- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing dark sector particles coupling to neutrinos with double beta decay

Noor-Inès Boudjema1,*, Frank F. Deppisch1,†, Antonio Herrero-Brocal2,‡, Chayan Majumdar1,3,§, and Supriya Senapati4,5,∥

  • *Contact author: noor-ines.boudjema.19@ucl.ac.uk
  • †Contact author: f.deppisch@ucl.ac.uk
  • ‡Contact author: antonio.herrero@ific.uv.es
  • §Contact author: chayanmajumdar@impcas.ac.cn
  • ∥Contact author: ssenapati@umass.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 075039 – Published 28 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/lxh2-wsrz

Abstract

Motivated by the observation of nonzero neutrino masses and the potential for discovering physics beyond the Standard Model, numerous experiments are actively searching for neutrinoless double beta (0νββ) decay. In all of these searches, a substantial amount of data on two-neutrino double beta (2νββ) decay has been collected. In this work, we explore the sensitivity of current and future double beta decay experiments to a massive Majoron-like scalar particle coupled to neutrinos and potentially dark sector fermions, and compare their reach to the relevant cosmological constraints. On- and off-shell production of such a scalar leads to characteristic distortions in the emitted electron spectrum. We investigate how these distortions manifest in current and future double beta decay experiments, deriving the sensitivity to such a scenario. We project the reach of future experiments which can probe scalar-neutrino couplings of |aν|≈2×10−6 for sub-MeV scalar particles and remain sensitive to off-shell production above the Q-value of double beta isotopes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (83)

  1. A. S. Barabash, Average and recommended half-life values for two-neutrino double beta decay: Upgrade-2019, AIP Conf. Proc. 2165, 020002 (2019).
  2. F. F. Deppisch, M. Hirsch, and H. Pas, Neutrinoless double beta decay and physics beyond the standard model, J. Phys. G 39, 124007 (2012).
  3. L. Graf, F. F. Deppisch, F. Iachello, and J. Kotila, Short-range neutrinoless double beta decay mechanisms, Phys. Rev. D 98, 095023 (2018).
  4. V. Cirigliano, W. Dekens, J. de Vries, M. L. Graesser, and E. Mereghetti, A neutrinoless double beta decay master formula from effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2018) 097.
  5. F. F. Deppisch, L. Graf, F. Iachello, and J. Kotila, Analysis of light neutrino exchange and short-range mechanisms in 0νββ decay, Phys. Rev. D 102, 095016 (2020).
  6. A. Gando et al. (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Precision measurement of the Xe136 two-neutrino ββ spectrum in KamLAND-Zen and its impact on the quenching of nuclear matrix elements, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 192501 (2019).
  7. J. Argyriades et al. (NEMO-3 Collaboration), Measurement of the two neutrino double beta decay half-life of Zr-96 with the NEMO-3 detector, Nucl. Phys. A847, 168 (2010).
  8. R. Arnold et al. (NEMO-3 Collaboration), Measurement of the 2νββ decay half-life of Nd150 and a search for 0νββ decay processes with the full exposure from the NEMO-3 detector, Phys. Rev. D 94, 072003 (2016).
  9. R. Arnold et al. (NEMO-3 Collaboration), Measurement of the double-beta decay half-life and search for the neutrinoless double-beta decay of Ca48 with the NEMO-3 detector, Phys. Rev. D 93, 112008 (2016).
  10. R. Arnold et al., Final results on Se82 double beta decay to the ground state of Kr82 from the NEMO-3 experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 821 (2018).
  11. R. Arnold et al. (NEMO-3 Collaboration), Detailed studies of Mo100 two-neutrino double beta decay in NEMO-3, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 440 (2019).
  12. F. Šimkovic, R. Dvornický, D. Stefánik, and A. Faessler, Improved description of the 2νββ -decay and a possibility to determine the effective axial-vector coupling constant, Phys. Rev. C 97, 034315 (2018).
  13. F. F. Deppisch, L. Graf, and F. Šimkovic, Searching for new physics in two-neutrino double beta decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 171801 (2020).
  14. F. F. Deppisch, L. Graf, W. Rodejohann, and X.-J. Xu, Neutrino self-interactions and double beta decay, Phys. Rev. D 102, 051701 (2020).
  15. P. D. Bolton, F. F. Deppisch, L. Gráf, and F. Šimkovic, Two-neutrino double beta decay with sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 103, 055019 (2021).
  16. M. Agostini, E. Bossio, A. Ibarra, and X. Marcano, Search for light exotic fermions in double-beta decays, Phys. Lett. B 815, 136127 (2021).
  17. R. Cepedello, F. F. Deppisch, L. González, C. Hati, and M. Hirsch, Neutrinoless double-β decay with nonstandard majoron emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 181801 (2019).
  18. Y. Chikashige, R. N. Mohapatra, and R. D. Peccei, Are there real Goldstone bosons associated with broken lepton number?, Phys. Lett. 98B, 265 (1981).
  19. G. B. Gelmini and M. Roncadelli, Left-handed neutrino mass scale and spontaneously broken lepton number, Phys. Lett. 99B, 411 (1981).
  20. C. P. Burgess and J. M. Cline, Majorons without Majorana masses and neutrinoless double beta decay, Phys. Lett. B 298, 141 (1993).
  21. C. P. Burgess and J. M. Cline, A new class of Majoron emitting double beta decays, Phys. Rev. D 49, 5925 (1994).
  22. C. D. Carone, Double beta decay with vector Majorons, Phys. Lett. B 308, 85 (1993).
  23. P. Bamert, C. P. Burgess, and R. N. Mohapatra, Multi—Majoron modes for neutrinoless double beta decay, Nucl. Phys. B449, 25 (1995).
  24. M. Hirsch, H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, S. G. Kovalenko, and H. Pas, On the observability of Majoron emitting double beta decays, Phys. Lett. B 372, 8 (1996).
  25. K. Blum, Y. Nir, and M. Shavit, Neutrinoless double-beta decay with massive scalar emission, Phys. Lett. B 785, 354 (2018).
  26. V. Berezinsky and J. W. F. Valle, The KeV Majoron as a dark matter particle, Phys. Lett. B 318, 360 (1993).
  27. C. Garcia-Cely and J. Heeck, Neutrino lines from Majoron dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 102.
  28. T. Brune and H. Päs, Massive Majorons and constraints on the Majoron-neutrino coupling, Phys. Rev. D 99, 096005 (2019).
  29. A. Gando et al. (KamLAND-Zen Collaboration), Limits on Majoron-emitting double-beta decays of Xe-136 in the KamLAND-Zen experiment, Phys. Rev. C 86, 021601 (2012).
  30. S. A. Kharusi et al., Search for Majoron-emitting modes of Xe136 double beta decay with the complete EXO-200 dataset, Phys. Rev. D 104, 112002 (2021).
  31. O. Azzolini et al. (CUPID-0 Collaboration), Search for Majoron-like particles with CUPID-0, Phys. Rev. D 107, 032006 (2023).
  32. W.-C. Huang and F. F. Deppisch, Dark matter origins of neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. D 91, 093011 (2015).
  33. P. S. B. Dev, D. Kim, D. Sathyan, K. Sinha, and Y. Zhang, New constraints on neutrino-dark matter interactions: A comprehensive analysis, arXiv:2507.01000.
  34. F. Nozzoli and C. Cernetti, Dark matter stimulated neutrinoless double beta decay, arXiv:2212.07832.
  35. M. Frigerio, T. Hambye, and E. Masso, Sub-GeV dark matter as pseudo-Goldstone from the seesaw scale, Phys. Rev. X 1, 021026 (2011).
  36. M. Doi, T. Kotani, and E. Takasugi, Double beta decay and Majorana neutrino, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 83, 1 (1985).
  37. J. D. Wells, Annihilation cross sections for relic densities in the low velocity limit, arXiv:hep-ph/9404219.
  38. A. Olivares-Del Campo, C. Bœhm, S. Palomares-Ruiz, and S. Pascoli, Dark matter-neutrino interactions through the lens of their cosmological implications, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075039 (2018).
  39. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  40. E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe (Taylor and Francis, London, 2019), Vol. 69, 10.1201/9780429492860.
  41. R. J. Scherrer and M. S. Turner, On the relic, cosmic abundance of stable weakly interacting massive particles, Phys. Rev. D 33, 1585 (1986); 34, 3263(E) (1986).
  42. F. Giacchino, L. Lopez-Honorez, and M. H. G. Tytgat, Scalar dark matter models with significant internal bremsstrahlung, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2013) 025.
  43. C. Boehm, P. Fayet, and R. Schaeffer, Constraining dark matter candidates from structure formation, Phys. Lett. B 518, 8 (2001).
  44. C. Boehm, A. Riazuelo, S. H. Hansen, and R. Schaeffer, Interacting dark matter disguised as warm dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 66, 083505 (2002).
  45. C. Boehm and R. Schaeffer, Constraints on dark matter interactions from structure formation: Damping lengths, Astron. Astrophys. 438, 419 (2005).
  46. K. Akita and S. Ando, Constraints on dark matter-neutrino scattering from the Milky-Way satellites and subhalo modeling for dark acoustic oscillations, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2023) 037.
  47. E. W. Kolb, M. S. Turner, and T. P. Walker, The effect of interacting particles on primordial nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2197 (1986).
  48. P. D. Serpico and G. G. Raffelt, MeV-mass dark matter and primordial nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043526 (2004).
  49. C. Boehm, M. J. Dolan, and C. McCabe, Increasing Neff with particles in thermal equilibrium with neutrinos, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2012) 027.
  50. C. M. Ho and R. J. Scherrer, Limits on MeV dark matter from the effective number of neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 87, 023505 (2013).
  51. G. Steigman, Equivalent neutrinos, light WIMPs, and the chimera of dark radiation, Phys. Rev. D 87, 103517 (2013).
  52. C. Boehm, M. J. Dolan, and C. McCabe, A lower bound on the mass of cold thermal dark matter from Planck, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 08 (2013) 041.
  53. K. M. Nollett and G. Steigman, BBN and the CMB constrain light, electromagnetically coupled WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D 89, 083508 (2014).
  54. G. Steigman and K. M. Nollett, Light WIMPs, equivalent neutrinos, BBN, and the CMB, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. 85, 175 (2014).
  55. K. M. Nollett and G. Steigman, BBN And The CMB constrain neutrino coupled light WIMPs, Phys. Rev. D 91, 083505 (2015).
  56. R. J. Wilkinson, A. C. Vincent, C. Bœhm, and C. McCabe, Ruling out the light weakly interacting massive particle explanation of the Galactic 511 keV line, Phys. Rev. D 94, 103525 (2016).
  57. G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, and M. Peloso, A precision calculation of the effective number of cosmological neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 534, 8 (2002).
  58. G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor, T. Pinto, O. Pisanti, and P. D. Serpico, Relic neutrino decoupling including flavor oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B729, 221 (2005).
  59. D. Camarena and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine, Strong constraints on a simple self-interacting neutrino cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 111, 023504 (2025).
  60. R. J. Wilkinson, C. Boehm, and J. Lesgourgues, Constraining dark matter-neutrino interactions using the CMB and large-scale structure, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2014) 011.
  61. W. Crumrine, E. O. Nadler, R. An, and V. Gluscevic, Dark matter coupled to radiation: Limits from the Milky Way satellites, Phys. Rev. D 111, 023530 (2025).
  62. W. Giarè, A. Gómez-Valent, E. Di Valentino, and C. van de Bruck, Hints of neutrino dark matter scattering in the CMB? Constraints from the marginalized and profile distributions, Phys. Rev. D 109, 063516 (2024).
  63. N. Blinov, K. J. Kelly, G. Z. Krnjaic, and S. D. McDermott, Constraining the self-interacting neutrino interpretation of the Hubble tension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 191102 (2019).
  64. K. Hirata et al. (Kamiokande-II Collaboration), Observation of a neutrino burst from the supernova SN 1987a, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1490 (1987).
  65. K. S. Hirata et al., Observation in the Kamiokande-II detector of the neutrino burst from supernova SN1987a, Phys. Rev. D 38, 448 (1988).
  66. E. N. Alekseev, L. N. Alekseeva, I. V. Krivosheina, and V. I. Volchenko, Detection of the neutrino signal from SN1987A in the LMC using the INR baksan underground scintillation telescope, Phys. Lett. B 205, 209 (1988).
  67. E. N. Alekseev, L. N. Alekseeva, V. I. Volchenko, and I. V. Krivosheina, Possible detection of a neutrino signal on 23 February 1987 at the baksan underground scintillation telescope of the institute of nuclear research, JETP Lett. 45 (1987) 589–592.
  68. R. M. Bionta et al., Observation of a neutrino burst in coincidence with supernova SN1987a in the large magellanic cloud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1494 (1987).
  69. P. S. Pasquini and O. L. G. Peres, Bounds on neutrino-scalar Yukawa coupling, Phys. Rev. D 93, 053007 (2016); 93, 079902(E) (2016).
  70. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  71. J. M. Berryman, A. De Gouvêa, K. J. Kelly, and Y. Zhang, Lepton-number-charged scalars and neutrino beamstrahlung, Phys. Rev. D 97, 075030 (2018).
  72. B. Telalovic, D. F. G. Fiorillo, P. Martínez-Miravé, E. Vitagliano, and M. Bustamante, The next galactic supernova can uncover mass and couplings of particles decaying to neutrinos, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2024) 011.
  73. M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018).
  74. S. Wilks, The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses, Ann. Math. Stat. 9, 60 (1938).
  75. E. Burns and W. Fisher, Testing the approximations described in “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”, arXiv:1110.5002.
  76. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011); 73, 2501(E) (2013).
  77. M. Agostini, G. Benato, J. A. Detwiler, J. Menéndez, and F. Vissani, Toward the discovery of matter creation with neutrinoless ββ decay, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 025002 (2023).
  78. L. Jokiniemi, B. Romeo, P. Soriano, and J. Menéndez, Neutrinoless ββ-decay nuclear matrix elements from two-neutrino ββ-decay data, Phys. Rev. C 107, 044305 (2023).
  79. M. Agostini et al. (GERDA Collaboration), Final results of GERDA on the search for neutrinoless double-β decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 252502 (2020).
  80. A. J. Zsigmond (LEGEND Collaboration), LEGEND: The future of neutrinoless double-beta decay search with germanium detectors, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1468, 012111 (2020).
  81. W. Armstrong et al. (CUPID Collaboration), CUPID pre-CDR, arXiv:1907.09376.
  82. G. Adhikari et al. (nEXO Collaboration), nEXO: Neutrinoless double beta decay search beyond 1028  year half-life sensitivity, J. Phys. G 49, 015104 (2022).
  83. T. Li et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Probing scalar-neutrino and scalar-dark-matter interactions with PandaX-4T, arXiv:2511.13515.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 075039– Published 28 April, 2026
  • Received 14 February 2026
  • Accepted 31 March 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation