Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Open Access

Planar Abelian mirror duals of N=2 SQCD3

Sergio Benvenuti1,*, Riccardo Comi2,3,†, Sara Pasquetti2,3,‡, Gabriel Pedde Ungureanu1,4,§, Simone Rota1,4,∥, and Anant Shri1,4,¶

  • *Contact author: benve79@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: r.comi2@campus.unimib.it
  • ‡Contact author: sara.pasquetti@gmail.com
  • §Contact author: gpeddeun@sissa.it
  • ∥Contact author: srota@sissa.it
  • Contact author: ashri@sissa.it

Phys. Rev. D 112, L101703 – Published 24 November, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k5b3-lrnz

Abstract

We propose an Abelian mirror dual for the N=2 SQCD3 that we obtain as real mass deformation of known N=4 mirror pairs. We match the superconformal index and the Sb3 partition function, discuss the agreement of the moduli spaces, and provide a map of the gauge invariant operators and the global symmetries as evidence of this duality.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. O. Aharony, A. Hanany, K. Intriligator, N. Seiberg, and M. J. Strassler, Nucl. Phys. B499, 67 (1997).
  2. J. de Boer, K. Hori, and Y. Oz, Nucl. Phys. B500, 163 (1997).
  3. K. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 079.
  4. A. Hanany and K. D. Kennaway, arXiv:hep-th/0503149.
  5. S. Franco, A. Hanany, D. Vegh, B. Wecht, and K. D. Kennaway, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2006) 096.
  6. K. Intriligator and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B 387, 513 (1996).
  7. A. Hanany and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B492, 152 (1997).
  8. S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, S. Pasquetti, G. Pedde Ungureanu, S. Rota, and A. Shri, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 211.
  9. S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, S. Pasquetti, G. Pedde Ungureanu, S. Rota, and A. Shri, arXiv:2506.05465.
  10. D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13, 721 (2008).
  11. A. Kapustin, B. Willett, and I. Yaakov, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 089.
  12. N. Hama, K. Hosomichi, and S. Lee, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2011) 014.
  13. Y. Imamura and S. Yokoyama, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2011) 007.
  14. A. Kapustin and B. Willett, arXiv:1106.2484.
  15. D. Tong, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2000) 019.
  16. The contribution to the shift in CS level is +F2 for fermions in the antifundamental representation, and −2×N2 for the fermions in the N=2 adjoint chiral.

  17. F. van de Bult, Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2007.
  18. F. Benini, C. Closset, and S. Cremonesi, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2011) 075.
  19. O. Aharony, S. Razamt, N. Seiberg, and B. Willett, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2013) 149.
  20. A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B120, 429 (1977).
  21. For N=2, F=4, k=0 there is also a single gauge invariant monopole M on the electric side. This is mapped to a monopole in the mirror M^(21 20 1 ) as well. This exception can be easily understood considering that SU(2)0 with [4, 0] flavors is the same as SU(2)0 with [2, 2] flavors or USp(2)0 with four fundamentals, which clearly has a chiral ring monopole and the associated Coulomb branch. For N≥3, F=2N, k=0 from the SCI we detect the presence of a chiral dressed monopole. However, the monopole is nilpotent and there is no Coulomb branch [36].

  22. B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y. H. He, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2007) 090.
  23. S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany, and Y. H. He, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2007) 050.
  24. J. Gray, A. Hanany, Y. H. He, V. Jejjala, and N. Mekareeya, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2008) 099.
  25. F. Benini, C. Closset, and S. Cremonesi, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2011) 005.
  26. D. L. Jafferis, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2012) 159.
  27. C. Hwang, S. Pasquetti, and M. Sacchi, Phys. Rev. D 106, 105014 (2022).
  28. R. Comi, C. Hwang, F. Marino, S. Pasquetti, and M. Sacchi, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2023) 119.
  29. S. Benvenuti, R. Comi, and S. Pasquetti, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 234.
  30. S. Benvenuti and S. Giacomelli, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 173.
  31. S. Benvenuti and S. Giacomelli, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2017) 106.
  32. S. Benvenuti and S. Giacomelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251601 (2017).
  33. Generically, real masses for the other fundamental fields correspond to different mirror dual frames for (12).

  34. A. Kapustin and M. J. Strassler, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (1999) 021.
  35. E. Witten, arXiv:hep-th/0307041.
  36. O. Aharony, P. Narayan, and T. Sharma, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2015) 117.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation