Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

FCC feasibility studies: Impact of tracker- and calorimeter-detector performance on jet flavor identification and Higgs physics analyses

Phys. Rev. D 112, 052002 – Published 9 September, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/m2zr-26yf

Abstract

The ambitious physics program planned for the Future Circular Collider electron-positron phase imposes stringent constraints on detector performance. This study systematically investigates how different detector configurations impact jet flavor identification and their effects on high-profile physics analyses. Using Higgs boson coupling measurements and searches for invisible Higgs decays as benchmarks, we evaluate the sensitivity of these analyses to variations in tracker and calorimeter detector properties. We examine modifications to single-point resolution, material budget, silicon layer placement, and particle identification capabilities, quantifying their effects on flavor-tagging performance. Additionally, we present the first comprehensive study of Higgs-to-invisible decay detection using full detector simulation, providing insights for optimizing detector designs at lepton colliders.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (42)

  1. A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration), FCC-ee: The lepton collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 228, 261 (2019).
  2. G. Gaudio, The IDEA detector concept for FCCee, Proc. Sci. ICHEP2022 (2022) 337.
  3. M. Antonello (RD-FA Collaboration), IDEA: A detector concept for future leptonic colliders, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 43C, 27 (2020).
  4. N. Bacchetta et al., CLD—A detector concept for the FCC-ee, arXiv:1911.12230.
  5. J. Pekkanen, ALLEGRO FCC-ee detector concept & Noble liquid calorimetry, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 1069, 169921 (2024).
  6. F. Bedeschi, L. Gouskos, and M. Selvaggi, Jet flavour tagging for future colliders with fast simulation, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 646 (2022).
  7. V. P. Dwivedi and X. Bresson, A generalization of transformer networks to graphs, arXiv:2012.09699.
  8. S. Aumiller, D. Garcia, and M. Selvaggi, Jet-flavor tagging performance at FCC-ee, CDS-e537w-n6886, 10.17181/8g834-jv464 (2025).
  9. B. Patt and F. Wilczek, Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors, arXiv:hep-ph/0605188.
  10. S. Argyropoulos, O. Brandt, and U. Haisch, Collider searches for dark matter through the Higgs lens, Symmetry 13, 2406 (2021).
  11. H. Goldberg, Erratum: Constraint on the photino mass from cosmology [Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1419 (1983)], Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 099905(E) (2009).
  12. J. Ellis, J. Hagelin, D. Nanopoulos, K. Olive, and M. Srednicki, Supersymmetric relics from the big bang, Nucl. Phys. B238, 453 (1984).
  13. W. Kilian, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, whizard: Simulating multi-particle processes at LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1742 (2011).
  14. M. Moretti, T. Ohl, and J. Reuter, O’Mega: An optimizing matrix element generator, in Proceedings, Physics and Experimentation at a Linear Electron-Positron Collider, 2nd ECFA/DESY Study (2001), pp. 1981–2009, arXiv:hep-ph/0102195.
  15. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (delphes 3 Collaboration), delphes: A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  16. C. Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of pythia 8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  17. trackcovariance module in delphes, https://github.com/delphes/delphes/blob/master/modules/TrackCovariance.cc.
  18. timeofflight module in delphes, https://github.com/delphes/delphes/blob/master/modules/TimeOfFlight.cc.
  19. clustercounting module in delphes, https://github.com/delphes/delphes/blob/master/modules/ClusterCounting.cc.
  20. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Skands, pythia 6.4 physics and manual, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2006) 026.
  21. S. Agostinelli et al., geant4—a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  22. M. Frank, F. Gaede, C. Grefe, and P. Mato, dd4hep: A detector description toolkit for high energy physics experiments, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 513, 022010 (2014).
  23. M. A. Thomson, Particle flow calorimetry and the pandorapfa algorithm, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 611, 25 (2009).
  24. cldconfig repository, https://github.com/key4hep/CLDConfig.
  25. A. Sailer et al. (key4hep Collaboration), The key4hep software stack: Beyond future Higgs factories, in Proceedings of the 21th International Workshop on Advanced Computing and Analysis Techniques in Physics Research: AI meets Reality (2023), arXiv:2312.08151.
  26. The ALICE Collaboration, Reports No. cERN-LHCC-2024-003, No. ALICE-TDR-021, 2024.
  27. M. Lucchini, W. Chung, S. Eno, Y. Lai, L. Lucchini, M. Nguyen, and C. Tully, New perspectives on segmented crystal calorimeters for future colliders, J. Instrum. 15, P11005 (2020).
  28. W. Buttinger, xrooFit, 10.5281/zenodo.15095380.
  29. A. D. Vecchio et al., Measurement of Higgs boson hadronic decays with Z(→νν/ℓℓ/qq)H events at FCC-ee at s=240  GeV and s=365  GeV, CDS, 10.17181/9pr7y-3v657 (2023).
  30. S. Catani, Y. L. Dokshitzer, M. Olsson, G. Turnock, and B. R. Webber, New clustering algorithm for multi—jet cross sections in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Lett. B 269, 432 (1991).
  31. G. Salam, G. Soyez, and M. Cacciari, Guidance through fastjet/jet algorithms for FCC-ee, Presented at the FCC Physics Performance Meeting (2022), https://indico.cern.ch/event/1173562/contributions/4929025/attachments/2470068/4237859/2022-06-FCC-jets.pdf.
  32. ATLAS and CMS Collaborations, Highlights of the HL-LHC physics projections by ATLAS and CMS, arXiv:2504.00672.
  33. M. Benedikt et al., Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report Volume 1: Physics and Experiments, Technical Report (CERN, Geneva, 2025).
  34. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  35. K. Asteriadis, S. Dawson, P. P. Giardino, and R. Szafron, Impact of NLO weak SMEFT corrections in e+e−→ZH, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 231801 (2024).
  36. K. Asteriadis, S. Dawson, P. P. Giardino, and R. Szafron, The e+e−→zh process in the smeft beyond leading order, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 162.
  37. J. ter Hoeve, L. Mantani, J. Rojo, A. N. Rossia, and E. Vryonidou, Higgs trilinear coupling in the standard model effective field theory at the high luminosity LHC and the FCC-ee, Phys. Rev. D 112, 013008 (2025).
  38. V. Maura, B. A. Stefanek, and T. You, The Higgs self-coupling at FCC-ee, arXiv:2503.13719v3.
  39. A. Mehta and N. Rompotis, H→invisible at FCC-ee, Presented at the Sixth FCC Physics Workshop, Krakow, Poland (2023), https://indico.cern.ch/event/1176398/contributions/5208291/attachments/2580000/4449733/mehta%20(2).pdf.
  40. M. Thomson, Particle flow calorimetry and the pandorapfa algorithm, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 611, 25 (2009).
  41. A. Hoecker et al., TMVA—Toolkit for multivariate data analysis, arXiv:physics/0703039.
  42. C. Adloff et al. (CALICE Collaboration), Calorimetry for lepton collider experiments—CALICE results and activities, arXiv:1212.5127.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation