Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Higgs field governs the interior spacetime of black holes

Itzhak Bars*

  • *Contact author: bars@usc.edu

Phys. Rev. D 112, 075041 – Published 22 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n3hw-831m

Abstract

The Higgs field is conventionally treated as a small local perturbation atop a large, constant vacuum value that uniformly permeates the Universe. I propose instead that in regions of extreme gravitational intensity—such as near gravitational singularities—the Higgs field behaves in a profoundly nonperturbative manner. In such environments, spacetime and the Higgs field engage in a dynamic interplay that extends spacetime beyond the singularity, achieving geodesic completeness. The continuation beyond the singularity is dominated by antigravity effects, reshaping the causal structure of spacetime and enabling novel flows of matter and information, including traversal through singularities. In its standard form, the combined framework of the Standard Model (SM) and general relativity (GR), as well as most of its extensions, fails to capture these phenomena due to its geodesic incompleteness. By contrast, a refined, locally conformal-symmetric formulation—denoted i(SM+GR)—naturally incorporates these effects. GR is not an optional component of i(SM+GR) but an essential ingredient. This framework preserves the empirical success of SM+GR in the low-energy regime while predicting striking new phenomena in extreme gravitational settings, including within black holes (on both sides of the singularity) and in pre–big bang cosmology. At the classical field theory level, i(SM+GR) offers fresh perspectives on the black hole information puzzle and provides a platform for locally scale-invariant generalizations, such as geodesically complete quantum field theory, string theory, and unified models of fundamental interactions. This paper presents the detailed derivations and explanations that underlie a condensed letter version recently published in Itzhak Bars, Higgs field as architect of a geodesically complete universe and agent for new physics in interiors of black holes, arXiv:2509.07346.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (23)

  1. C. V. Johnson, Wigner meets ’t Hooft near the black hole horizon, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 31, 2242003 (2022).
  2. Itzhak Bars, Paul Steinhardt, and Neil Turok, Local conformal symmetry in physics and cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 89, 043515 (2014).
  3. Itzhak Bars and Sophia D. Singh, Locally scale invariant Chern-Simons actions in 3+1 dimensions and their emergence from (4+2)-dimensional 2T physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 045010 (2024).
  4. Itzhak Bars, P. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, Dynamical string tension in string theory with spacetime Weyl invariance, Fortschr. Phys. 62, 901 (2014).
  5. Itzhak Bars, Higgs field as architect of a geodesically complete universe and agent for new physics in interiors of black holes, arXiv:2509.07346.
  6. See for example, S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2000), Vol. III.
  7. Itzhak Bars, P. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, Cyclic cosmology, conformal symmetry and the metastability of the Higgs, Phys. Lett. B 726, 50 (2013).
  8. Itzhak Bars, The Higgs Field Meets the Black Hole with Exact Electroweak Symmetry (to be published).
  9. I. J. Araya, Itzhak Bars, and A. James, Journey beyond the Schwarzschild black hole singularity, arXiv:1510.03396.
  10. C. H. Lineweaver and T. M. Davis, Misconceptions about the big bang, Sci. Am. Mag. 292, 36 (2005).
  11. G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics and particle creation, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738 (1977).
  12. C. Misner, K. Thorne, and J. Wheeler, Gravitation (W. H.Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 1973), see Fig. 31.3.
  13. Itzhak Bars, Paul Steinhardt, and Neil Turok, Antigravity and the big crunch/big bang transition, Phys. Lett. B 715, 278 (2012).
  14. Itzhak Bars, P. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, Sailing through the big crunch-big bang transition, Phys. Rev. D 89, 061302 (2014).
  15. J. T. Wheeler, Weyl geometry, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 50, 80 (2018).
  16. Itzhak Bars, Hidden symmetries, AdSd×Sn, and the lifting of one-time-physics to two-time-physics, Phys. Rev. D 59, 045019 (1999).
  17. David Tong, Lectures on General Relativity, http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/gr/gr.pdf. See Fig. 39 on p. 179, and related commentary, and Eqs. (4.23), (4.25), and (4.27).
  18. J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, Cool horizons for entangled black holes, Fortschr. Phys. 61, 781 (2013).
  19. L. Susskind, ER=EPR, GHZ, and the consistency of quantum measurements, Fortschr. Phys. 64, 72 (2016).
  20. J. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
  21. S. Gubser, I. Klebanov, and A. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428, 105 (1998).
  22. E. Witten, Anti de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
  23. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation