- Open Access
Diffusion models for SU(2) lattice gauge theory in two dimensions
Phys. Rev. D 114, 014522 – Published 27 July, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n3bh-gs98
Abstract
We apply score-based diffusion models to two-dimensional SU(2) lattice pure gauge theory with the Wilson action, extending recent work on U(1) gauge theories. The SU(2) manifold structure is handled through a quaternion parametrization. The model is trained on 10,000 configurations generated via hybrid Monte Carlo at a fixed coupling on an lattice, augmented to 20,000 samples via random gauge transformations. Through physics-conditioned sampling exploiting the linear dependence of the score function, we generate configurations at different values of the coupling without retraining; through the fully convolutional U-Net architecture with periodic boundary conditions, we generate configurations on lattices of different spatial extents. We validate our approach by comparing the average plaquette against exact analytical predictions. At the training lattice size (), the model reproduces the exact plaquette with biases for and across . For lattices sharing the training extent in at least one direction, biases remain below for , with larger deviations at higher couplings. This work demonstrates that diffusion models are a promising tool for non-Abelian gauge field generation and motivates further investigation toward higher-dimensional theories.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (29)
- K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974).
- M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2308 (1980).
- S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195, 216 (1987).
- L. Del Debbio, H. Panagopoulos, and E. Vicari, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2002) 044.
- P. de Forcrand, Proc. Sci. LAT2009 (2009) 010 [arXiv:1005.0539].
- M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034515 (2019).
- G. Kanwar, M. S. Albergo, D. Boyda, K. Cranmer, D. C. Hackett, S. Racanière, D. J. Rezende, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 121601 (2020).
- D. Boyda, G. Kanwar, S. Racanière, D. Jimenez Rezende, M. S. Albergo, K. Cranmer, D. C. Hackett, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074504 (2021).
- R. Abbott et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 59, 257 (2023).
- J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 6840 (2020).
- Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, and B. Poole, arXiv:2011.13456.
- L. Wang, G. Aarts, and K. Zhou, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 060.
- L. Wang, G. Aarts, and K. Zhou, arXiv:2311.03578.
- Q. Zhu, G. Aarts, W. Wang, K. Zhou, and L. Wang, arXiv:2410.19602.
- Q. Zhu, G. Aarts, W. Wang, K. Zhou, and L. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2026) 111.
- O. Vega, J. Komijani, A. El-Khadra, and M. Marinkovic, arXiv:2510.26081.
- G. Kanwar and O. Vega, arXiv:2512.19877.
- G. Aarts, D. E. Habibi, A. Ipp, D. I. Müller, T. R. Ranner, L. Wang, W. Wang, and Q. Zhu, arXiv:2601.19552.
- J.-M. Drouffe and J.-B. Zuber, Phys. Rep. 102, 1 (1983).
- A. Q. Nichol and P. Dhariwal, arXiv:2102.09672.
- G. Parisi and Y. Wu, Sci. Sin. 24, 483 (1981).
- D. Zwanziger, Nucl. Phys. B192, 259 (1981).
- O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention MICCAI 2015 (Springer, Cham, 2015), p. 234.
- A. Vaswani et al., Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30, 5998 (2017).
- Y. Wu and K. He, Group normalization, in ECCV (Springer Cham, 2018), p. 3.
- D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, arXiv:1412.6980.
- M. Favoni, A. Ipp, D. I. Müller, and D. Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 032003 (2022).
- R. DerSimonian and N. Laird, Control. Clin. Trials 7, 177 (1986).
- B.-D. Sun, https://github.com/sunbaodong/DiffusionModelSU2 (2026).