Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation

    Frequentist view of the two-body decaying dark matter model

    Thomas Montandon*, Elsa M. Teixeira, Adèle Poudou, and Vivian Poulin

    • *Contact author: thomas.montandon@umontpellier.fr

    Phys. Rev. D 112, 043521 – Published 15 August, 2025

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mr78-ddnc

    Abstract

    Decaying dark matter (DDM) has emerged as an interesting framework to extend the Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model, as many particle physics models predict that dark matter may not be stable over cosmic time and can impact structure formation. In particular, a model in which DM decays at a rate Γ and imprints a velocity kick v onto its decay products leads to a low amplitude of fluctuations, as quantified by the parameter S8, in better agreement with that measured by some past weak lensing surveys. Bayesian analyses have provided mixed conclusions regarding its viability, with a reconstructed clustering amplitude only slightly below the standard ΛCDM value. In this paper, we contrast previous results with a frequentist analysis of Planck and SDSS baryon acoustic oscillation data. We find that the 68% confidence level region corresponds to a decay half-life of 6.93−2.85+7.88  Gyr and a velocity kick of 1250−1000+1450  km/s. These 1σ constraints strongly differ from their Bayesian counterparts, indicating the presence of volume effect in the Bayesian analysis. Moreover, we find that under the DDM model, the frequentist analysis predicts lower values of S8, in agreement with those found by KiDS-1000 and DES-Y3 at ∼1.5σ. We further show that previously derived KiDS-1000 constraints that appeared to exclude the best-fit model from Planck data were driven by priors on the primordial amplitude As and spectral index ns. When those are removed from the analysis, KiDS-1000 constraints on the DDM parameters are fully relaxed. It is only when applying Planck-informed priors on As and ns to the KiDS-1000 analysis that one can constrain the model. We further highlight that in the absence of such priors, the region of scales best measured by KiDS-1000 does not exactly match the S8 kernel (centered around k∼0.1  h/Mpc), but rather a slightly smaller range of scales centered around k∼0.3  h/Mpc. One must thus be careful in applying S8 constraints to a model instead of the full data likelihood.

    Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

    Authorization Required

    We need you to provide your credentials before accessing this content.

    References (Subscription Required)

    Outline

    Information

    Sign In to Your Journals Account

    Filter

    Filter

    Article Lookup

    Enter a citation