Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Numerical relativity simulations of compact binaries: Comparison of cell- and vertex-centered adaptive meshes

Boris Daszuta1, William Cook1, Peter Hammond2, Jacob Fields2,3, Eduardo M. Gutiérrez2,3, Sebastiano Bernuzzi1, and David Radice2,3,4

Phys. Rev. D 112, 103006 – Published 5 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lxp5-c1g1

Abstract

Given the compact binary evolution problem of numerical relativity, in the finite-difference, block-based, adaptive mesh refinement context, choices must be made on how evolved fields are to be discretized. In gr-athena++, the space-time solver was previously fixed to be vertex centered. Here, our recent extensions to a cell-centered treatment are described. Simplifications in the handling of variables during the treatment of general relativistic magneto-hydrodynamical (GRMHD) evolution are found. A novelty is that performance comparison for the two choices of grid sampling is made within a single code base. In the case of a binary black hole inspiral-merger problem, by evolving geometric fields on vertex centers, an average ∼20% speed increase is observed, when compared against cell-centered sampling. The opposite occurs in the GRMHD setting. A binary neutron star inspiral-merger-collapse problem, representative of typical production simulations, is considered. We find that cell-centered sampling for the space-time solver improves performance, by a similar factor.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (76)

  1. B. P. Abbott et al. (Virgo Collaboration and LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
  2. A. Goldstein et al., Astrophys. J. 848, L14 (2017).
  3. V. Savchenko et al., Astrophys. J. 848, L15 (2017).
  4. T. Akutsu et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2021, 05A102 (2021).
  5. P. Amaro-Seoane, arXiv:1702.00786.
  6. M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. Andersson et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 27, 194002 (2010).
  7. B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration), Classical Quantum Gravity 34, 044001 (2017).
  8. A. Nagar et al., Phys. Rev. D 98, 104052 (2018).
  9. J. A. Font, Living Rev. Relativity 11, 7 (2007).
  10. M. Shibata, K. Kiuchi, Y.-i. Sekiguchi, and Y. Suwa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 125, 1255 (2011).
  11. D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, A. Perego, and R. Haas, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 512, 1499 (2022).
  12. D. Hilditch, A. Weyhausen, and B. Brügmann, Phys. Rev. D 93, 063006 (2016).
  13. M. Bugner, T. Dietrich, S. Bernuzzi, A. Weyhausen, and B. Brügmann, Phys. Rev. D 94, 084004 (2016).
  14. M. Fernando, D. Neilsen, H. Lim, E. Hirschmann, and H. Sundar, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 41, C97 (2019).
  15. F. Löffler et al., Classical Quantum Gravity 29, 115001 (2012).
  16. S. Shankar, P. Mösta, S. R. Brandt, R. Haas, E. Schnetter, and Y. de Graaf, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 205009 (2023).
  17. K. Clough, P. Figueras, H. Finkel, M. Kunesch, E. A. Lim, and S. Tunyasuvunakool, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 245011 (2015).
  18. W. Tichy, L. Ji, A. Adhikari, A. Rashti, and M. Pirog, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 025004 (2023).
  19. L. E. Kidder et al., J. Comput. Phys. 335, 84 (2017).
  20. S. Rosswog and P. Diener, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 115002 (2021).
  21. P. Grandclement and J. Novak, Living Rev. Relativity 12, 1 (2009).
  22. G. Doulis, F. Atteneder, S. Bernuzzi, and B. Brügmann, Phys. Rev. D 106, 024001 (2022).
  23. R. Alfieri, S. Bernuzzi, A. Perego, and D. Radice, J. Low Power Electron. Appl. 8, 15 (2018).
  24. Q. F. Stout, D. L. De Zeeuw, T. I. Gombosi, C. P. T. Groth, H. G. Marshall, and K. G. Powell, in Proceedings of the 1997 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing, SC ’97 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 1997), pp. 1–10.
  25. M. J. Berger and J. Oliger, J. Comput. Phys. 53, 484 (1984).
  26. C. Burstedde, J. Holke, and T. Isaac, Found. Comput. Math. 19, 843 (2019).
  27. G. M. Morton, A computer oriented geodetic data base and a new technique in file sequencing, Tech. Rep. (International Business Machines Company, 1966).
  28. T. Nakamura, K. Oohara, and Y. Kojima, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 90, 1 (1987).
  29. M. Shibata and T. Nakamura, Phys. Rev. D 52, 5428 (1995).
  30. T. W. Baumgarte and S. L. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. D 59, 024007 (1999).
  31. S. Bernuzzi and D. Hilditch, Phys. Rev. D 81, 084003 (2010).
  32. D. Hilditch, S. Bernuzzi, M. Thierfelder, Z. Cao, W. Tichy, and B. Bruegmann, Phys. Rev. D 88, 084057 (2013).
  33. H. Friedrich, Commun. Math. Phys. 100, 525 (1985).
  34. F. Pretorius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 121101 (2005).
  35. L. Lindblom, M. A. Scheel, L. E. Kidder, R. Owen, and O. Rinne, Classical Quantum Gravity 23, S447 (2006).
  36. C. O. Lousto and J. Healy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 191102 (2020).
  37. L. Lannelongue, H.-E. G. Aronson, A. Bateman, E. Birney, T. Caplan, M. Juckes, J. McEntyre, A. D. Morris, G. Reilly, and M. Inouye, Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 514 (2023).
  38. F. Banyuls, J. A. Font, J. M. A. Ibanez, J. M. A. Marti, and J. A. Miralles, Astrophys. J. 476, 221 (1997).
  39. B. Daszuta, F. Zappa, W. Cook, D. Radice, S. Bernuzzi, and V. Morozova, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 257, 25 (2021).
  40. W. Cook, B. Daszuta, J. Fields, P. Hammond, S. Albanesi, F. Zappa, S. Bernuzzi, and D. Radice, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 277, 3 (2025).
  41. B. Daszuta and W. Cook, gr-athena++: Magnetohydrodynamical evolution with dynamical space-time, in New Frontiers in GRMHD Simulations (Springer, Singapore, 2024).
  42. C. J. White, J. M. Stone, and C. F. Gammie, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 225, 22 (2016).
  43. K. G. Felker and J. M. Stone, J. Comput. Phys. 375, 1365 (2018).
  44. J. M. Stone, K. Tomida, C. J. White, and K. G. Felker, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 249, 4 (2020).
  45. B. Brügmann, J. A. Gonzalez, M. Hannam, S. Husa, U. Sperhake, and W. Tichy, Phys. Rev. D 77, 024027 (2008).
  46. P. Mösta, B. C. Mundim, J. A. Faber, R. Haas, S. C. Noble, T. Bode, F. Löffler, C. D. Ott, C. Reisswig, and E. Schnetter, Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 015005 (2014).
  47. C. Palenzuela, S. Liebling, and B. Miñano, Phys. Rev. D 105, 103020 (2022).
  48. D. Radice, L. Rezzolla, and F. Galeazzi, Classical Quantum Gravity 31, 075012 (2014).
  49. M. Thierfelder, S. Bernuzzi, and B. Brügmann, Phys. Rev. D 84, 044012 (2011).
  50. C. Reisswig, R. Haas, C. D. Ott, E. Abdikamalov, P. Mösta, D. Pollney, and E. Schnetter, Phys. Rev. D 87, 064023 (2013).
  51. N. Fleischmann, S. Adami, and N. A. Adams, Comput. Fluids 189, 94 (2019).
  52. A. Neumaier, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 54, 39 (1974).
  53. J. M. Stone, K. Tomida, C. J. White, and K. G. Felker, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 249, 4 (2020).
  54. J.-P. Berrut and L. N. Trefethen, SIAM Rev. 46, 501 (2004).
  55. A. Rashti, M. Bhattacharyya, D. Radice, B. Daszuta, W. Cook, and S. Bernuzzi, Classical Quantum Gravity 41, 095001 (2024).
  56. M. Campanelli, C. O. Lousto, P. Marronetti, and Y. Zlochower, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 111101 (2006).
  57. S. C. Noble, C. F. Gammie, J. C. McKinney, and L. Del Zanna, Astrophys. J. 641, 626 (2006).
  58. W. Kastaun, J. V. Kalinani, and R. Ciolfi, Phys. Rev. D 103, 023018 (2021).
  59. R. Borges, M. Carmona, B. Costa, and W. S. Don, J. Comput. Phys. 227, 3191 (2008).
  60. L. D. Zanna and N. Bucciantini, Astron. Astrophys. 390, 1177 (2002).
  61. C. Bona, J. Massó, J. Stela, and E. Seidel, in The Seventh Marcel Grossmann Meeting: On Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Gravitation, and Relativistic Field Theories, edited by R. T. Jantzen, G. M. Keiser, and R. Ruffini (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996).
  62. M. Alcubierre, B. Brügmann, P. Diener, M. Koppitz, D. Pollney, E. Seidel, and Ryoji Takahashi, Phys. Rev. D 67, 084023 (2003).
  63. J. R. van Meter, J. G. Baker, M. Koppitz, and D.-I. Choi, Phys. Rev. D 73, 124011 (2006).
  64. M. Ansorg, B. Brügmann, and W. Tichy, Phys. Rev. D 70, 064011 (2004).
  65. D. I. Ketcheson, J. Comput. Phys. 229, 1763 (2010).
  66. N. Wang and J.-L. Lee, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33, 2536 (2011).
  67. J. N. Goldberg, A. J. MacFarlane, E. T. Newman, F. Rohrlich, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 8, 2155 (1967).
  68. LIGO Scientific Collaboration, LIGO Algorithm Library—lalsuite, free software (GPL), 10.7935/GT1W-FZ16 (2018).
  69. S. Albanesi, A. Rashti, F. Zappa, R. Gamba, W. Cook, B. Daszuta, S. Bernuzzi, A. Nagar, and D. Radice, Phys. Rev. D 111, 024069 (2025).
  70. M. Thierfelder, S. Bernuzzi, D. Hilditch, B. Brügmann, and L. Rezzolla, Phys. Rev. D 83, 064022 (2011).
  71. V. Mewes, Y. Zlochower, M. Campanelli, T. W. Baumgarte, Z. B. Etienne, F. G. Lopez Armengol, and F. Cipolletta, Phys. Rev. D 101, 104007 (2020).
  72. E. Gourgoulhon, P. Grandclement, K. Taniguchi, J.-A. Marck, and S. Bonazzola, Phys. Rev. D 63, 064029 (2001).
  73. S. Gottlieb, D. I. Ketcheson, and C.-W. Shu, J. Sci. Comput. 38, 251 (2009).
  74. C. Reisswig and D. Pollney, Classical Quantum Gravity 28, 195015 (2011).
  75. www.gauss-centre.eu.
  76. J. A. Font, M. A. Miller, W.-M. Suen, and M. Tobias, Phys. Rev. D 61, 044011 (2000).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation