Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Screening masses for scalar and pseudoscalar mesons and their diquark partners: Insights from the contact interaction model

M. A. Ramírez-Garrido1,*, R. J. Hernández-Pinto1,†, I. M. Higuera-Angulo2,‡, and L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero3,§

  • *Contact author: miguelramirez.fcfm@ms.uas.edu.mx
  • †Contact author: roger@uas.edu.mx
  • ‡Contact author: higuera@jlab.org
  • §Contact author: lxgutierrez@secihti.mx

Phys. Rev. D 112, 034024 – Published 25 August, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jfzy-2nt4

Abstract

In this study, we calculate the screening masses of 40 spin-zero meson and diquark states composed of light, heavy, and heavy-light quarks, within a symmetry-preserving framework based on Dyson-Schwinger equations and a vector × vector contact interaction. This effective interaction reproduces hadron static properties at T=0  MeV that are in close agreement with experimental data and results from more sophisticated interaction kernels. Our analysis reveals that, at temperatures above the critical temperature, the dressed quark masses of the lightest mesons converge toward their respective current quark masses. Our work extends this study up to T=500  MeV. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the screening masses of meson parity partners become degenerate above a characteristic temperature, a phenomenon that is likewise reflected in the thermal evolution of their associated Bethe-Salpeter amplitudes, providing robust evidence for chiral symmetry restoration. A similar trend is observed for scalar and pseudoscalar diquarks, whose screening masses also converge at high temperatures. As a consequence, these diquarks shall contribute equally to the baryon screening masses in the high-temperature regime. Wherever results from other approaches are available, we perform direct comparisons and observe consistency with our findings.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (81)

  1. A. Ayala, C. A. Dominguez, and M. Loewe, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 9291623 (2017).
  2. H. Elfner and B. Müller, J. Phys. G 50, 103001 (2023).
  3. A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, and J. Stachel, Nature (London) 561, 321 (2018).
  4. A. Bazavov et al., Phys. Rev. D 85, 054503 (2012).
  5. K. Yagi, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Miake, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 50, 8 (2006).
  6. X. Yao, W. Ke, Y. Xu, S. Bass, and B. Müller, Nucl. Phys. A982, 755 (2019).
  7. R. Rapp and H. van Hees, Heavy Quarks in the Quark-Gluon Plasma (World Scientific, Singapore, 2010), pp. 111–206.
  8. J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration), Nucl. Phys. A757, 102 (2005).
  9. B. B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 734, 314 (2014).
  10. NA50 Collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. C 39, 335 (2005).
  11. S. Chatrchyan (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 222301 (2012); 120, 199903(E) (2018).
  12. E. V. Veliev, H. Sundu, K. Azizi, and M. Bayar, Phys. Rev. D 82, 056012 (2010).
  13. G. Aarts, C. Allton, R. Bignell, T. J. Burns, S. C. García-Mascaraque, S. Hands, B. Jäger, S. Kim, S. M. Ryan, and J.-I. Skullerud, arXiv:2209.14681.
  14. A. Bazavov and J. H. Weber, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 116, 103823 (2021).
  15. S. Mukherjee, Nucl. Phys. A820, 283C (2009).
  16. E. V. Veliev, K. Azizi, H. Sundu, and N. Aksit, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 219–220, 170 (2011).
  17. G. Aarts, C. Allton, S. Hands, B. Jäger, C. Praki, and J.-I. Skullerud, Phys. Rev. D 92, 014503 (2015).
  18. L. Giusti, T. Harris, D. Laudicina, M. Pepe, and P. Rescigno, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138799 (2024).
  19. S. Takeuchi, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 548 (2019).
  20. R. Rapp and J. Wambach, Adv. Nucl. Phys. 25, 1 (2000).
  21. P. Maris, C. D. Roberts, S. M. Schmidt, and P. C. Tandy, Phys. Rev. C 63, 025202 (2001).
  22. K.-l. Wang, Y.-x. Liu, L. Chang, C. D. Roberts, and S. M. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. D 87, 074038 (2013).
  23. C. A. Dominguez, M. Loewe, and Y. Zhang, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 234, 305 (2013).
  24. Sumit, N. Haque, and B. K. Patra, Phys. Lett. B 845, 138143 (2023).
  25. S. Mallik and S. Sarkar, Eur. Phys. J. C 25, 445 (2002).
  26. C. A. Dominguez, M. S. Fetea, and M. Loewe, Phys. Lett. B 387, 151 (1996).
  27. C. Song, Phys. Rev. D 49, 1556 (1994).
  28. W. Florkowski and B. L. Friman, Z. Phys. A 347, 271 (1994).
  29. A. Bazavov, F. Karsch, Y. Maezawa, S. Mukherjee, and P. Petreczky, Phys. Rev. D 91, 054503 (2015).
  30. F. Karsch, E. Laermann, S. Mukherjee, and P. Petreczky, Phys. Rev. D 85, 114501 (2012).
  31. V. L. Eletsky and B. L. Ioffe, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 48, 384 (1988).
  32. W. M. Alberico, A. Beraudo, A. Czerska, P. Czerski, and A. Molinari, Nucl. Phys. A792, 152 (2007).
  33. M. Cheng et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1564 (2011).
  34. P. Petreczky, S. Sharma, and J. H. Weber, Phys. Rev. D 104, 054511 (2021).
  35. A. Rothkopf, Phys. Rep. 858, 1 (2020).
  36. O. Kaczmarek, Lect. Notes Phys. 999, 281 (2022).
  37. F. S. Navarra and C. A. A. Nunes, Phys. Lett. B 356, 439 (1995).
  38. L. X. Gutierrez-Guerrero, A. Bashir, I. C. Cloet, and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. C 81, 065202 (2010).
  39. L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero, A. Bashir, M. A. Bedolla, and E. Santopinto, Phys. Rev. D 100, 114032 (2019).
  40. L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero, G. Paredes-Torres, and A. Bashir, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094013 (2021).
  41. L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero, A. Raya, L. Albino, and R. J. Hernández-Pinto, Phys. Rev. D 110, 074015 (2024).
  42. R. J. Hernández-Pinto, L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero, M. A. Bedolla, and A. Bashir, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114015 (2024).
  43. G. Paredes-Torres, L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero, A. Bashir, and A. S. Miramontes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 114006 (2024).
  44. C. Chen, F. Gao, and S.-x. Qin, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014022 (2025).
  45. A. Ahmad and M. Ishtiaq, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 64, 101 (2025).
  46. A. C. Aguilar, D. Binosi, C. T. Figueiredo, and J. Papavassiliou, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 181 (2018).
  47. D. Binosi and J. Papavassiliou, Phys. Rev. D 97, 054029 (2018).
  48. F. Gao, S.-X. Qin, C. D. Roberts, and J. Rodriguez-Quintero, Phys. Rev. D 97, 034010 (2018).
  49. M. A. Bedolla, J. J. Cobos-Martínez, and A. Bashir, Phys. Rev. D 92, 054031 (2015).
  50. M. A. Bedolla, K. Raya, J. J. Cobos-Martínez, and A. Bashir, Phys. Rev. D 93, 094025 (2016).
  51. K. Raya, M. A. Bedolla, J. J. Cobos-Martínez, and A. Bashir, Few Body Syst. 59, 133 (2018).
  52. P.-L. Yin, C. Chen, G. Krein, C. D. Roberts, J. Segovia, and S.-S. Xu, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034008 (2019).
  53. P.-L. Yin, Z.-F. Cui, C. D. Roberts, and J. Segovia, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 327 (2021).
  54. X.-L. Sheng, S.-Y. Yang, Y.-L. Zou, and D. Hou, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 299 (2024).
  55. E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 84, 1232 (1951).
  56. M. Gell-Mann, Phys. Lett. 8, 214 (1964).
  57. G. Zweig, in Developments in the Quark Theory of Hadrons. VOL. 1. 1964–1978, edited by D. Lichtenberg and S. P. Rosen (1964), pp. 22–101, 10.17181/CERN-TH-412.
  58. G. Zweig (1964), 10.17181/CERN-TH-401.
  59. R. J. Hernández-Pinto, L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero, A. Bashir, M. A. Bedolla, and I. M. Higuera-Angulo, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054002 (2023).
  60. R. Bermudez, L. Albino, L. X. Gutiérrez-Guerrero, M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, and A. Bashir, Phys. Rev. D 95, 034041 (2017).
  61. A. Bashir, R. Bermudez, L. Chang, and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. C 85, 045205 (2012).
  62. L. Chang, Y.-X. Liu, and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 072001 (2011).
  63. L. Chang and C. D. Roberts, Phys. Rev. C 85, 052201 (2012).
  64. H. L. L. Roberts, L. Chang, I. C. Cloet, and C. D. Roberts, Few Body Syst. 51, 1 (2011).
  65. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  66. N. Santowsky, G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, P. C. Wallbott, and R. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 102, 056014 (2020).
  67. N. Santowsky and C. S. Fischer, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034025 (2022).
  68. N. Santowsky, G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, P. C. Wallbott, and R. Williams, arXiv:2103.14673.
  69. J. R. Pelaez and G. Rios, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 242002 (2006).
  70. J. Ruiz de Elvira, J. R. Pelaez, M. R. Pennington, and D. J. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 84, 096006 (2011).
  71. W.-j. Fu and Y.-x. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 79, 074011 (2009).
  72. A. Bhattacharyya, P. Deb, S. K. Ghosh, S. Maity, S. Raha, R. Ray, K. Saha, and S. Upadhaya, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074006 (2020).
  73. X. Li, W.-J. Fu, and Y.-X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 99, 074029 (2019).
  74. F. E. Serna, B. El-Bennich, and G. Krein, Phys. Rev. D 96, 014013 (2017).
  75. G. Montana, A. Ramos, L. Tolos, and J. M. Torres-Rincon, EPJ Web Conf. 259, 12008 (2022).
  76. E. V. Veliev, K. Azizi, H. Sundu, and N. Aksit, J. Phys. G 39, 015002 (2012).
  77. C. E. Detar and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 399 (1987).
  78. D. Blaschke, G. Burau, Y. L. Kalinovsky, P. Maris, and P. C. Tandy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16, 2267 (2001).
  79. F. Gao and M. Ding, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1171 (2020).
  80. Y. Lu, C. Chen, C. D. Roberts, J. Segovia, S.-S. Xu, and H.-S. Zong, Phys. Rev. C 96, 015208 (2017).
  81. Y. Mo, S.-x. Qin, and Y.-x. Liu, Phys. Rev. C 82, 025206 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation