- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine

Physical Review D

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Controlling the dynamical evolution of quantum coherence and quantum correlations in e+e−→ΛΛ¯ processes at BESIII

Elhabib Jaloum and Mohamed Amazioug*

  • *Contact author: m.amazioug@uiz.ac.ma
PDF

Phys. Rev. D 113, 016024 – Published 28 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kxw9-wdth

Abstract

Quantum coherence, a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, is of paramount importance for quantum information protocols. However, maintaining coherence in elementary particle systems presents significant challenges. In this work, we investigate quantum coherence and quantum correlations in the e+e−→ΛΛ¯ processes at BESIII using experimentally feasible parameters, where Λ and Λ¯ denote the spin-1/2 hyperon and its antihyperon, respectively. We analyze the dependence of quantum coherence and quantum correlations on the scattering angle φ. Notably, these resources reach their maximum at φ=π/2. We demonstrate that classical correlations can significantly delay the decay of quantum correlations and coherence. This study underscores the importance of understanding the interplay between classical and quantum correlations in high-energy particle physics, particularly in the context of hyperon-antihyperon interactions explored in the BESIII experiment. Furthermore, we discuss the hierarchy of quantum resources (quantum steering, entanglement of formation, geometric quantum discord, and quantum coherence) in both Markovian and non-Markovian regimes. This result could have potential applications in quantum information processing and high-energy physics.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Comments & Replies

Comment on “Controlling the dynamical evolution of quantum coherence and quantum correlations in e+e−→ΛΛ¯ processes at BESIII”

Saeed Haddadi
Phys. Rev. D 114, 038901 (2026)

Reply to “Comment on ‘Controlling the dynamical evolution of quantum coherence and quantum correlations in e+e−→ΛΛ¯ processes at BESIII”’

Elhabib Jaloum and Mohamed Amazioug
Phys. Rev. D 114, 038902 (2026)

Article Text

References (103)

  1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
  2. E. Schrödinger, Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1983), pp. 152–167.
  3. J. S. Bell, Phys. Phys. Fiz. 1, 195 (1964).
  4. R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009).
  5. C. H. Bennett, D. P. DiVincenzo, C. A. Fuchs, T. Mor, E. Rains, P. W. Shor, J. A. Smolin, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. A 59, 1070 (1999).
  6. M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, R. Horodecki, J. Oppenheim, A. Sen, U. Sen, and B. Synak-Radtke, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 71, 062307 (2005).
  7. A. Datta, A. Shaji, and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 050502 (2008).
  8. B. P. Lanyon, M. Barbieri, M. P. Almeida, and A. G. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 200501 (2008).
  9. A. Ferraro, L. Aolita, D. Cavalcanti, F. M. Cucchietti, and A. Acín, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 81, 052318 (2010).
  10. K. Modi, A. Brodutch, H. Cable, T. Paterek, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1655 (2012).
  11. L. Henderson and V. Vedral, J. Phys. A 34, 6899 (2001).
  12. J. Schneeloch, C. J. Broadbent, S. P. Walborn, E. G. Cavalcanti, and J. C. Howell, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 87, 062103 (2013).
  13. M. Amazioug and M. Daoud, Phys. Lett. A 493, 129245 (2024).
  14. W. H. Zurek, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 715 (2003).
  15. M.-L. Hu, X. Hu, J. Wang, Y. Peng, Y.-R. Zhang, and H. Fan, Phys. Rep. 762, 1 (2018).
  16. C. Cruz, M. F. Anka, M. S. Reis, R. Bachelard, and A. C. Santos, Quantum Sci. Technol. 7, 025020 (2022).
  17. Y. Khedif, S. Haddadi, M. Daoud, H. Dolatkhah, and M. R. Pourkarimi, Quantum Inf. Process. 21, 235 (2022).
  18. C. Cruz, Int. J. Quantum. Inform. 15, 1750031 (2017).
  19. F.-G. Deng, B.-C. Ren, and X.-H. Li, Sci. Bull. 62, 46 (2017).
  20. H.-K. Lo, Phys. Rev. A 62, 012313 (2000).
  21. R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963).
  22. E. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 277 (1963).
  23. P. Kammerlander and J. Anders, Sci. Rep. 6, 22174 (2016).
  24. K. Zhang, X. Wang, Q. Zeng, and J. Wang, PRX Quantum 3, 030315 (2022).
  25. C. Filgueiras, O. Rojas, and M. Rojas, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 532, 2000207 (2020).
  26. K. Berrada, Physica (Amsterdam) 116E, 113784 (2020).
  27. Y.-T. Sha, Y. Wang, Z.-H. Sun, and X.-W. Hou, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam) 392, 229 (2018).
  28. H. A. Zad and M. Rojas, Physica (Amsterdam) 126E, 114455 (2021).
  29. K. Ullah, E. Köse, R. Yagan, M. C. Onbaşl𝚤, and Ö. E. Müstecapl𝚤oğlu, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023221 (2022).
  30. H.-L. Shi, S. Ding, Q.-K. Wan, X.-H. Wang, and W.-L. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 130602 (2022).
  31. F. Ahnefeld, T. Theurer, D. Egloff, J. M. Matera, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 120501 (2022).
  32. R. Sk and P. K. Panigrahi, Physica (Amsterdam) 596A, 127129 (2022).
  33. M. Lamehi-Rachti and W. Mittig, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2543 (1976).
  34. N. A. Törnqvist, Found. Phys. 11, 171 (1981).
  35. S. Abel, M. Dittmar, and H. Dreiner, Phys. Lett. B 280, 304 (1992).
  36. F. Benatti and R. Floreanini, Phys. Rev. D 57, R1332 (1998).
  37. F. Benatti and R. Floreanini, Eur. Phys. J. C 13, 267 (2000).
  38. R. A. Bertlmann, W. Grimus, and B. Hiesmayr, Phys. Lett. A 289, 21 (2001).
  39. S. Banerjee, A. K. Alok, and R. MacKenzie, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 129 (2016).
  40. A. Acin, J. Latorre, and P. Pascual, Phys. Rev. A 63, 042107 (2001).
  41. A. Go, J. Mod. Opt. 51, 991 (2004).
  42. S. Baranov, J. Phys. G 35, 075002 (2008).
  43. S. Banerjee, A. K. Alok, R. Srikanth, and B. C. Hiesmayr, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 1 (2015).
  44. Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 907 (2021).
  45. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, and G. Panizzo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 161801 (2021).
  46. C. Severi, C. D. E. Boschi, F. Maltoni, and M. Sioli, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 285 (2022).
  47. A. J. Larkoski, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096012 (2022).
  48. J. A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J. Casas, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 666 (2022).
  49. Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 221801 (2023).
  50. Y. Afik and J. R. M. de Nova, Quantum 6, 820 (2022).
  51. W. Gong, G. Parida, Z. Tu, and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. D 106, L031501 (2022).
  52. A. J. Barr, Phys. Lett. B 825, 136866 (2022).
  53. J. Aguilar-Saavedra, A. Bernal, J. Casas, and J. Moreno, Phys. Rev. D 107, 016012 (2023).
  54. R. Ashby-Pickering, A. J. Barr, and A. Wierzchucka, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2023) 020.
  55. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli, and L. Marzola, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 823 (2023).
  56. G. Fäldt and A. Kupsc, Phys. Lett. B 772, 16 (2017).
  57. E. Perotti, G. Fäldt, A. Kupsc, S. Leupold, and J. J. Song, Phys. Rev. D 99, 056008 (2019).
  58. P. Adlarson and A. Kupsc, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114005 (2019).
  59. N. Salone, P. Adlarson, V. Batozskaya, A. Kupsc, S. Leupold, and J. Tandean, Phys. Rev. D 105, 116022 (2022).
  60. M. Ablikim, M. Achasov, P. Adlarson, S. Ahmed, M. Albrecht, M. Alekseev, A. Amoroso, F. An, Q. An, Y. Bai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 122003 (2019).
  61. M. Ablikim, M. Achasov, P. Adlarson, M. Albrecht, R. Aliberti, A. Amoroso, M. An, Q. An, X. Bai, Y. Bai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 131801 (2022).
  62. R. A. Bertlmann and A. Zeilinger, Real or Not Real that is the Question... (Springer, Berlin, 2002), pp. 119–50.
  63. S. Wu, C. Qian, Q. Wang, and X. R. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054012 (2024).
  64. N. A. Törnqvist, Phys. Lett. A 117, 1 (1986).
  65. J. P. Lv, Z. H. Yu, Z. T. Liang, Q. Wang, and X. N. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114003 (2024).
  66. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration),Nat. Phys. 15, 631 (2019).
  67. K. Schönning, V. Batozskaya, P. Adlarson, and X. Zhou, Chin. Phys. C 47, 052002 (2023).
  68. E. Beall, B. Cork, D. Keefe, P. Murphy, and W. Wenzel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 75 (1962).
  69. Y. Wang, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 873, 012026 (2017).
  70. S. Chen and S. L. Olsen, Natl. Sci. Rev. 8, nwab189 (2021).
  71. S. Wu, C. Qian, Q. Wang, and X.-R. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 110, 054012 (2024).
  72. R. Horodecki et al., Phys. Rev. A 54, 1838 (1996).
  73. S. Daffer, K. Wódkiewicz, J. D. Cresser, and J. K. McIver, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 70, 010304 (2004).
  74. M. Albrecht, F. An, Q. An, J. Bai, Y. Bai, O. Bakina et al., Phys. Rev. D 95, 052003 (2017).
  75. M. Ablikim, J. Bai, Y. Bai, Y. Ban, X. Cai, H. Chen, H. Chen, H. Chen, J. Chen, J. Chen et al., Phys. Rev. D 78, 092005 (2008).
  76. P. Adlarson, S. Ahmed, Anita, Y. Bai, O. Bakina et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 052004 (2020).
  77. R. Workman, P. D. Group et al., Exp. Physiol. 2022, 083C01 (2022).
  78. M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, S. Ahmed, X. Ai, O. Albayrak, M. Albrecht, D. Ambrose, A. Amoroso, F. An, Q. An et al., Phys. Lett. B 770, 217 (2017).
  79. M. Ablikim, M. N. Achasov, P. Adlarson, X. Ai, R. Aliberti, A. Amoroso, M. An, Q. An, Y. Bai, O. Bakina et al., Phys. Rev. D 108, L031106 (2023).
  80. C. Chen, C. Ren, X.-J. Ye, and J.-L. Chen, Phys. Rev. A 98, 052114 (2018).
  81. K. Zhang and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 104, 042404 (2021).
  82. S. A. Hill and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5022 (1997).
  83. W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
  84. H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017901 (2001).
  85. F. Paula, T. R. de Oliveira, and M. Sarandy, Phys. Rev. A:At., Mol., Opt. Phys. 87, 064101 (2013).
  86. B. Dakić, V. Vedral, and Č. Brukner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 190502 (2010).
  87. Z. Ma, Z. Chen, F. F. Fanchini, and S.-M. Fei, Sci. Rep. 5, 10262 (2015).
  88. S. Luo, Phys. Rev. A: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 77, 042303 (2008).
  89. F. Ciccarello and T. Tufarelli, New J. Phys. 16, 013038 (2014).
  90. V. Bouchiat, D. Vion, P. Joyez, D. Esteve, and M. Devoret, Phys. Scr. 1998, 165 (1998).
  91. T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014).
  92. A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, and M. B. Plenio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041003 (2017).
  93. K. Modi, A. Brodutch, H. Cable, T. Paterek, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1655 (2012).
  94. E. Chitambar and G. Gour, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 025001 (2019).
  95. H. M. Wiseman, S. J. Jones, and A. C. Doherty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 140402 (2007).
  96. P. Privitera, Phys. Lett. B 275, 172 (1992).
  97. P. Privitera, Phys. Lett. B 275, 172 (1992).
  98. M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, and E. Gabrielli, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 162 (2023).
  99. M. M. Altakach, P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari, and K. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. D 107, 093002 (2023).
  100. Y.-S. Tsai, Phys. Rev. D 4, 2821 (1971).
  101. M. L. Perl, G. Abrams, A. Boyarski, M. Breidenbach, D. Briggs, F. Bulos, W. Chinowsky, J. Dakin, G. Feldman, C. Friedberg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1489 (1975).
  102. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).
  103. K. Ehatäht, M. Fabbrichesi, L. Marzola, and C. Veelken, Phys. Rev. D 109, 032005 (2024).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. D 113, 016024– Published 28 January, 2026
  • Received 5 March 2025
  • Accepted 10 September 2025
Crossmark - Check for updates button
Creative Commons Logo

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation