Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing lepton-flavor-violating four-lepton operators at a muon collider

Sukanta Dutta

Purnath Unnikrishnan* and Yashasvi†

  • *Contact author: purnathuk@gmail.com
  • †Contact author: yamansangwan16@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. D 114, 075015 – Published 9 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/k249-jg2x

Abstract

We investigate charged lepton-flavor violation (LFV) induced by dimension-six four-lepton operators within the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) at a proposed high-energy muon collider. We study the processes μ+μ−→e±τ∓, μ+μ−→e±μ∓, and μ+μ−→μ±τ∓ at s=3, 10, and 14 TeV, incorporating beam polarization and hadronic τ reconstruction. Using an optimal-observable analysis of the angular distributions, we perform a global fit to the relevant set of four-lepton operators. Projected sensitivities reach C/Λ2∼(0.5–1.2)×10−4  TeV−2, depending on the flavor and chiral structure of the operator, exceeding current limits by up to an order of magnitude. A combined analysis of multiple center-of-mass energies and beam polarizations significantly improves the resolution of correlations among the Wilson coefficients. These results highlight the strong sensitivity of a future multi-TeV muon collider to charged LFV four-lepton interactions, establishing it as a powerful probe of the SMEFT parameter space.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (67)

  1. T.-P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Muon-number-nonconservation effects in a gauge theory with v+a currents and heavy neutral leptons, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1425 (1977).
  2. S. T. Petcov, The processes μ→e+γ,μ→e+e¯,ν′→ν+γ in the Weinberg-Salam model with neutrino mixing, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 25, 340 (1977); 25, 698(E) (1977) [Yad. Fiz. 25, 1336(E) (1977)].
  3. A. Ilakovac and A. Pilaftsis, Flavour-violating charged lepton decays in seesaw-type models, Nucl. Phys. B437, 491 (1995).
  4. R. Alonso, M. Dhen, M. B. Gavela, and T. Hambye, Muon conversion to electron in nuclei in type-i seesaw models, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 118.
  5. G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
  6. A. Pich and P. Tuzon, Yukawa alignment in the two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 80, 091702(R) (2009).
  7. P. Langacker, The physics of heavy Z′ gauge bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1199 (2009).
  8. J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe, and M. Yamaguchi, Lepton-flavor violation via right-handed neutrino Yukawa couplings in the supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2442 (1996).
  9. R. Barbieri, L. Hall, and A. Strumia, Violations of lepton flavour and CP in supersymmetric unified theories, Nucl. Phys. B445, 219 (1995).
  10. R. Barbieri and L. Hall, Signals for supersymmetric unification, Phys. Lett. B 338, 212 (1994).
  11. S. Davidson, D. Bailey, and B. A. Campbell, Model independent constraints on leptoquarks from rare processes, Z. Phys. C 61, 613 (1994).
  12. K. Agashe, A. Azatov, and L. Zhu, Flavor violation tests of warped/composite SM in the two-site approach, Phys. Rev. D 79, 056006 (2009).
  13. W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986).
  14. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  15. A. M. Baldini et al. (MEG Collaboration), Search for the lepton flavour violating decay μ+→e+γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 434 (2016).
  16. U. Bellgardt et al. (SINDRUM Collaboration), Search for the decay μ+→e+e+e−, Nucl. Phys. B299, 1 (1988).
  17. E. Kou et al., The Belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019).
  18. K. Hayasaka et al. (Belle Collaboration), New search for τ→μγ and τ→eγ decays at Belle, Phys. Lett. B 666, 16 (2008).
  19. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Searches for lepton flavor violation in the decays τ±→e±γ and τ±→μ±γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 021802 (2010).
  20. K. Hayasaka et al., Search for lepton flavor violating tau decays into three leptons with 719 million produced Tau+Tau− pairs, Phys. Lett. B 687, 139 (2010).
  21. W. H. Bertl et al. (SINDRUM II Collaboration), A search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 337 (2006).
  22. L. Bartoszek et al. (R. Group Collaboration), Mu2e Technical Design Report, Fermilab Technical Report, 2015, 10.2172/1172555, comments: Compressed file, 888 pages, 621 figures, 126 tables; full resolution available at http://mu2e.fnal.gov.
  23. R. Abramishvili et al. (The COMET Collaboration), Comet phase-I technical design report, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 033C01 (2020).
  24. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for the lepton flavour violating decay B+→K+μ−τ+ using Bs2*0 decays, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2020) 129.
  25. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for lepton-flavor violating decays B+→K+μ±e∓, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 241802 (2019).
  26. P. Abreu et al. (DELPHI Collaboration), A search for lepton flavor violation in Z0 decays, Phys. Lett. B 298, 247 (1993).
  27. O. Adriani et al. (L3 Collaboration), Search for lepton flavor violation in Z decays, Phys. Lett. B 316, 427 (1993).
  28. L. Calibbi and G. Signorelli, Charged lepton flavour violation: An experimental and theoretical introduction, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 41, 71 (2018).
  29. S. Banerjee, B. Bhattacherjee, M. Mitra, and M. Spannowsky, The lepton flavour violating Higgs decays at the HL-LHC and the ILC, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2016) 059.
  30. A. K. Barik, A. Dey, and T. Samui, Search for lepton flavor violating signals at the future electron-proton colliders, Phys. Lett. B 872, 140048 (2026).
  31. L. Calibbi, X. Marcano, and J. Roy, Z lepton flavour violation as a probe for new physics at future e+e− colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 1054 (2021).
  32. E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators I: Formalism and lambda dependence, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2013) 087.
  33. E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2013) 035.
  34. R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators III: Gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2014) 159.
  35. M. Casarsa (Muon Collider Collaboration), Prospects of a future multi-TeV muon collider, SciPost Phys. Proc. 8, 061 (2022).
  36. T. Han, D. Liu, I. Low, and X. Wang, Electroweak couplings of the Higgs boson at a multi-tev muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 103, 013002 (2021).
  37. D. Buttazzo, D. Redigolo, F. Sala, and A. Tesi, Fusing vectors into scalars at high energy lepton colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2018) 144.
  38. A. Abada et al. (FCC Collaboration), FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future circular collider conceptual design report Volume 2, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 228, 261 (2019).
  39. J. F. Kamenik, A. Korajac, M. Szewc, M. Tammaro, and J. Zupan, Flavor-violating Higgs and Z boson decays at a future circular lepton collider, Phys. Rev. D 109, L011301 (2024).
  40. W. Altmannshofer, P. Munbodh, and T. Oh, Probing lepton flavor violation at circular Electron-Positron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 026.
  41. S. Jahedi and A. Sarkar, Exploring optimal sensitivity of lepton flavor violating effective couplings at the e+e− colliders, Phys. Rev. D 110, 095021 (2024).
  42. H. Al Ali et al., The muon Smasher’s guide, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 084201 (2022).
  43. S. Homiller, Q. Lu, and M. Reece, Complementary signals of lepton flavor violation at a high-energy muon collider, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2022) 036.
  44. P. Asadi, H. Bagherian, K. Fraser, S. Homiller, and Q. Lu, Lepton flavor violation: From muon decays to muon colliders, Phys. Rev. D 113, 015003 (2026).
  45. A. Glioti, D. Marzocca, and A. Wulzer, Flavor physics at high-energy muon colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2025) 152.
  46. S. Davidson, μ→eγ and matching at mW, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 370 (2016).
  47. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  48. M. Ardu, S. Davidson, and M. Gorbahn, The sensitivity of μ→e processes to τ flavour change, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096040 (2022).
  49. M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), A search for lepton-flavor-violating decays of the Z boson into a τ-lepton and a light lepton with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 98, 092010 (2018).
  50. N. V. Mokhov and S. I. Striganov, Detector background at muon colliders, Phys. Procedia 37, 2015 (2012).
  51. J. P. Delahaye et al., Muon colliders, arXiv:1901.06150.
  52. K. M. Black et al., Muon collider forum report, J. Instrum. 19, T02015 (2024).
  53. K. Long, D. Lucchesi, M. Palmer, N. Pastrone, D. Schulte, and V. Shiltsev, Muon colliders to expand frontiers of particle physics, Nat. Phys. 17, 289 (2021).
  54. T. Han, Y. Ma, and K. Xie, High energy leptonic collisions and electroweak parton distribution functions, Phys. Rev. D 103, L031301 (2021).
  55. C. Aime et al., Muon collider physics summary, Technical Report, IMCC, 2022, 21 pages, 7 figures; Contribution to Snowmass 2021, arXiv:2203.07256.
  56. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, feynrules2.0—A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  57. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  58. T. Sjöstrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  59. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2014) 057.
  60. D. Lucchesi and D. Zuliani, Release of simplified detector performance model (delphes card or/and similar format) (2024), 10.5281/zenodo.14001528.
  61. Delphes Collaboration, Muon collider detector Delphes card (2024), https://github.com/delphes/delphes/blob/master/cards/delphes_card_MuonColliderDet.tcl.
  62. M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012).
  63. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011); 73, 2501(E) (2013).
  64. M. Diehl and O. Nachtmann, Optimal observables for the measurement of three gauge boson couplings in e+e−−>W+W−, Z. Phys. C 62, 397 (1994).
  65. J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. L. Kane, and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter’s Guide, Frontier in Physics, Vol. 80 (Brookhaven Nat. Lab., 2000).
  66. S. Dutta, K. Hagiwara, and Y. Matsumoto, Measuring the Higgs-vector boson couplings at linear e+e− collider, Phys. Rev. D 78, 115016 (2008).
  67. S. Bhattacharya, S. Jahedi, S. Nandi, and A. Sarkar, Probing flavor constrained SMEFT operators through tc production at the muon collider, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 061.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation