Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Tbcs¯ states in the process ϒ→D−B¯0Ds+

Wen-Ying Liu and Hua-Xing Chen*

  • *Contact author: hxchen@seu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 116004 – Published 4 December, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jxjc-mzj7

Abstract

We perform a theoretical study of the decay process ϒ→D−B¯0Ds+ in search of the doubly heavy tetraquark states Tbcs¯ with quark content bcs¯d¯. These Tbcs¯ states are assumed to be dynamically generated molecular states from the S-wave interactions between B¯s(*)0D(*)+ and B¯(*)0Ds(*)+ meson pairs. Based on the total angular momentum and the type of the constituent mesons (pseudoscalars P or vectors V), they are labeled as Tbcs¯0,PP, Tbcs¯0,VV, and Tbcs¯2,VV, respectively. The B¯0Ds+ invariant mass distribution for this decay is calculated using current algebra, incorporating contributions from Tbcs¯ states arising from final-state interactions. Our results reveal a clear peak structure in the 7415–7425 MeV region, which is attributed to the Tbcs¯2,VV state. Additionally, a distinct dip structure appears near the B¯*0Ds*+ threshold, characteristic of the Tbcs¯2,VV as a hadronic molecular state. A near-threshold enhancement associated with the Tbcs¯0,PP state and a dip arising from the Tbcs¯0,VV state are also identified, though the manifestation of these features depends sensitively on model parameter fine-tuning. Therefore, with increased experimental statistics, the decay channel ϒ→D−B¯0Ds+ offers a promising avenue for discovering and characterizing the Tbcs¯ states.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (65)

  1. J. Z. Bai et al. (BES Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 472, 207 (2000).
  2. M. Ablikim et al. (BES Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 73, 112007 (2006).
  3. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 87, 092009 (2013); 87, 119901(E) (2013).
  4. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 44, 040001 (2020).
  5. A. Etkin, K. J. Foley, R. S. Longacre, W. A. Love, T. W. Morris, E. D. Platner, A. C. Saulys, S. J. Lindenbaum, C. S. Chan, and M. A. Kramer, Phys. Lett. B 165, 217 (1985).
  6. J. Z. Bai et al. (BES Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 022001 (2003).
  7. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 34, 421 (2010).
  8. D. Alde et al. (IHEP-Brussels-Los Alamos-Annecy(LAPP) Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 205, 397 (1988).
  9. G. S. Adams et al. (E852 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5760 (1998).
  10. J. Kuhn et al. (E852 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 595, 109 (2004).
  11. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 106, 072012 (2022); 107, 079901(E) (2023).
  12. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 192002 (2022); 130, 159901(E) (2023).
  13. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 746 (2020).
  14. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 151904 (2023).
  15. S. K. Choi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
  16. K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 182002 (2005).
  17. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 242002 (2009).
  18. T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF Collaboration), Mod. Phys. Lett. A 32, 1750139 (2017).
  19. K. Chilikin et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 90, 112009 (2014).
  20. Q. He et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 74, 091104 (2006).
  21. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 142001 (2005).
  22. K. Abe et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 082001 (2007).
  23. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252001 (2013).
  24. A. Garmash et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 91, 072003 (2015).
  25. P. Krokovny et al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 88, 052016 (2013).
  26. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 112003 (2020).
  27. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 242001 (2020).
  28. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Sci. Bull. 65, 1983 (2020).
  29. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 151902 (2023).
  30. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 102001 (2021).
  31. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
  32. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019).
  33. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 062001 (2022).
  34. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Sci. Bull. 66, 1278 (2021).
  35. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 18, 751 (2022).
  36. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Commun. 13, 3351 (2022).
  37. Y. Yang, C. Deng, J. Ping, and T. Goldman, Phys. Rev. D 80, 114023 (2009).
  38. N. Li, Z.-F. Sun, X. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 88, 114008 (2013).
  39. S. Ohkoda, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Yasui, K. Sudoh, and A. Hosaka, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034019 (2012).
  40. T. Guo, J. Li, J. Zhao, and L. He, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014021 (2022).
  41. W.-Y. Liu, H.-X. Chen, and E. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054041 (2023).
  42. E. Oset et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25, 1630001 (2016).
  43. H.-X. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 105, 094003 (2022).
  44. H.-X. Chen, L.-S. Geng, W.-H. Liang, E. Oset, E. Wang, and J.-J. Xie, Phys. Rev. C 93, 065203 (2016).
  45. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 152001 (2020).
  46. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 021901 (2025).
  47. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2023) 106.
  48. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  49. S. Sakai, L. Roca, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 96, 054023 (2017).
  50. A. Anastassov et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 286 (1999).
  51. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), arXiv:2506.09386.
  52. P. A. Zyla et al. (Particle Data Group), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  53. Z.-G. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 427 (2015).
  54. D. Bečirević, G. Duplančić, B. Klajn, B. Melić, and F. Sanfilippo, Nucl. Phys. B883, 306 (2014).
  55. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1914 (1999).
  56. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000).
  57. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, and C. T. Sachrajda, Nucl. Phys. B606, 245 (2001).
  58. A. Feijoo, W. H. Liang, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114015 (2021).
  59. E. Oset and L. Roca, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 882 (2022); 82, 1014(E) (2022).
  60. M. Bando, T. Kugo, S. Uehara, K. Yamawaki, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1215 (1985).
  61. W. H. Liang, C. W. Xiao, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 89, 054023 (2014).
  62. R. Molina, T. Branz, and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 82, 014010 (2010).
  63. F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, and M. E. Bracco, Phys. Rev. D 65, 037502 (2002).
  64. R. Molina and E. Oset, Phys. Lett. B 811, 135870 (2020); 837, 137645(E) (2023).
  65. A. Bramon, A. Grau, and G. Pancheri, Phys. Lett. B 283, 416 (1992).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation