Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access

Strange pentaquark molecules in QCD sum rules

Di Ben1,* and Sheng-Qi Zhang2,†

  • *Contact author: bd@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn
  • †Contact author: shqzhang@pku.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. D 114, 034030 – Published 13 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/hbtg-qny8

Abstract

We study hidden- and open-strange pentaquark configurations in the hadronic molecular picture with QCD sum rules. Starting from the baryon octet combined with an ss¯ pair, we construct 21 interpolating currents with J=1/2 and 3/2. In the analysis, contributions up to dimension 11 are included in the operator product expansion, and both parity-projected spectra and the chiral-even and chiral-odd Lorentz structures are examined. No bound-state solution is found in the JP=1/2− sector, although several channels generate resonance masses near nearby thresholds or poorly established strange baryons. In the JP=3/2− sector, the Σϕ and ΞK* currents both support a near-threshold bound-state solution around 2.2 GeV, suggesting a possible molecular configuration with channel mixing. In contrast, positive-parity sectors are more difficult to identify the corresponding states. In addition, our results favor the spin-parity assignments JP=3/2− for Σ(2250), JP=1/2− for Σ(2455), Σ(2620), and Ξ(2370), and JP=3/2+ for Ξ(2250). These results provide a systematic QCD sum rule study of strange pentaquark molecular candidates in the strange sector.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (85)

  1. R. Aaij et al., Observation of J/ψp resonances consistent with pentaquark states in Λb0→J/ψK−p decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 072001 (2015).
  2. R. Aaij et al., Observation of a narrow pentaquark state, Pc(4312)+, and of two-peak structure of the Pc(4450)+, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222001 (2019).
  3. R. F. Lebed, Do the Pc+ pentaquarks have strange siblings?, Phys. Rev. D 92, 114030 (2015).
  4. J. He, Nucleon resonances N(1875) and N(2100) as strange partners of LHCb pentaquarks, Phys. Rev. D 95, 074031 (2017).
  5. H. Huang, X. Zhu, and J. Ping, Pc-like pentaquarks in hidden strange sector, Phys. Rev. D 97, 094019 (2018).
  6. Y.-H. Lin, C.-W. Shen, and B.-S. Zou, Decay behavior of the strange and beauty partners of Pc hadronic molecules, Nucl. Phys. A980, 21 (2018).
  7. D. Ben and S.-M. Wu, Decay behavior of hidden-strange hadronic molecular state N(2270), Phys. Rev. C 112, 015203 (2025).
  8. S.-M. Wu, F. Wang, and B.-S. Zou, Strange molecular partners of Pc states in the γp→ϕp reaction, Phys. Rev. C 108, 045201 (2023).
  9. D. Ben, A.-C. Wang, F. Huang, and B.-S. Zou, Effects of N(2080)3/2− and N(2270)3/2− molecules on K*Σ photoproduction, Phys. Rev. C 108, 065201 (2023).
  10. J.-C. Suo, D. Ben, and B.-S. Zou, Effects of strange molecular partners of Pc states in γp→KΣ reactions, Phys. Rev. C 112, 065208 (2025).
  11. W.-Y. Tian, N.-C. Wei, Y.-F. Wang, F. Huang, and B.-S. Zou, Effects of hadronic molecule N(2080)3/2− on K*+Λ photoproduction (2025).
  12. G. Burgun et al., Resonance formation in the reactions K−+p→K++Ξ− and K−+p→K0+Ξ0 in the mass region from 1915 to 2168 MeV, Nucl. Phys. B8, 447 (1968).
  13. J. R. Carlson, H. F. Davis, D. E. Jauch, N. D. Sossong, and R. Ellsworth, Measurement of neutral cascade production from negative-kaon-hydrogen at 1.8  GeV/c, Kp→K0Ξ0, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2533 (1973).
  14. P. M. Dauber, J. P. Berge, J. R. Hubbard, D. W. Merrill, and R. A. Muller, Production and decay of cascade hyperons, Phys. Rev. 179, 1262 (1969).
  15. M. Haque et al., Reactions K−p→hyperon+meson at 3.5  GeV/c, Phys. Rev. 152, 1148 (1966).
  16. G. W. London, R. R. Rau, N. P. Samios, S. S. Yamamoto, M. Goldberg, S. Lichtman, M. Prime, and J. Leitner, K–p interaction at 2. Be-24Vc, Phys. Rev. 143, 1034 (1966).
  17. T. G. Trippe and P. E. Schlein, Partial-wave analysis of K−p→Ξ−K+ at 2 GeVc, Phys. Rev. 158, 1334 (1967).
  18. W. P. Trower, J. R. Ficenec, R. I. Hulsizer, J. Lathrop, J. N. Snyder, and W. P. Swanson, Some two-body final states of K-p interactions at 1.33 GeVc, Phys. Rev. 170, 1207 (1968).
  19. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, QCD and resonance physics. Theoretical foundations, Nucl. Phys. B147, 385 (1979).
  20. M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein, and V. I. Zakharov, QCD and resonance physics: Applications, Nucl. Phys. B147, 448 (1979).
  21. S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi, and H. Sundu, Mass and decay constant of the newly observed exotic X(5568) state, Phys. Rev. D 93, 074024 (2016).
  22. J.-P. Zhang, X.-L. Chen, Z.-X. Ou-Yang, X. Yu, W. Chen, and J.-J. Wu, Unraveling K(1690) as a pseudoscalar udd¯s¯ tetraquark state, Phys. Rev. D 112, 094047 (2025).
  23. R. M. Albuquerque, S. Narison, and D. Rabetiarivony, Zc-like spectra from QCD Laplace sum rules at NLO, Phys. Rev. D 103, 074015 (2021).
  24. R. M. Albuquerque, S. Narison, D. Rabetiarivony, and G. Randriamanatrika, X0,1(2900) and (D−K+) invariant mass from QCD Laplace sum rules at NLO, Nucl. Phys. A1007, 122113 (2021).
  25. Z.-G. Wang and T. Huang, Possible assignments of the X(3872), Zc(3900) and Zb(10610) as axial-vector molecular states, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2891 (2014).
  26. S.-Q. Zhang, B.-D. Wan, L. Tang, and C.-F. Qiao, Gluonic nature of the newly observed state X(2600), Phys. Rev. D 106, 074010 (2022).
  27. B.-D. Wan and C.-F. Qiao, About the exotic structure of Zcs, Nucl. Phys. B968, 115450 (2021).
  28. B.-D. Wan and C.-F. Qiao, Gluonic tetracharm configuration of X(6900), Phys. Lett. B 817, 136339 (2021).
  29. Z.-G. Wang and T. Huang, Analysis of the X(3872), Zc(3900) and Zc(3885) as axial-vector tetraquark states with QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 89, 054019 (2014).
  30. L. Tang, B.-D. Wan, K. Maltman, and C.-F. Qiao, Doubly Heavy Tetraquarks in QCD Sum Rules, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094032 (2020).
  31. Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of Pc(4380) and Pc(4450) as pentaquark states in the diquark model with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 70 (2016).
  32. X.-H. Zhang, S.-Q. Zhang, and C.-F. Qiao, The spectra of pΛ¯ and pΣ¯ hexaquark states, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 693 (2025).
  33. B.-D. Wan, S.-Q. Zhang, and C.-F. Qiao, Possible structure of the newly found exotic state η1(1855), Phys. Rev. D 106, 074003 (2022).
  34. C.-F. Qiao and L. Tang, Interpretation of Zc(4025) as the hidden charm tetraquark states via QCD Sum Rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2810 (2014).
  35. C.-F. Qiao and L. Tang, Finding the 0−− Glueball, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 221601 (2014).
  36. X.-H. Zhang, S.-Q. Zhang, and C.-F. Qiao, Spectrum of light hexaquark states in triquark-antitriquark configuration, Phys. Rev. D 113, 034022 (2026).
  37. W.-H. Tan, H.-M. Yang, and H.-X. Chen, Predicted Ξb(6087)0 and further predictions, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, 382 (2024).
  38. T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Determination of the quantum numbers of Σb(6097)± via their strong decays, Phys. Rev. D 99, 094003 (2019).
  39. S.-Q. Zhang and C.-F. Qiao, Rare Λc decays and new physics effects, Phys. Rev. D 110, 114040 (2024).
  40. K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Λb(6146)0 state newly observed by LHCb, Phys. Rev. D 101, 074026 (2020).
  41. S.-Q. Zhang and C.-F. Qiao, Λc semileptonic decays, Phys. Rev. D 108, 074017 (2023).
  42. H. G. Dosch, E. Ferreira, M. Nielsen, and R. Rosenfeld, QCD sum rules calculation of heavy Λ semileptonic decay, Phys. Lett. B 431, 173 (1998).
  43. C.-S. Huang, C.-F. Qiao, and H.-G. Yan, Decay Λb→plν¯ in QCD sum rules, Phys. Lett. B 437, 403 (1998).
  44. Z.-X. Zhao, R.-H. Li, Y.-L. Shen, Y.-J. Shi, and Y.-S. Yang, The semi-leptonic form factors of Λb→Λc and Ξb→Ξc in QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1181 (2020).
  45. S.-Q. Zhang, X.-H. Zhang, and C.-F. Qiao, Hyperon semileptonic decays in QCD sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 122.
  46. T. M. Aliev, K. Azizi, and M. Savci, Analysis of the Λb→Λℓ+ℓ− decay in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 81, 056006 (2010).
  47. P. Colangelo and A. Khodjamirian, QCD Sum Rules, a Modern Perspective, At The Frontier of Particle Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2000), pp. 1495–1576.
  48. M. Nielsen, F. S. Navarra, and S. H. Lee, New Charmonium States in QCD sum rules: A concise review, Phys. Rep. 497, 41 (2010).
  49. R. M. Albuquerque, J. M. Dias, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martínez Torres, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, and C. M. Zanetti, QCD sum rules approach to the X, Y and Z states, J. Phys. G 46, 093002 (2019).
  50. Z.-G. Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 21, 016300 (2026).
  51. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele, and S.-L. Zhu, Towards exotic hidden-charm pentaquarks in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 172001 (2015).
  52. Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the Pcs(4459) as the hidden-charm pentaquark state with QCD sum rules, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, 2150071 (2021).
  53. Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the 12± pentaquark states in the diquark–diquark–antiquark model with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 142 (2016).
  54. P. Yang and W. Chen, QCD sum rule study for hidden-strange pentaquarks*, Chin. Phys. C 47, 013105 (2023).
  55. H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, and S.-L. Zhu, Possible interpretations of the Pc(4312), Pc(4440), and Pc(4457), Phys. Rev. D 100, 051501 (2019).
  56. Z.-G. Wang and T. Huang, Analysis of the 12± pentaquark states in the diquark model with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 43 (2016).
  57. H.-X. Chen, E.-L. Cui, W. Chen, X. Liu, T. G. Steele, and S.-L. Zhu, QCD sum rule study of hidden-charm pentaquarks, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 572 (2016).
  58. J.-B. Xiang, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X.-B. Li, X.-Q. Yao, and S.-L. Zhu, Revisiting hidden-charm pentaquarks from QCD sum rules, Chin. Phys. C 43, 034104 (2019).
  59. K. Azizi, Y. Sarac, and H. Sundu, Analysis of Pc+(4380) and Pc+(4450) as pentaquark states in the molecular picture with QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 95, 094016 (2017).
  60. T. Feldmann and P. Kroll, Mixing of pseudoscalar mesons, Phys. Scr. 2002, 13 (2002).
  61. T. Feldmann, Quark structure of pseudoscalar mesons, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15, 159 (2000).
  62. G. Launer, S. Narison, and R. Tarrach, Nonperturbative QCD vacuum from e+e−→I=1 hadron data, Z. Phys. C 26, 433 (1984).
  63. L. J. Reinders, H. Rubinstein, and S. Yazaki, Hadron properties from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rep. 127, 1 (1985).
  64. S. Narison, QCD Spectral Sum Rules (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
  65. S. Narison, Power corrections to αs(Mτ),|Vus| and m¯s, Phys. Lett. B 673, 30 (2009).
  66. P. Gubler, D. Jido, T. Kojo, T. Nishikawa, and M. Oka, Possible quantum numbers of the pentaquark Θ+ (1540) in QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 80, 114030 (2009).
  67. G. Erkol and M. Oka, Finite-width effects on delta baryons in QCD sum rules, Nucl. Phys. A801, 142 (2008).
  68. K. Ohtani, P. Gubler, and M. Oka, Parity projection of QCD sum rules for the nucleon, Phys. Rev. D 87, 034027 (2013).
  69. S. Navas et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110, 030001 (2024).
  70. B.-D. Wan, S.-Q. Zhang, and C.-F. Qiao, Light baryonium spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 105, 014016 (2022).
  71. B. L. Ioffe, Calculation of baryon masses in quantum chromodynamics, Nucl. Phys. B188, 317 (1981); B191, 591(E) (1981).
  72. S.-Q. Zhang and C.-F. Qiao, Baryons and baryoniums in the perspective of QCD sum rules, AAPPS Bull. 36, 12 (2026).
  73. H. X. Chen, E. L. Cui, W. Chen, T. G. Steele, and S. L. Zhu, QCD sum rule study of the d*(2380), Phys. Rev. C 91, 025204 (2015).
  74. K. Azizi, S. S. Agaev, and H. Sundu, The scalar hexaquark uuddss: A candidate to dark matter?, J. Phys. G 47, 095001 (2020).
  75. Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the scalar doubly charmed hexaquark state with QCD sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 642 (2017).
  76. R.-H. Wu, Y.-S. Zuo, C. Meng, Y.-Q. Ma, and K.-T. Chao, NLO effects for ΩQQQ baryons in QCD Sum Rules, Chin. Phys. C 45, 093103 (2021).
  77. R.-H. Wu, Y.-S. Zuo, C.-Y. Wang, C. Meng, Y.-Q. Ma, and K.-T. Chao, NLO results with operator mixing for fully heavy tetraquarks in QCD sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2022) 023.
  78. R.-H. Wu, C.-Y. Wang, C. Meng, Y.-Q. Ma, and K.-T. Chao, Zc and Zcs systems with operator mixing at NLO in QCD sum rules, J. High Energy Phys. 06 (2024) 216.
  79. J. Sugiyama, T. Doi, and M. Oka, Pentaquark baryon from the QCD sum rule, Phys. Lett. B 581, 167 (2004).
  80. P. Gubler, D. Jido, T. Kojo, T. Nishikawa, and M. Oka, Spin-3/2 pentaquark in QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 79, 114011 (2009).
  81. T. Kojo, A. Hayashigaki, and D. Jido, Pentaquark state in pole-dominated QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. C 74, 045206 (2006).
  82. M. Oka, D. Jido, and A. Hosaka, Negative parity baryons in the QCD sum rule, Nucl. Phys. A629, 156C (1998).
  83. M. Ablikim et al. (BESII Collaboration), Observation of a new excited $Σ$ State in ψ(3686)→p¯K+Σ0+c.c., arXiv:2602.11501.
  84. X. Liu, H. Huang, and J. Ping, Hidden strange pentaquark states in constituent quark models, Phys. Rev. C 98, 055203 (2018).
  85. D. Jido, N. Kodama, and M. Oka, Negative parity nucleon resonance in the QCD sum rule, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4532 (1996).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation