Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Heavy dibaryons Ξcc(*)Ξcc(*) and Ξbb(*)Ξbb(*)

An-Su Lu, Mao-Jun Yan*, Chun-Sheng An†, and Cheng-Rong Deng‡

  • *Contact author: yanmj0789@swu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: ancs@swu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: crdeng@swu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 113, 074003 – Published 2 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/j351-hnhy

Abstract

We systematically investigate the dibaryons Ξcc(*)Ξcc(*) (di-Ξcc) and Ξbb(*)Ξbb(*) (di-Ξbb), with various isospin-spin configurations I(JP) in a nonrelativistic quark model. For the di-Ξcc system, only the single channels ΞccΞcc* and Ξcc*Ξcc* with 0(1+) are capable of forming deuteronlike bound states, with the σ meson exchange playing a decisive role. Those states have binding energies of approximately −1.5  MeV and −3.3  MeV and sizes of 2.37 fm and 1.87 fm, respectively. The coupled channel effect in the di-Ξcc system with 0(1+) enhances the attraction. As a result, this di-Ξcc system can establish a deuteronlike configuration, with the binding energy of −7.5  MeV relative to the threshold ΞccΞcc and the size of approximately 1.40 fm. For the di-Ξbb system, the single channels with 0(1+), 0(2+), and 0(3+) can give rise to deuteronlike bound states with binding energies ranging from −6.1  MeV to −14.3  MeV. Additionally, the di-Ξbb system with 1(0+) and 1(2+) can also establish deuteronlike bound states with binding energies of around −0.5  MeV. When considering the coupled channel effect in the di-Ξbb system with 0(1+), a compact hexaquark state is formed, exhibiting a binding energy of −21.2  MeV relative to the threshold ΞbbΞbb and a size of 0.53 fm. In this state, the π meson exchange provides a very powerful attractive force. The meson exchange interactions in the quark model is dispensable in the di-Ξbb bound states, except for Ξbb*Ξbb* with 1(0+).

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (74)

  1. H. De Vries, C. W. De Jager, and C. De Vries, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 36, 495 (1987).
  2. H. Clement, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 93, 195 (2017).
  3. H. Clement and T. Skorodko, Chin. Phys. C 45, 022001 (2021).
  4. Y. B. Dong, P. N. Shen, and Z. Y. Zhang, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 131, 104045 (2023).
  5. A. Gal and H. Garcilazo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 172301 (2013).
  6. A. Gal and H. Garcilazo, Nucl. Phys. A928, 73 (2014).
  7. Y. Dong, A. Faessler, and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 94, 282 (2017).
  8. F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B. S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018); 94, 029901(E) (2022).
  9. X. K. Dong, F. K. Guo, and B. S. Zou, Commun. Theor. Phys. 73, 125201 (2021).
  10. X. K. Dong, F. K. Guo, and B. S. Zou, Prog. Phys. 41, 65 (2021).
  11. H. X. Chen, W.Chen, X.Liu, Y. R. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026201 (2023).
  12. L. Meng, B. Wang, G. J. Wang, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rep. 1019, 1 (2023).
  13. H. X. Huang, C. R. Deng, X. J. Liu, Y. Tan, and J. L. Ping, Symmetry 15, 1298 (2023).
  14. M. Z. Liu, Y. W. Pan, Z. W. Liu, T. W. Wu, J. X. Lu, and L. S. Geng, Phys. Rep. 1108, 1 (2025).
  15. T. F. Carames and A. Valcarce, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034015 (2015).
  16. L. Meng, N. Li, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 95, 114019 (2017).
  17. B. Yang, L. Meng, and S. L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 67 (2020).
  18. R. Chen, F. L. Wang, A. Hosaka, and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 97, 114011 (2018).
  19. Z. G. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 102, 034008 (2020).
  20. C. R. Deng, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054037 (2023).
  21. B. Wang, K. Chen, L. Meng, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 110, 014038 (2024).
  22. L. Zhang, T. Doi, Y. Lyu, T. Hatsuda, and Y. G. Ma, Phys. Lett. B 871, 139998 (2025).
  23. Y. Cui, Y. H. Wu, X. M. Zhu, H. X. Huang, and J. L. Ping, Phys. Rev. D 111, 114018 (2025).
  24. P. Junnarkar and N. Mathur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 162003 (2019).
  25. Y. Lyu, H. Tong, T. Sugiura, S. Aoki, T. Doi, T. Hatsuda, J. Meng, and T. Miyamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 072003 (2021).
  26. N. Mathur, M. Padmanath, and D. Chakraborty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 111901 (2023).
  27. P. M. Junnarkar and N. Mathur, Phys. Rev. D 111, 014512 (2025).
  28. H. Y. Xing, Y. Q. Geng, C. Liu, L. M. Liu, P. Sun, J. J. Wu, Z. C. Yan, and R. L. Zhu, Chin. Phys. C 49, 063107 (2025).
  29. M. J. Savage and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B 248, 177 (1990).
  30. M. Z. Liu, F. Z. Peng, M. Sánchez Sánchez, and M. P. Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 98, 114030 (2018).
  31. Y. W. Pan, M. Z. Liu, F. Z. Peng, M. Sánchez Sánchez, L. S. Geng, and M. Pavon Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 102, 011504 (2020).
  32. Y. W. Pan, M. Z. Liu, and L. S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D 102, 054025 (2020).
  33. Y. W. Pan, T. W. Wu, M. Z. Liu, and L. S. Geng, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 908 (2022).
  34. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Phys. 18, 751 (2022).
  35. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Nat. Commun. 13, 3351 (2022).
  36. N. Mathur and M. Padmanath, Proc. Sci. LATTICE2021 (2022) 443.
  37. R. Chen, Q. Huang, X. Liu, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 104, 114042 (2021).
  38. C. R. Deng and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 054015 (2022).
  39. M. Karliner and J. L. Rosner, Phys. Rev. D 105, 034020 (2022).
  40. M. Albaladejo, Phys. Lett. B 829, 137052 (2022).
  41. C. R. Deng and S. L. Zhu, Sci. Bull. 67, 1522 (2022).
  42. Y. Li, Y. B. He, X. H. Liu, B. Chen, and H. W. Ke, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 258 (2023).
  43. T. Aoki, S. Aoki, and T. Inoue, Phys. Rev. D 108, 054502 (2023).
  44. C. Alexandrou, J. Finkenrath, T. Leontiou, S. Meinel, M. Pflaumer, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 151902 (2024).
  45. M. Padmanath, A. Radhakrishnan, and N. Mathur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 201902 (2024).
  46. W. Y. Liu, H. X. Chen, and E. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054041 (2023).
  47. Z. H. Lin, C. S. An, and C. R. Deng, Phys. Rev. D 109, 056005 (2024).
  48. A. Radhakrishnan, M. Padmanath, and N. Mathur, Phys. Rev. D 110, 034506 (2024).
  49. X. Chen and L. Ma, Eur. Phys. J. A 61, 150 (2025).
  50. M. Tanaka, Y. Yamaguchi, and M. Harada, Phys. Rev. D 110, 016024 (2024).
  51. H. H. He, M. J. Yan, C. S. An, and C. R. Deng, Phys. Rev. D 111, 094038 (2025).
  52. C. R. Deng, H. Chen, and J. L. Ping, Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 9 (2020).
  53. A. Ali, Q. Qin, and W. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 785, 605 (2018).
  54. A. De Rujula, H. Georgi, and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D 12, 147 (1975).
  55. N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D 18, 4187 (1978).
  56. N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1191 (1979).
  57. D. A. Liberman, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1542 (1977).
  58. V. G. Neudachin, Y. F. Smirnov, and R.Tamagaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 58, 1072 (1977).
  59. Y. Fujiwara and K. T. Hecht, Nucl. Phys. A444, 541 (1985).
  60. M. Oka and K. Yazaki, Nucl. Phys. A402, 477 (1983); A458, 773(E) (1986).
  61. A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984).
  62. I. T. Obukhovsky and A. M. Kusainov, Phys. Lett. B 238, 142 (1990).
  63. F. Fernandez, A. Valcarce, U. Straub, and A. Faessler, J. Phys. G 19, 2013 (1993).
  64. A. Valcarce, F. Fernandez, P. Gonzalez, and V. Vento, Phys. Lett. B 367, 35 (1996).
  65. Y. Fujiwara, C. Nakamoto, and Y. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. C 54, 2180 (1996).
  66. J. Vijande, F. Fernandez, and A. Valcarce, J. Phys. G 31, 481 (2005).
  67. M. D. Scadron, Phys. Rev. D 26, 239 (1982).
  68. F. James and M. Roos, Comput. Phys. Commun. 10, 343 (1975).
  69. B. Silvestre-Brac and C. Gignoux, Phys. Rev. D 32, 743 (1985).
  70. B. Silvestre-Brac, Few Body Syst. 20, 1 (1996).
  71. E. Hiyama, Y. Kino, and M. Kamimura, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51, 223 (2003).
  72. L. Meng, Y. K. Chen, Y.Ma, and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 108, 114016 (2023).
  73. M. Nzar and P. Hoodbhoy, Phys. Rev. C 42, 1778 (1990).
  74. [Data reference here.]

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation