Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Probing gravity with nonlinear clustering in redshift space

    Cristian Viglione1,2,*, Pablo Fosalba1,2, Isaac Tutusaus3, Linda Blot4,5, Jorge Carretero6,7, Pau Tallada6,7, and Francisco Castander1,2

    • *Contact author: crisneryvi@gmail.com, viglione@ice.csic.es

    Phys. Rev. D 113, 124017 – Published 8 June, 2026

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n3p5-dyxz

    Abstract

    We compute the gravity model testing parameter EG (gravity estimator) on realistic simulated modified gravity galaxy mocks adopting the more accurate estimator described in [Z. Wang et al., J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. (2023) 038.]. The analysis is conducted using two twin simulations presented in [C. Arnold, M. Leo, and B. Li, Nat. Astron. 3, 917 (2019).]; one based on general relativity (GR) and the other on the f(R) Hu and Sawicki model with f=10−5 (F5). This study aims to measure the EG estimator in GR and f(R) models using high-fidelity simulated galaxy catalogs, with the goal of assessing how future galaxy surveys can detect deviations from standard gravity. Deriving this estimator requires precise, unbiased measurements of the growth rate of structure and the linear galaxy bias. We achieve this by implementing an end-to-end cosmological analysis pipeline in configuration space, using the multipoles of the two-point correlation function. In our analysis we estimate the scale-dependent growth rate predicted by nonstandard gravity models using COMET-VDG (cosmological observables modelled by emulated perturbation theory-velocity difference generator) fits. We split the estimation of the redshift space distortions (RSD) β parameter over distinct scale ranges, separating large (quasilinear) and small (nonlinear) scales. We show that this estimator can be accurately measured using mock galaxies in low redshift bins (z<1), although its discriminating power between competing theories is limited. We find that, for an all-sky galaxy survey and neglecting observational systematics, accurate and largely unbiased estimations of EG can be obtained across all redshifts. However, the error bars are too large to clearly distinguish between the theories. When measuring the scale dependence of the EG estimator, we note that state-of-the-art theory modeling limitations and intrinsic “prior volume effects” prevent high-accuracy constraints. Alternatively, we propose a null test of gravity using RSD clustering, which, if small scales are modeled accurately in future surveys, could detect departures from GR.

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation