Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Anthropic selection in a model with negative Λ plus axion dark energy

Kai Murai* and Fuminobu Takahashi†

  • *Contact author: kai.murai.e2@tohoku.ac.jp
  • †Contact author: fumi@tohoku.ac.jp

Phys. Rev. D 112, 103501 – Published 3 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kwhj-vl35

Abstract

We study a dark energy model composed of a bare negative cosmological constant and a single ultralight axion, motivated by the string axiverse. Assuming that intelligent observers arise and observe, as in our Universe, the onset of dark-energy-driven acceleration following matter domination, and that this acceleration persists to the present, we derive nontrivial constraints on both the axion mass and the bare cosmological constant. The axion mass is bounded from above to avoid fine-tuning of the initial misalignment angle near the hilltop, and from below because too light axions cannot achieve accelerated expansion due to their limited energy budget. As a result, the anthropically allowed axion mass range typically lies around m=O(10)H0 for a decay constant close to the Planck scale, where H0 is the observed value of the Hubble constant. In this framework, the dark energy equation-of-state parameter w0 generically deviates from −1 by O(0.1), providing a natural explanation for why w≠−1 may be expected. We also find that, for a decay constant slightly smaller than the Planck scale, the peak value of dark energy density is significantly smaller than the anthropic bound on the cosmological constant and can be close to the observed value. These outcomes are intriguingly consistent with recent DESI hints of time-varying dark energy, and offer a compelling anthropic explanation within the Λ+ axion framework.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (54)

  1. S. Perlmutter et al. (Supernova Cosmology Project Collaboration), Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999).
  2. A. G. Riess et al. (Supernova Search Team), Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998).
  3. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck Collaboration ), Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020); 652, C4(E) (2021).
  4. S. Alam et al. (BOSS Collaboration), Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 470, 2617 (2017).
  5. S. M. Carroll, V. Duvvuri, M. Trodden, and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 70, 043528 (2004).
  6. B. Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles, Phys. Rev. D 37, 3406 (1988).
  7. R. R. Caldwell, R. Dave, and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1582 (1998).
  8. S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989).
  9. S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A. D. Linde, and S. P. Trivedi, Phys. Rev. D 68, 046005 (2003).
  10. R. Bousso and J. Polchinski, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2000) 006.
  11. G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko, and C. Vafa, arXiv:1806.08362.
  12. U. H. Danielsson and T. Van Riet, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, 1830007 (2018).
  13. M. Demirtas, M. Kim, L. McAllister, J. Moritz, and A. Rios-Tascon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 011602 (2022).
  14. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2607 (1987).
  15. L. Susskind, arXiv:hep-th/0302219.
  16. J. Polchinski, in 23rd Solvay Conference in Physics: The Quantum Structure of Space and Time (2006), pp. 216–236, arXiv:hep-th/0603249.
  17. G. F. R. Ellis and L. Smolin, arXiv:0901.2414.
  18. D. Sorini, J. A. Peacock, and L. Lombriser, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 535, 1449 (2024).
  19. F. Takahashi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 121, 711 (2009).
  20. N. Kaloper, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2019) 106.
  21. A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010).
  22. P. Svrcek, arXiv:hep-th/0607086.
  23. Ruchika, S. A. Adil, K. Dutta, A. Mukherjee, and A. A. Sen, Phys. Dark Universe 40, 101199 (2023).
  24. H. N. Luu, Y.-C. Qiu, and S. H. H. Tye, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023524 (2025).
  25. R. Cardenas, T. Gonzalez, Y. Leiva, O. Martin, and I. Quiros, Phys. Rev. D 67, 083501 (2003).
  26. K. Dutta, Ruchika, A. Roy, A. A. Sen, and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 52, 15 (2020).
  27. L. Visinelli, S. Vagnozzi, and U. Danielsson, Symmetry 11, 1035 (2019).
  28. R. Calderón, R. Gannouji, B. L’Huillier, and D. Polarski, Phys. Rev. D 103, 023526 (2021).
  29. A. A. Sen, S. A. Adil, and S. Sen, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 518, 1098 (2022).
  30. S. A. Adil, U. Mukhopadhyay, A. A. Sen, and S. Vagnozzi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2023) 072.
  31. N. Menci, S. A. Adil, U. Mukhopadhyay, A. A. Sen, and S. Vagnozzi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 072.
  32. A. G. Adame et al. (DESI Collaboration), J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 02 (2025) 021.
  33. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083515 (2025).
  34. M. Abdul Karim et al. (DESI Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 112, 083514 (2025).
  35. Y. Tada and T. Terada, Phys. Rev. D 109, L121305 (2024).
  36. W. Yin, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 327.
  37. M. Cortês and A. R. Liddle, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 12 (2024) 007.
  38. S. Bhattacharya, G. Borghetto, A. Malhotra, S. Parameswaran, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2024) 073.
  39. P. Mukherjee and A. A. Sen, Phys. Rev. D 110, 123502 (2024).
  40. A. Notari, M. Redi, and A. Tesi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2024) 025.
  41. X. D. Jia, J. P. Hu, S. X. Yi, and F. Y. Wang, Astrophys. J. Lett. 979, L34 (2025).
  42. A. Hernández-Almada, M. L. Mendoza-Martínez, M. A. García-Aspeitia, and V. Motta, Phys. Dark Universe 46, 101668 (2024).
  43. S. Bhattacharya, G. Borghetto, A. Malhotra, S. Parameswaran, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 086.
  44. M. Berbig, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 03 (2025) 015.
  45. W. J. Wolf, C. García-García, and P. G. Ferreira, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2025) 034.
  46. A. Chakraborty, P. K. Chanda, S. Das, and K. Dutta, arXiv:2503.10806.
  47. G. Borghetto, A. Malhotra, G. Tasinato, and I. Zavala, Phys. Rev. D 112, 023521 (2025).
  48. S. Nakagawa, Y. Nakai, Y.-C. Qiu, and M. Yamada, Phys. Lett. B 868, 139774 (2025).
  49. J. Lee, K. Murai, F. Takahashi, and W. Yin, Phys. Rev. D 112, 043538 (2025).
  50. E. O. Colgáin, S. Pourojaghi, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and L. Yin, arXiv:2504.04417.
  51. F. B. M. d. Santos, J. Morais, S. Pan, W. Yang, and E. Di Valentino, arXiv:2504.04646.
  52. S. Hellerman and J. Walcher, Phys. Rev. D 72, 123520 (2005).
  53. F. Takahashi and M. Yamada, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2019) 001.
  54. H. N. Luu, Y.-C. Qiu, and S. H. H. Tye, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2025) 055.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation