Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Search for light dark matter in rare meson decays

Ze-Kun Liu*, Ying Li†, Biao-Feng Hou‡, and Qin Chang§

  • *Contact author: liuzekun@htu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: liying20239@stu.htu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: resonhou@zknu.edu.cn
  • §Contact author: qinchang@htu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 035030 – Published 24 February, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jk9r-xvph

Abstract

Current dark matter direct detection experiments have low sensitivity to sub-GeV dark matter. In this work, we demonstrate that rare B and K meson decays with missing energy in the final state can serve as efficient probes in this mass range. We analyze a generic Z′ portal dark matter model and derive upper limits on its parameters from experimental bounds on the rare B and K meson decays. Our results show that such meson decay processes provide complementary constraints to current direct detection experiments for sub-GeV dark matter, particularly for interaction forms mediated by dark matter momentum-dependent operators.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (65)

  1. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  2. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), First dark matter search with nuclear recoils from the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041003 (2023).
  3. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), First dark matter search results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 041002 (2023).
  4. Z. Huang et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Constraints on the axial-vector and pseudo-scalar mediated WIMP-nucleus interactions from PandaX-4T experiment, Phys. Lett. B 834, 137487 (2022).
  5. I. Adachi et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Evidence for B+→K+νν¯ decays, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112006 (2024).
  6. B.-F. Hou, X.-Q. Li, M. Shen, Y.-D. Yang, and X.-B. Yuan, Deciphering the Belle II data on B→Kνν¯ decay in the (dark) SMEFT with minimal flavour violation, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 172.
  7. W. Altmannshofer, A. J. Buras, D. M. Straub, and M. Wick, New strategies for new physics search in B→K*νν¯, B→Kνν¯ and B→Xsνν¯ decays, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2009) 022.
  8. A. J. Buras, J. Girrbach-Noe, C. Niehoff, and D. M. Straub, B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the Standard Model and beyond, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2015) 184.
  9. D. Bečirević, G. Piazza, and O. Sumensari, Revisiting B→K(*)νν¯ decays in the standard model and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 252 (2023).
  10. T. Felkl, A. Giri, R. Mohanta, and M. A. Schmidt, When energy goes missing: New physics in b→sνν with sterile neutrinos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 1135 (2023).
  11. A. J. Buras, J. Harz, and M. A. Mojahed, Disentangling new physics in K→πνν¯ and B→K(K*)νν¯ observables, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2024) 087.
  12. A. Datta, D. Marfatia, and L. Mukherjee, B→Kνν¯, MiniBooNE and muon g−2 anomalies from a dark sector, Phys. Rev. D 109, L031701 (2024).
  13. S. Rosauro-Alcaraz and L. P. S. Leal, Disentangling left and right-handed neutrino effects in B→K(*)νν, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 795 (2024).
  14. T. Li, Z. Qian, M. A. Schmidt, and M. Yuan, The quark flavor-violating ALPs in light of B mesons and hadron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 232.
  15. T. Li, M. A. Schmidt, and M. Yuan, Reexamining the search for light ALPs at flavor and forward accelerator experiments., Phys. Rev. D 112, 115038 (2025).
  16. L. Calibbi, T. Li, L. Mukherjee, and M. A. Schmidt, Is dark matter the origin of the B→Kνν¯ excess at Belle II?, Phys. Rev. D 112, 075020 (2025).
  17. W. Altmannshofer and S. Roy, Joint explanation of the B→πK puzzle and the B→Kνν¯ excess, Phys. Rev. D 111, 075029 (2025).
  18. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, FCNC B and K meson decays with light bosonic Dark Matter, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2023) 037.
  19. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, and G. Valencia, Revisiting models that enhance B+→K+νν¯ in light of the new Belle II measurement, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075019 (2024).
  20. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, M. A. Schmidt, G. Valencia, and R. R. Volkas, Scalar dark matter explanation of the excess in the Belle II B+→K++ invisible measurement, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2024) 168.
  21. T. M. Aliev, A. Elpe, L. Selbuz, and I. Turan, Explaining Belle data on B→K(*)νν¯ decays via dark Z resonances, Phys. Rev. D 112, 015025 (2025).
  22. X.-G. He, X.-D. Ma, J. Tandean, and G. Valencia, B→K+ invisible, dark matter, and CP violation in hyperon decays, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 078.
  23. W. Altmannshofer, A. Crivellin, H. Haigh, G. Inguglia, and J. Martin Camalich, Light new physics in B→K(*)νν¯?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 075008 (2024).
  24. K. Fridell, M. Ghosh, T. Okui, and K. Tobioka, Decoding the B→Kνν excess at Belle II: Kinematics, operators, and masses, Phys. Rev. D 109, 115006 (2024).
  25. E. Gabrielli, L. Marzola, K. Müürsepp, and M. Raidal, Explaining the B+→K+νν¯ excess via a massless dark photon, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 460 (2024).
  26. A. Berezhnoy, W. Lucha, and D. Melikhov, Scrutinizing dark-matter scenarios with B→(K,K*)ν¯ν decays, Universe 11, 385 (2025).
  27. J. Martin Camalich and R. Ziegler, Flavor phenomenology of light dark sectors, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 75, 223 (2025).
  28. M. Abdughani and Y. Reyimuaji, Constraining light dark matter and mediator with B+→K+νν¯ data, Phys. Rev. D 110, 055013 (2024).
  29. Z. S. Wang, H. K. Dreiner, and J. Y. Günther, The decay B→K+ν+ν¯ at Belle II and a massless bino in R-parity-violating supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 66 (2025).
  30. F.-Z. Chen, Q. Wen, and F. Xu, Correlating B→K(*)νν¯ and flavor anomalies in SMEFT, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1012 (2024).
  31. L. Allwicher, D. Becirevic, G. Piazza, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, and O. Sumensari, Understanding the first measurement of B(B→Kνν¯), Phys. Lett. B 848, 138411 (2024).
  32. P. Athron, R. Martinez, and C. Sierra, B meson anomalies and large B+→K+νν¯ in non-universal U(1)′ models, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2024) 121.
  33. R. Bause, H. Gisbert, and G. Hiller, Implications of an enhanced B→Kνν¯ branching ratio, Phys. Rev. D 109, 015006 (2024).
  34. C.-H. Chen and C.-W. Chiang, Rare B and K decays in a scotogenic model, Phys. Rev. D 110, 075036 (2024).
  35. A. De Simone, G. F. Giudice, and A. Strumia, Benchmarks for dark matter searches at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2014) 081.
  36. A. Alves, A. Berlin, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz, Dark matter complementarity and the Z′ portal, Phys. Rev. D 92, 083004 (2015).
  37. J. Aebischer, W. Altmannshofer, E. E. Jenkins, and A. V. Manohar, Dark matter effective field theory and an application to vector dark matter, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2022) 086.
  38. H. Song, H. Sun, and J.-H. Yu, Complete EFT operator bases for dark matter and weakly-interacting light particle, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 103.
  39. E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and P. Stoffer, Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: Operators and matching, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2018) 016.
  40. J.-H. Liang, Y. Liao, X.-D. Ma, and H.-L. Wang, Dark sector effective field theory, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2023) 172.
  41. D. M. Straub, flavio: A Python package for flavour and precision phenomenology in the standard model and beyond, arXiv:1810.08132.
  42. J. Grygier et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for B→hνν¯ decays with semileptonic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 96, 091101 (2017).
  43. O. Lutz et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for B→h(*)νν¯ with the full Belle ϒ(4S) data sample, Phys. Rev. D 87, 111103 (2013).
  44. C. Hambrock, A. Khodjamirian, and A. Rusov, Hadronic effects and observables in B→πℓ+ℓ− decay at large recoil, Phys. Rev. D 92, 074020 (2015).
  45. E. Cortina Gil et al. (NA62 Collaboration), Observation of the K+→π+νν¯ decay and measurement of its branching ratio, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2025) 191.
  46. P. Ball and R. Zwicky, New results on B→π,K,η decay formfactors from light-cone sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 71, 014015 (2005).
  47. A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub, and R. Zwicky, B→Vℓ+ℓ− in the standard Model from light-cone sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 098.
  48. V. Shtabovenko, New multiloop capabilities of feyncalc 10, Proc. Sci., LL2024 (2024) 071.
  49. J. F. Kamenik and C. Smith, FCNC portals to the dark sector, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2012) 090.
  50. H. An, X. Ji, and L.-T. Wang, Light dark matter and Z′ dark force at colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2012) 182.
  51. G. Belanger, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov, Recasting direct detection limits within micromegas and implication for non-standard Dark Matter scenarios, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 239 (2021).
  52. P. Klos, J. Menéndez, D. Gazit, and A. Schwenk, Large-scale nuclear structure calculations for spin-dependent WIMP scattering with chiral effective field theory currents, Phys. Rev. D 88, 083516 (2013).
  53. A. H. Abdelhameed et al. (CRESST Collaboration), First results from the CRESST-III low-mass dark matter program, Phys. Rev. D 100, 102002 (2019).
  54. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (DAMIC Collaboration), Results on low-mass weakly interacting massive particles from a 11  kg−day target exposure of DAMIC at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 241803 (2020).
  55. R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), Search for low-mass dark matter with CDMSlite using a profile likelihood fit, Phys. Rev. D 99, 062001 (2019).
  56. P. Agnes et al. (DarkSide-50 Collaboration), Search for low-mass dark matter WIMPs with 12 ton-day exposure of DarkSide-50, Phys. Rev. D 107, 063001 (2023).
  57. R. Agnese et al. (SuperCDMS Collaboration), Results from the super cryogenic dark matter search experiment at Soudan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 061802 (2018).
  58. R. Ajaj et al. (DEAP Collaboration), Search for dark matter with a 231-day exposure of liquid argon using DEAP-3600 at SNOLAB, Phys. Rev. D 100, 022004 (2019).
  59. J. Aalbers et al. (LZ Collaboration), Dark matter search results from 4.2 tonne-years of exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 011802 (2025).
  60. Z. Bo et al. (PandaX Collaboration), Dark matter search results from 1.54  tonne·year exposure of PandaX-4T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011805 (2025).
  61. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), WIMP dark matter search using a 3.1  tonne−year exposure of the XENONnT experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 221003 (2025).
  62. C. Amole et al. (PICO Collaboration), Dark matter search results from the complete exposure of the PICO-60  C3F8 bubble chamber, Phys. Rev. D 100, 022001 (2019).
  63. J. Xia et al. (PandaX-II Collaboration), PandaX-II constraints on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon effective interactions, Phys. Lett. B 792, 193 (2019).
  64. D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX Collaboration), Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtained from the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 251302 (2017).
  65. E. Aprile et al. (XENON Collaboration), Constraining the spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections with XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 141301 (2019).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation