Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Scattering amplitudes in dimensionless quadratic gravity coupled to QED

I. F. Cunha* and A. C. Lehum†

  • *Contact author: ivana.cunha@icen.ufpa.br
  • †Contact author: lehum@ufpa.br

Phys. Rev. D 113, 085006 – Published 7 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k79x-52gj

Abstract

We study ultra-Planckian 2→2 scattering in an Abelian gauge theory coupled to agravity, the scale-free and renormalizable realization of quadratic quantum gravity. Focusing on charged fermions and scalars interacting with the photon and the higher-derivative graviton, we present compact analytic expressions for the unpolarized squared matrix elements for a broad set of tree-level processes, including photon–photon, fermion–fermion, fermion–photon, scalar–fermion, scalar–photon, scalar–scalar, and annihilation channels. In contrast to purely graviton-mediated analyses, we retain systematically the photon–graviton interference contributions and verify explicitly the independence of the results on the gravitational gauge-fixing parameter. The amplitudes display characteristic forward/backward enhancements associated with small momentum transfer, amplified by the 1/p4 graviton propagator, while their high-energy scaling reflects the underlying dimensionless gravitational couplings. Moreover, for all channels analyzed, the corresponding differential cross sections exhibit the universal ultra-Planckian scaling dσ/dΩ∝1/s, where s is the Mandelstam invariant (the squared center-of-momentum energy). Our results furnish a unified amplitude-level description of how higher-derivative gravity reshapes familiar QED scattering at ultra-Planckian energies and provide analytic building blocks for further studies of IR definitions and UV consistency in agravity with matter.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare Phys. Theor. A 20, 69 (1974).
  2. S. Deser and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 245 (1974).
  3. S. Deser and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. D 10, 411 (1974).
  4. J. F. Donoghue, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3874 (1994).
  5. C. P. Burgess, Living Rev. Relativity 7, 5 (2004).
  6. J. F. Donoghue, M. M. Ivanov, and A. Shkerin, arXiv:1702.00319.
  7. K. S. Stelle, Phys. Rev. D 16, 953 (1977).
  8. E. Tomboulis, Phys. Lett. 70B, 361 (1977).
  9. S. D. Odintsov and I. L. Shapiro, Classical Quantum Gravity 9, 873 (1992).
  10. A. Salvio and A. Strumia, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 080.
  11. A. Salvio and A. Strumia, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 124 (2018).
  12. M. B. Einhorn and D. R. T. Jones, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2015) 047.
  13. I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov, and I. L. Shapiro, Effective Action in Quantum Gravity, 1st ed., edited by I. L. Buchbinder (IOP Publishing, Routledge, 2017), 10.1201/9780203758922.
  14. A. Salvio, Front. Phys. 6, 77 (2018).
  15. J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 45C, 26 (2022).
  16. M. Aoki, J. Kubo, and J. Yang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01 (2022) 005.
  17. M. Aoki, J. Kubo, and J. Yang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2024) 096.
  18. C. Álvarez-Luna, S. de la Calle-Leal, J. A. R. Cembranos, and J. J. Sanz-Cillero, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 232.
  19. L. Buoninfante, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 111.
  20. I. D. Gialamas, A. Karam, and A. Racioppi, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11 (2020) 014.
  21. A. Salvio, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2130006 (2021).
  22. D. Anselmi, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 086.
  23. J. F. Donoghue and G. Menezes, Phys. Rev. D 100, 105006 (2019).
  24. A. Salvio, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 750 (2019).
  25. A. Salvio, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 07 (2024) 092.
  26. A. Salvio, A. Strumia, and H. Veermäe, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 842 (2018).
  27. I. F. Cunha and A. C. Lehum, Phys. Rev. D 112, 025016 (2025).
  28. B. Holdom, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 133.
  29. B. Holdom, Phys. Rev. D 105, 046008 (2022).
  30. S. Y. Choi, J. S. Shim, and H. S. Song, Phys. Rev. D 51, 2751 (1995).
  31. H. Souza, L. Ibiapina Bevilaqua, and A. C. Lehum, Phys. Rev. D 106, 045010 (2022).
  32. H. Souza, L. Ibiapina Bevilaqua, and A. C. Lehum, Phys. Rev. D 107, 125012 (2023).
  33. M. Gomes, A. C. Lehum, and A. J. da Silva, Phys. Rev. D 110, 065007 (2024).
  34. R. Mertig, M. Bahm, and A. Denne, Comput. Phys. Commun. 64, 345 (1991).
  35. T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118, 153 (1999).
  36. T. Hahn, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140, 418 (2001).
  37. N. D. Christensen and C. Duhr, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 1614 (2009).
  38. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  39. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 207, 432 (2016).
  40. V. Shtabovenko, Comput. Phys. Commun. 218, 48 (2017).
  41. V. Shtabovenko, R. Mertig, and F. Orellana, Comput. Phys. Commun. 256, 107478 (2020).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation