Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Probing the electromagnetic dipole moment of the τ lepton in the e+e−→γ*/Z→τ+τ− reaction

Peng-Cheng Lu*, Zong-Guo Si†, and Han Zhang‡

  • *Contact author: pclu@sdu.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: zgsi@sdu.edu.cn
  • ‡Contact author: han.zhang@mail.sdu.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 112, 075039 – Published 21 October, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hvz6-b69m

Abstract

High-precision measurements of the lepton’s electromagnetic dipole moments provide a powerful probe for testing the Standard Model. A nonzero value of the τ lepton’s electric(weak) dipole moment (dτγ, dτZ) would serve as a smoking gun of the new physics. On the one hand, current and future high energy colliders offer an ideal environment for such measurements. On the other hand, it is essential to investigate the optimal measurement method for extracting not only dτγ and dτZ, but also the anomalous magnetic dipole moment (aτ). In this work, we analyze the precision of observables, particularly optimal observables, for determining these physics quantities through the process e+e−→γ*/Z→τ+τ− with τ leptons undergoing (semi)leptonic and hadronic decays at the center-of-mass energies at the Z pole mass and significantly below mZ. By considering the full kinematic information of the decay products, we find that the sensitivities to the weak dipole moments, Im[dτZ] and Re[dτZ], can reach 10−21  e cm at CEPC with s=mZ. This compares to sensitivities for the electric dipole moments, Im[dτγ] and Re[dτγ], of 10−20  e cm at Belle-II ϒ(4S) resonance and 10−17  e cm at BEPCII ψ(2S) resonance. For aτ, we find that precisions of 10−5 for Im[aτ] and Re[aτ] can be attained at Belle-II s=10.58  GeV.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. M. Kobayashi and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
  2. Y. Yamaguchi and N. Yamanaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 241802 (2020).
  3. Y. Yamaguchi and N. Yamanaka, Phys. Rev. D 103, 013001 (2021).
  4. T. S. Roussy, L. Caldwell, T. Wright, W. B. Cairncross, Y. Shagam, K. B. Ng, N. Schlossberger, S. Y. Park, A. Wang, J. Ye et al., Science 381, adg4084 (2023).
  5. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon (g-2) Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 80, 052008 (2009).
  6. W. Bernreuther, A. Brandenburg, and P. Overmann, Phys. Lett. B 391, 413 (1997); 412, 425(E) (1997).
  7. S. Navas et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  8. K. Inami et al. (Belle Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2022) 110.
  9. W. Lohmann, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 144, 122 (2005).
  10. T. Kinoshita, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1430003 (2014).
  11. R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey, and H. Müller, Science 360, 191 (2018).
  12. G. W. Bennett et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 73, 072003 (2006).
  13. B. Abi et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 141801 (2021).
  14. D. P. Aguillard et al. (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 161802 (2023).
  15. T. Aoyama, N. Asmussen, M. Benayoun, J. Bijnens, T. Blum, M. Bruno, I. Caprini, C. M. Carloni Calame, M. Cè, G. Colangelo et al., Phys. Rep. 887, 1 (2020).
  16. L. Cotrozzi (Muon g-2 Collaboration), Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. 47C, 282 (2024).
  17. B. C. Toth, S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, J. Guenther, C. Hoelbling, S. D. Katz, L. Lellouch, T. Lippert, K. Miura, L. Parato et al., Proc. Sci., LATTICE2021 (2022) 005.
  18. P. Masjuan, A. Miranda, and P. Roig, Proc. Sci., QNP2024 (2025) 216 [arXiv:2411.09811].
  19. R. Aliberti, T. Aoyama, E. Balzani, A. Bashir, G. Benton, J. Bijnens, V. Biloshytskyi, T. Blum, D. Boito, M. Bruno et al., Phys. Rep. 1143, 1 (2025).
  20. S. P. Martin and J. D. Wells, Phys. Rev. D 64, 035003 (2001).
  21. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Rep. Prog. Phys. 87, 107801 (2024).
  22. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura, and T. Teubner, Phys. Rev. D 101, 014029 (2020).
  23. T. Abe et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), arXiv:1011.0352.
  24. E. Kou et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019); 2020, 029201(E) (2020).
  25. M. Ablikim et al. (BESIII Collaboration), Chin. Phys. C 48, 093001 (2024).
  26. H. B. Li et al. (BESIII Collaboration), arXiv:2204.08943.
  27. J. B. Guimarães da Costa et al. (CEPC Study Group), arXiv:1811.10545.
  28. H. Cheng et al. (CEPC Physics Study Group), arXiv:2205.08553.
  29. D. Atwood and A. Soni, Phys. Rev. D 45, 2405 (1992).
  30. M. Diehl and O. Nachtmann, Z. Phys. C 62, 397 (1994).
  31. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Phys. Lett. B 805, 135426 (2020).
  32. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2024) 105.
  33. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 104, 052004 (2021).
  34. S. Jahedi, J. Lahiri, and A. Subba, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2025) 280.
  35. G. Abbiendi et al. (OPAL Collaboration), Eur. Phys. J. C 33, 463 (2004).
  36. W. Bernreuther, L. Chen, and O. Nachtmann, Phys. Rev. D 103, 096011 (2021).
  37. X. Chen and Y. Wu, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2019) 089.
  38. X. G. He, C. W. Liu, J. P. Ma, C. Yang, and Z. Y. Zou, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2025) 001.
  39. K. Bhide and V. Lang, arXiv:2410.23070.
  40. S. Banerjee, A. Y. Korchin, E. Richter-Was, and Z. Was, Phys. Rev. D 109, 013002 (2024).
  41. D. Shao, B. Yan, S. R. Yuan, and C. Zhang, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 67, 281062 (2024).
  42. D. Y. Shao, H. Xiang, F. Xu, B. Yan, and C. Zhang, arXiv:2506.15245.
  43. W. Bernreuther, O. Nachtmann, and P. Overmann, Phys. Rev. D 48, 78 (1993).
  44. W. Bernreuther, L. Chen, and O. Nachtmann, Phys. Rev. D 104, 115002 (2021).
  45. P. Poulose and S. D. Rindani, Pramana 51, 387 (1998).
  46. T. Huang, W. Lu, and Z. j. Tao, Phys. Rev. D 55, 1643 (1997).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation