Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Finding unexpected nonhelical tracks

Levi Condren and Daniel Whiteson

Phys. Rev. D 113, 092020 – Published 29 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k9n2-d85w

Abstract

Many theories of physics beyond the Standard Model predict particles with nonhelical trajectories in a uniform magnetic field, but standard tracking algorithms assume helical paths and so are incapable of discovering nonhelical tracks. While alternative algorithms have been developed for specific trajectories, unforeseen physics could lead to unanticipated behavior, and such unexpected tracks are largely invisible to current algorithms, despite being potentially striking to the naked eye. A model-agnostic tracking algorithm is presented, capable of reconstructing a broad class of smooth nonhelical tracks without requiring explicit specification of particle trajectories, instead defining the target trajectories implicitly in the training sample. The network exhibits strong performance, even outside of the trajectories defined by the training sample. This proof-of-principle study takes the first step towards searches for unexpected tracks which may await discovery in current data.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (52)

  1. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  2. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  3. T. Gehrmann and B. Malaescu, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72, 233 (2022).
  4. P. Ferreira da Silva, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 73, 255 (2023).
  5. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
  6. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151601 (2014).
  7. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252303 (2010).
  8. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2010) 091.
  9. A. Strandlie and R. Fruhwirth, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1419 (2010).
  10. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Comput. Software Big Sci. 8, 9 (2024).
  11. ATLAS Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 031802 (2020).
  12. A. Abulencia et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 201801 (2006).
  13. J. Kang and M. A. Luty, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2009) 065.
  14. J. A. Evans and M. A. Luty, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2019) 090.
  15. S. Knapen, H. K. Lou, M. Papucci, and J. Setford, Phys. Rev. D 96, 115015 (2017).
  16. Q. Sha, D. Murnane, M. Fieg, S. Tong, M. Zakharyan, Y. Fang, and D. Whiteson, arXiv:2410.00269.
  17. C. D. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 43, 491 (1933).
  18. ATLAS Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 673 (2017).
  19. M. M. Bronstein, J. Bruna, Y. LeCun, A. Szlam, and P. Vandergheynst, IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 34, 18 (2017).
  20. X. Ju et al. (Exa.TrkX Collaboration), in 33rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2020), arXiv:2003.11603.
  21. X. Ju, D. Murnane, P. Calafiura, N. Choma, S. Conlon, S. Farrell, Y. Xu, M. Spiropulu, J.-R. Vlimant, A. Aurisano et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 876 (2021).
  22. S. Caillou, P. Calafiura, X. Ju, D. Murnane, T. Pham, C. Rougier, J. Stark, and A. Vallier (ATLAS Collaboration), EPJ Web Conf. 295, 03030 (2024).
  23. S. Caillou, P. Calafiura, S. A. Farrell, X. Ju, D. T. Murnane, C. Rougier, J. Stark, and A. Vallier ATLAS ITk Track Reconstruction with a GNN-based pipeline (2022), 10.5281/zenodo.8119762.
  24. J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  25. C. Bierlich et al., SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  26. X. Ju et al. (Exa.TrkX Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 876 (2021).
  27. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschits, The Classical Theory of Fields, Volume 2 of Course of Theoretical Physics (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975), ISBN [Amazon][WorldCat].
  28. R. Shakarchi and Elias M. Stein, Fourier Analysis: An Introduction (Princeton Lectures in Analysis I) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2003).
  29. L. Hormander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators 1 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990).
  30. M. Reed and B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics: Functional Analysis I (Revised and enlarged ed.) (Academic Press, San Diego, 1980).
  31. https://github.com/LeviCondren/non-helical-tracks.git.
  32. J. Duarte and J.-R. Vlimant, in Artificial Intelligence for High Energy Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2022), pp. 387–436.
  33. G. DeZoort, P. W. Battaglia, C. Biscarat, and J.-R. Vlimant, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 281 (2023).
  34. S. Thais, P. Calafiura, G. Chachamis, G. DeZoort, J. Duarte, S. Ganguly, M. Kagan, D. Murnane, M. S. Neubauer, and K. Terao, arXiv:2203.12852.
  35. L. Heinrich, B. Huth, A. Salzburger, and T. Wettig, arXiv:2401.16016.
  36. L. H. Vaage, in Connecting the Dots Workshop (CTD) (Princeton, NJ, 2022).
  37. T. Kortus, R. Keidel, N. R. Gauger et al. (B. pCT Collaboration), IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 45, 15820 (2023).
  38. S. Caillou, P. Calafiura, C. Rougier, J. Stark, D. T. Murnane, A. Vallier, X. Ju, and S. A. Farrell, CERN Technical Report No. ATL-COM-ITK-2022-057, 2022.
  39. Y. Verma and S. Jena, arXiv:2012.08515.
  40. J. Hewes, A. Aurisano, G. Cerati, J. Kowalkowski, C. Lee, W.-k. Liao, A. Day, A. Agrawal, M. Spiropulu, J.-R. Vlimant et al., in EPJ Web of Conferences (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France, 2021), Vol. 251, p. 03054.
  41. F. Drielsma, K. Terao, L. Dominé, and D. H. Koh, arXiv:2102.01033.
  42. A. Akram and X. Ju, arXiv:2208.12178.
  43. X. Jia, X. Qin, T. Li, X. Huang, X. Zhang, N. Yin, Y. Zhang, and Y. Yuan, in EPJ Web of Conferences (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France, 2024), Vol. 295, p. 09006.
  44. C. Biscarat, S. Caillou, C. Rougier, J. Stark, and J. Zahreddine, in EPJ Web of Conferences (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France, 2021), Vol. 251, p. 03047.
  45. M. Zdybal, M. Kucharczyk, and M. Wolter, Comput. Sci. 25, 25 (2024).
  46. M. Andrews, B. Burkle, S. Chaudhari, D. Di Croce, S. Gleyzer, U. Heintz, M. Narain, M. Paulini, and E. Usai, in EPJ Web of Conferences (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France, 2021), Vol. 251, p. 03057.
  47. G. DeZoort, S. Thais, J. Duarte, V. Razavimaleki, M. Atkinson, I. Ojalvo, M. Neubauer, and P. Elmer, Comput. Software Big Sci. 5, 1 (2021).
  48. A. Correia, F. I. Giasemis, N. Garroum, V. V. Gligorov, and B. Granado, J. Instrum. 19, P12022 (2024).
  49. A. Elabd, V. Razavimaleki, S.-Y. Huang, J. Duarte, M. Atkinson, G. DeZoort, P. Elmer, S. Hauck, J.-X. Hu, S.-C. Hsu et al., Front. Big Data, 5, 828666 (2022).
  50. M. Hansroul, H. Jeremie, and D. Savard, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 270, 498 (1988).
  51. J. Nelder and R. Mead, Comput. J. 7, 308 (1965).
  52. P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright et al., Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation