Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Searching for the lepton-flavor violating γγeμ interaction at future e−e+ colliders

M. A. Arroyo-Ureña1,2,*, R. Gaitán3,†, Marcela Marín3,4,‡, Humberto Salazar1,2,§, and M. G. Villanueva-Utrilla1,2,∥

  • 1Facultad de Ciencias Físico-Matemáticas, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, C.P. 72570, Puebla, México
  • 2Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación y Enseñanza de la Ciencia (CIIEC), Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, C.P. 72570, Puebla, México
  • 3Departamento de Física, FES-Cuautitlán, UNAM, C.P. 54770, Estado de México, México
  • 4Instituto de Física, Universidad de Antioquia, Calle 70 # 52-21, Medellín, Colombia

  • *Contact author: marco.arroyo@fcfm.buap.mx
  • †Contact author: rgaitan@unam.mx
  • ‡Contact author: marcemarino8a@cuautitlan.unam.mx
  • §Contact author: hsalazar@fcfm.buap.mx
  • ∥Contact author: maria.villanueva@alumno.buap.mx

Phys. Rev. D 113, 035014 – Published 13 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mvrj-qf6j

Abstract

We investigate the lepton flavor violating (LFV) process e+e−→e+e−eμ (e=e−,e+,μ=μ−,μ+) at future circular colliders, probing the effective γγeμ interaction through photon fusion. Within an effective field theory framework compatible with theoretical and experimental constraints, we identify regions in the parameter space of the effective couplings where the signal could be observed at the Circular Electron-Positron Collider at s=240  GeV and the Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee) at s=240 and 350 GeV. Our analysis leverages distinctive kinematic distributions—particularly the transverse momentum of the scattered electron pT(e−scattered) and the central muon pTμ—to achieve efficient signal-background separation. By employing a neural network classifier, we enhance the sensitivity beyond traditional cut-based methods, demonstrating the discovery potential of these facilities for LFV searches in the clean environment of e+e− collisions.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (50)

  1. Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
  2. Q. R. Ahmad et al. (SNO Collaboration), Measurement of the rate of νe+d→p+p+e− interactions produced by B8 solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 071301 (2001).
  3. Q. R. Ahmad et al. (SNO Collaboration), Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002).
  4. S. T. Petcov, The Processes μ→e+γ,μ→e+e¯,ν′→ν+γ in the Weinberg-Salam Model with Neutrino Mixing, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 25, 340 (1977); 25, 698(E) (1977); Yad. Fiz. 25, 1336(E) (1977), https://inspirehep.net/literature/109011.
  5. E. Diociaiuti (Mu2e Collaboration), Status and perspectives of cLFV at Mu2e, Proc. Sci., WIFAI2023 (2024) 017.
  6. A. Blondel et al., Research proposal for an experiment to search for the decay μ→eee, arXiv:1301.6113.
  7. W. Altmannshofer et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), The Belle II Physics Book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019); 2020, 029201(E) (2020).
  8. X. Ai et al., Flavor physics at CEPC: A general perspective, Chin. Phys. 49, 103003 (2025).
  9. M. Benedikt et al. (FCC Collaboration), Future circular collider feasibility study report: Volume 1, physics, experiments, detectors, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1468 (2025).
  10. V. M. Budnev, I. F. Ginzburg, G. V. Meledin, and V. G. Serbo, The Two photon particle production mechanism. Physical problems. Applications. Equivalent photon approximation, Phys. Rep. 15, 181 (1975).
  11. C. F. von Weizsacker, Radiation emitted in collisions of very fast electrons, Z. Phys. 88, 612 (1934).
  12. E. J. Williams, Nature of the high-energy particles of penetrating radiation and status of ionization and radiation formulae, Phys. Rev. 45, 729 (1934).
  13. D. d’Enterria and G. G. da Silveira, Observing light-by-light scattering at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 080405 (2013); 116, 129901(E) (2016).
  14. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of light-by-light scattering in ultraperipheral Pb+Pb collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 052001 (2019).
  15. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Evidence for light-by-light scattering and searches for axion-like particles in ultraperipheral PbPb collisions at sNN=5.02  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 797, 134826 (2019).
  16. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Exclusive photon-photon production of muon pairs in proton-proton collisions at s=7  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2012) 052.
  17. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Measurement of exclusive γγ→ℓ+ℓ− production in proton-proton collisions at s=7  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 749, 242 (2015).
  18. A. Aryshev et al. (ILC International Development Team Collaboration), The International Linear Collider: Report to Snowmass 2021, arXiv:2203.07622.
  19. E. Adli et al., The compact linear e+e− collider (CLIC), arXiv:2503.24168.
  20. F. Fortuna, X. Marcano, M. Marín, and P. Roig, Lepton flavor violation from diphoton effective interactions, Phys. Rev. D 108, 015008 (2023).
  21. A. M. Baldini et al. (MEG Collaboration), Search for the lepton flavour violating decay μ+→e+γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 434 (2016).
  22. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Searches for lepton flavor violation in the decays τ±→e±γ and τ±→μ±γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 021802 (2010).
  23. A. Abdesselam et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for lepton-flavor-violating tau-lepton decays to ℓγ at Belle, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 019.
  24. J. D. Bowman, T. P. Cheng, L.-F. Li, and H. S. Matis, New upper limit for μ→eγγ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 442 (1978).
  25. S. Davidson, Y. Kuno, Y. Uesaka, and M. Yamanaka, Probing μeγγ contact interactions with μ→e conversion, Phys. Rev. D 102, 115043 (2020).
  26. F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Rare muon decays, natural lepton models, and doubly charged leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 531 (1977).
  27. J. Hisano, S. Sugiyama, M. Yamanaka, and M. J. S. Yang, Reevaluation of Higgs-mediated μ−e transition in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 694, 380 (2011).
  28. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  29. F. Fortuna, A. Ibarra, X. Marcano, M. Marín, and P. Roig, Indirect upper limits on ℓi→ℓjγγ from ℓi→ℓjγ, Phys. Rev. D 107, 015027 (2023).
  30. R. Kitano, M. Koike, and Y. Okada, Detailed calculation of lepton flavor violating muon electron conversion rate for various nuclei, Phys. Rev. D 66, 096002 (2002); 76, 059902(E) (2007).
  31. M. Achasov et al., STCF conceptual design report (Volume 1): Physics & detector, Front. Phys. 19, 14701 (2024).
  32. A. M. Baldini et al. (MEG II Collaboration), The design of the MEG II experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 380 (2018).
  33. D. Grosnick et al., Search for the rare decay μ+→e+γγ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 3241 (1986).
  34. W. H. Bertl et al. (SINDRUM II Collaboration), A search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 337 (2006).
  35. F. Abdi et al. (Mu2e Collaboration), Mu2e Run I sensitivity projections for the neutrinoless conversion search in aluminum, Universe 9, 54 (2023).
  36. S. Banerjee et al., Snowmass 2021 White Paper: Charged lepton flavor violation in the tau sector, arXiv:2203.14919.
  37. D. A. Bryman, S. Ito, and R. Shrock, Upper limits on branching ratios of the lepton-flavor-violating decays τ→ℓγγ and τ→ℓX, Phys. Rev. D 104, 075032 (2021).
  38. I. Angelozzi, In pursuit of lepton flavour violation: A search for the τ→μγγ decay with ATLAS at s=8  TeV, Ph.D. thesis, U. Amsterdam, IHEF, 2017.
  39. S. Gninenko, S. Kovalenko, S. Kuleshov, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and A. S. Zhevlakov, Deep inelastic e−τ and μ−τ conversion in the NA64 experiment at the CERN SPS, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 015007,
  40. A. Semenov, LanHEP—A package for automatic generation of Feynman rules from the Lagrangian. Version 3.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 201, 167 (2016).
  41. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, madgraph 5: going beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  42. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  43. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  44. M. Selvaggi and D. Collaboration, Delphes card for the CEPC detector simulation, Technical Report, CERN, 2019. Configuration file: delphes_card_CEPC.tcl.
  45. M. Selvaggi and D. Collaboration, Delphes card for the IDEA detector concept, Technical Report, CERN, 2020, Configuration file: delphes_card_IDEA.tcl.
  46. E. Conte, B. Fuks, and G. Serret, madanalysis 5, A user-friendly framework for collider phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 222 (2013).
  47. Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition, Proc. IEEE 86, 2278 (1998).
  48. D. E. Rumelhart, G. E. Hinton, and R. J. Williams, Learning representations by back-propagating errors, Nature (London) 323, 533 (1986).
  49. A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 30 (2017), arXiv:1706.03762.
  50. W. Abdallah et al. (CEPC Study Group Collaboration), CEPC Technical Design Report: Accelerator, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods 8, 1 (2024); 9, 184(E) (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation