- Open Access
Color gauge invariant theory of diquark interactions
Phys. Rev. D 113, 016019 – Published 20 January, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mw52-xl56
Abstract
In the present work, we construct a color gauge invariant theory of diquark interactions. With the transformation rule of the diquark fields and the definition of the covariant derivatives under color SU(3) symmetry, we construct the gauge invariant Lagrangians describing the vertices of , , , , and , where is the light (heavy) scalar diquark field, is the light (heavy) axial vector diquark field, and is the gluon field. And then we derive the one-gluon-exchange effective potentials for diquark-antidiquark interactions using the obtained Lagrangians. By comparing these potentials with those in the Godfrey-Isgur quark model, the coupling constants of the Lagrangians are determined. We find that the potentials are mainly made of Coulomb, contact, and tensor terms. The potential for the process is 0, since . And the tensor terms proportional to are negligible.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (35)
- H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 639, 1 (2016).
- Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107, 237 (2019).
- N. Drenska, R. Faccini, F. Piccinini, A. Polosa, F. Renga, and C. Sabelli, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 33, 633 (2010).
- S. L. Olsen, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 10, 121 (2015).
- A. Hosaka, T. Iijima, K. Miyabayashi, Y. Sakai, and S. Yasui, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016, 062C01 (2016).
- R. A. Briere, F. A. Harris, and R. E. Mitchell, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 66, 143 (2016).
- J.-M. Richard, Few Body Syst. 57, 1185 (2016).
- R. F. Lebed, R. E. Mitchell, and E. S. Swanson, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 143 (2017).
- A. Esposito, A. Pilloni, and A. D. Polosa, Phys. Rep. 668, 1 (2017).
- F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); 94, 029901(E) (2022).
- A. Ali, J. S. Lange, and S. Stone, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 97, 123 (2017).
- M. Karliner, J. L. Rosner, and T. Skwarnicki, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68, 17 (2018).
- R. M. Albuquerque, J. M. Dias, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martínez Torres, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, and C. M. Zanetti, J. Phys. G 46, 093002 (2019).
- N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, C. Hanhart, A. Nefediev, C.-P. Shen, C. E. Thomas, A. Vairo, and C.-Z. Yuan, Phys. Rep. 873, 1 (2020).
- F.-K. Guo, X.-H. Liu, and S. Sakai, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 112, 103757 (2020).
- L. Meng, B. Wang, G.-J. Wang, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 1019, 1 (2023).
- P. Bicudo, Phys. Rep. 1039, 1 (2023).
- D. Johnson, I. Polyakov, T. Skwarnicki, and M. Wang, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 74, 583 (2024).
- M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rep. 1108, 1 (2025).
- H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
- X.-K. Dong, F.-K. Guo, and B.-S. Zou, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 125201 (2021).
- Y. Dong, A. Faessler, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 94, 282 (2017).
- G. Yang, J. Ping, and J. Segovia, Symmetry 12, 1869 (2020).
- G. Mezzadri and S. Spataro, Rev. Phys. 8, 100070 (2022).
- Z.-H. Cao, W. He, and Z.-F. Sun, Phys. Rev. D 107, 014017 (2023).
- W. He, D.-S. Zhang, and Z.-F. Sun, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054006 (2024).
- D.-S. Zhang, W. He, C.-W. Xiao, and Z.-F. Sun, arXiv:2410.05749.
- Y. Ma, D.-S. Zhang, C.-Q. Pang, and Z.-F. Sun, arXiv:2412.11144.
- D.-S. Zhang, J.-F. Wang, and Z.-F. Sun (to be published).
- C.-N. Yang and R. L. Mills, Phys. Rev. 96, 191 (1954).
- S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).
- J. Ferretti, Few Body Syst. 60, 17 (2019).
- M. Anselmino, P. Kroll, and B. Pire, Z. Phys. C 36, 89 (1987).
- P. Kroll and W. Schweiger, Nucl. Phys. A474, 608 (1987).
- P. Kroll, B. Quadder, and W. Schweiger, Nucl. Phys. B316, 373 (1989).