Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

High-precision continuum limit study of the HVP short-distance window

Sebastian Spiegel* and Christoph Lehner†

  • *Contact author: sebastian.spiegel@ur.de
  • †Contact author: christoph.lehner@ur.de

Phys. Rev. D 111, 114517 – Published 24 June, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mj3d-yq87

Abstract

The separation of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment into Euclidean windows allows for a tailored approach to address the different dominant challenges at short, intermediate, and long distances. We present a novel approach to compute the short-distance window without the need for using perturbative QCD. We combine a quenched continuum extrapolation using 18 lattice spacings (1.6  GeV≲a−1≲6.1  GeV) with a separate continuum extrapolation of the sea quark effects. This method allows for the computationally expensive sea quark effects to be estimated using only a smaller number of ensembles at coarser lattice spacings, while largely confining the logarithmic dependency of the continuum extrapolation to the quenched component.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (37)

  1. B. Abi et al. (Muon g−2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
  2. D. P. o. Aguillard (The Muon g−2 Collaboration), Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.20 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161802 (2023).
  3. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Final report of the E821 muon anomalous magnetic moment measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006).
  4. T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the standard model, Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  5. M. Abe et al., A new approach for measuring the muon anomalous magnetic moment and electric dipole moment, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 053C02 (2019).
  6. T. Blum, P. Boyle, V. Gülpers, T. Izubuchi, L. Jin, C. Jung, A. Jüttner, C. Lehner, A. Portelli, and J. Tsang, Calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 022003 (2018).
  7. D. Bernecker and H. B. Meyer, Vector correlators in lattice QCD: Methods and applications, Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 148 (2011).
  8. S. Duane, A. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Hybrid Monte Carlo, Phys. Lett. B 195, 216 (1987).
  9. I. Omelyan, I. Mryglod, and R. Folk, Symplectic analytically integrable decomposition algorithms: Classification, derivation, and application to molecular dynamics, quantum and celestial mechanics simulations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 151, 272 (2003).
  10. R. Sommer, Scale setting in lattice QCD, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2013 (2014) 015 [arXiv:1401.3270].
  11. M. Bruno and R. Sommer, On the nf-dependence of gluonic observables, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2013 (2014) 321 [arXiv:1311.5585].
  12. M. Lüscher, Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2010) 071.
  13. R. C. Brower, H. Neff, and K. Orginos, The Möbius domain wall fermion algorithm, Comput. Phys. Commun. 220, 1 (2017).
  14. Y. Shamir, Chiral fermions from lattice boundaries, Nucl. Phys. B406, 90 (1993).
  15. V. Furman and Y. Shamir, Axial symmetries in lattice QCD with kaplan fermions, Nucl. Phys. B439, 54 (1995).
  16. T. Blum, P. A. Boyle, M. Bruno, D. Giusti, V. Gülpers, R. C. Hill, T. Izubuchi, Y. C. Jang, L. Jin, C. Jung, A. Jüttner, C. Kelly, C. Lehner, N. Matsumoto, R. D. Mawhinney, A. S. Meyer, and J. T. Tsang, An update of euclidean windows of the hadronic vacuum polarization, arXiv:2301.08696.
  17. S. Borsányi, S. Dürr, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, T. Kurth, L. Lellouch, T. Lippert, C. McNeile, and K. K. Szabó, High-precision scale setting in lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 010.
  18. T. Blum, P. Boyle, N. Christ, J. Frison, N. Garron, R. Hudspith, T. Izubuchi, T. Janowski, C. Jung, A. Jüttner, C. Kelly, R. Kenway, C. Lehner, M. Marinkovic, R. Mawhinney, G. McGlynn, D. Murphy, S. Ohta, A. Portelli, C. Sachrajda, and A. Soni, Domain wall QCD with physical quark masses, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074505 (2016).
  19. T. DeGrand and S. Schaefer, Improving meson two-point functions by low-mode averaging, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 140, 296 (2005).
  20. G. S. Bali, S. Collins, and A. Schäfer, Effective noise reduction techniques for disconnected loops in lattice QCD, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 1570 (2010).
  21. T. Blum, T. Izubuchi, and E. Shintani, New class of variance-reduction techniques using lattice symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 88, 094503 (2013).
  22. E. Shintani, R. Arthur, T. Blum, T. Izubuchi, C. Jung, and C. Lehner, Covariant approximation averaging, Phys. Rev. D 91, 114511 (2015).
  23. R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  24. T. Harris, M. Cè, H. B. Meyer, A. Toniato, and C. Török, Vacuum correlators at short distances from lattice QCD, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2021) 572.
  25. M. Cè, T. Harris, H. B. Meyer, A. Toniato, and C. Török, Vacuum correlators at short distances from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2021) 215.
  26. R. Sommer, L. Chimirri, and N. Husung, Log-enhanced discretization errors in integrated correlation functions, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2022 (2023) 358 [arXiv:2211.15750].
  27. N. Husung, Logarithmic corrections to O(a) and O(a2) effects in lattice QCD with Wilson or Ginsparg–Wilson quarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 142 (2023); 83, 144(E) (2023).
  28. H. Akaike, A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19, 716 (1974).
  29. C. Alexandrou et al. (Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration), Lattice calculation of the short and intermediate time-distance hadronic vacuum polarization contributions to the muon magnetic moment using twisted-mass fermions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 074506 (2023).
  30. S. Kuberski, M. Cè, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, and H. Wittig, Hadronic vacuum polarization in the muon g −2: The short-distance contribution from lattice QCD, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2024) 172.
  31. A. Boccaletti et al., High precision calculation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contribution to the muon anomaly, arXiv:2407.10913.
  32. D. Giusti and S. Simula, Window contributions to the muon hadronic vacuum polarization with twisted-mass fermions, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 189.
  33. G. Wang, T. Draper, K.-F. Liu, and Y.-B. Yang (chiQCD Collaboration), Muon g-2 with overlap valence fermions, Phys. Rev. D 107, 034513 (2023).
  34. T. Blum et al. (RBC and UKQCD Collaborations), Update of Euclidean windows of the hadronic vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054507 (2023).
  35. https://www.gauss-centre.eu/
  36. C. Lehner, Grid python toolkit, https://github.com/lehner/gpt.
  37. S. Spiegel, python toolkit targeted at lattice QCD data analysis, https://github.com/spieseba/statpy.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation