Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Searching for lepton flavor violating decays of the Higgs boson into μτ, eτ, and eμ final states at FCC-ee

Pongsakorn Sriling, Rutjanaret Uttho, and Vichayanun Wachirapusitanand

Norraphat Srimanobhas*

Patipan Uttayarat

  • Center of Excellence in High Energy Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand

  • Theoretical High-Energy Physics and Astrophysics Research Unit, Department of Physics, Srinakharinwirot University, 114 Sukhumvit 23 Road, Wattana, Bangkok 10110, Thailand

  • *Contact author: Norraphat.S@chula.ac.th

Phys. Rev. D 114, 075026 – Published 20 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hs3z-6tnr

Abstract

We investigate the projected sensitivity of the Future Circular Collider in e+e− mode (FCC-ee) in probing the lepton flavor violating (LFV) decay of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, h→μτ, h→eτ, and h→eμ at center-of-mass energy of 240 GeV with an integrated luminosity of 5  ab−1. With the clean multilepton final states, we consider the Higgs production modes that contribute to e+e−→ℓℓh, in particular, the Higgs-strahlung and the vector boson fusion production channels. The 95% confidence level upper limits on branching ratio are found to be 5.94×10−4, 6.28×10−4, and 7.37×10−5 for the channels h→μτ, h→eτ, and h→eμ, respectively. In addition, we also consider the LFV decay of a new CP-even Higgs boson with mass in the range of 110–200 GeV. The projected FCC-ee sensitivities are then compared to those from low-energy searches for ℓ→ℓ′γ decay. We find that the FCC-ee sensitivity for the LFV decays of the Higgs boson in the e−τ and μ−τ channels is superior to the low-energy constraints. However, in the e−μ case, the low-energy search offers stronger constraints.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (64)

  1. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012).
  2. S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012).
  3. G. Aad et al., Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and coupling strengths using pp collision data at s=7 and 8 TeV in the ATLAS experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 6 (2016).
  4. V. Khachatryan et al., Precise determination of the mass of the Higgs boson and tests of compatibility of its couplings with the standard model predictions using proton collisions at 7 and 8  TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 212 (2015).
  5. A. Hayrapetyan et al., Measurement of the Higgs boson mass and width using the four-lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at s=13, Phys. Rev. D 111, 092014 (2025).
  6. G. C. Branco, P. M. Ferreira, L. Lavoura, M. N. Rebelo, M. Sher, and J. P. Silva, Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rep. 516, 1 (2012).
  7. M. A. Arroyo-Ureña, J. L. Diaz-Cruz, E. Díaz, and J. A. Orduz-Ducuara, Flavor violating Higgs signals in the Texturized Two-Higgs Doublet Model (THDM-Tx), Chin. Phys. C 40, 123103 (2016).
  8. A. Crivellin, A. Kokulu, and C. Greub, Flavor-phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models with generic Yukawa structure, Phys. Rev. D 87, 094031 (2013).
  9. W. Altmannshofer, J. Eby, S. Gori, M. Lotito, M. Martone, and D. Tuckler, Collider signatures of flavorful Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D 94, 115032 (2016).
  10. M. A. Arroyo-Ureña, T. A. Valencia-Pérez, R. Gaitán, J. H. Montes De Oca, and A. Fernández-Téllez, Flavor-changing decay h→τμ at super hadron colliders, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2020) 170.
  11. M. A. Arroyo-Ureña, J. L. Díaz-Cruz, O. Félix-Beltrán, and M. Zeleny-Mora, Lessons from LHC on the LFV Higgs decays h→ℓaℓb in the two-Higgs doublet models, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39, 2450079 (2024).
  12. G. Perez and L. Randall, Natural neutrino masses and mixings from warped geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2009) 077.
  13. S. Casagrande, F. Goertz, U. Haisch, M. Neubert, and T. Pfoh, Flavor physics in the Randall-Sundrum model: I. Theoretical setup and electroweak precision tests, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008) 094.
  14. M. E. Albrecht, M. Blanke, A. J. Buras, B. Duling, and K. Gemmler, Electroweak and flavour structure of a warped extra dimension with custodial protection, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2009) 064.
  15. J. L. Diaz-Cruz and J. J. Toscano, Lepton flavor violating decays of Higgs bosons beyond the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 62, 116005 (2000).
  16. T. Han and D. Marfatia, h→μτ at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1442 (2001).
  17. A. Arhrib, Y. Cheng, and O. C. W. Kong, Comprehensive analysis on lepton flavor violating Higgs boson to μ∓τ± decay in supersymmetry without R parity, Phys. Rev. D 87, 015025 (2013).
  18. M. Arana-Catania, E. Arganda, and M. J. Herrero, Non-decoupling SUSY in LFV Higgs decays: A window to new physics at the LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (2013) 160; 10 (2015) 192(E).
  19. E. Arganda, M. J. Herrero, X. Marcano, and C. Weiland, Enhancement of the lepton flavor violating Higgs boson decay rates from SUSY loops in the inverse seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 93, 055010 (2016).
  20. E. Arganda, M. J. Herrero, R. Morales, and A. Szynkman, Analysis of the h, H, A →τμ decays induced from SUSY loops within the mass insertion approximation, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2016) 055.
  21. A. Pilaftsis, Lepton flavour nonconservation in H0 decays, Phys. Lett. B 285, 68 (1992).
  22. E. Arganda, A. M. Curiel, M. J. Herrero, and D. Temes, Lepton flavor violating Higgs boson decays from massive seesaw neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 71, 035011 (2005).
  23. E. Arganda, M. J. Herrero, X. Marcano, and C. Weiland, Imprints of massive inverse seesaw model neutrinos in lepton flavor violating Higgs boson decays, Phys. Rev. D 91, 015001 (2015).
  24. E. Arganda, M. J. Herrero, X. Marcano, R. Morales, and A. Szynkman, Effective lepton flavor violating Hℓiℓj vertex from right-handed neutrinos within the mass insertion approximation, Phys. Rev. D 95, 095029 (2017).
  25. X. Marcano and R. A. Morales, Flavor techniques for LFV processes: Higgs decays in a general seesaw model, Front. Phys. 7, 228 (2020).
  26. R. Primulando, J. Julio, and P. Uttayarat, Zee model with quasidegenerate neutrino masses and where to find it, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 253 (2022).
  27. R. Primulando, J. Julio, and P. Uttayarat, Minimal Zee model for lepton G-2 and W-mass shifts, Phys. Rev. D 107, 055034 (2023).
  28. M. A. Arroyo-Ureña, E. A. Herrera-Chacón, I. Melendez-Hernández, and S. Rosado-Navarro, Lepton flavor violation in Higgs boson decays at the HL-LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (2026) 120.
  29. M. A. Arroyo-Ureña, J. L. Díaz-Cruz, G. Tavares-Velasco, A. Bolaños, and G. Hernández-Tomé, Searching for lepton flavor violating flavon decays at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 98, 015008 (2018).
  30. M. A. A. Ureña, R. Gaitan-Lozano, J. H. M. de Oca Yemha, and R. S. Vélez, Lepton flavor violating h→τμ decay induced by leptoquarks, Rev. Mex. Fis. 67, 040801 (2021).
  31. R. Primulando and P. Uttayarat, Probing Lepton Flavor Violation at the 13 TeV LHC, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2017) 055.
  32. R. Primulando, J. Julio, and P. Uttayarat, Collider constraints on lepton flavor violation in the 2HDM, Phys. Rev. D 101, 055021 (2020).
  33. E. Arganda, X. Marcano, N. I. Mileo, R. A. Morales, and A. Szynkman, Model-independent search strategy for the lepton-flavor-violating heavy Higgs boson decay to τμ at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 738 (2019).
  34. R. K. Barman, P. S. B. Dev, and A. Thapa, Constraining lepton flavor violating Higgs couplings at the HL-LHC in the vector boson fusion channel, Phys. Rev. D 107, 075018 (2023).
  35. R. Primulando, J. Julio, N. Srimanobhas, and P. Uttayarat, A new Higgs boson with electron-muon flavor-violating couplings, Phys. Lett. B 845, 138129 (2023).
  36. Y. Afik, P. S. Bhupal Dev, and A. Thapa, Hints of a new leptophilic Higgs sector?, Phys. Rev. D 109, 015003 (2024).
  37. A. Hayrapetyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for the lepton-flavor violating decay of the Higgs boson and additional Higgs bosons in the eμ final state in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Rev. D 108, 072004 (2023).
  38. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for lepton-flavor violating decays of the Higgs boson in the μτ and eτ final states in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, Phys. Rev. D 104, 032013 (2021).
  39. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), Search for the Higgs boson decays H→ee and H→eμ in pp collisions at s=13  TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 801, 135148 (2020).
  40. G. Aad, B. Abbott, D. C. Abbott, K. Abeling, and S. H. Abidi, Searches for lepton-flavour-violating decays of the Higgs boson into eτ and μτ in s=13  TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2023) 166.
  41. A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), Search for lepton flavour violating decays of a neutral heavy Higgs boson to μτ and eτ in proton-proton collisions at s=13  TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2020) 103.
  42. R. Aaij et al. (LHCb Collaboration), Search for lepton-flavour-violating decays of Higgs-like bosons, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 1008 (2018).
  43. Q. Qin, Q. Li, C.-D. Lü, F.-S. Yu, and S.-H. Zhou, Charged lepton flavor violating Higgs decays at future e+e− colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 835 (2018).
  44. J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, J. High Energy Phys. 07 (2014) 079.
  45. T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to pythia8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191, 159 (2015).
  46. S. Ovyn, X. Rouby, and V. Lemaitre, DELPHES, a framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, arXiv:0903.2225.
  47. The IDEA Study Group, The IDEA detector concept for FCC-ee, arXiv:2502.21223.
  48. S. Frixione, O. Mattelaer, M. Zaro, and X. Zhao, Lepton collisions in madgraph5_amc@nlo, arXiv:2108.10261.
  49. N. Barchetta, P. Collins, and P. Riedler, Tracking and vertex detectors at FCC-ee, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 231 (2022).
  50. A. Elagin, P. Murat, A. Pranko, and A. Safonov, A new mass reconstruction technique for resonances decaying to ττ, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 654, 481 (2011).
  51. M. Benedikt, A. Blondel, P. Janot, M. Mangano, and F. Zimmermann, Future circular colliders succeeding the LHC, Nat. Phys. 16, 402 (2020).
  52. A. Hayrapetyan et al., The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: combine, Comput. Software Big Sci. 8, 19 (2024).
  53. ATLAS and CMS Collaborations and LHC Higgs Combination Group, Procedure for the LHC Higgs Boson Search Combination in Summer 2011, Tech. Rep. (CERN, Geneva, 2011), https://cds.cern.ch/record/1379837?ln=en.
  54. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration and CMS Collaboration), Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at s=7 and 8 TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2016) 045.
  55. A. Tumasyan et al. (CMS Collaboration), A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature (London) 607, 60 (2022); 623, 7985(E) (2023).
  56. G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration), A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature (London) 607, 52 (2022); 612, E24(E) (2022).
  57. K. Afanaciev et al. (MEG II Collaboration), New limit on the μ+→e+γ decay with the MEG II experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1177 (2025); 85, 1317(E) (2025).
  58. B. Aubert et al. (BABAR Collaboration), Searches for lepton flavor violation in the decays τ±→e±γ and τ±→μ±γ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 021802 (2010).
  59. W. Altmannshofer et al. (Belle-II Collaboration), The Belle II physics book, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 123C01 (2019); 2020, 029201(E) (2020).
  60. A. Abdesselam et al. (Belle Collaboration), Search for lepton-flavor-violating tau-lepton decays to ℓγ at Belle, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2021) 19.
  61. D. M. Asner et al. (US Belle II Group and Belle II/SuperKEKB e- Polarization Upgrade Working Group), Snowmass 2021 White Paper on Upgrading SuperKEKB with a Polarized Electron Beam: Discovery Potential and Proposed Implementation, in Snowmass 2021 (2022).
  62. W. Altmannshofer, B. Assi, J. Brod, N. Hamer, J. Julio, P. Uttayarat, and D. Volkov, Electron EDM and Γ(μ→ eγ) in the 2HDM, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2025) 156.
  63. W. H. Bertl et al. (SINDRUM II Collaboration), A Search for muon to electron conversion in muonic gold, Eur. Phys. J. C 47, 337 (2006).
  64. A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, and M. Procura, Improved predictions for μ→e conversion in nuclei and Higgs-induced lepton flavor violation, Phys. Rev. D 89, 093024 (2014).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation