Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Decoding weak phase amplitudes in charmed baryon decays

Zhi-Peng Xing1, Jin Sun2,*, and Xiao-Gang He3

  • *Contact author: sunjin0810@ibs.re.kr

Phys. Rev. D 114, L071301 – Published 13 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/kdz9-ks7n

Abstract

In this paper, we present a strategy to decode decay amplitudes with different weak phases in two-body charmed baryon decays, addressing a long-standing challenge to understanding CP violation in this sector. Using SU(3) flavor symmetry, we disentangle the amplitudes defined through M=λsAs+λbAb (λi=VuiVci*), enabling a data-driven determination of their relative hierarchy across Cabibbo-favored, singly, and doubly Cabibbo-suppressed modes. Applying this framework to current data, we find that the ratio Ab/As is approximately 100 times larger than expectation of O(1) at 2.1σ level. This unexpected pattern may be accommodated by SU(3) breaking effects, but it can also point to new physics. We further show that the Lee-Yang parameters provide an independent and complementary probe. To resolve this ambiguity in the origin of the enhancement, we propose a decisive discriminator using decay modes insensitive to large SU(3) breaking, in particular Ξc0→pK− and Ξc0→Σ+π− as golden channels. Measurements of these modes will distinguish between symmetry breaking effects and new physics, establishing a clean pathway to probe CP violation in the charm baryon sector.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (20)

  1. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Observation of CP violation in charm decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 211803 (2019).
  2. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of the time-integrated CP asymmetry in D0→K−K+ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 091802 (2023).
  3. J. G. Korner, G. Kramer, and J. Willrodt, Weak decays of charmed baryons, Z. Phys. C 2, 117 (1979).
  4. H.-Y. Cheng and B. Tseng, Nonleptonic weak decays of charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 46, 1042 (1992); Phys. Rev. D 55, 1697(E) (1997).
  5. C.-D. Lü, W. Wang, and F.-S. Yu, Test flavor SU(3) symmetry in exclusive Λc decays, Phys. Rev. D 93, 056008 (2016).
  6. C. Q. Geng, Y. K. Hsiao, C.-W. Liu, and T.-H. Tsai, Charmed baryon weak decays with SU(3) flavor symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2017) 147.
  7. P.-R. Li, X.-R. Lyu, and Y. Zheng, Experimental overview on the charmed baryon decays, Chin. Phys. C 50, 022002 (2026).
  8. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  9. Z.-P. Xing, Y.-J. Shi, J. Sun, and Y. Xing, SU(3) symmetry analysis in charmed baryon two body decays with penguin diagram contribution, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1014 (2024).
  10. C. Yang, X.-G. He, and C.-W. Liu, Charmed baryon decays: SU(3)F breaking and CP violation, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2025) 193.
  11. X.-G. He and C.-W. Liu, Large CP violation in charmed baryon decays, Sci. Bull. 70, 2598 (2025).
  12. G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, and M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125 (1996).
  13. H.-n. Li, C.-D. Lu, and F.-S. Yu, Branching ratios and direct CP asymmetries in D→PP decays, Phys. Rev. D 86, 036012 (2012).
  14. J. G. Korner, Octet behaviour of single-particle matrix elements <B′|H(W)|B> and <M’|H(W)|M> using a weak current current quark Hamiltonian, Nucl. Phys. B25, 282 (1971).
  15. J. C. Pati and C. H. Woo, Delta I=1/2 rule with fermion quarks, Phys. Rev. D 3, 2920 (1971).
  16. S. Groote and J. G. Körner, Topological tensor invariants and the current algebra approach: Analysis of 196 nonleptonic two-body decays of single and double charm baryons—a review, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 297 (2022).
  17. C.-Q. Geng, X.-G. He, X.-N. Jin, C.-W. Liu, and C. Yang, Complete determination of SU(3)F amplitudes and strong phase in Λc+→Ξ0K+, Phys. Rev. D 109, L071302 (2024).
  18. I. Adachi et al. (Belle Collaboration and Belle-II Collaboration), Measurements of the branching fractions of Ξc0→Ξ0π0, Ξc0→Ξ0η, and Ξc0→Ξ0η′ and asymmetry parameter of Ξc0→Ξ0π0, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 045.
  19. T. D. Lee and C.-N. Yang, general partial wave analysis of the decay of a hyperon of spin 1/2, Phys. Rev. 108, 1645 (1957).
  20. H.-Y. Cheng and B. Tseng, Cabibbo allowed nonleptonic weak decays of charmed baryons, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4188 (1993).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation