bottomonium melting from screening correlators at high temperature, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054511 (2021).
  7. P. Lowdon and O. Philipsen, Pion spectral properties above the chiral crossover of QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2022) 161.
  8. G. Aarts, C. Allton, M. N. Anwar, R. Bignell, T. J. Burns, B. Jäger, and J.-I. Skullerud, Non-zero temperature study of spin 1/2 charmed baryons using lattice gauge theory, Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 59 (2024).
  9. D. Bala, O. Kaczmarek, P. Lowdon, O. Philipsen, and T. Ueding, Pseudo-scalar meson spectral properties in the chiral crossover region of QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 332.
  10. A. Bazavov, D. Hoying, R. N. Larsen, S. Mukherjee, P. Petreczky, A. Rothkopf, and J. H. Weber (HotQCD Collaboration), Unscreened forces in the quark-gluon plasma?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 074504 (2024).
  11. D. Bala, O. Kaczmarek, P. Petreczky, S. Sharma, and S. Tah, Spatial string tension and its effects on screening correlators in a thermal QCD plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 012301 (2025).
  12. M. Asakawa and T. Hatsuda, J/ψ and ηc in the deconfined plasma from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 012001 (2004).
  13. A. Rothkopf, T. Hatsuda, and S. Sasaki, Complex heavy-quark potential at finite temperature from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 162001 (2012).
  14. Y. Burnier and A. Rothkopf, Bayesian approach to spectral function reconstruction for Euclidean quantum field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 182003 (2013).
  15. Y. Burnier, O. Kaczmarek, and A. Rothkopf, Quarkonium at finite temperature: Towards realistic phenomenology from first principles, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2015) 101.
  16. D. Bala and S. Datta, Nonperturbative potential for the study of quarkonia in QGP, Phys. Rev. D 101, 034507 (2020).
  17. D. Bala, O. Kaczmarek, R. Larsen, S. Mukherjee, G. Parkar, P. Petreczky, A. Rothkopf, and J. H. Weber (HotQCD Collaboration), Static quark-antiquark interactions at nonzero temperature from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054513 (2022).
  18. T. Spriggs, C. Allton, T. Burns, and S. Kim, New results for thermal interquark bottomonium potentials using NRQCD from the HAL QCD method, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2022 (2023) 192 [arXiv:2301.03320].
  19. J. A. Mickley, C. Allton, R. Bignell, and D. B. Leinweber, Center vortex evidence for a second finite-temperature QCD transition, Phys. Rev. D 111, 034508 (2025).
  20. C. Rohrhofer, Y. Aoki, G. Cossu, H. Fukaya, C. Gattringer, L. Y. Glozman, S. Hashimoto, C. B. Lang, and S. Prelovsek, Symmetries of spatial meson correlators in high temperature QCD, Phys. Rev. D 100, 014502 (2019).
  21. C. Rohrhofer, Y. Aoki, L. Y. Glozman, and S. Hashimoto, Chiral-spin symmetry of the meson spectral function above Tc, Phys. Lett. B 802, 135245 (2020).
  22. L. Y. Glozman, O. Philipsen, and R. D. Pisarski, Chiral spin symmetry and the QCD phase diagram, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 247 (2022).
  23. L. Y. Glozman, Chiral spin symmetry and hot/dense QCD, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 131, 104049 (2023).
  24. T. D. Cohen and L. Y. Glozman, Large Nc QCD phase diagram at μB=0, Eur. Phys. J. A 60, 171 (2024).
  25. Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, Y. Hidaka, and L. McLerran, New state of matter between the hadronic phase and the quark-gluon plasma?, Phys. Rev. D 112, 074006 (2025).
  26. M. Hanada, J. Holden, and H. Watanabe, New phases in QCD at finite temperature and chemical potential, arXiv:2509.04671.
  27. A. Bazavov and J. H. Weber, Color screening in quantum chromodynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 116, 103823 (2021).
  28. M. Marczenko, G. Kovács, L. McLerran, and K. Redlich, String-based model with Hagedorn temperature of TH∼300  MeV describes the spectrum of mesons and glueballs, Phys. Rev. D 112, 096010 (2025).
  29. R. Hagedorn, Statistical thermodynamics of strong interactions at high-energies, Nuovo Cimento Suppl. 3, 147 (1965), https://cds.cern.ch/record/346206.
  30. S. C. Frautschi, Statistical bootstrap model of hadrons, Phys. Rev. D 3, 2821 (1971).
  31. N. Cabibbo and G. Parisi, Exponential hadronic spectrum and quark liberation, Phys. Lett. 59B, 67 (1975).
  32. Y. Fujimoto, K. Fukushima, and Y. Hidaka, Deconfining phase boundary of rapidly rotating hot and dense matter and analysis of moment of inertia, Phys. Lett. B 816, 136184 (2021).
  33. S. Borsanyi, R. Kara, Z. Fodor, D. A. Godzieba, P. Parotto, and D. Sexty, Precision study of the continuum SU(3) Yang-Mills theory: How to use parallel tempering to improve on supercritical slowing down for first order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074513 (2022).
  34. L. Giusti, M. Hirasawa, M. Pepe, and L. Virzı, A precise study of the thermodynamic properties of the SU(3) Yang-Mills theory across the deconfinement transition, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139775 (2025).
  35. B. Svetitsky, Symmetry aspects of finite temperature confinement transitions, Phys. Rep. 132, 1 (1986).
  36. H. B. Meyer, High-precision thermodynamics and Hagedorn density of states, Phys. Rev. D 80, 051502 (2009).
  37. W. Broniowski and W. Florkowski, Different Hagedorn temperatures for mesons and baryons from experimental mass spectra, compound hadrons, and combinatorial saturation, Phys. Lett. B 490, 223 (2000).
  38. W. Broniowski, W. Florkowski, and L. Y. Glozman, Update of the Hagedorn mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 70, 117503 (2004).
  39. A. Majumder and B. Muller, Hadron mass spectrum from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252002 (2010).
  40. P. M. Lo, M. Marczenko, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Matching the Hagedorn mass spectrum with lattice QCD results, Phys. Rev. C 92, 055206 (2015).
  41. P. Man Lo, M. Marczenko, K. Redlich, and C. Sasaki, Missing baryonic resonances in the Hagedorn spectrum, Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 235 (2016).
  42. Melting Hadrons, Boiling Quarks—From Hagedorn Temperature to Ultra-Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions at CERN. With a Tribute to Rolf Hagedorn, edited by J. Rafelski (Springer, New York, 2016).
  43. R. L. Jaffe, Exotica, Phys. Rep. 409, 1 (2005).
  44. M. Shifman, QCD chemistry: Remarks on diquarks, Nucl. Part. Phys. Proc. 347, 86 (2024).
  45. F. Wilczek, Diquarks as inspiration and as objects, in From Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2005), pp. 322–338.
  46. A. Selem and F. Wilczek, Hadron systematics and emergent diquarks, in New Trends in HERA Physics 2005 (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006), pp. 337–356.
  47. G. S. Sharov, Instability of classic rotational motion for three string baryon model, arXiv:hep-ph/0001154.
  48. G. S. Sharov, Quasirotational motions and stability problem in dynamics of string hadron models, Phys. Rev. D 62, 094015 (2000).
  49. G. ’t Hooft, Minimal strings for baryons, in Hadrons and Strings Workshop: A Trento ECT Workshop (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0408148.
  50. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  51. V. Vovchenko and H. Stoecker, Thermal-FIST: A package for heavy-ion collisions and hadronic equation of state, Comput. Phys. Commun. 244, 295 (2019).
  52. M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten, Superstring Theory. Vol. 1: Introduction, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1988).
  53. K. Huang and S. Weinberg, Ultimate temperature and the early universe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 895 (1970).
  54. G. Veneziano, An Introduction to dual models of strong interactions and their physical motivations, Phys. Rep. 9, 199 (1974).
  55. S. Borsányi, S. Dürr, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, T. Kurth, L. Lellouch, T. Lippert, and C. McNeile (BMW Collaboration), High-precision scale setting in lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 010.
  56. A. Athenodorou and M. Teper, The glueball spectrum of SU(3) gauge theory in 3+1 dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2020) 172.
  57. N. Brambilla, R. L. Delgado, A. S. Kronfeld, V. Leino, P. Petreczky, S. Steinbeißer, A. Vairo, and J. H. Weber (TUMQCD Collaboration), Static energy in (2+1+1)-flavor lattice QCD: Scale setting and charm effects, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074503 (2023).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 054044– Published 25 March, 2026
  • Received 15 January 2026
  • Accepted 10 March 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation