- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Quadrature-witness readout for backscatter mitigation in gravitational-wave detectors dominated by backaction

Niels Böttner, Roman Schnabel, and Mikhail Korobko*

  • Institut für Quantenphysik und Zentrum für Optische Quantentechnologien, Universität Hamburg, Luruper Chaussee 149, 22761 Hamburg, Germany

  • *Contact author: mikhail.korobko@uni-hamburg.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 102002 – Published 8 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ls1z-vjn7

Abstract

Disturbances in gravitational wave (GW) observational data are often caused by nonstationary noise in the detector itself, such as backscattering of laser stray light into the signal field. Unlike GW signals, nonstationary noise can appear in both the GW-signal quadrature and the orthogonal quadrature, which is usually not measured. Simultaneous sensing of this orthogonal quadrature provides a witness channel that can be used to reconstruct the disturbance in the signal quadrature enabling subtraction of nonstationary noise. Here, we present the concept of quadrature witness that is compatible with frequency-dependent squeezing, which is already used to simultaneously reduce photon shot noise and photon radiation-pressure noise. We demonstrate that implementing this approach in a GW detector could reduce noise caused by loud backscatter events, thereby improving the overall sensitivity and robustness of GW observatories.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (53)

  1. B. Abbott et al., Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
  2. B. P. Abbott et al., GW170817: Observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017).
  3. B. P. Abbott et al., GWTC-1: A gravitational-wave transient catalog of compact binary mergers observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019).
  4. LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration et al., GWTC-2.1: Deep extended catalog of compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the first half of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. D 109, 022001 (2024).
  5. LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration, kagra Collaboration et al., GWTC-3: Compact binary coalescences observed by LIGO and Virgo during the second part of the third observing run, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041039 (2023).
  6. A. Abac, I. Abouelfettouh, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adamcewicz, S. Adhicary, D. Adhikari, N. Adhikari, R. Adhikari, V. Adkins et al., GWTC-4.0: Updating the gravitational-wave transient catalog with observations from the first part of the fourth LIGO-Virgo-kagra observing run, arXiv:2508.18082.
  7. Marica Branchesi et al., Science with the Einstein Telescope: A comparison of different designs, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2023) 068.
  8. Matthew Evans et al., A horizon study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, observatories, and community, arXiv:2109.09882.
  9. A. Abac, R. Abramo, S. Albanesi, A. Albertini, A. Agapito, M. Agathos, C. Albertus, N. Andersson, T. Andrade, I. Andreoni et al., The science of the Einstein Telescope, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2026) 081.
  10. LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Advanced LIGO, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 074001 (2015).
  11. F. Acernese et al., Advanced Virgo status, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1342, 012010 (2020).
  12. T. Akutsu et al., kagra: 2.5 generation interferometric gravitational wave detector, Nat. Astron. 3, 35 (2019).
  13. C. M. Caves, Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer, Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693 (1981).
  14. R. Schnabel, N. Mavalvala, D. E. McClelland, and P. K. Lam, Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy, Nat. Commun. 1, 121 (2010).
  15. R. Schnabel, Squeezed states of light and their applications in laser interferometers, Phys. Rep. 684, 1 (2017).
  16. J. Abadie et al., A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit, Nat. Phys. 7, 962 (2011).
  17. H. Grote, K. Danzmann, K. L. Dooley, R. Schnabel, J. Slutsky, and H. Vahlbruch, First long-term application of squeezed states of light in a gravitational-wave observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 181101 (2013).
  18. M. Tse et al., Quantum-enhanced Advanced LIGO detectors in the era of gravitational-wave astronomy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231107 (2019).
  19. F. Acernese et al. (Virgo Collaboration), Increasing the astrophysical reach of the Advanced Virgo detector via the application of squeezed vacuum states of light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 231108 (2019).
  20. W. Jia, V. Xu, K. Kuns, M. Nakano, L. Barsotti, M. Evans, N. Mavalvala et al., Squeezing the quantum noise of a gravitational-wave detector below the standard quantum limit, Science 385, 1318 (2024).
  21. W. G. Unruh, Quantum noise in the interferometer detector, in Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravity, and Measurement Theory, edited by P. Meystre and M. O. Scully (Springer, Boston, MA, 1983), pp. 647–660.
  22. M. T. Jaekel and S. Reynaud, Quantum limits in interferometric measurements, Europhys. Lett. 13, 301 (1990).
  23. H. J. Kimble, Y. Levin, A. B. Matsko, K. S. Thorne, and S. P. Vyatchanin, Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum nondemolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics, Phys. Rev. D 65, 022002 (2001).
  24. S. Chelkowski, H. Vahlbruch, B. Hage, A. Franzen, N. Lastzka, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Experimental characterization of frequency-dependent squeezed light, Phys. Rev. A 71, 013806 (2005).
  25. S. L. Danilishin and F. Y. Khalili, Quantum measurement theory in gravitational-wave detectors, Living Rev. Relativity 15, 5 (2012).
  26. S. L. Danilishin, F. Y. Khalili, and H. Miao, Advanced quantum techniques for future gravitational-wave detectors, Living Rev. Relativity 22, 2 (2019).
  27. M. Korobko, Quantum technologies for the Einstein telescope, Galaxies 13, 11 (2025).
  28. J.-Y. Vinet, V. Brisson, and S. Braccini, Scattered light noise in gravitational wave interferometric detectors: Coherent effects, Phys. Rev. D 54, 1276 (1996).
  29. J.-Y. Vinet, V. Brisson, S. Braccini, I. Ferrante, L. Pinard, F. Bondu, and E. Tournié, Scattered light noise in gravitational wave interferometric detectors: A statistical approach, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6085 (1997).
  30. H. Vahlbruch, S. Chelkowski, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Quantum engineering of squeezed states for quantum communication and metrology, New J. Phys. 9, 371 (2007).
  31. D. J. Ottaway, P. Fritschel, and S. J. Waldman, Impact of upconverted scattered light on advanced interferometric gravitational wave detectors, Opt. Express 20, 8329 (2012).
  32. S. Soni, J. Glanzer, A. Effler, V. Frolov, G. González, A. Pele, and R. Schofield, Modeling and reduction of high frequency scatter noise at LIGO Livingston, Classical Quantum Gravity 41, 135015 (2024).
  33. M. Andrés-Carcasona, A. Macquet, M. Martínez, L. M. Mir, and H. Yamamoto, Study of scattered light in the main arms of the Einstein Telescope gravitational wave detector, Phys. Rev. D 108, 102001 (2023).
  34. S. Steinlechner, J. Bauchrowitz, M. Meinders, H. Müller-Ebhardt, K. Danzmann, and R. Schnabel, Quantum-dense metrology, Nat. Photonics 7, 626 (2013).
  35. M. Ast, S. Steinlechner, and R. Schnabel, Reduction of classical measurement noise via quantum-dense metrology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 180801 (2016).
  36. M. Meinders and R. Schnabel, Sensitivity improvement of a laser interferometer limited by inelastic back-scattering, employing dual readout, Classical Quantum Gravity 32, 195004 (2015).
  37. D. Voigt, A. Lohde, and O. Gerberding, Simulating tunable coherence for scattered light suppression in laser-interferometric gravitational wave detectors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 021106 (2023).
  38. D. Voigt, L. Eggers, K.-S. Isleif, S. M. Koehlenbeck, M. Ast, and O. Gerberding, Tunable coherence laser interferometry: Demonstrating 40 dB of stray light suppression and compatibility with resonant optical cavities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 213802 (2025).
  39. A. Lohde, D. Voigt, and O. Gerberding, Dual balanced readout for scattered light noise mitigation in Michelson interferometers, Phys. Rev. D 111, 022004 (2025).
  40. N. Böttner, R. Schnabel, and M. Korobko, Quantum dense metrology for backscatter mitigation in gravitational-wave detectors operating in the backaction-dominated quantum regime (to be published).
  41. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/ls1z-vjn7 for details of the full theoretical model including quantum radiation pressure noise, optical losses, and frequency-dependent squeezing, which includes Refs. [42–45].
  42. M. Korobko, Taming the quantum noise: How quantum metrology can expand the reach of gravitational-wave observatories, Ph.D. thesis, University of Hamburg, 2020, https://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/handle/ediss/8460.
  43. M. Rakhmanov, J. D. Romano, and J. T. Whelan, High-frequency corrections to the detector response and their effect on searches for gravitational waves, Classical Quantum Gravity 25, 184017 (2008).
  44. E. Nichols and G. Hull, The pressure due to radiation, Astrophys. J. 17, 315 (1903).
  45. A. Buonanno and Y. Chen, Scaling law in signal recycled laser-interferometer gravitational-wave detectors, Phys. Rev. D 67, 062002 (2003).
  46. L. Barsotti, L. McCuller, M. Evans, and P. Fritschel, The A+ design curve, Technical note T1800042-v5 (https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1800042/public, 2018).
  47. B. Canuel, E. Genin, G. Vajente, and J. Marque, Displacement noise from back scattering and specular reflection of input optics in advanced gravitational wave detectors, Opt. Express 21, 10546 (2013).
  48. M. Ast, Quantum-dense metrology for subtraction of back-scatter disturbances in gravitational-wave detection, Ph.D. thesis, Hannover, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover, 2017, 10.15488/8928.
  49. S. Soni et al., Reducing scattered light in LIGO’s third observing run, Classical Quantum Gravity 38, 025016 (2020).
  50. S. Bahaadini, V. Noroozi, N. Rohani, S. Coughlin, M. Zevin, J. Smith, V. Kalogera, and A. Katsaggelos, Machine learning for Gravity Spy: Glitch classification and dataset, Inf. Sci. 444, 172 (2018).
  51. J. Glanzer, S. Banagiri, S. B. Coughlin, S. Soni, M. Zevin, C. P. L. Berry, O. Patane, S. Bahaadini, N. Rohani, K. Crowston, V. Kalogera, C. Østerlund, L. Trouille, and A. Katsaggelos, Data quality up to the third observing run of Advanced LIGO: Gravity Spy glitch classifications, Classical Quantum Gravity 40, 065004 (2023).
  52. J. Zander and R. Schnabel, Full monitoring of ensemble trajectories with 10 dB-sub-Heisenberg imprecision, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 148 (2021).
  53. N. Böttner, R. Schnabel, and M. Korobko, Supplemental code, Zenodo, 2025, https://zenodo.org/records/17865133.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 102002– Published 8 May, 2026
  • Received 12 December 2025
  • Accepted 17 April 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation