Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Lepton flavor violating top quark FCNC processes at the μTRISTAN

Abhik Sarkar*

  • *Contact author: sarkar.abhik@iitg.ac.in

Phys. Rev. D 113, 095010 – Published 5 May, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jnnt-6t8f

Abstract

We investigate charged lepton flavor violating top quark flavor-changing neutral current interactions at the proposed asymmetric muon-electron collision stage of the μTRISTAN collider, operating at a center-of-mass energy of 346 GeV. Specifically, we study the process μ+e−→tq (tq¯+t¯q) with q=u, c, within the framework of three classes of four-fermion contact interactions: scalar, vector, and tensor operators. A cut-based analysis is performed using boost-invariant kinematic observables, followed by a likelihood-based statistical treatment to derive projected sensitivities for each operator. For an integrated luminosity of 100  fb−1, the projected constraints improve upon current LHC bounds on the corresponding effective couplings by approximately an order of magnitude. Projections for 1  ab−1 indicate even stronger sensitivity, indicating improved reach at higher luminosity. Additionally, we explore the impact of initial-state beam polarization on these projections, showing how it can further enhance sensitivity to specific operator structures.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (124)

  1. S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos, and L. Maiani, Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285 (1970).
  2. T. Saito et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the B¯→Xsγ branching fraction with a sum of exclusive decays, Phys. Rev. D 91, 052004 (2015).
  3. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Exclusive measurements of b→sγ transition rate and photon energy spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 86, 052012 (2012).
  4. J. P. Lees et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Precision measurement of the B→Xsγ photon energy spectrum, branching fraction, and direct CP asymmetry ACP(B→Xs+dγ), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 191801 (2012).
  5. T. Horiguchi et al. (Belle Collaboration), Evidence for isospin violation and measurement of CP asymmetries in B→K*(892)γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 191802 (2017).
  6. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Measurement of branching fractions and CP and isospin asymmetries in B→K*(892)γ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 211802 (2009).
  7. S. Choudhury et al. (BELLE Collaboration), Test of lepton flavor universality and search for lepton flavor violation in B→Kℓℓ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2019) 105.
  8. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Direct CP, lepton flavor and isospin asymmetries In the decays B→K(*)ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 091803 (2009).
  9. J. T. Wei et al. (Belle Collaboration), Measurement of the differential branching fraction and forward-backward asymmetry for B→K(*)ℓ+ℓ−, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 171801 (2009).
  10. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Branching fraction measurements of the rare Bs0→ϕμ+μ− and Bs0→f2′(1525)μ+μ−- decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151801 (2021).
  11. F. Abudinén et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Measurement of the B0 lifetime and flavor-oscillation frequency using hadronic decays reconstructed in 2019–2021 Belle II data, Phys. Rev. D 107, L091102 (2023).
  12. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Precise determination of the Bs0–B¯s0 oscillation frequency, Nat. Phys. 18, 1 (2022).
  13. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Measurement of D0−D¯0 mixing parameters and search for CP violation using D0→K+π− decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 251801 (2013).
  14. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Measurement of the very rare K+→π+νν¯ decay, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2021) 093.
  15. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for flavor-changing neutral current interactions of the top quark mediated by a Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 112, 032008 (2025).
  16. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for flavour-changing neutral-current interactions of a top quark and a gluon in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 334 (2022).
  17. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for flavour-changing neutral-current couplings between the top quark and the photon with the ATLAS detector at s=13  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 842, 137379 (2023); (ATLAS Collaboration)Phys. Lett. B847, 138286(E) (2024).
  18. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for flavor-changing neutral-current couplings between the top quark and the Z boson with proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032019 (2023).
  19. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for charged-lepton-flavor violating μτqt interactions in top-quark production and decay in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 110, 012014 (2024).
  20. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for charged-lepton flavor violation in top quark production and decay in pp collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 082.
  21. Y. Fukuda et al. (Super-Kamiokande Collaboration), Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562 (1998).
  22. Q. R. Ahmad et al. (SNO Collaboration), Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 011301 (2002).
  23. K. Afanaciev et al. (MEG II Collaboration), A search for μ+→e+γ with the first dataset of the MEG II experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 216 (2024); (MEG II Collaboration)Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1042(E) (2024).
  24. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration, Searches for lepton flavor violation in the decays τ±→e±γ and τ±→μ±γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 021802 (2010).
  25. A. Abdesselam et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for lepton-flavor-violating tau-lepton decays to ℓγ at Belle, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 19.
  26. U. Bellgardt et al. (SINDRUM Collaboration), Search for the decay μ+→e+e+e−, Nucl. Phys. B299, 1 (1988).
  27. K. Hayasaka et al., Search for lepton flavor violating tau decays into three leptons with 719 million produced Tau+Tau- pairs, Phys. Lett. B 687, 139 (2010).
  28. A. Badertscher et al., New upper limits for muon—electron conversion in sulfur, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 28, 401 (1980).
  29. C. Dohmen et al. (SINDRUM II Collaboration), Test of lepton flavor conservation in mu−>e conversion on titanium, Phys. Lett. B 317, 631 (1993).
  30. W. Honecker et al. (SINDRUM II Collaboration), Improved limit on the branching ratio of mu −> e conversion on lead, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 200 (1996).
  31. W. H. Bertl et al. (SINDRUM II Collaboration), A search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 337 (2006).
  32. S. Davidson, B. Echenard, R. H. Bernstein, J. Heeck, and D. G. Hitlin, Charged lepton flavor violation, arXiv:2209.00142.
  33. W.-S. Hou and T. Modak, Probing top changing neutral Higgs couplings at colliders, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36, 2130006 (2021).
  34. K. Fuyuto, W.-S. Hou, and M. Kohda, Z’ -induced FCNC decays of top, beauty, and strange quarks, Phys. Rev. D 93, 054021 (2016).
  35. S. Bhattacharya, L. Kolay, D. Pradhan, and A. Sarkar, Up-type FCNC in presence of dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2026) 239.
  36. S. Bhattacharya, S. Jahedi, S. Nandi, and A. Sarkar, Probing flavor constrained SMEFT operators through tc production at the muon collider, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 061.
  37. S. Sun, Q.-S. Yan, X. Zhao, and Z. Zhao, Constraining rare B decays by μ+μ−→tc at future lepton colliders, Phys. Rev. D 108, 075016 (2023).
  38. M. Ghasemi Bostanabad and M. Mohammadi Najafabadi, Machine learning approaches to top quark flavor-changing four-fermion interactions in trilepton signals at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 111, 112003 (2025).
  39. O. Atkinson, C. Englert, M. Kirk, and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, Collider-flavour complementarity from the bottom to the top, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 258 (2025).
  40. C.-H. Chen and T. Nomura, Scotogenic top-quark FCNC decays, Phys. Rev. D 106, 095005 (2022).
  41. R. Gaitán, R. Martinez, J. H. M. de Oca, and E. A. Garcés, SM Higgs boson and t→cZ decays in the 2HDM type III with CP violation, Phys. Rev. D 98, 035031 (2018).
  42. L. Shi and C. Zhang, Probing the top quark flavor-changing couplings at CEPC, Chin. Phys. C 43, 113104 (2019).
  43. M. A. Arroyo-Ureña, R. Gaitán, E. A. Herrera-Chacón, J. H. Montes de Oca Y., and T. A. Valencia-Pérez, Search for the t→ch decay at hadron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2019) 041.
  44. Y.-B. Liu and S. Moretti, Probing the top-Higgs boson FCNC couplings via the h→γγ channel at the HE-LHC and FCC-hh, Phys. Rev. D 101, 075029 (2020).
  45. Y. Liu, B. Yan, and R. Zhang, Loop induced top quark FCNC through top quark and dark matter interactions, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136964 (2022).
  46. P. Gutierrez, R. Jain, and C. Kao, Flavor changing top decays to charm and a Higgs boson with ττ at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 103, 115020 (2021).
  47. S.-Y. Bie, G.-L. Liu, and W. Wang, Top rare decays t→cV in mirror twin Higgs models, Chin. Phys. C 45, 013106 (2021).
  48. S. Balaji, CP asymmetries in the rare top decays t→cγ and t→cg, Phys. Rev. D 102, 113010 (2020).
  49. M. Frank and I. Turan, Rare decay of the top t−>  c l anti-l and single top production at ILC, Phys. Rev. D 74, 073014 (2006).
  50. D. d’Enterria and V. D. Le, Rare and exclusive few-body decays of the Higgs, Z, W bosons, and the top quark, J. Phys. G 52, 053001 (2025).
  51. S. Kala, L. Kolay, L. Mukherjee, and S. Nandi, Constraining anomalous Wtb and related SMEFT couplings using low-energy and electroweak precision observables, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2025) 071.
  52. V. Khachatryan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for lepton flavour violating decays of the Higgs boson to eτ and eμ in proton–proton collisions at s=8  TeV, Phys. Lett. B 763, 472 (2016).
  53. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for lepton flavour violating decays of the Higgs boson to μτ and eτ in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2017) 001.
  54. R. Akers et al. (OPAL Collaboration), A search for lepton flavor violating Z0 decays, Z. Phys. C 67, 555 (1995).
  55. P. Abreu et al. (DELPHI Collaboration), Search for lepton flavor number violating Z0 decays, Z. Phys. C 73, 243 (1997).
  56. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for the lepton flavor violating decay Z→eμ in pp collisions at s  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 90, 072010 (2014).
  57. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for charged-lepton-flavour violation in Z-boson decays with the ATLAS detector, Nat. Phys. 17, 819 (2021).
  58. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for lepton-flavor-violation in Z-boson decays with τ-leptons with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 271801 (2022).
  59. G. Abbiendi et al. (OPAL Collaboration), Search for lepton flavor violation in e+ e−  collisions at s**(1/2)=189−GeV−209−GeV, Phys. Lett. B 519, 23 (2001).
  60. T. Han, I. Lewis, and M. Sher, Mu-Tau production at hadron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2010) 090.
  61. S. Davidson, S. Lacroix, and P. Verdier, LHC sensitivity to lepton flavour violating Z boson decays, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2012) 092.
  62. Y. Cai and M. A. Schmidt, A case study of the sensitivity to LFV operators with precision measurements and the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 176.
  63. Y. Cai, M. A. Schmidt, and G. Valencia, Lepton-flavour-violating gluonic operators: Constraints from the LHC and low energy experiments, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2018) 143.
  64. A. Angelescu, D. A. Faroughy, and O. Sumensari, Lepton flavor violation and dilepton tails at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 641 (2020).
  65. B. Murakami and T. M. P. Tait, Searching for lepton flavor violation at a future high energy e+ e−  collider, Phys. Rev. D 91, 015002 (2015).
  66. G.-C. Cho, Y. Fukuda, and T. Kono, Lepton flavor violation via four-Fermi contact interactions at the international linear collider, Phys. Lett. B 789, 399 (2019).
  67. S. M. Etesami, R. Jafari, M. M. Najafabadi, and S. Tizchang, Searching for lepton flavor violating interactions at future electron-positron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 104, 015034 (2021).
  68. W. Altmannshofer, P. Munbodh, and T. Oh, Probing lepton flavor violation at circular electron-positron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2023) 026.
  69. W. Altmannshofer and P. Munbodh, Probing lepton flavor violation at linear electron-positron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 147.
  70. A. Moreno-Sánchez and A. Palavrić, Leptonic flavor from modular A4: UV mediators and SMEFT realizations, Phys. Rev. D 112, 075002 (2025).
  71. A. Palavrić, Discrete leptonic flavor symmetries: UV mediators and phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 110, 115025 (2024).
  72. L. Calibbi, C. Hagedorn, M. A. Schmidt, and J. Vandeleur, Selection rules for charged lepton flavour violating processes from residual flavour groups, Phys. Rev. D 112, 075031 (2025).
  73. J. Kriewald, E. Pinsard, and A. M. Teixeira, High-energy cLFV at μTRISTAN: HNL extensions of the standard model, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 116.
  74. B. Batell, H. Davoudiasl, R. Marcarelli, E. T. Neil, and S. Trojanowski, Lepton-flavor-violating ALP signals with TeV-scale muon beams, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075039 (2024).
  75. L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee, and Y. Yang, Probing ALP lepton flavor violation at μTRISTAN, Phys. Rev. D 110, 115009 (2024).
  76. R. Ding, J. Li, M. Lu, Z. You, Z. Wang, and Q. Li, Study of charged lepton flavor violation in electron muon interactions, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 165.
  77. J. L. G. Santiago, D. Portillo-Sánchez, G. Hernández-Tomé, and J. Rendón, Authentic Majorana versus singlet Dirac neutrino contributions to μ+μ+→ℓ+ℓ+ (ℓ=e,τ) transitions, Phys. Rev. D 110, 053006 (2024).
  78. J. Heeck and M. Sokhashvili, Lepton flavor violation by two units, Phys. Lett. B 852, 138621 (2024).
  79. A. Goudelis, J. Kriewald, E. Pinsard, and A. M. Teixeira, cLFV leptophilic Z′ as a dark matter portal: Prospects for colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 804 (2024).
  80. G. Lichtenstein, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, Complementarity of μTRISTAN and Belle II in searches for charged-lepton flavour violation, Phys. Lett. B 845, 138144 (2023).
  81. S. Jahedi and A. Sarkar, Exploring optimal sensitivity of lepton flavor violating effective couplings at the e+ e−  colliders, Phys. Rev. D 110, 095021 (2024).
  82. Y. Hamada, R. Kitano, R. Matsudo, H. Takaura, and M. Yoshida, μTRISTAN, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2022, 053B02 (2022).
  83. C.-H. Chen, C.-W. Chiang, and C.-W. Su, Top-quark FCNC decays, LFVs, lepton g−2, and W mass anomaly with inert charged Higgses, J. Phys. G 51, 085001 (2024).
  84. A. Crivellin, A. Kokulu, and C. Greub, Flavor-phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models with generic Yukawa structure, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094031 (2013).
  85. B. L. Gonçalves, M. Knauss, and M. Sher, Lepton flavor specific extended Higgs model, Phys. Rev. D 107, 095001 (2023).
  86. I. Doršner, S. Fajfer, A. Greljo, J. F. Kamenik, and N. Košnik, Physics of leptoquarks in precision experiments and at particle colliders, Phys. Rep. 641, 1 (2016).
  87. S. Davidson, D. C. Bailey, and B. A. Campbell, Model independent constraints on leptoquarks from rare processes, Z. Phys. C 61, 613 (1994).
  88. P. Langacker, The physics of heavy Z′ gauge bosons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1199 (2009).
  89. P. Langacker and M. Plumacher, Flavor changing effects in theories with a heavy Z′ boson with family nonuniversal couplings, Phys. Rev. D 62, 013006 (2000).
  90. K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B719, 165 (2005).
  91. F. Feruglio, P. Paradisi, and A. Pattori, Lepton flavour violation in composite Higgs models, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 579 (2015).
  92. W. Altmannshofer, Z. Balme, C. M. Donohue, S. Gori, and S. V. Mukundhan, Targets for flavor-violating top decay, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2025) 191.
  93. M. Lu, A. M. Levin, C. Li, A. Agapitos, Q. Li, F. Meng, S. Qian, J. Xiao, and T. Yang, The physics case for an electron-muon collider, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2021, 6693618 (2021).
  94. A. O. Bouzas and F. Larios, Two-to-two processes at an electron-muon collider, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2022, 3603613 (2022).
  95. A. O. Bouzas and F. Larios, An electron-muon collider: What can be probed with it?, Rev. Mex. Fis. Suppl. 4, 021128 (2023).
  96. S. Iwata, TRISTAN experiment, in Adriatico Research Conference on Mesoscopic Systems and Chaos: A Novel Approach (1993), pp. 255–275.
  97. P. Dehghani, M. Frank, and B. Fuks, Vector boson fusion signatures of superheavy Majorana neutrinos at muon colliders, Phys. Rev. D 112, 035020 (2025).
  98. S. Bhattacharya, S. Datta, and A. Sarkar, Probing ΔL=2 lepton number violating SMEFT operators at the same-sign muon collider, Phys. Rev. D 113, 055043 (2026).
  99. P. D. Bolton, F. F. Deppisch, S. Kulkarni, C. Majumdar, and W. Pei, Constraining the SMEFT extended with sterile neutrinos at FCC-ee, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2025) 199.
  100. C. H. de Lima, D. McKeen, J. N. Ng, M. Shamma, and D. Tuckler, Probing lepton number violation at same-sign lepton colliders, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075002 (2025).
  101. Y. Hamada, R. Kitano, R. Matsudo, S. Okawa, R. Takai, H. Takaura, and L. Treuer, Higgs boson production at μ+μ+ colliders, Phys. Rev. D 110, 113011 (2024).
  102. L. Chen, S. Iguro, and Y. Hamada, Determining weak-mixing angle at μTRISTAN, arXiv:2406.04500.
  103. R. Okabe and S. Shirai, Indirect probe of electroweak-interacting particles at the μTRISTAN μ+μ+ collider, Phys. Rev. D 110, 035002 (2024).
  104. H. Fukuda, T. Moroi, A. Niki, and S.-F. Wei, Search for WIMPs at future μ+μ+ colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2023) 214.
  105. P. S. B. Dev, J. Heeck, and A. Thapa, Neutrino mass models at μTRISTAN, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 148 (2024).
  106. W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986).
  107. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2010) 085.
  108. S. Weinberg, Baryon and lepton nonconserving processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1566 (1979).
  109. G. Durieux, F. Maltoni, and C. Zhang, Global approach to top-quark flavor-changing interactions, Phys. Rev. D 91, 074017 (2015).
  110. J. Aebischer, A. J. Buras, and J. Kumar, SMEFT ATLAS: The landscape beyond the standard model, arXiv:2507.05926.
  111. F. Delzanno, K. Fuyuto, S. Gonzàlez-Solís, and E. Mereghetti, Global analysis of μ→e interactions in the SMEFT, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 283.
  112. M. Chala, J. Santiago, and M. Spannowsky, Constraining four-fermion operators using rare top decays, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2018) 014.
  113. J. M. Roney (Belle II SuperKEKB e- Polarization Upgrade Working Group Collaboration), Upgrading SuperKEKB with polarized e− beams, Proc. Sci., ICHEP2020 (2021) 699.
  114. A. Alloul, N. D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, and B. Fuks, feynrules2.0—A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014).
  115. L. Darmé et al., UFO 2.0: The Universal Feynman Output’ format, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 631 (2023).
  116. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2011) 128.
  117. C. Bierlich et al., A comprehensive guide to the physics and usage of pythia8.3, SciPost Phys. Codebases 2022, 8 (2022).
  118. J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaître, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3 Collaboration), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2013) 057.
  119. H. Abramowicz et al., The International Linear Collider technical design report—volume 4: Detectors, arXiv:1306.6329.
  120. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  121. S. S. Wilks, The Large-Sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses, Annals Math. Statist. 9, 60 (1938).
  122. A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkovič, and P. Stangl, Rare b decays meet high-mass Drell-Yan, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2022) 087.
  123. G. M. Pruna and A. Signer, The μ→eγ decay in a systematic effective field theory approach with dimension 6 operators, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2014) 014.
  124. J. Kumar, Renormalization group improved implications of semileptonic operators in SMEFT, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2021) 107.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation