Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Diffusion models for SU(2) lattice gauge theory in two dimensions

H. Alharazin, J. Yu. Panteleeva, and B.-D. Sun

Phys. Rev. D 114, 014522 – Published 27 July, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n3bh-gs98

Abstract

We apply score-based diffusion models to two-dimensional SU(2) lattice pure gauge theory with the Wilson action, extending recent work on U(1) gauge theories. The SU(2) manifold structure is handled through a quaternion parametrization. The model is trained on 10,000 configurations generated via hybrid Monte Carlo at a fixed coupling β0=2.0 on an 8×8 lattice, augmented to 20,000 samples via random gauge transformations. Through physics-conditioned sampling exploiting the linear β dependence of the score function, we generate configurations at different values of the coupling without retraining; through the fully convolutional U-Net architecture with periodic boundary conditions, we generate configurations on lattices of different spatial extents. We validate our approach by comparing the average plaquette against exact analytical predictions. At the training lattice size (8×8), the model reproduces the exact plaquette with biases |Δ|≤0.001 for β∈[1.5,2.5] and |Δ|<0.06 across β∈[1,4]. For lattices sharing the training extent L=8 in at least one direction, biases remain below ∼0.003 for β∈[1.5,2.5], with larger deviations at higher couplings. This work demonstrates that diffusion models are a promising tool for non-Abelian gauge field generation and motivates further investigation toward higher-dimensional theories.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (29)

  1. K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974).
  2. M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2308 (1980).
  3. S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195, 216 (1987).
  4. L. Del Debbio, H. Panagopoulos, and E. Vicari, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2002) 044.
  5. P. de Forcrand, Proc. Sci. LAT2009 (2009) 010 [arXiv:1005.0539].
  6. M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034515 (2019).
  7. G. Kanwar, M. S. Albergo, D. Boyda, K. Cranmer, D. C. Hackett, S. Racanière, D. J. Rezende, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 121601 (2020).
  8. D. Boyda, G. Kanwar, S. Racanière, D. Jimenez Rezende, M. S. Albergo, K. Cranmer, D. C. Hackett, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074504 (2021).
  9. R. Abbott et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 257 (2023).
  10. J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 6840 (2020).
  11. Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, arXiv:2011.13456.
  12. L. Wang, G. Aarts, and K. Zhou, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 060.
  13. L. Wang, G. Aarts, and K. Zhou, arXiv:2311.03578.
  14. Q. Zhu, G. Aarts, W. Wang, K. Zhou, and L. Wang, arXiv:2410.19602.
  15. Q. Zhu, G. Aarts, W. Wang, K. Zhou, and L. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2026) 111.
  16. O. Vega, J. Komijani, A. El-Khadra, and M. Marinkovic, arXiv:2510.26081.
  17. G. Kanwar and O. Vega, arXiv:2512.19877.
  18. G. Aarts, D. E. Habibi, A. Ipp, D. I. Müller, T. R. Ranner, L. Wang, W. Wang, and Q. Zhu, arXiv:2601.19552.
  19. J.-M. Drouffe and J.-B. Zuber, Phys. Rep. 102, 1 (1983).
  20. A. Q. Nichol and P. Dhariwal, arXiv:2102.09672.
  21. G. Parisi and Y. Wu, Sci. Sin. 24, 483 (1981).
  22. D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys. B192, 259 (1981).
  23. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention MICCAI 2015 (Springer, Cham, 2015), p. 234.
  24. A. Vaswani et al., Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, 5998 (2017).
  25. Y. Wu and K. He, Group normalization, in ECCV (Springer Cham, 2018), p. 3.
  26. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, arXiv:1412.6980.
  27. M. Favoni, A. Ipp, D. I. Müller, and D. Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 032003 (2022).
  28. R. DerSimonian and N. Laird, Control. Clin. Trials 7, 177 (1986).
  29. B.-D. Sun, https://github.com/sunbaodong/DiffusionModelSU2 (2026).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation