Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Open case for a closed universe

Nathan L. Burwig and Damien A. Easson

  • Department of Physics and Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-1504, USA

Phys. Rev. D 113, 083530 – Published 23 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mn3v-myzc

Abstract

We establish a new no-go theorem for cosmology: spatially flat (k=0) and open (k=−1) Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) nonstatic spacetimes cannot be simultaneously nonsingular, geodesically complete, and consistent with the averaged null energy condition (ANEC). Equivalently, any dynamic flat or open universe that is complete must violate the ANEC. By contrast, closed universes (k=+1) uniquely admit nonsingular, geodesically complete, ANEC-consistent solutions, with global de Sitter space as the canonical realization that saturates the ANEC. Furthermore, we analytically demonstrate that positive spatial curvature naturally mimics the phenomenology of phantom dark energy (w<−1), biasing flat-model reconstructions of w(z) at the ∼1% level. These results sharpen the classical singularity theorems, establish a new classification of eternal cosmologies, and motivate renewed scrutiny of spatial curvature in both theory and observation.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (27)

  1. R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57 (1965).
  2. S. Hawking, The occurrence of singularities in cosmology, Proc. R. Soc. A 294, 511 (1966).
  3. S. Hawking, The occurrence of singularities in cosmology. II, Proc. R. Soc. A 295, 490 (1966).
  4. S. Hawking, The occurrence of singularities in cosmology. III. Causality and singularities, Proc. R. Soc. A 300, 187 (1967).
  5. S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology, Proc. R. Soc. A 314, 529 (1970).
  6. S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2023).
  7. A. Borde, A. H. Guth, and A. Vilenkin, Inflationary space-times are incompletein past directions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 151301 (2003).
  8. W. H. Kinney, S. Maity, and L. Sriramkumar, Borde-Guth-Vilenkin theorem in extended de Sitter spaces, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043519 (2024).
  9. G. Geshnizjani, E. Ling, and J. Quintin, On the initial singularity and extendibility of flat quasi-de Sitter spacetimes, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 182.
  10. G. F. R. Ellis and R. Maartens, The emergent universe: Inflationary cosmology with no singularity, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 223 (2004).
  11. G. F. R. Ellis, J. Murugan, and C. G. Tsagas, The emergent universe: An explicit construction, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 233 (2004).
  12. J. E. Lesnefsky, D. A. Easson, and P. C. W. Davies, Past-completeness of inflationary spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 107, 044024 (2023).
  13. D. A. Easson and J. E. Lesnefsky, Inflationary resolution of the initial singularity, Phys. Lett. B 875, 140370 (2026).
  14. D. A. Easson and J. E. Lesnefsky, Eternal universes, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063545 (2025).
  15. R. M. Wald and U. Yurtsever, General proof of the averaged null energy condition for a massless scalar field in two-dimensional curved space-time, Phys. Rev. D 44, 403 (1991).
  16. C. J. Fewster, K. D. Olum, and M. J. Pfenning, Averaged null energy condition in spacetimes with boundaries, Phys. Rev. D 75, 025007 (2007).
  17. N. Graham and K. D. Olum, Achronal averaged null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 76, 064001 (2007).
  18. A. C. Wall, Proving the achronal averaged null energy condition from the generalized second law, Phys. Rev. D 81, 024038 (2010).
  19. T. Hartman, S. Kundu, and A. Tajdini, Averaged null energy condition from causality, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2017) 066.
  20. N. Burwig and D. Easson (to be published).
  21. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  22. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  23. R. R. Caldwell, A Phantom menace?, Phys. Lett. B 545, 23 (2002).
  24. R. R. Caldwell, M. Kamionkowski, and N. N. Weinberg, Phantom energy and cosmic doomsday, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 071301 (2003).
  25. S. M. Carroll, M. Hoffman, and M. Trodden, Can the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w be less than −1?, Phys. Rev. D 68, 023509 (2003).
  26. A. Vikman, Can dark energy evolve to the phantom?, Phys. Rev. D 71, 023515 (2005).
  27. C. Clarkson, M. Cortes, and B. A. Bassett, Dynamical dark energy or simply cosmic curvature?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2007) 011.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation