Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Missing baryons recovered: A measurement of the gas fraction in galaxies and groups with the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect and CMB lensing

Boryana Hadzhiyska1,2,3,4,*, Simone Ferraro1,2, Gerrit S. Farren1,2, Noah Sailer2,1, and Rongpu Zhou1,2

  • *Contact author: boryanah@alumni.princeton.edu

Phys. Rev. D 112, 123507 – Published 3 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/mdhz-fgj8

Abstract

We present new constraints on the halo masses and matter density profiles of DESI galaxy groups by cross-correlating samples of luminous red galaxies (LRGs) and bright galaxy survey (BGS) galaxies with the publicly available CMB lensing convergence map from ACT DR6. This provides an independent, lensing-based calibration of halo masses, complementary to methods relying on clustering or dynamics. We derive constraints on the mean halo mass for three DESI-selected samples, finding log(Mhalo/(M⊙/h))≈13.18, 13.03 and 13.02 for the main LRG, extended LRG, and BGS samples, respectively. Using a halo model approach, we also compare the projected galaxy-matter density profiles with previously reported gas profiles inferred from measurements of the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich (kSZ) effect. This work addresses one of the key uncertainties in interpreting kSZ signals—the unknown host halo mass distribution—by providing an independent and consistent mass calibration. The agreement between the gas and total mass profiles at large aperture suggests that sufficiently far from the group center (2–3 virial radii), we recover all the baryons, offering a resolution to the missing baryon problem. We further study the cumulative gas fractions for all galaxies as well as for the most massive galaxy groups in the sample [log(Mhalo/(M⊙/h))≈13.5], finding values that are physically sensible and in agreement with previous findings using kSZ and x-ray data: compared to the TNG300 simulation, the observed gas fractions are systematically lower at fixed radius by ≳4σ, providing compelling, independent evidence for stronger baryonic feedback in the real Universe. These findings highlight the power of combining CMB lensing with galaxy surveys to probe the interplay between baryons and dark matter in group-sized halos.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (80)

  1. M. P. van Daalen, J. Schaye, C. M. Booth, and C. Dalla Vecchia, The effects of galaxy formation on the matter power spectrum: A challenge for precision cosmology, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 415, 3649 (2011).
  2. N. E. Chisari, A. J. Mead, S. Joudaki, P. G. Ferreira, A. Schneider, J. Mohr, T. Tröster, D. Alonso, I. G. McCarthy, S. Martin-Alvarez, J. Devriendt, A. Slyz, and M. P. van Daalen, Modelling baryonic feedback for survey cosmology, Open J. Astrophys. 2, 4 (2019).
  3. M. Fukugita and P. J. E. Peebles, The cosmic energy inventory, Astrophys. J. 616, 643 (2004).
  4. R. Cen and J. P. Ostriker, Where are the baryons? II. Feedback effects, Astrophys. J. 650, 560 (2006).
  5. A. Schneider, R. Teyssier, J. Stadel, N. E. Chisari, A. M. C. Le Brun, A. Amara, and A. Refregier, Quantifying baryon effects on the matter power spectrum and the weak lensing shear correlation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2019) 020.
  6. L. Bigwood et al., Weak lensing combined with the kinetic Sunyaev Zel’dovich effect: A study of baryonic feedback, arXiv:2404.06098.
  7. A. Schneider, R. Teyssier, J. Stadel, N. E. Chisari, A. M. C. Le Brun, A. Amara, and A. Refregier, Quantifying baryon effects on the matter power spectrum and the weak lensing shear correlation, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2019) 020.
  8. A. Amon and G. Efstathiou, A non-linear solution to the S8 tension?, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 516, 5355 (2022).
  9. W. Elbers, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, B. Li, J. C. Helly, R. Kugel, M. Schaller, J. Schaye, J. Braspenning, J. Kwan, I. G. McCarthy, J. Salcido, M. P. van Daalen, B. Vandenbroucke, and S. Pascoli, The FLAMINGO project: The coupling between baryonic feedback and cosmology in light of the S8 tension, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 537, 2160 (2025).
  10. H.-J. Huang, T. Eifler, R. Mandelbaum, and S. Dodelson, Modelling baryonic physics in future weak lensing surveys, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 488, 1652 (2019).
  11. T. Mroczkowski, D. Nagai, K. Basu, J. Chluba, J. Sayers, R. Adam, E. Churazov, A. Crites, L. Di Mascolo, D. Eckert, J. Macias-Perez, F. Mayet, L. Perotto, E. Pointecouteau, C. Romero, F. Ruppin, E. Scannapieco, and J. ZuHone, Astrophysics with the spatially and spectrally resolved Sunyaev-Zeldovich effects. A millimetre/submillimetre probe of the warm and hot universe, Space Sci. Rev. 215, 17 (2019).
  12. E. Schaan et al. (Atacama Cosmology Telescope Collaboration), Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Combined kinematic and thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich measurements from BOSS CMASS and LOWZ halos, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063513 (2021).
  13. B. Hadzhiyska et al., Evidence for large baryonic feedback at low and intermediate redshifts from kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich observations with ACT and DESI photometric galaxies, Phys. Rev. D 112, 083509 (2025).
  14. B. Hadzhiyska, S. Ferraro, and R. Zhou, Tracing cosmic gas in filaments and halos: Low-redshift insights from the kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect, Phys. Rev. D 111, 023534 (2025).
  15. B. Ried Guachalla et al., Backlighting extended gas halos around luminous red galaxies: Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect from DESI Y1 x ACT, Phys. Rev. D 112, 103512 (2025).
  16. E. Moser, S. Amodeo, N. Battaglia, M. A. Alvarez, S. Ferraro, and E. Schaan, The impacts of modeling choices on the inference of circumgalactic medium properties from Sunyaev-Zeldovich observations, Astrophys. J. 919, 2 (2021).
  17. S. Amodeo et al., Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Modeling the gas thermodynamics in BOSS CMASS galaxies from kinematic and thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich measurements, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063514 (2021).
  18. E. J. Baxter et al., A measurement of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background by galaxy clusters using data from the south pole telescope, Astrophys. J. 806, 247 (2015).
  19. M. S. Madhavacheril et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Weighing distant clusters with the most ancient light, Astrophys. J. Lett. 903, L13 (2020).
  20. J. Sunseri, A. Amon, J. Dunkley, N. Battaglia, S. Ferraro, B. Hadzhiyska, B. Ried Guachalla, and E. Schaan, Disentangling the halo: Joint model for measurements of the kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect and galaxy-galaxy lensing, arXiv:2505.20413.
  21. I. G. McCarthy, A. Amon, J. Schaye, E. Schaan, R. E. Angulo, J. Salcido, M. Schaller, L. Bigwood, W. Elbers, R. Kugel, J. C. Helly, V. J. Forouhar Moreno, C. S. Frenk, R. J. McGibbon, L. Ondaro-Mallea, and M. P. van Daalen, FLAMINGO: Combining kinetic SZ effect and galaxy–galaxy lensing measurements to gauge the impact of feedback on large-scale structure, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 540, 143 (2025).
  22. L. Bigwood et al., Weak lensing combined with the kinetic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect: A study of baryonic feedback, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 534, 655 (2024).
  23. B. Abareshi et al. (DESI Collaboration), Overview of the instrumentation for the dark energy spectroscopic instrument, Astron. J. 164, 207 (2022).
  24. A. Aghamousa et al. (DESI Collaboration), The DESI experiment part II: Instrument design, arXiv:1611.00037.
  25. J. H. Silber et al. (DESI Collaboration), The robotic multiobject focal plane system of the dark energy spectroscopic instrument (DESI), Astron. J. 165, 9 (2023).
  26. T. N. Miller et al., The optical corrector for the dark energy spectroscopic instrument, Astron. J. 168, 95 (2024).
  27. M. Levi, C. Bebek, T. Beers, R. Blum, R. Cahn, D. Eisenstein, B. Flaugher, K. Honscheid, R. Kron, O. Lahav, P. McDonald, N. Roe, and D. Schlegel (representing the DESI Collaboration), The DESI experiment, a whitepaper for snowmass 2013, arXiv:1308.0847.
  28. A. Aghamousa et al. (DESI Collaboration), The DESI experiment part I: Science, targeting, and survey design, arXiv:1611.00036.
  29. R. Zhou et al., Target selection and validation of DESI luminous red galaxies, Astron. J. 165, 58 (2023).
  30. R. Zhou et al., DESI luminous red galaxy samples for cross-correlations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2023) 097.
  31. C. Hahn et al., The DESI bright galaxy survey: Final target selection, design, and validation, Astron. J. 165, 253 (2023).
  32. S. Chen et al., Analysis of DESI×DES using the Lagrangian effective theory of LSS, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103518 (2024).
  33. M. S. Madhavacheril et al. (ACT Collaboration), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 gravitational lensing map and cosmological parameters, Astrophys. J. 962, 113 (2024).
  34. F. J. Qu et al. (ACT Collaboration), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A measurement of the DR6 CMB lensing power spectrum and its implications for structure growth, Astrophys. J. 962, 112 (2024).
  35. N. MacCrann et al. (ACT Collaboration), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Mitigating the impact of extragalactic foregrounds for the DR6 cosmic microwave background lensing analysis, Astrophys. J. 966, 138 (2024).
  36. G. S. Farren et al. (ACT Collaboration), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Cosmology from cross-correlations of unWISE Galaxies and ACT DR6 CMB lensing, Astrophys. J. 966, 157 (2024).
  37. N. Sailer, E. Schaan, and S. Ferraro, Lower bias, lower noise CMB lensing with foreground-hardened estimators, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063517 (2020).
  38. https://github.com/EmmanuelSchaan/ThumbStack
  39. M. White, Reconstruction within the Zeldovich approximation, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 3822 (2015).
  40. B. Hadzhiyska, S. Ferraro, B. Ried Guachalla, and E. Schaan, Velocity reconstruction in the era of DESI and Rubin/LSST. II. Realistic samples on the light cone, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103534 (2024).
  41. B. Ried Guachalla, E. Schaan, B. Hadzhiyska, and S. Ferraro, Velocity reconstruction in the era of DESI and Rubin/LSST. I. Exploring spectroscopic, photometric, and hybrid samples, Phys. Rev. D 109, 103533 (2024).
  42. N. A. Maksimova, L. H. Garrison, D. J. Eisenstein, B. Hadzhiyska, S. Bose, and T. P. Satterthwaite, abacussummit: A massive set of high-accuracy, high-resolution N-body simulations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 4017 (2021).
  43. B. Hadzhiyska, L. H. Garrison, D. Eisenstein, and S. Bose, The halo light-cone catalogues of abacussummit, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 2194 (2022).
  44. L. H. Garrison, D. J. Eisenstein, and P. A. Pinto, A high-fidelity realization of the Euclid code comparison N-body simulation with abacus, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 3370 (2019).
  45. L. H. Garrison, D. J. Eisenstein, D. Ferrer, N. A. Maksimova, and P. A. Pinto, The abacus cosmological N-body code, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 508, 575 (2021).
  46. B. Hadzhiyska, D. Eisenstein, S. Bose, L. H. Garrison, and N. Maksimova, COMPASO: A new halo finder for competitive assignment to spherical overdensities, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 501 (2022).
  47. G. L. Bryan and M. L. Norman, Statistical properties of x-ray clusters: Analytic and numerical comparisons, Astrophys. J. 495, 80 (1998).
  48. Z. Zheng, A. A. Berlind, D. H. Weinberg, A. J. Benson, C. M. Baugh, S. Cole, R. Dave, C. S. Frenk, N. Katz, and C. G. Lacey, Theoretical models of the halo occupation distribution: Separating central and satellite galaxies, Astrophys. J. 633, 791 (2005).
  49. https://github.com/abacusorg/abacusutils
  50. https://camb.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
  51. B. Hadzhiyska et al., Synthetic light-cone catalogues of modern redshift and weak lensing surveys waith abacussummit, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 525, 4367 (2023).
  52. https://github.com/simonsobs/pixell
  53. https://github.com/simonsobs/so-lenspipe
  54. W. Hu, S. DeDeo, and C. Vale, Cluster mass estimators from CMB temperature and polarization lensing, New J. Phys. 9, 441 (2007).
  55. M. S. Madhavacheril et al. (ACT Collaboration), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Weighing distant clusters with the most ancient light, Astrophys. J. Lett. 903, L13 (2020).
  56. E. J. Baxter et al., A measurement of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background by galaxy clusters using data from the south pole telescope, Astrophys. J. 806, 247 (2015).
  57. S. Raghunathan, S. Patil, E. J. Baxter, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, T. M. Crawford, G. P. Holder, A. Manzotti, and C. L. Reichardt, Measuring galaxy cluster masses with CMB lensing using a Maximum Likelihood estimator: Statistical and systematic error budgets for future experiments, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2017) 030.
  58. B. Horowitz, S. Ferraro, and B. D. Sherwin, Reconstructing small scale lenses from the cosmic microwave background temperature fluctuations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485, 3919 (2019).
  59. K. Levy, S. Raghunathan, and K. Basu, A foreground-immune CMB-cluster lensing estimator, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2023) 020.
  60. G. Stein, M. A. Alvarez, J. R. Bond, A. van Engelen, and N. Battaglia, The websky extragalactic CMB simulations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2020) 012.
  61. E. Schaan and S. Ferraro, Foreground-immune cosmic microwave background lensing with shear-only reconstruction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 181301 (2019).
  62. F. J. Qu, A. Challinor, and B. D. Sherwin, CMB lensing with shear-only reconstruction on the full sky, Phys. Rev. D 108, 063518 (2023).
  63. M. S. Madhavacheril and J. C. Hill, Mitigating foreground biases in CMB lensing reconstruction using cleaned gradients, Phys. Rev. D 98, 023534 (2018).
  64. N. Sailer, S. Ferraro, and E. Schaan, Foreground-immune CMB lensing reconstruction with polarization, Phys. Rev. D 107, 023504 (2023).
  65. O. Darwish, B. D. Sherwin, N. Sailer, E. Schaan, and S. Ferraro, Optimizing foreground mitigation for CMB lensing with combined multifrequency and geometric methods, Phys. Rev. D 107, 043519 (2023).
  66. N. Sailer, E. Schaan, S. Ferraro, O. Darwish, and B. Sherwin, Optimal multifrequency weighting for CMB lensing, Phys. Rev. D 104, 123514 (2021).
  67. W. R. Coulton et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Detection of patchy screening of the cosmic microwave background, arXiv:2401.13033.
  68. J. S. Speagle, dynesty: A dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 3132 (2020).
  69. E. Chung, S. Foreman, and A. van Engelen, Baryonic effects on CMB lensing and neutrino mass constraints, Phys. Rev. D 101, 063534 (2020); 102, 109903(E) (2020).
  70. To avoid potential bias from upward fluctuations, we do not select the bin with the highest SNR in the data, but instead use simulations. We also note that the first radial bin in the κ measurements correlates best with the one-halo term amplitude, as it is sensitive to smaller scales.

  71. E. Schaan et al. (Atacama Cosmology Telescope Collaboration), Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Combined kinematic and thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich measurements from BOSS CMASS and LOWZ halos, Phys. Rev. D 103, 063513 (2021).
  72. P. Popesso et al., The hot gas mass fraction in halos. From Milky Way-like groups to massive clusters, arXiv:2411.16555.
  73. M. Ayromlou, D. Nelson, and A. Pillepich, Feedback reshapes the baryon distribution within haloes, in halo outskirts, and beyond: The closure radius from dwarfs to massive clusters, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524, 5391 (2023).
  74. L. Lucie-Smith, H. V. Peiris, A. Pontzen, A. Halder, J. Schaye, M. Schaller, J. Helly, R. J. McGibbon, and W. Elbers, Cosmological feedback from a halo assembly perspective, Phys. Rev. D 112, 063541 (2025).
  75. M. Kovač, A. Nicola, J. Bucko, A. Schneider, R. Reischke, S. K. Giri, R. Teyssier, M. Schaller, and J. Schaye, Baryonification II: Constraining feedback with x-ray and kinematic Sunyaev-Zel’dovich observations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2025) 046.
  76. D. Nelson, V. Springel, A. Pillepich, V. Rodriguez-Gomez, P. Torrey, S. Genel, M. Vogelsberger, R. Pakmor, F. Marinacci, R. Weinberger, L. Kelley, M. Lovell, B. Diemer, and L. Hernquist, The IllustrisTNG simulations: Public data release, Comput. Astrophys. Cosmol. 6, 2 (2019).
  77. R. Zhou, J. A. Newman, Y.-Y. Mao, A. Meisner, J. Moustakas, A. D. Myers, A. Prakash, A. R. Zentner, D. Brooks, Y. Duan, M. Landriau, M. E. Levi, F. Prada, and G. Tarle, The clustering of DESI-like luminous red galaxies using photometric redshifts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 501, 3309 (2021).
  78. A. Pillepich et al., First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: The stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475, 648 (2018).
  79. B. Hadzhiyska, S. Tacchella, S. Bose, and D. J. Eisenstein, The galaxy-halo connection of emission-line galaxies in IllustrisTNG, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 502, 3599 (2021).
  80. B. Hadzhiyska, L. Hernquist, D. Eisenstein, A. M. Delgado, S. Bose, R. Kannan, R. Pakmor, V. Springel, S. Contreras, M. Barrera, F. Ferlito, C. Hernández-Aguayo, S. D. M. White, and C. Frenk, The MillenniumTNG Project: Refining the one-halo model of red and blue galaxies at different redshifts, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524, 2524 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation