Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Sampling off-axis neutrino fluxes with the short-baseline near detector

P. Abratenko39, R. Acciarri13, C. Adams1, L. Aliaga-Soplin38, O. Alterkait39, R. Alvarez-Garrote7, D. Andrade Aldana16, C. Andreopoulos21, A. Antonakis4 et al. (SBND Collaboration*)

A. Antonakis4, L. Arellano24, J. Asaadi38, S. Balasubramanian27, A. Barnard28, V. Basque13, J. Bateman24,17, A. Beever33, E. Belchior23, M. Betancourt13, A. Bhat6, M. Bishai3, A. Blake20, B. Bogart25, D. Brailsford20, A. Brandt38, S. Brickner4, M. B. Brunetti19, L. Camilleri9, D. Caratelli4, D. Carber8, B. Carlson14, M. F. Carneiro3, R. Castillo38, F. Cavanna13, A. Chappell41, H. Chen3, S. Chung9, M. F. Cicala42, R. Coackley20, J. I. Crespo-Anadón7, C. Cuesta7, Y. Dabburi31, O. Dalager13, M. Dall’Olio38, R. Darby34, M. Del Tutto13, Z. Djurcic1, V. do Lago Pimentel5, S. Dominguez-Vidales7, M. Dubnowski30, K. Duffy28, S. Dytman13, A. Ereditato6, J. J. Evans24, A. Ezeribe33, C. Fan14, A. Filkins35, B. Fleming6,13, W. Foreman22, D. Franco6, G. Fricano13,29, I. Furic14, A. Furmanski26, S. Gao3, D. Garcia-Gamez15, S. Gardiner13, G. Ge9, I. Gil-Botella7, S. Gollapinni22,36, P. Green28, W. C. Griffith34, P. Guzowski24, L. Hagaman9, A. Hamer10, P. Hamilton17, R. Harnik13, A. Hergenhan17, M. Hernandez-Morquecho16, C. Hilgenberg26, P. Holanda5, B. Howard13, Z. Imani39, C. James13, R. S. Jones33, M. Jung6, T. Junk13, D. Kalra9, G. Karagiorgi9, L. Kashur8, K. J. Kelly37, W. Ketchum13, M. King6, J. Klein30, L. Kotsiopoulou10, S. Kr Das34, T. Kroupová30, V. A. Kudryavtsev33, N. Lane24,17, J. Larkin3, H. Lay33, R. LaZur8, J.-Y. Li13, K. Lin32, B. R. Littlejohn16, L. Liu13, W. C. Louis22, X. Lu41, X. Luo4, A. Machado5, P. Machado13, C. Mariani40, F. Marinho18, J. Marshall41, A. Mastbaum32, K. Mavrokoridis21, N. McConkey31, B. McCusker20, J. Mclaughlin16, D. Mendez3, M. Mooney8, A. F. Moor33, G. Moreno Granados40, C. A. Moura11, J. Mueller13, S. Mulleriababu2, A. Navrer-Agasson17, M. Nebot-Guinot10, V. C. L. Nguyen4, F. J. Nicolas-Arnaldos38, J. Nowak20, S. B. Oh13, N. Oza9, O. Palamara13, N. Pallat26, V. Pandey13, A. Papadopoulou22, H. B. Parkinson10, J. Paton13, L. Paulucci18, Z. Pavlovic13, D. Payne21, L. Pelegrina Gutiérrez15, O. L. G. Peres5, J. Plows21, F. Psihas13, G. Putnam13, X. Qian3, R. Rajagopalan35, P. Ratoff20, H. Ray14, M. Reggiani-Guzzo10, M. Roda21, J. Romeo-Araujo7, M. Ross-Lonergan9, N. Rowe6, P. Roy40, I. Safa9, A. Sanchez-Castillo15, P. Sanchez-Lucas15, D. W. Schmitz6, A. Schneider22, A. Schukraft13, H. Scott33, E. Segreto5, J. Sensenig30, M. Shaevitz9, B. Slater21, J. Smith3, M. Soares-Nunes13, M. Soderberg35, S. Söldner-Rembold17, J. Spitz25, M. Stancari13, T. Strauss13, A. M. Szelc10, C. Thorpe24, D. Totani8, M. Toups13, C. Touramanis21, L. Tung6, G. A. Valdiviesso12, R. G. Van de Water22, A. Vázquez Ramos15, L. Wan13, M. Weber2, H. Wei23, T. Wester6, A. White6, A. Wilkinson41, P. Wilson13, T. Wongjirad39, E. Worcester3, M. Worcester3, S. Yadav38, E. Yandel22, T. Yang13, L. Yates13, B. Yu3, H. Yu3, J. Yu38, B. Zamorano15, J. Zennamo13, and C. Zhang3 (SBND Collaboration*)

  • 1Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 2Universität Bern, Bern CH-3012, Switzerland
  • 3Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
  • 4University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA
  • 5Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo 13083-970, Brazil
  • 6Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
  • 7CIEMAT, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas, Madrid E-28040, Spain
  • 8Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
  • 9Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
  • 10University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FD, United Kingdom
  • 11Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, São Paulo 09210-580, Brazil
  • 12Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Poços de Caldas, Minas Gerais 37715-400, Brazil
  • 13Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
  • 14University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
  • 15Universidad de Granada, Granada E-18071, Spain
  • 16Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
  • 17Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
  • 18Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica, São José dos Campos, São Paulo 12228-900, Brazil
  • 19University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA
  • 20Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YW, United Kingdom
  • 21University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZE, United Kingdom
  • 22Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 23Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA
  • 24University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
  • 25University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA
  • 26University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
  • 27Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts 01075, USA
  • 28University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
  • 29Università degli Studi di Palermo, Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica, I-90123 Palermo, Italy
  • 30University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
  • 31Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom
  • 32Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA
  • 33University of Sheffield, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
  • 34University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RH, United Kingdom
  • 35Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244, USA
  • 36University of Tennessee at Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
  • 37Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 38University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019, USA
  • 39Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
  • 40Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA
  • 41University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom
  • 42University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom

  • *Contact author: sbnd-info@fnal.gov

Phys. Rev. D 113, 072007 – Published 13 April, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hc3v-tqdb

Abstract

The short-baseline near detector (SBND), the near detector in the short-baseline neutrino program at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, is located just 110 m from the booster neutrino beam target. Thanks to this close proximity, relative to its 4  m×4  m front face, neutrinos enter SBND over a range of angles from 0° to approximately 1.6°, enabling the detector to sample variations in the neutrino flux as a function of the angle—a technique known as precision reaction-independent spectrum measurement (PRISM), referred to here as SBND-PRISM. In this paper, we show how muon- and electron-neutrino fluxes vary as a function of the neutrino beam axis angle and how this can be exploited to expand the physics potential of SBND. We make use of a model that predicts an angle-dependent electron-neutrino excess signal to illustrate this effect, such as νμ→νe oscillations. We present how SBND-PRISM provides a method to add robustness against uncertainties in cross-section modeling and, more generally, uncertainties that do not depend on the spatial position of neutrino interaction inside the detector. The fluxes, along with their associated covariance matrices, are made publicly available with this publication.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (58)

  1. A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Neutrino flux prediction at MiniBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 79, 072002 (2009).
  2. R. Acciarri et al. (MicroBooNE, LAr1-ND, and ICARUS-WA104 Collaborations), A proposal for a three detector short-baseline neutrino oscillation program in the Fermilab booster neutrino beam, arXiv:1503.01520.
  3. P. Abratenko et al. (ICARUS Collaboration), ICARUS at the Fermilab Short-Baseline Neutrino program: Initial operation, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 467 (2023).
  4. P. A. Machado, O. Palamara, and D. W. Schmitz, The short-baseline neutrino program at Fermilab, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69, 363 (2019).
  5. K. T. McDonald, An off-axis neutrino beam, arXiv:hep-ex/0111033.
  6. P. B. Denton, M. Friend, M. D. Messier, H. A. Tanaka, S. Böser, J. A. B. Coelho, M. Perrin-Terrin, and T. Stuttard, Snowmass neutrino frontier: NF01 topical group report on three-flavor neutrino oscillations, arXiv:2212.00809.
  7. S. Bhadra et al. (NuPRISM Collaboration), Letter of intent to construct a nuPRISM detector in the J-PARC neutrino beamline, arXiv:1412.3086.
  8. A. A. Abud et al. (DUNE Collaboration), Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) near detector conceptual design report, Instruments 5, 31 (2021).
  9. Moving the detectors, or using dedicated off-axis detectors [10, 11, 12], can enable measurements at significantly larger angles than SBND can access.

  10. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of the flux-averaged inclusive charged-current electron neutrino and antineutrino cross section on argon using the NuMI beam and the MicroBooNE detector, Phys. Rev. D 104, 052002 (2021).
  11. M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Measurement of the double-differential cross section of muon-neutrino charged-current interactions with low hadronic energy in the NOvA Near Detector, arXiv:2410.10222.
  12. A. P. Wood, The NuMI neutrino flux prediction at ICARUS, Ph.D. thesis, University of Houston, 2024, arXiv:2504.08950.
  13. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Measurement of the muon neutrino inclusive charged-current cross section in the energy range of 1–3 GeV with the T2K INGRID detector, Phys. Rev. D 93, 072002 (2016).
  14. P. S. Auchincloss, R. Blair, C. Haber et al., Measurement of the inclusive charged-current cross section for neutrino and antineutrino scattering on isoscalar nucleons, Z. Phys. C 48, 411 (1990).
  15. C. Rubbia, The liquid argon time projection chamber: A new concept for neutrino detectors, Technical Report No. CERN-EP-INT-77-08, CERN, 1977.
  16. R. Acciarri et al. (SBND Collaboration), Construction of precision wire readout planes for the Short-Baseline Near Detector (SBND), J. Instrum. 15, P06033 (2020).
  17. R. Acciarri et al. (SBND Collaboration), Scintillation light in SBND: Simulation, reconstruction, and expected performance of the photon detection system, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 1046 (2024).
  18. S. Agostinelli et al., Geant4—a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 506, 250 (2003).
  19. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Vertex-finding and reconstruction of contained two-track neutrino events in the MicroBooNE detector, J. Instrum. 16, P02017 (2021).
  20. C. Adams et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Ionization electron signal processing in single phase LArTPCs. Part I. Algorithm description and quantitative evaluation with MicroBooNE simulation, J. Instrum. 13, P07006 (2018).
  21. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/hc3v-tqdb for tabulated values of flux and flux covariance matrices.
  22. C. Andreopoulos et al., The GENIE neutrino Monte Carlo generator, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 614, 87 (2010).
  23. E. Bertuzzo, S. Jana, P. A. N. Machado, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Dark neutrino portal to explain MiniBooNE excess, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 241801 (2018).
  24. E. Bertuzzo, S. Jana, P. A. N. Machado, and R. Zukanovich Funchal, Neutrino masses and mixings dynamically generated by a light dark sector, Phys. Lett. B 791, 210 (2019).
  25. P. Ballett, S. Pascoli, and M. Ross-Lonergan, U(1)′ mediated decays of heavy sterile neutrinos in MiniBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 99, 071701 (2019).
  26. A. de Gouvêa, P. J. Fox, R. Harnik, K. J. Kelly, and Y. Zhang, Dark tridents at off-axis liquid argon neutrino detectors, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2019) 001.
  27. C. A. Argüelles, M. Hostert, and Y.-D. Tsai, Testing new physics explanations of the MiniBooNE anomaly at neutrino scattering experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 261801 (2019).
  28. P. Ballett, M. Hostert, and S. Pascoli, Dark neutrinos and a three-portal connection to the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 101, 115025 (2020).
  29. W. Abdallah, R. Gandhi, and S. Roy, Two-Higgs doublet solution to the LSND, MiniBooNE and muon g−2 anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 104, 055028 (2021).
  30. B. Dutta, D. Kim, A. Thompson, R. T. Thornton, and R. G. Van de Water, Solutions to the MiniBooNE anomaly from new physics in charged meson decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 111803 (2022).
  31. A. M. Abdullahi et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), First search for dark sector e+e− explanations of the MiniBooNE anomaly at MicroBooNE, arXiv:2502.10900.
  32. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Inclusive search for anomalous single-photon production in MicroBooNE, arXiv:2502.06064.
  33. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Search for the production of Higgs-portal scalar bosons in the NuMI beam using the MicroBooNE detector, arXiv:2501.08052.
  34. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Search for an anomalous production of charged-current νe interactions without visible pions across multiple kinematic observables in MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 081802 (2025).
  35. K. Abe et al., Search for heavy neutrinos with the T2K near detector ND280, Phys. Rev. D 100, 052006 (2019).
  36. P. Coloma, J. López-Pavón, L. Molina-Bueno, and S. Urrea, New physics searches using ProtoDUNE and the CERN SPS accelerator, J. High Energy Phys. 01 (2024) 134.
  37. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Search for light sterile neutrinos with two neutrino beams at MicroBooNE, Nature (London) 648, 64 (2025).
  38. N. M. Coyle, S. W. Li, and P. A. N. Machado, The impact of neutrino-nucleus interaction modeling on new physics searches, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2022) 166.
  39. B. P. Roe, Statistical errors in Monte Carlo estimates of systematic errors, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 570, 159 (2007).
  40. A. S. Meyer, M. Betancourt, R. Gran, and R. J. Hill, Deuterium target data for precision neutrino-nucleus cross sections, Phys. Rev. D 93, 113015 (2016).
  41. T. Le et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Measurement of ν¯μ charged-current single π− production on hydrocarbon in the few-GeV region using MINERvA, Phys. Rev. D 100, 052008 (2019).
  42. A. M. Ankowski, A. Friedland, S. W. Li, O. Moreno, P. Schuster, N. Toro, and N. Tran, Lepton-nucleus cross section measurements for DUNE with the LDMX detector, Phys. Rev. D 101, 053004 (2020).
  43. A. M. Ankowski and A. Friedland, Assessing the accuracy of the GENIE event generator with electron-scattering data, Phys. Rev. D 102, 053001 (2020).
  44. D. Coplowe et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Probing nuclear effects with neutrino-induced charged-current neutral pion production, Phys. Rev. D 102, 072007 (2020); 110, 059903(E) (2024).
  45. A. Filkins et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Double-differential inclusive charged-current νμ cross sections on hydrocarbon in MINERvA at ⟨Eν⟩∼3.5  GeV, Phys. Rev. D 101, 112007 (2020).
  46. K. Borah, R. J. Hill, G. Lee, and O. Tomalak, Parametrization and applications of the low-Q2 nucleon vector form factors, Phys. Rev. D 102, 074012 (2020).
  47. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), Simultaneous measurement of the muon neutrino charged-current cross section on oxygen and carbon without pions in the final state at T2K, Phys. Rev. D 101, 112004 (2020).
  48. K. Abe et al. (T2K Collaboration), First T2K measurement of transverse kinematic imbalance in the muon-neutrino charged-current single-π+ production channel containing at least one proton, Phys. Rev. D 103, 112009 (2021).
  49. O. Tomalak, Q. Chen, R. J. Hill, and K. S. McFarland, QED radiative corrections for accelerator neutrinos, Nat. Commun. 13, 5286 (2022).
  50. D. Ruterbories et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Measurement of inclusive charged-current νμ cross sections as a function of muon kinematics at ⟨Eν⟩∼6  GeV on hydrocarbon, Phys. Rev. D 104, 092007 (2021).
  51. M. A. Acero et al. (NOvA Collaboration), Measurement of the double-differential muon-neutrino charged-current inclusive cross section in the NOvA near detector, Phys. Rev. D 107, 052011 (2023).
  52. M. Khachatryan et al. (CLAS and e4v Collaborations), Electron-beam energy reconstruction for neutrino oscillation measurements, Nature (London) 599, 565 (2021).
  53. J. Isaacson, W. I. Jay, A. Lovato, P. A. N. Machado, and N. Rocco, Introducing a novel event generator for electron-nucleus and neutrino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 107, 033007 (2023).
  54. D. Ruterbories et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Simultaneous measurement of proton and lepton kinematics in quasielasticlike νμ-hydrocarnbon interactions from 2 to 20 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 021803 (2022).
  55. U. Mosel and K. Gallmeister, Lepton-induced reactions on nuclei in a wide kinematical regime, Phys. Rev. D 109, 033008 (2024).
  56. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Inclusive cross section measurements in final states with and without protons for charged-current νμ-Ar scattering in MicroBooNE, Phys. Rev. D 110, 013006 (2024).
  57. P. Abratenko et al. (MicroBooNE Collaboration), Search for an anomalous excess of charged-current νe interactions without pions in the final state with the MicroBooNE experiment, Phys. Rev. D 105, 112004 (2022).
  58. G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1554 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation