Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Flavor-violating Higgs and top decays in the type 1B flavorful two-Higgs-doublet model with a twist

Ti-Bin Hou1,2,3,*, Zheng Li1,2,3, Yu-Ju Peng1,2,3, Jin-Lei Yang1,2,3,†, Hao-Ran Ma1,2,3, and Tai-Fu Feng1,2,3,4,‡

  • *Contact author: 3078849770@qq.com
  • †Contact author: jlyang@hbu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: fengtf@hbu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 055048 – Published 25 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/l8qz-q978

Abstract

We study flavor-violating decays of the SM-like Higgs boson and rare top decays in the type 1B realization of the flavorful two-Higgs-doublet model with a twist, focusing on h→sb, h→db, h→uc, h→μτ, h→eτ, h→eμ, t→ch, and t→uh. We present the relevant amplitude and branching-ratio formulae, include one-loop vertex corrections, and impose constraints from Higgs signal-strength measurements, electroweak precision tests, meson mixing, B→Xsγ, direct HFV searches, and CLFV constraints, including μ−e conversion. The surviving parameter space favors BR(h→sb)≫BR(h→db), BR(t→ch)≫BR(t→uh), and BR(h→μτ)≫BR(h→eτ)∼BR(h→eμ) in the lepton sector. One-loop effects usually preserve these hierarchies, but can modify individual channels through different mechanisms: sizable destructive tree-loop interference can reduce h→sb enough to yield rare BR1L(h→db)>BR1L(h→sb) points, whereas the large relative corrections found in rare top decays mainly reflect strong SM-like alignment suppressing the tree-level amplitudes.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (48)

  1. ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  2. CMS Collaboration, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  3. S. L. Glashow and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1958 (1977).
  4. E. A. Paschos, Phys. Rev. D 15, 1966 (1977).
  5. A. Pich and P. Tuzon, Phys. Rev. D 80, 091702 (2009).
  6. G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
  7. T. P. Cheng and M. Sher, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3484 (1987).
  8. D. Atwood, L. Reina, and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 55, 3156 (1997).
  9. W.-S. Hou, Phys. Lett. B 296, 179 (1992).
  10. G. C. Branco, W. Grimus, and L. Lavoura, Phys. Lett. B 380, 119 (1996).
  11. F. J. Botella, G. C. Branco, A. Carmona, M. Nebot, L. Pedro, and M. N. Rebelo, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 078.
  12. F. J. Botella, G. C. Branco, M. Nebot, and M. N. Rebelo, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 161 (2016).
  13. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, D. J. Robinson, and D. Tuckler, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2017) 129.
  14. W. Altmannshofer and B. Maddock, Phys. Rev. D 98, 075005 (2018).
  15. CMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 104, 032013 (2021).
  16. ATLAS Collaboration, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 166.
  17. CMS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. D 108, 072004 (2023).
  18. W. Altmannshofer, C. Caillol, M. Dam, S. Xella, and Y. Zhang, arXiv:2205.10576.
  19. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra, Acta Phys. Pol. B 35, 2695 (2004).
  20. Z.-f. Ge and J.-l. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1189 (2024).
  21. J.-L. Yang, T.-F. Feng, H.-B. Zhang, G.-Z. Ning, and X.-Y. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 438 (2018).
  22. CMS Collaboration, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2022) 169.
  23. ATLAS Collaboration, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 195.
  24. ATLAS Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 757 (2024).
  25. G. Blankenburg, J. Ellis, and G. Isidori, Phys. Lett. B 712, 386 (2012).
  26. R. Harnik, J. Kopp, and J. Zupan, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 026.
  27. J. Kopp and M. Nardecchia, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 156.
  28. M. Buschmann, J. Kopp, J. Liu, and X.-P. Wang, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2016) 149.
  29. J. Herrero-Garcia, M. Nebot, F. Rajec, M. White, and A. G. Williams, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2019) 147.
  30. G. Abbas, A. Celis, X.-Q. Li, J. Lu, and A. Pich, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2015) 005.
  31. W. Altmannshofer, J. Eby, S. Gori, M. Lotito, M. Martone, and D. Tuckler, Phys. Rev. D 94, 115032 (2016).
  32. W. Altmannshofer, B. Maddock, and D. Tuckler, Phys. Rev. D 100, 015003 (2019).
  33. Z. Cao, J.-L. Yang, T.-B. Hou, and T.-F. Feng, Phys. Rev. D 113, 016012 (2026).
  34. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  35. M. Bona et al. (UTfit Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2008) 049.
  36. Y. Amhis et al. (HFLAV Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 895 (2017).
  37. L. Bartoszek et al. (Mu2e Collaboration), Fermilab Technical Report, 2014, 10.2172/1172555.
  38. C. Dohmen et al. (SINDRUM II Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 317, 631 (1993).
  39. W. H. Bertl et al. (SINDRUM II Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 337 (2006).
  40. F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1773 (2014).
  41. W. Porod, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153, 275 (2003).
  42. W. Porod and F. Staub, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2458 (2012).
  43. W. Porod, F. Staub, and A. Vicente, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2992 (2014).
  44. P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2711 (2014).
  45. P. Bechtle, D. Dercks, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 145 (2021).
  46. T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001).
  47. T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999).
  48. T. Hahn, in 5th International Symposium on Radiative Corrections (RADCOR 2000), Vol. 89 (2000), pp. 231–236, arXiv:hep-ph/0005029.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation